Naughty Julie (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Julie is hot, her vids and pic sets are hot. Layout is easy to navigate. Lots of other (past) amateur girls in her shoots. Mobile friendly. |
| Cons: |
Old content. All from 2009 and earlier. No Julie involvement in the site. No HD video, Video downloads NOT allowed. NO pic zips, must download every picture one by one. No batch downloaders allowed, you get banned if you use them. No live shows. No members forum. No future updates with new content possible since Julie is retired. Rude webmaster if you try to contact with any issues. |
| Bottom Line: |
This review is for the NEW version of Naughtyjulie.com which relaunced in January 2015.
First thing that must be noted is Julie herself is NOT involved with this site. She retired from xxx in 2009 permanently. The site was kept alive by her former webmasters and was made to appear like regular updates were happening, but it was just the same content from 2009 and earlier being recycled over and over in the 'updates'.
Now with this 'new' version of the site, it's the same content again, but with a catch. You now cannot download the videos at all! they stream in your browser only. And if you try to use any sort of download helper or batch download pics they WILL ban your membership with no refund. Trust me it happened to me after only 2 days of membership! And the webmaster will not even email you as to why, or offer a refund.
There is no HD at all. The videos are mostly in 848x480 ratio. This is misleading as well, because in their tour there is no mention of the the vid ratios or sizes, yet the still frames they use on the tour pages are all 1920x1080, giving the impression that the old vids were remastered to full 1080p, when in fact they are not.
It's clear from looking at the videos that they are all the same ones from the older version of the site, just remastered into mp4, degrading their quality in the process (they should have taken the original vids in their highest bitrate and encoded them at 1080p).
There are some 'bonus' third party sites, but it's the same old run of the mill stuff that most people have surely seen and got bored with long ago by now. All in all this just seems like a money grab by the current webmasters to use the old content to make some cash, possibly with or without Julie's knowledge or consent. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
