Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Finishes The Job (0)

Newbie 75* rearadmiral (0) 04-12-15  07:07am                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 1400+ scenes in an under-served niche - Updates daily - Lots of A-list models - Good ability to sort scenes - Downloads and streaming available - Photos are available Cons: - Download speeds range from average to abysmal but tend to be lower than average - Download managers are a little problematic - Scene resolution is lower than average Bottom Line: I suspect that most porn buyers are like me and wish that this niche didn’t need to exist. But in a world where so many porn money shots are the guy jerking off on the girl this site is needed. The whole premise of the site is that the girls finish the guys off in every scene. (That’s the premise, but there are scenes where the usual happens.) I’ll start with what this site does well – its good porn. The scenes feature top porn models and the scenes are all fairly hot and fun to watch. And there aren't many jerk-off sessions either – most of these girls do finish the job. This site is really made up of three distinct sub-sites: Mano Job, which features handjobs, The Dick Suckers, which features blowjobs, and Mr. POV which features hardcore b/g sex. It’s a great idea to break the scenes down into those sub-genres because many people may prefer one niche over the others. I find handjobs boring to watch, for example, so I could filter those out if I wanted to. The site currently has 1400+ scenes available with a new one added every day, making it a good value. In case anyone is interested, Mano Job has 850+ scenes, The Dick Sucker has 300+ scenes and Mr. POV has 280+ scenes.) The volume of great porn is enough for me to recommend the site, but to allow prospective members to make an informed decision you should know that the site has some flaws. These are, in no particular order: • The download speeds vary wildly. I could download a scene and see 15MB/s and then download immediately after and see less than 1MB/s. I could understand if I was downloading at peak times and consistently got slow speeds but that wasn’t the case. I tried different times and would get different speeds regularly. Most downloads came in at the slower end of things at about 2MB/s. In my opinion, the download speeds are the greatest flaw here. While I could hit average speeds, in most cases the downloads were well below average speeds expected in 2015. • Scene quality varied. The scenes had multiple download options but most offered 1080p. The 1080p quality wasn’t consistent: on some scenes it was true 1080 and on others it was lower. • Video quality isn't the best. I’m not a tech guy but most of the scenes were a little fuzzy with some pixilation – and this is with downloading the best resolution available. I also found that there was a narrow band at the bottom of many of the scenes that was badly pixilated. • Download managers are supported but may cause issues. I’d normally queue up scenes but since the site doesn’t allow downloads to be stopped and resume I played it safe and downloaded individually. Scene resolution varies too, but some of that is to be expected since the site has been around for 10 years. Most of the newer scenes are good with 1920x1080 at 6200kb/s and 1280x720 at 2800kb/s being common. Some scenes are lower at 1024x768 at 2500kb/s. There are even some really low resolution scene tossed into the mix but thankfully these seem rare. These are 320x240. Some older scenes are remastered and uploaded as a new scene. While I don’t have a problem with that, these remastered scenes are often fuzzy and pixilated. A problem that the site seems to have is the bitrate they use which is only half of that used by many other sites. I suspect the low bitrate is the culprit for the reduced quality. The file types aren't listed but I always chose one of the two best resolutions depending on file size and those were all in MP4 format. Streaming is also available in multiple resolutions. The site also offers some interesting options: apart from the full scene you could stream or download just the money shot (sometimes also offered in slow-motion) and an interview with the model. The site has a list of tags for all the common niches so it’s easy to sort for anything you’re looking for. You can also sort by models. Photos are also available, as singles or as a zip. The photos are 1500x1000 which won’t impress any serious collector, but it is fair to say that this is more of a video site than a photo site. The TBP review says the Terms of Reference mentions a download limit but doesn’t put a number on it. I can’t confirm this, but if there is a limit it has to be fairly high. I downloaded close to 50GB in one day trying to find the limit but was never locked out or prevented from downloading. Overall I still recommend the site because the good outweighs the bad. This is an under-served niche (which only shows how crappy a lot of porn is these days) and has more than 1400 scenes available on a well-organized site. The download speeds are well below average and the resolution quality could be better, but the site is worth checking out if you can put up with those flaws. I can’t however, give it my highest rating which is to say that this is a site I’ll rejoin. I don’t regret joining once, but the speeds and video quality issues are enough to make it unlikely that I’ll rejoin. Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (8) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 graymane (Suspended) In large part, my comment this time has zero-to-nothing to do with what I wanna say, individually, emanating from this single review of "Finishes the job" (I already know his review's a winner even without reading it, I do, however, just want to sound-off loud and clear ..... that this message reverberates to the far corners of Porn Users, and on the way collectively catching the view of countless others perusing this widely popular PU feature. I don't think this guy ever sleeps. How could he with all the reviews he's churning out? I suppose God only knows why Rear Admiral's seemingly labor of love continues at such a fevered motivation. Its fair to say that I's quite obvious his generous contribution serves greatly to the betterment of this great site. I hasten to say, however, it should be noted that I's general opinion RA is right at home here at Porn Users. Bottom line: Evidenced clearly by the sheer volume we see posted here of RA's priceless info, leaves no doubt in my mind he's a review Dynamo . 04-14-15  11:16pm Reply To Message 2 rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #1 - graymane : Thanks once again for the kind words, Sir! 04-18-15  05:12am Reply To Message 3 mbaya (Disabled) REPLY TO #2 - rearadmiral : Congratulations on becoming third on the list of reviewers. I always enjoy reading your reviews and wish you the best. 04-28-15  05:46am Reply To Message 4 rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #3 - mbaya : Thanks! 04-29-15  02:14pm Reply To Message 5 bkreidercrhl (0) The concept of finishing the job is exciting and the women on the site tour look consistently desirable. Are there a significant number of scenes where the guys uncorks a big load? Do most of the women take cum on their face, ideally on the eye lids, nose, forehead and hair? 10-28-15  11:39am Reply To Message 6 rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #5 - bkreidercrhl : It's hard to generalize since the network is so big but it's fair to say that in probably 75% of the scenes the guy shoots an average load. There are some scenes where the guy channels his inner Peter North but those aren't really identified. In a vast majority of the scenes the target is definitely around the girl's mouth, though her nose often gets some too. If the cumshot goes up higher than that - to the eyes, forehead or hair - that's usually just an accident from the guy shooting that far. I hope that helps. 10-29-15  02:53pm Reply To Message 7 bkreidercrhl (0) REPLY TO #6 - rearadmiral : Thank you for the information. It was exactly what I was seeking. The website will not likely work for my interests. 10-31-15  03:05am Reply To Message 8 rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #7 - bkreidercrhl : From your questions I think you're right. If they could find a male talent with a cumshot like Peter North that would be my preference too. 10-31-15  05:28am Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.