Review Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
I love this site and think it is one of the best. I wrote a review six years ago and gave it an 85, but I think that now I would go to 95. It is so huge and the models, camera work and just overall class set it apart from any competition.
That being said, it has some flaws. It is too serious and slow paced. The videos seem to miss tease for example. After twenty minutes of slow motion stripping, you get about two minutes of interesting action.
Where is the sense of fun, or of not knowing what to expect next? There is not much buildup. When you get visuals of the models best parts, you get them in spades, but twenty minutes or a half hour is a bit of an overload, even clinical. This can get to be too much of a class in gynecology.
I think that your point is basically the same as what I just said, just stated differently.
|
09-15-15 05:46am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :
A few things:
mbaya: When you say "miss tease", I don't quite understand, since what you seem to be saying is that the site is *too* long on the tease factor and too little on what you call the 'interesting action'. Was there a typo? Most likely I just didn't get what you were saying.
Yes, I certainly agree that the gyno aspect of the site is overdone, BUT - their mission statement plainly tells the prospective customer what to expect, so, it is what it is. I'm not disputing you, or trying to argue for the sake of argument (I HATE that!), just basically agreeing and reiterating things (because I like to type!).
Unfortunately, my review left a few things out, and these are big things, so I need to add:
PROS
- The male presence is virtually non-existent on this site, and even when so much as a male hand will be in the video, the customer is warned beforehand (pun intended). I think this is a cardinal virtue, and should be applauded, and copied on other sites of this nature. Since this site isn't about sex between men and women, but about the adulation and worship (literally) of the beauty and - what used to be - the mystery, of adult females, the customer is NOT interested in seeing or hearing another male. The people behind this site understand this and the total absence of the male voice and male presence is intentional and adhered to religiously.
- The absence of silly music, which I mentioned, is of UTMOST value and importance on a site of this nature. We have FIVE senses, and we can interact with the models here via TWO of those five: seeing and hearing. We can't touch, taste, or smell them (but in time we'll be able to do something like that in a "virtual" sense). Hence the utter silliness of sites that put a music track to their videos, which effectively reduces our real contact with the models by blotting out the sounds generated by the model: her footsteps, the rustle of her clothing, her breath, her utterances, and whatever other blesséd noises that come from her body. I refuse to pay even a cent for a site that offers video content of models posing and stripping if there is a music track. It almost destroys the experience for me. Music is an art. Worshipping a woman in the privacy of my cave is not an art, and I don't want art while I'm worshipping a woman.
- There is nothing but complete respect for the dignity of these models as individuals, as human beings. Yes, they are being objectified here, but they are being well-paid, and these girls know the deal. The site should be applauded and copied by other sites in that they DO NOT refer to women as sluts, bitches, whores, or any of those dehumanizing terms, and the site does not belittle the models or speak of them as anything other than the equals of the men behind the cameras and the consumers. There is a strong sense that these models are well paid, respected, and above all, SAFE, while they do their work for ITC.
- If I think of something I left out, I'll return.
|
09-15-15 06:09pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - WeeWillyWinky :
I can see that I did not make my point clear. Tease is a feeling of anticipation that increases as you watch the video. My complaint is that it is too long on useless slow moving filler. Nearly a half hour to finally get to topless is not tease, it is boring. That is basically how I feel about the gynecological overload. I expect some, as advertised, but they overdo it to the point of my losing interest.
I would not like music either, but the videos nearly always have no sound at all. Combined with a lot of visual filler, that is not so great.
I think we are in basic agreement here.
|
09-15-15 06:24pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
