Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Femjoy

Femjoy (0)

skippy (0) 10-29-15  07:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Still waiting for file size updates.

I've been a member of this site for many years but am getting increasingly frustrated because Femjoy is not keeping up with the times when it comes to file sizes. The small and medium download sizes are microscopic by today's standards. Small files are 800x535 and medium files are 1200x800. That is about 1/5 and 1/2 of my monitor's screen resolution (1920x1080). I've complained about this before and thought I got a response that they were working on it. Apparently not. Now the LARGE files are 6000x4000 these days, which is fine, but those large zip files take a long time to download, are slow to load and use up to half a gig of disk space each. Please, please please!!! Change the file sizes so you have a 2000 or 3000 option like Met Art, Hegre Art, X-Art, W4B, MPL and the rest of the sites in your niche. The larger size is OK (although several other sites are at 10,000 now), but the site has to bump up the size of the smaller images.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (2)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

tangub (0) Good comment skippy and I totally agree with you. I've never been a member of Femjoy and it is exactly for this reason that they don't offer a decent mid-sized photo size. I've been a member of all those other sites you mentioned in your post and have to agree that as a collector I find the 2000 photo size the perfect compromise between quality and file size. I would sign up straight away if they upgraded the medium sized photos.
10-29-15  11:41am

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (Disabled) Yes, anything below 2000 px is definitely shrimpy these days (unless the viewing area is a mobile). I don't understand why they haven't addressed this yet. It's not that technically challenging.
10-29-15  04:58pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.