Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

When looking at porn images, you prefer the girl(s) to be:

Type: General

Submitted by skippy (0)
Looking at you/the camera 79% 11 Votes
Looking away from you/camera 0% 0 Votes
Looking at herself 0% 0 Votes
Looking at her partner 14% 2 Votes
Other (see reply) 7% 1 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

14 Votes Total

Nov 16, 2015

Poll Replies (5)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Monahan (0) Close call because I focus a bit lower when checking out the babes. Of all the choices I would say I prefer the models who look at the camera, but it must be a natural look.

That said, I'm OK with her looking at whatever she wants if she's gorgeous.

What made me so conscious of this characteristic is what I see on the FTV Girls videos. A frequent scene style is recording the model walking toward the camera in a populated area. When the girl is looking directly at the camera, the shot is very effective. However when she's trying to look nonchalant it always looks forced and awkward.

So on a scale of 1 to 10, looking at the camera gets a 6 and looking at other things, is a 5-.

11-17-15  09:01am

Reply To Message

2

skippy (0) I'm kind of hoping that some of the webmasters will see this survey since I'm expecting it to be mostly "looking at the camera". I am SO tired of sets where the girl never looks at the camera.

The only not-looking set I've ever enjoyed is the "peeping tom" type of set where the shoot is through curtains or a mostly closed door and the girl doesn't make eye contact until she "notices" you. That is followed by a)yelling, b)a smile and a show, c)sex, or d) all of the above. Those are kind of fun but fortunately not that common. I say fortunately because the rarity makes them more enjoyable when they do pop up.

Oh, and I suppose a really wonderful arched-back spread-eagle or similar pose where the girl's face isn't visible is fine. But again, those type of shots are rare.

11-17-15  10:28pm

Reply To Message

3

Drooler (Disabled) We used to have someone here at PU who named the looks-away-from-camera shots "JC Penny Poses." Sex-Art is one of sites that excels at them. Personally, I don't see the point, but I guess some people do.
11-18-15  11:33am

Reply To Message

4

graymane (Suspended) Don't forget the guy on the sideline whom she's constantly focused on and off who's giving her instructions on where, how, and when to do whatever is necessary she's supposed to know and do that's needed to acceptably do her job.
---

11-18-15  10:14pm

Reply To Message

5

martinlongbow (0) this is something some websites never learn ( I am talking to you atk) girls are not there to interact with each other, they need to interact with the viewer. I cant believe these amateur mistakes are still being done
11-19-15  07:13am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.