Errotica Archives (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A nice alternative for when you've viewed every model on Met-Art.
- Owned by Met-Art, has similarly high production values as Met-Art's other sites.
- Update schedule is straightforward. Updates daily. You get 1 video a week and 6 photo sets per week.
- Videos have 1080p option (since early 2007) and photos are close to 6000 on the long end and have been for five years. Prior to that they were still over 4000 on the long end.
- 320 models with most having multiple scenes/videos/photo sets.
- Has always been a little more risky than Met-Art has been, though Met-Art is similar to Errotica Archives now in terms of what all they show.
- Quite a few girls you don't see on many sites, which led to me joining it since they had 3 models I've collected for nearly 10 years.
- I'm going to say it's exclusive content, but the archive in the name bothers me since this site is owned by Met-Art. I don't recognize any of the sets. |
| Cons: |
- I had a love/hate relationship with Met-Art for many years and I kind of feel the same way about Errotica Archives. They have the models, the high technical quality, then I open a photo set and everything feels bland.
- Videos that tease masturbation by ... masturbating. I like tease as much as anyone does, but if you're going to be fully nude, legs spread, touching yourself, just keep going instead of rolling over into another sexual position only to repeat the above "tease".
- Site kind of feels like a knock-off of Met-Art or an extension, which I think it used to be offered in a bundle with Met-Art years ago.
- Navigation needs a "photos" tab. It has a "top photos" tab which shows me the highest rated or most popular photos, but doesn't line all the photo sets up for me. Videos/films has its own tab, so I don't get why there's not a photo tab. |
| Bottom Line: |
These type of sites are always hard for me to review. Naked, beautiful women. Showing everything they have. Only to disappear like an oasis. Gives new meaning to came and gone.
This site does nearly everything right. Consistent updates, high technical quality videos and photos in zip downloads. Price is good with the PU discount. But I've seen it all before. The main draw for me was the content of models Veronica Fasterova (Verunka on this site), Dominika A/Dominika C (Dominika on this site) and Chiara. Errotica Archives has over 40 photo sets and videos of these 3 models who I've collected for 5+ years each.
Beyond those three there was some interest, but most of the content is fairly predictable and tame. There are sets with more than one girl in them, but somehow they have figured out a way to take 75-100 photos without the models doing anything remotely sexual. The videos show the model masturbating, starting to get into it only to quickly change positions and start this same pattern again.
I was more open to these types of sets a few years ago, but I just don't get much out of them these days.
I do think the site is very good at what it does. Young, slim, nude models frolicking in the park. Running around naked prior to the filming even starting since most sets start with the model completely nude. Which is a no-no with me. Technically, the site is a 90, but in terms of entertainment for me it's maybe an 80 ... and that's a maybe. I went with 82 since it is a good site, but it would be higher for anyone who likes artsy, pretty pictures. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
