| Bottom Line: |
I’ve been a member here four times in the past and started my first membership when the site was fairly new. The fact that I’ve rejoined again likely indicates what I think of the site and whether or not I’d recommend it. If I had to sum up an objective look at this site in one sentence this might do it: the site has some serious specific flaws but this is definitely a case of the whole being much greater than the sum of its parts. Put more simply; I’m willing to overlook a few weak spots to get access to porn this good.
I’d better qualify my bold statement of ‘porn this good’ before I move on as the site owner/male talent can be polarizing and the kind of porn can be too. Many readers will be familiar with Pierre Woodman’s work: he was a prolific director for the Private studio. Private made some of the best porn on the planet for many years and Woodman was behind much of that. Woodman is a polarizing figure on some other forums and many people actively dislike him. My suspicion is that this is mostly grounded in the kind of porn he produces now: this isn't couples porn; this is hardcore porn that feeds a specific male fantasy. My opinion of Woodman is colored by the fact that I like the porn, but more swayed by the fact that he doesn’t fall into the trap that catches so many males in porn: Woodman never forgets why his customers are buying his porn; his role is to showcase the women and to not upstage them.
It’s best to note that the scenes here are definitely too misogynistic for some potential members. A turn-off for many will be that most of the scenes have anal sex in them. Feminists probably hate Pierre Woodman for his current stuff.
Some potential members may also dislike that each scene follows the same premise: Woodman tiptoes into a hotel room early in the morning to find a sleeping model and hot sex follows. While I’m not a fan of repetitive porn I’m willing to accept it where it works and doesn’t get in the way of a good scene. While repetitive, it works as a means to get into some amazing porn so I won’t complain.
The scenes are pretty rough but Woodman is known for that these days. If you like ‘artcore’ porn then don’t join the site hoping to curl up with your wife to watch two people in the physical act of love. Try that with this site and your wife will leave you. Most scenes have deep-throating, face-fucking, female-on-male rimming and anal sex. This is just a guess, but anal sex occurs in 80%+ of the scenes. (An advantage to this is that Woodman gets some first and rare anals. Most scenes have Woodman as the male talent (shooting in POV) but there is other male talent here as well as some b/b/g and b/g/g threeways.
Most of the models here are Eastern European and Russian but there are some A-list American models. It is fair to say that all the models are beautiful women.
The site is very basic and outdated. I’ll be kind and say that a modern site design isn't really needed here because the porn is mostly the same in each scene with the only difference being the model but the reality is that the site could use some modernization with searching and tags.
Opening a scene brings you to a separate page where you can download or stream the scene. There are no streaming options. A word of warning is that streaming begins automatically when you open a scene page. To make things worse, the intro to every scene has to be the loudest intro on the internet today. Turn your speakers off first.
There are three download options available. Obviously these will differ with older scenes. If the site has one serious flaw that needed to be fixed yesterday it is the wide chasm between file resolutions. The top two resolutions are 960x540 and 1500kb/s and 1920x1080 and 10,000 kb/s. Simple choice though, right? The problem is file size: the lower resolution files come in at or below 1GB whereas the higher res files can top out at over 5GB. The site really needs to plug the gap with a 720p file that has a decent bitrate. While this is a serious site flaw I will admit that the lower resolution files better than their specs would indicate.
I used Internet Download Manager and had no problems queuing scenes for download. I’ve never encountered a download limit here. Download speeds are about half what I see elsewhere. I see about 10MB/s here so it isn't bad.
Two minor quibbles are that the scenes aren't dated and the site doesn’t offer a TBP discount.
There are some serious flaws with this site that are made more acute by how easily they could be fixed. The biggest fix needed is simply making a fourth download option available to bridge the massive gap that now exists. But the quality of the porn so far outweighs the minor flaws that there is no question that I recommend this site to anyone who likes hard-edged porn. For those who join I think you’ll agree that this is insanely hot porn. I’ll forgive a lot of minor flaws to get hot porn. |
