Review Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
mudman (Suspended)
|
Roseman_
You've hit me, so here's my inquiry.
What do you find wothwhile when it comes to photography? What size of image and what quality? Do you have interests in lighting or not?
Are there photographers you are impressed with or are you being ignored here?
With regards to videos, regardless of subject matter what isues to you have? Every site should offer enough formats for all to enjoy, and every video should be clear enough for anyone to see and appreciate. Since I'm even mentioning this, it's not something we've been burderned with. Which sites, in your opinion, serve us viewers as we should be served?
|
02-05-07 10:59am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
roseman (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #1 - mudman :
LOL.
Well, mudman if you have ANY questions about the concrete website that I did review please feel free to ask.
I feel that answering to your general questions about photos and videos has NOTHING to do with this site.
|
02-06-07 07:29am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
mudman (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #2 - roseman :
Roseman:
Now I'm lost. Which cut in stone web site are you referencing. You've review 27 of them.
Every site needs to offer a basic basis of quality. Every member or potential member deserves this much. Videos need to accessible to all and photos need to be clear, seeable, large enough and somewhat appealing. This certainly places some constraints upon artistry, but not unreasonably so.
Are you suggesting that anything goes, if the particular site's subject matter agreed with your or whomever interest, is okay? Seems an insufficent standard to me. Everything out there need to live up to more, as the majority is falling way short. We user/members feed this beast with our subsciptions, our money, so we should get quality regardless of the site. So I find so problem on not addressing any one failing site over another. The problem is in the system. It wants us to accept too much mediocrity as some form of quality. "Here's a great site, now spend you money and be unhappy with it."
I don't think I'm opposing you, but we may not be being as clear with each other as would be desireable.
mudman
|
02-06-07 10:29am
Reply To Message
|
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|