Gape My Pussy (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Uses Epoch as biller. Very reliable and trustworthy.
-Decent size site with 176 videos and 221 zip downloadable photosets.
-The videos are 1280x720 and about 5000 kbps. Not the best I have ever seen, but more than adequate for my monitor. Some older videos are remastered to these specs and are not as sharp. The average length is about 15 minutes and about 600MB.
--The photos are 2000x1333. Again, I have seen better, but adequate.
-The models are natural, very unglam and have imperfections. Some have acne, skin discolorations, etc. They are clean, so I have can live with this. Overall they seem to be shown as real women and no attempt is made to make them more “porn”. For me this is a plus.
-Many models are attractive, some, maybe quite a few are not. This is obviously a matter of opinion and personal taste.
-There is a bonus site shefuckedher.com. The site states that in July they will be adding two new bonus sites MissDP.com and LuckyAmateurs.com.com |
| Cons: |
-Updates are not frequent enough. There is one every five days, but alternate between videos and photosets.
-Some videos have ads for their other sites. Not obtrusive, but I don’t like this.
-Daily download limit of 20GB, which is 12-15 videos. I asked to have the limit removed and was given a yes in less than 30 minutes.
-No ethnic variety to speak of as this site features models from the Czech Republic. There are a few that are from other European countries though. This negative is basically nitpicking as they deliver what you would expect from a European site.
-A few models have tattoos and very few are not shaved. I hate tats, but I would prefer unshaven.
-PU is not offering a discounted price at this time. |
| Bottom Line: |
There should be many more sites like this. I have no idea why not, as nude sites are plentiful.
Porn usually uses the term gaping for anal, but here it is open vaginal in every video, every time without fail. The scenes start off as stripping from street clothes and sometimes from other outfits. Every strip is complete and these models then open wide. Sometimes they masturbate with fingers or dildos, however, an orgasm is not the focus. Putting on a show and spreading wide is always the priority. Sometimes they use speculums or lip spreaders( I don’t think this is the term, but I think you get my drift).
Watching these scenes, I could not help but notice that many models are not quite my taste. Many are plain and there is little use of makeup. The models are often mechanical in how they go through the motions. Some are quite attractive and I think with a site this large I can afford to ignore some videos. This site is very unglam and natural as there are few tattoos and no or almost no artificial breasts.
Basically the site works as advertised. There are very few sites that present models stripping, let alone how many have them put on a complete show. In some ways a comparison to In The Crack is of value.
ITC has glam models, much makeup and slick production values in great HD. The emphasis is on the butt and gaping shots are very common. There are many strip videos, but I find them very slow moving. There is a fair amount of speculum use. Great site and highly recommended.
This site is both similar and different. Unlike ITC, these models don’t smile and never seem to be having any fun at all.
There is no slick production here, what you see is much more standard and basic. The videos are of adequate quality, but not state of the art, unlike ITC. To be fair, I prefer the speculum use here as it focuses on the whole body. ITC speculum scenes are more like a gynecology class. Unlike ITC, the butt is not a focus.
I like the photos better than ITC also. While of lesser quality, I find them to be more erotic. Works for me. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
