| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
pat362 (0)
|
I prefer gradually because this way you have the anticipation factor where has if she does it all from the get go than what is left except to see her do same thing but with different people.
Of course I'm talking about gradually doing newer stuff over a period of maybe 12-16 months and not many years.
|
08-03-16 03:59pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Monahan (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :
Ditto.
Jana Foxy (aka Jana Jordan) has done virtually everything except BJ and hardcore, to the best of my knowledge. That has kept her very high in my interest level.
Andy Valentino held out as well until very late in her career. Her later hard stuff was really not particularly appealing just because she did such a great job on the soft stuff. The hard stuff was the standard slam-bam stuff with nothing very creative.
Jennifer Avalon did all kinds of great stuff including BJ's and participated in BGG stuff but never did full penetration stuff, again, until very late in her career where she did a little hardcore.
Sydney Moon, to my knowledge, never did much more than solo stuff. I don't even think she ever did anything like dildo work. She didn't have that big a career.
In other words, the babes that hold out, who are young and gorgeous, increase their stature substantially by doing so.
|
08-03-16 05:18pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
sonofzog (0)
|
I'm more or less a freak, I think, because I'd prefer my favorites rarely do anal and never do DP. Ditto spitting, choking, rimming and gang bangs. And no problem with only going g/g or someone like Marry Queen who quit doing b/g after being hardcore. Bonus points for a solo scene with lots of dirty talk.
|
08-05-16 12:30pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
skippy (0)
|
There are many girls in this industry that know exactly how to manage their careers, but there are also a lot of girls who have no idea what they are getting into. It seems like many of the girls make the decisions about what to do, but it also seems like in some cases others make the decisions for them. My point is that I'm not sure if the start easy and get progressively more hard core is a planned thing, or if the girl just progresses from nude modeling to porn acting to progressively nastier stuff because those around her are telling her that's what she needs to be doing.
I am NOT saying that this is an exploitation thing, but it is interesting how the pattern so closely mimics exploitation that you often would not be able to tell if it was or not.
Personally, I am not into the really freak stuff. I like the model sites and straight porn with a POV perspective...a little bondage occasionally. Anal, DP and brutality are huge turn-offs to me...probably because I could never do those things in the bedroom and would never want to treat a woman that way. (Seriously, have you ever had a long term relationship with a woman who likes Anal? Do you know any woman that truly likes it? Porn is not about getting off, it is about getting YOU off.) So I don't want my favorite porn girls to be doing too much of the truly freaky stuff...ever!
|
08-06-16 09:36pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
skippy (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Monahan :
Monahan,
I understand where you are coming from, but I don't think you can compare softcore modeling or even European porn to mainstream US porn. Very few models make the transition to hardcore easily because the traits needed for the two are different. Those who do make the transition may simply be starting in softcore with a plan to move on as they gain popularity. Also, European and some american nude models make a shitload of money, probably as much as or more than US porn stars do. Sidney Moon started with Playboy, made a lot of money modeling and was able to retire without going into porn videos (although she did a couple of girl/girl videos back in the Danni's Hotbox days.) Marketa Belonoha never did a single porn or girl/girl scene, often had two shootings a day and retired fairly wealthy in her early 30s.
There are a lot of European models that have done what I'll call European porn but will probably never progress beyond sex with their real life boyfriends on-screen. Connie Carter, often seen in Met-Art is a good example of that. There are also a lot of softcore models that are lesbians and won't do boy/girl sex scenes. This gets back to the traits thing I spoke of earlier. (i.e. Sydney, I think.)
So, my point is that nobody HAS to progress to freaky porn to be successful. There are plenty of very, very successful nude models that don't and plenty of their followers who appreciate it.
Just sayin' :-)
Skippy
|
08-06-16 10:07pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
pat362 (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Monahan :
All great examples but these women all have on thing in common and it's that they never really did a lot of hardcore (if any) porn. I'd also like to add that they were all pre-2008 when it was possible to have an long term porn career without doing hardcore. I don't think that is possible now and hasn't been for many years. You can still do solo and softcore with a some midcore stuff but the opportunities will be few and far between so making huge sums of money will be next to impossible.
The harsh reality for sanyone who is considering a career in the porn industry and only doing stuff that is not more intense than midcore is likely doomed to fail which is too bad because once upon a time you had many studios that were dedicated to the more artistic aspect of porn (I think using the term porn is incorrect when talking about these sites) because they don't really exist all that much anymore.
If a girl wants any kind of porn career than hardcore has to be an option. Otherwise she will get plenty of offers in the beginning but these will quickly disappear and the money she will make on those softcore jobs will not be all that great.
|
08-07-16 09:31am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Homegirl (Disabled)
|
i think a gradual progression makes for a longer career.
|
05-27-20 04:35am
Reply To Message
|
