Finishes The Job (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Bills through CCBill and Epoch. However the default is Rocketpay. I used it and had no problems.
-Discount available on Rabbits, but not on PU.
-Huge archive with 1452 videos and a photoset for each video. Most are zip downloadable.
-Many very attractive well known porn models. You can find Kelly Wells, Darcy Tyler, Jodi Taylor, Riley Reid, Ana Foxx and Cindy Starfall, just to name a few.
-The ability to stream as well as download just the cum shot, as well as only an interview.
-Irregular updates, but frequent enough. July had 21 and there were 19 each for June and May.
-Has some ethnic variety with Latinas and some Ebony models, but needs more Asians.
-No download limits as I tried my best to test the site. |
| Cons: |
-Many models, maybe most, have tattoos.
-File name duplications if the model has more than one scene.
-Many videos have over saturated color.
-Many videos are remastered older scenes. There is only so much you can do to improve by remastering. What you get are small videos that don’t look sharp, despite the HD specs.
-The most recent videos are described as 1920x1080. I found the one for July 31st at 1024x768, 5465kbps. The one for August 1st is a mere 320x240. I suspect this is recycled as no one would shoot a scene now with that low resolution. |
| Bottom Line: |
The premise of the site is that the male model never finishes himself, only the female does. Further, the male stunt cock is never intrusive. Most of the time he does not speak and never shows his face. To further enhance the heat in the scene, most if not all videos have JOE, which is jerk off encouragement. This can be hot, but some models just don’t have that something extra when they talk dirty. My best guess is that it works in maybe half the scenes.
There are three websites in the network: Mano Job, Mr. Pov, and The Dick Suckers. Nearly every cumshot is either on the face or in her mouth. Mano is a hand job site, Mr. POV is all kinds of sex in one scene, focusing mostly on oral and vaginal and The Dick Suckers is obviously BJ’s.
Most videos focus on POV style, which unfortunately is not to my taste. We here at PU have discussed POV many times, and I am one of those in the majority who don’t care for it. I would like more whole body shots. Also, unfortunately far too many models have tattoos. Too many videos are over saturated. To add another negative, there is a big problem with low quality videos. Most are remastered older videos that were not shot originally in HD. What you end up with are videos that are too small and not very sharp. While watchable, I look for better in 2016. I also feel deceived by advertising recent videos as HD 1920x1080 and then not delivering. The most recent two were NOT HD and one was 320x240. HUH? As far as remastering, I found it very interesting that the present video count is 1452 and in Rearadmiral's review he mentioned there were 1400+. In the last 16 months how many new updates were really added?
Photos are small by today’s standards at 1500x1000. I would never join for the photos available here.
There are many well known porn stars that are quite attractive and are fun to watch here. Another plus is that the archive is huge with 1452 videos that are updated about 20 days a month. But, I have serious reservations as to what exactly has been added.
For me the bottom line here is that despite its pluses, many of the videos just don’t work for me. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
