Phil Flash (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
An absolute bargain at $7.87 for a month or $29.87 for the whole year.
Billing by CC Bill with no pre-checked cross sells.
A huge archive of exclusive content.
Subscription includes several solo model sites such as Next Door Nikki and Dawn Avril which used to require separate subscriptions of $30 plus each.
Some 720p hd video and large resolution photos 3000px plus (minimal amount)
Zip downloads for about two thirds of the available photo content.
Site appears Download manager friendly, I used Down Them All without any problems. |
| Cons: |
Automatically generated username and password
Annoying captcha to log in.
An archive site so don't expect any updates apart from maybe the occasional remastered video.
Much of the content is at least 10 years old so fairly low resolution by today's standards.
Some of the models are non-nude.
Most videos only have the one download option.
A few of the old solo model sites have not yet been added to the new site design and require a separate log in.
And finally the thing that has become my biggest pet peeve lately with porn sites, the file naming. Every single zip download has the file name “images” so need to rename everything yourself. The videos do have unique file names though mostly just numbers (e.g. 409a-720p). |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of those sites that has been on my radar to join for what seems like forever but I could never quite bring myself to join due to the lack of zips for the photos and the high price of joining the separate individual solo model sites so when I was checking out my old bookmarks the other week and noticed all the old Phil Flash sites had been brought together in a modern new site design and all for the new low price of $7.87 I jumped straight in. Some of the classic solo model sites included in a membership here include: Anna's Assets, Brandy's Box, Bratty Brittany, Dawn Avril, Dawn Avril Exposed, Kendall Blaze, Megan QT, Megan Summers, Next Door Nikki, Princess Blueyez, Seanna Teen, Taylor Twins, Tiffany Teen, and Teen Kasia along with the multi model site Face Down Ass Up University.
As the content is spread over several sites it's difficult to gauge the exact number of photo sets and videos available but it's a lot. Dawn Avril and Megan QT have over 400 photo sets each, Next Door Nikki has almost 300 and a few of the others have more than 200 sets. Unfortunately around 6 or 7 of the old solo sites have not yet been incorporated in to the new site design so you have to log in to the old original sites which means no zip files for the photos. Luckily thanks to sensible consecutive numbering of the picture files it was fairly simple to batch download them with Down Them All.
The content is all fairly softcore solo teasing and stripping featuring amateur 18 to early 20s models, Some models like Next Door Nikki and Princess Blueyez are non nude, some go topless only and some like my favourite Teen Kasia go fully nude with some toy play. Some of the non nude content here can be pretty hot often with only the skimpiest of underwear and the tiniest thongs covering the model's modesty leaving little to the imagination.
Due to much of the content here being 10 years or more old the resolutions are not really up to today's standards. The most common photo size across the sites tends to be around 800 x 1200px although there are a few exceptions to the rule. The majority of Teen Kasia's 80 plus zipped photo sets surprisingly came in at 2592 x 3872px. The video quality also varies greatly, I found some nice quality 1280 x 720p @ 8000k videos on the Seanna Teen website and then on the Dawn Avril site found many of her earlier videos a tiny 320 x 240p @ 700k that on full screen looked very grainy and almost unwatchable. The most common video size across the network of sites is probably around 640 x 480p,
It's difficult to know what to score this site, as a photo collector I got a lot classic content for a low value for money price but on the other hand anyone who prefers videos would probably find the resolution of most of it poor to mediocre if you've been used to watching hi-def. Ten years ago I would probably have scored this site a 90 but today high 70s is probably more realistic given the age of the content. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
