ATK Premium (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Good search engine
- Tremendous number of models and sets.
- Downloadable .zip files for photos, download links for videos
- Looks like the newer sets have three resolutions available for .zip downloads
- Links to site's sets by specific studio/photographer
- Great selection of women, body types, hairstyles, etc.
- No retouching that I could see, although that could be a con in some cases.
- No problems opening multiple tabs of a model's sets. |
| Cons: |
- Underarm fetish is prominent
- Ads inside, and not just to other ATK sites
- Logs you out fairly often.
- No distinguishing features for downloads. A dozen photo .zips of Charisma will each be named the same "Charisma_all.zip"
- Art =/= "holding fruit and/or wearing a hat" |
| Bottom Line: |
A pretty good site with most of its focus on photos but quite a few videos available as well, and some videos are available in HD (newer clips I'd imagine). There are lots of hidden gems, and you'll come across early sets from models like Lucie Theodovora and Addison O'Reilly in addition to hundreds of unknowns.
Lots of girls, and lots of different bodies. It's a nice way to appreciate all the various shapes and wonderfulness.
There are links to the photographers' sets, so if you like the way one set looks you can click on the photographer's name and see his others on the site.
Less good:
Lots of average girls, so you're just as likely to see below average as you are above.
If videos are available they seem to be mostly masturbation. That's not all bad, of course, but know what to expect going in.
I think I saw some of the same models' sets in Aunt Judy, but I'm not 100% positive. They may have just looked extremely familiar. This didn't happen often, but there were one or two models' sets that I'm pretty sure I'd seen elsewhere. Maybe the webmaster can verify this.
Like Aunt Judy's, it's sort of comical to watch for the models lifting their arms within the first dozen or so frames. It becomes so obvious that you notice when the girl DOESN'T do it more than when she does. There are some fairly hairy women in there, too, so be aware of what you might stumble across if you join. Not my thing, but I do think it should be advertised more. Of course, it might already be a known quantity in the underarm community and it's a way of not pushing away other customers.
Apparently you get a folder when they haven't made a .zip file for a set, and you can't create another zip file until you delete one of the .zip files you had to make because they didn't. "You have more than five zips in your folder. Please delete some of them to continue your custom zip selection." That seems like a weird way to do things. Frankly, not having a simple zip file to download without "creating" when the majority of the other sets on the site have one seems pretty weird, too.
Models will be in multiple scenes but link associated with her name leads nowhere. (Amber in Paulina scenes for example).
The majority of "artistic" photos are amusing. They look a lot like all the other sets, but the lighting is worse and there might be fruit, hats, or a barn in the frame. Because art. That's not really what the site seems to push itself as, so it's forgivable.
Would I recommend? Sure, why not? It's a decent photo site with a lot of variety. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
