Upskirt Jerk (0)
|
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Updated: |
12-06-16 01:13pm (Update History)
Reason: Updated information
|
Pros: |
+ Daily updates
+ 640x386, 960x540, 1280x720, 1920x1080 and 3840x2160 mp4
+ Niche tag sorting with over 100 tags to choose from
+ Search function
+ Model index
+ Zip files for pictures
+ Forum for all sites in the wankbb.com network
+ Renews at a lower monthly rate
+ Network access available |
Cons: |
- Flash based picture viewing, no option for regular browser view
- Zip downloads necessary for full sized pictures
- Some models need some coaching in their "simulation" (See comments) |
Bottom Line: |
The premise here, in case it's not obvious, is that it's a jerk off encouragement site, with the models assuming various poses and occupations and talking dirty to you. Although there are a few more reserved models who keep it to "panty shots only", the majority, for lack of a better phrase, take it down to some good crotch shots. The models, for the most part, are attractive, in the 20s and 30s and include some names that you might have seen elsewhere. Tina Kay, Samantha Bentley, Cherry Blush to name a few. As far as the video goes, the only thing I found to knock the site for is how some of the models simulate stroking a guy. As I said on their forum, please tell some of the women to stop looking like they were rolling dice in a crap game.
THIS is how to set up a site! Straight forward navigation with every scene represented by a large thumbnail with title, date and running time. The layout is so simple yet detailed that it was easy to come up with the following without clicking into every scene to find out what's what:
The site was kicked off on October 21, 2014 with a 4K video, then for some strange reason went to 1080p video for a bit. On the 24th, going with 1920x1080HD, they added another. On the 29th, still in HD mode they kicked in 32 more. On the 31st and November 3, two more chunks with daily updates starting from there. With 4K video increasing in availability, the last time HD was the highest option was on April 27th, 2015. To be able to figure all of that out, a site has to be readily navigable. Finding what you want is definitely easy here.
Picture sets aren't as repetitive as so many sites seem to have, but the browser viewing quality just isn't there. Screencaps just never seem to cut it. To get the full sized pics, you have to download the zip. Then they're 3840 pixels long side - still average when compared to picture sites with 5000+ being more common.
I don't tend to spend a lot of time on site forums, but I did check it out. It does require a separate login, presumably because there appears to be people on it who aren't subscribed to any of the sites. It's also setup nicely, with sections for general chat, current models, scene requests, model suggestions and technical help. From what I can tell, the admins are quick to respond to the users AND to keep it civil.
Wankitnow, DownblouseJerk, UpskirtJerk, BoppingBabes and LingerieTales are all a part of this network and, as was pointed out to me by tangub, can be joined together for $49.95 a month with further discounts for longer subscriptions. I've been on all but LingerieTales. If the lingerie site is as good as the rest, I will say that these are all great sites to check out! A nice break from the world of gonzo and other run-of-the-mill porn. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|