Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.

Visit Site ATK Natural & Hairy Type: Pay Site NICHES COMPANY COST 1. Hairy Women 2. All Fetishes ATKingdom 8 Sites Listed Partner: ATK Cash Monthly: $34.99 (recurring) Watch for additional offers (unchecked) to other pay-sites when inputting your credit card info. Details: 1 unchecked View all ATK Natural & Hairy Site Facts at TBP.

N/A Feedback History  (76) Active Reviews 0 Newbie Reviews 32 Active Ratings 0 Newbie Ratings 2 Comments 42 Review by TheBestPorn: 89.0 TBP Review Date: 02-05-22 Type: 2.0 Della +  Watch Exclusive HQ Hairy Porn +  Effective Browsing Tools -  Not a Mobile-Responsive Experience -  "New" Content is Being Rotated User Reviews (26)  User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts. Shown : 11-20 of 26 < Previous Page - Next Page > Expired 72* rayone (0) 01-31-11  08:26pm TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply) Expired 92* Ray O (Suspended) 10-20-09  09:23pm TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (9 Replies) - Webmaster Replied! Expired 70* mbaya (Disabled) 09-20-09  09:50am                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies) Expired 89* Capn (0) 09-05-09  05:19pm              TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies) Expired 91* Mr Fountain (Suspended) 03-13-09  06:08pm    TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies) Expired 87* DickH (Suspended) 02-01-09  12:32pm No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply) Expired 90* Blue Thunder (Suspended) 10-01-08  09:23pm TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies) Expired 90* landers4 (0) 08-19-08  06:23pm No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies) Expired 90* WeeWillyWinky (0) 05-16-08  09:41pm            TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (3 Replies) Expired 89* visor (0) 03-12-08  10:39am TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies) *Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews. Shown : 11-20 of 26 < Previous Page - Next Page > User Comments (42)  Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc. Shown : 31-40 of 42 < Previous Page - Next Page > messmer (Disabled) 10-28-09  09:52am                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Grossly Overrated! I am a four time subscriber to this site and my latest subscription leaves me immensely disappointed. The models have become second rate, the photography is repetitious and boring and the videos are still far from acceptable. I downloaded seven of one of my favorite models the other day and five were unwatchable in both wmv and mov formats. The support specialist has promised to have them fixed within the next 48 hours but with a bit of care there shouldn`t have been a need to fix them in the first place. Out of the last three updates, which to their credit have always been huge, I've downloaded ONE set of pictures. My main pleasure has been to grade the picture sets with a one or two out of five points. No doubt personal preferences might have a lot to do with my complaint because most models this morning received the designation hot. Go figure, maybe cotton and wool and denim are considered hot nowadays. Respond: 14 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied! Ray O (Suspended) 10-21-09  01:06pm TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) ATK Photographer Reviews P - R Can only Post three comments. There is more... Paris P (90) Models: Americans. Pretty gals, many GND types. Sets: Outdoors, indoors. Lighting very good. Direction: Good. Being a female photographer gives her a different perspective. You can tell that the models look comfortable and ready to do what asked. Her framing of shots is excellent. Face Shots: excellent Body Shots: excellent Crotch Shots: Very good Ass Shots: Very good Explicit close-ups: good Overall: A strong photographer. PKM (80) Models: Americans. Very similar selection as Alicia S. More to the glam style, lots of make-up. Sets: Definitely stages areas, indoors, lighting good Direction: Almost glam style. Lots of dildo stuff. Gets them to pose ok. Face Shots: good Body Shots: good Crotch Shots: good Ass Shots: good Explicit close-ups: ok, could use more. Overall: Good work. I have to wonder what the relation between Alicia, PKM and HMB is. Very similar. Shared models…. Hmmmm Riley Williams/RWL (90 – 5 = 85) Models: Americans from the Pacific Northwest. Very many GND types. Mostly college gals. Wide range of sizes, shapes, colors. He recently returned from a break for a couple of years. His later models tend to be overweight. Sets: Outdoors, indoors. Lighting very good. Direction: Excellent. He is a master of posing the models and getting the shots he want. Models always look comfortable and ready to do what asked. He also needs to increase from the scant 70-80 shots per set he provides (-5) Face Shots: excellent Body Shots: excellent Crotch Shots: excellent Ass Shots: poor to good Explicit close-ups: very good. He used to do peeing sets, but seems to have stopped this. In general he seems a bit tamer than he was in the early 2000’s Overall: An American master. He needs to upgrade his model stack a little, but he has the skills. I personally wish he would get more ass shots that were not from a weird angle. Be direct now and then. Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply Ray O (Suspended) 10-21-09  01:03pm TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) ATK Photographer Reviews R - S Roman K (75) Models: Russians. His models are cute, but have too much Russian porn-star in them and lack realness. Pros and Ams. Sets: Moslty indoors. Lighting good. Direction: good. Not very innovative and his poses are boring. Face Shots: very good Body Shots: good , mostly at distance Crotch Shots: poor Ass Shots: poor Explicit close-ups: poor , some peeing shots Overall: Roman is typical of Russian porn. There is a sterile quality and the models do not generate much life as compared to J Ant. Much of the posing is from a distance and there are far too few explicit shots. Robin W./RWA (80) Models: United Kingdom. Nice mixture of looks, ages and sizes. Typically shoots the same gals as Sean R. Sets: Mostly indoors, good lighting Direction: Very good. Gets them to pose ok. Could be more versatile. Models seem comfortable. Good with a camera Face Shots: Very good Body Shots: Very good Crotch Shots: good Ass Shots: poor Explicit close-ups: generally poor Overall: Good models. It is nice to have a different perspective on the same models that Sean R uses. Robin is much more tame and not very explicit. Score would be better if he included some more ass shots and was a little more explicit. Sean R. (95) Models: United Kingdom. Nice mixture of looks, ages and sizes. A whole lot of variety from freaks & skanks to moms to GDN types. Sets: Mostly Indoors. Lighting Outstanding Direction: Excellent. This guy knows how to get the models to pose to get the shots he wants. At the same time, the models seem comfortable. Face Shots: very good Body Shots: poor. Rarely shows good shots of the breasts and full body shots. Crotch Shots: Excellent Ass Shots: Excellent, he is one of the few that can really frame a female ass and associated nether regions to get the greatest shots. Explicit close-ups: Excellent Overall: The premier ATK photographer today. Lots of shots, lots of poses. He knows how to frame a shot and get the right lighting. Others should sit up and take some lessons from Sean. He is a master at explicit photography. His weakness is that he universally fails to take many pictures of the models full bodies and breasts. Yes, they are there, but you have to look at a lot of shots to get an idea of what their bodies, in total look like. Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply Ray O (Suspended) 10-21-09  01:00pm TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Review of ATK Photographers T-Z Tom Mayes TMI (75 – 5 = 70) Models: Americans. Nice variety of models. Plenty of GND-types. Sets: Outdoors, indoors. Lighting very good. Direction: poor. Not very innovative and his poses are boring. He seems to be afraid to get close to the models so his work feels distant, cold. A lost opportunity here. He also needs to increase from the scant 75-80 shots per set he provides (-5) Face Shots: very good Body Shots: good, but everything looks like he shot from across the room. Get closer, they don’t bite (unless you are lucky) Crotch Shots: poor Ass Shots: poor, none. Doesn’t seem to think this perspective is too important. Explicit close-ups: poor / none Overall: He has room for improvement. His older work was better. Vladimir Fillit VLF (80) Models: Russians. Very cute selection. A little bit too pro and glam. You would not confuse these with Americans. Sets: Definitely stages areas, indoors, lighting good Direction: Gets them to pose ok. Wide variety from standing, laying down, sitting Face Shots: very good Body Shots: very good Crotch Shots: very good Ass Shots: good Explicit close-ups: good, more spread shots would be nice Overall: Good work, would rate higher if he tried to get more shots from behind Walter K (WAK) (85) Models: Russians. Very cute selection with nice variety. A little bit too pro and glam. You would not confuse these with Americans. Sets: Definitely stages areas, indoors, lighting good Direction: Gets them to pose ok. Wide variety from standing, laying down, sitting Face Shots: very good Body Shots: very good Crotch Shots: very good Ass Shots: very good Explicit close-ups: very good, more spread shots would be nice Overall: Good work. About on par with the other Russians. Marginally better than VLF. Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply Capn (0) 09-28-09  11:01am              TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Sloppy Editing? There are still huge 15+ page photosets being uploaded in a single zip, with no smaller selected download zips. Often the shots on an entire thumbnail page would be adequately covered by about 3 shots. Ideally if there is to be no custom zip option as there is on other sites, I would like to see the zip size limited to about 5-6 pages. After over 2 years continuous membership, I am close to cancelling because of this issue. Respond: 14 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied! TheRizzo (0) 02-08-09  09:22pm          TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Hardcore an improvement As of Christmas time, ATK finally started adding hardcore content to the site. LONG OVERDUE. Now if they would get some hotter girls to grow out their pubic hair for the site, that would get the rating back to the top. Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply Drooler (Disabled) 01-19-09  02:00am                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) One Opinion: Going Hardcore Wasn't the Answer I'd joined this site almost two years ago. Wasn't too thrilled by a lot of the women, though a few were really hot. Then I recently got an offer to rejoin for $20. I see they've started adding hardcore as of Dec. last year. Frankly, I don't think that step was as critical as simply getting better looking women. Having gone through their archives, I feel I've done it mostly for Queen and Country. Older doesn't bother me, to a point at least, but fat and/or shriveled just ain't what I'm after. And there are a couple of girls in there, young ones, who would have looked nice had they not apparently had a head-on collision with a hardware store (face piercings). Messmer's right in his review that the photographers produce sets that could be clones of each other. Being an ass man, I was disppointed that the recent Michelle from Hungary, a very hot girl, never got to show her goods the way Josi, another dynamo, was able to. Who (or which robot) did the shooting made all the difference. "Toby" is probably my favorite photographer there. "Atomic W" does OK sometimes. I feel I got my money's worth, thanks to my waiting so long and their generous discount. But as I was saying, ugly-solo isn't going to be improved upon by ugly-likes-duckies. There's no other ATK site that has this problem, generally speaking. Why it does at all is beyond me. Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply mbaya (Disabled) 10-01-08  06:22am                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) nice site I really liked this site, as I am a fan of natural hairy women. My only complaint is that there is a lot of overlap between this site and ATKexotics. It is not worthwhile to join both sites. Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply fugly (Suspended) 07-25-08  07:12pm No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Rejoined-two favs gone I just rejoined ATK Natural & Hairy...and discovered two old favorites are no longer there: Florence and Fawn. Ouch....but, this is still a great site! For those of us who like the '70's look, this is THE place. (Anyone know were the two favs call home these days? Thanks for any information). Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply TheRizzo (0) 06-26-08  06:23pm          TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) ATK Hairy have hardcore yet? Hey guys, looking to see if anyone is a current member of ATK Hairy and if they have started adding any boy/girl hardcore photos or movies to the site as of yet? I joined All Hairy because they had hardcore hairy content, but the site just doesn't stack up to the quality of ATK Hairy so I am considering joining the site once my membership to Galleria expires. I hope they have started adding hardcore as I never understood why it was never part of the site in the first place. I see they have hairy hardcore in Galleria, but would prefer not to be a member of both sites at the same time to get what I want with hairy girls. Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply Shown : 31-40 of 42 < Previous Page - Next Page > Visit ATK Natural & Hairy Company Sites Top sites from this company.       Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP 1. ATK Girlfriends (0) N/A 92.0 2. ATK Petites (0) N/A 90.0 3. AT Kingdom Network (0) N/A 89.0 4. ATK Galleria (0) N/A 89.0 5. ATK Natural & Hairy (0) N/A 89.0 6. ATK Exotics (0) N/A 86.0 7. ATK Premium (0) N/A 86.0 8. ATK Archives (0) N/A 85.0 View All: Company Sites (8) Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.07 seconds.