| User Reviews (4) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site I gave my highest ever rating to – takes a slight drop
The strength of this “gay” porn site is a large amount of solo male scenes and it still holds up in that regard
Gamma, the owner of Adult Time, also owns Chaos Men and it might be the most important pro
Nearly 3,000 videos including new updates
Navigation, search engine, download options, are all top notch
Has enough gay hardcore sex scents to also retain a large following from gay male porn fans (important) |
| Cons: |
Hardcore gay sex scenes do very little for me and not surprisingly, the solo scenes are at times – repetitive to me.
Daily download limit, as with all Gamma sites, is in place, but it is 300 GB per day. I rarely download over 300 GB in a full month, making the limit, not a problem for me |
| Bottom Line: |
Chaos Men received my highest ever score of 98 in 2020. As you can see, the site still receives an excellent score of 93, but that is still a 5 point drop.
In my years of joining and even collecting gay porn, the major focus and interest for me was in the solo scenes. It shows the difference between female and male, gay/straight porn. It is common for solo women porn to be advertised and marketed towards straight men. Solo men porn is grouped in with gay men porn and marketed and advertised towards gay men, instead of directed at straight women. It does have some importance since I referred to some of the male actors as being more for gay men than straight women. Which makes sense since it is a gay site, but that doesn’t help us straight women fans. The men are often effeminate and I do see that more on Chaos Men than I remember noticing in 2020. It doesn’t mean all the men are effeminate, Chaos Men has one of the best collections of solo men who are masculine. That hasn’t changed.
Gamma being the owner of the site is becoming a more common situation in porn with Gamma owning hundreds of sites, but I see it as a major pro. Of all the Gamma sites I have been a member of, nearly all feature the near exact style of site layout, navigation, search options and even download options. On the videos, that does include 4K video downloads.
The solo scenes are not the majority focus of Chaos Men. Solo scenes make up about one-third of the 3,000 exclusive scenes. It is still one of the biggest collections of solo men porn available today. I have seen a couple transsexual sites with more solo videos, but that would depend more on the viewer’s preference. I typically look at porn as purely fantasy and because of that, I can enjoy solo scenes of men, women and transsexuals, all alike. Men are my favorite, but because of the effeminate possibility, I don’t focus solely on solo men. I do believe it’s an interesting quandary to know I prefer masculine men, but effeminate transsexuals.
That is why I keep Chaos Men’s rating relatively high. While it is no longer new to me as it was in 2020, the content is still very good for the genre of solo men masturbating. The sex scenes are okay, but I have yet to be able to fully enjoy those. Chaos Men is still my pick for the best site for solo masculine men.
I try to point out specifics with my cons. The download limit is daily and it is 300 GB. All Gamma sites I have been a member of have the same daily download limit and despite being a huge fan of Adult Time, an even bigger site than Chaos Men, I still haven’t even come close to hitting the 300 GB daily download limit. Just looking at the average file, it would require downloading around 450 solo 4K videos in one day, to reach that limit.
The other con is more or less just one all porn fans face. When we prefer a certain genre and specific niche, we almost always are going to experience some feelings of repetitiveness.
The pros far outweigh the cons and make Chaos Men one of the better buys in gay porn. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
