| User Reviews (3) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
UK-based panty fetish content
Videos are downloadable up to 2160p
Over 5,000 scenes
All the models are amateurs
The navigation is good |
| Cons: |
The price is high for a niche site
There are no pictures
There is a download limit, but I have not hit it |
| Bottom Line: |
Panty fetish is my favourite fetish. This site should score higher for me, but there are a few glaring flaws that make it come up short. Starting with the price of nearly $30 a month. I personally don’t have a problem with paying $30 a month for my favourite fetish, but I expect premium quality and features when I pay a premium price. The videos are downloadable and the quality goes up to 4K, but there are no pictures. For me, that’s a glaring flaw. At least for me, the pictures on a panty fetish site are as important or even more important than videos. That’s just disappointing for me. That’s not even close to premium.
The landscape of porn has changed – for better or worse – is not up to me to say, but Panty Amateur is a site that does not particularly fit in with mainstream hardcore sites. The content is softcore. It’s directed towards people who like to see a young, pretty woman in her panties. There is little to no chance you’re going to see much more than you would see in a risqué R or AO movie.
The videos are sharp on a 4K monitor and nearly half of their 5,000+ videos are available to download in 4K resolution. The video action is primarily focused on showing the female in panties. It’s not masturbation or sex. There is some touching and flashing shown, but it’s very timid.
The pictures are a different story. There are no pictures and therefore, no downloadable zips. Watching Panty Fetish in pictures, is really just as effective as videos. Some would even say there’s more to see in pictures than videos. I agree with that, too. Without pictures, this is just an average site to me.
I can’t complain much about anything else. The navigation works well and the site is fast to load. You get to use CCBill for billing and everything on the site works as it should.
My final thought is this site could be much better and should be much better based on the subscription price. There is no reason for a softcore porn site to omit pictures. The videos are good, but I spend more time using VLC to take snapshots. It’s a solid site, but far from best in class. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (7 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (3) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
