| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A personal favorite in the anal genre
High production values
Every model is smoking hot
Stands out in the crowded anal/hardcore genre
Super nice photos you can download
Videos can be downloaded in 4K |
| Cons: |
Downloads are limited to 25 scenes per month
Really should be made into a network based on the price
Too much separation between similar sites |
| Bottom Line: |
Despite the high score and all the positives, this site along with the entire network of sites owned by the Mad Cheddar company really needs to be a network. You can, in theory, join it as a network by joining their ultra premium network of sites for $50. That’s not very realistic in the long-term view.
As it is, the site, relatively small in size (give or take a few at 250), is very similar to their site Tushy. There is not noticeable, discernable difference between the two except you have to pay to access each separately. That is going to be a recurring positive and negative with their sites. Their “harder” versions of their sites, labeled “raw” just aren’t different enough to justify the multi-memberships needed to access all the content. Even then, you will then see the further ugliness of their download limit.
I can’t complain about anything involving the site and quality of content. The scenes are well-produced, great lighting and delivers all the anal sex you could ever want. The downloads are super high quality on pictures and videos. I believe my suggested remedy for the price/low quantity is to make it a premium network and spread te amount of download limited videos across all the sites.
As much as Mad Cheddar should be applauded for this high quality porn, they also should be looked at as miliking a niche with each of their sites. My compromise would be to at least pair two of the sites that are directly-related. For example, Blacked and Blacked Raw, Tushy and Tushy Raw to make myself clear. I just believe when the content is this similar it makes that download limit stick out like a sore thumb.
The models are all sexy and hot. The sex action is very good and the camerawork is superb. Why hurt any of that with a heavily limited download limit?
I will answer a question if anyone is wondering. If you join their entire network of sites it does not change the download limit. That means you have 25 downloads per site, per month. That is the sticking negative point. All this great content, but you can only download 25 scenes. That seems like the most counterproductive decision. I get that it means fans will have to join multiple months, but I also wonder how many of those members refuse to join a second or third time? Let your porn’s quality be the deciding factor in the public view of your site not some strange, limited download limit. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (4) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
