Great deal with discount. Very good HD video, but screen shots have not so big quality. But for this type of voyeur its normal.
Few cameras fixed and shoved different girls, womans, granny.. Looks as real voyeur. all these people not know about hidden cameras and you can see really fun viewpoint)
BeachHunters.com deleted all of their content older than 2011. Their program also closed their sister site PissHunters.com. Not much to see here anymore.
I've had this site on my radar for a few years. The thing that keeps me from joining is that the front page/tour hasn't changed in that year. So my question is, is the site still updating? Or does anyone know?
I used to watch my ex-wife iron the clothes and wonder: I wonder how many guys out there would pay to see videos of just this very thing? Just a great-looking woman bent over with her lovely-bits all a jostle and in near-to-plain sight by virtue of the gravity-challenged blouse?
Finally, only about a dozen years later, someone has had that same light bulb over his noggin! This was one of those things that, as soon as I saw it, I joined. If there is anything more hypnotic than a gravity-challenged blouse with boobies underneath I don't know what it could be.
Will do full review soon. Downside is vids are split into bite-sized pieces and there is too much talking; but other than that this is literally a dream come true for Wee Willy.
The Brits come through once again. I say let's hoist the Union Jack here in the States and call it even. :)
Joined the trial and got a good return on my investment; however, it makes me wonder how a site can operate like this one, with pictures that are non-exclusive, and many of which are plucked from pic-hosting sites like Webshots. I've seen photos from all over Netville, a few with the Teen Flood watermark still intact, for example, under their own watermark. Maybe they buy up old sets or soemthing? I don't know how this all works.
Main difficulty is this: these people need to remove children from their pics. MANY photos contain children, at beaches or pools, and they are not blurred or masked at all. One photo that needs mention is of a very-obviously under-age girl without a top in one of their topless beach sets. This is stupid practice and I'm surprised to see it.
Every candid-photo board I've ever frequented sternly reminds their posters not to upload pics with children in them, even if they are street candids or whatever.
I recently wrote in the forums of this site and my critique was removed in less than 24 hours. Please note that #6 was wrong and I did add a reply to note this. Basically, the video I thought was reposts was video that appeared on another site (jackass-nudebeach.com) so it was not reposted for this site. Here is what I wrote:
Subject: We are not that stupid
While I appreciate the site there are several problems that could be addressed to make the site much better. However, I am guessing that those who own/manage it are soooo rich that they do not care to make more money, or they smoke pot all day and are unmotivated to improve it. In either case here is what needs to be fixed, because for those of use who subscribe and browse the collection from time to time...to put it bluntly...we are not that stupid to notice that...
1. Making 20 videos out of a single 5 minuet clip and then spreading them over a 5 month period doesn't mean that the site has more content. It just means the user has to spend more time downloading a bunch of short clips instead of one. I assume the owners feel this increases the appearance of their content and/or dissuades users from using more bandwidth. In either case it sucks and makes the experience second rate to quality adult sites.
2. Video shot from above that shows shoulders and bald-headed men plain suck and should appear very rarely. If I wanted to look at the tops of naked bald headed men I would find a spot in the ceiling of the men's locker room at the local YMCA.
3. High Definition video is NOT up-converted standard definition video OR compressed HD video made to be smaller in file size so that users use less bandwidth. Just because a video appears in HD aspect ratios doesn't make it HD, and yes we can tell. Come on most of us HAVE HD or are members of sites that offer REAL HD (e.g. ilovethebeach.com). Real HD doesn't take up 9MB for 17 sec clips but about 50+MB.
4. Did I mention how STUPID clips that are less than 1 minuet are...
5. Taking captures of the REAL HD video (which is not made available to subscribers) and then posting it as "pictures" is weak. It is quite obvious that this is what you are doing...
6. You may have 190+ pages of video content (mostly due to the STUPID 17 second clips), but that doesn't mean you need to repost so many videos. Sure most people will get tired of wading through the STUPID 17 second clips, but those of us with memories longer than goldfish are quite aware of how many reposts appear in the course of a year.
To summarize this site could be SUPER cool. It could have the quality that ilovethebeach.com has with its content. But it appears that those who manage this site are cheap and prefer to cut corners and maintain their profit margin instead of increase it. It could be such a great site too which is what makes it a shame...I do wish they read this and consider some of what I have said (even if it was caustic and sarcastic).
reply quote
The people are fucking from the initial frame, don't even build up to anything. Like watching animals humping on the farm. You can choose from different camera angles, but nothing helps.
Good news is there is a 2 day trial for 6.95, no bonus sites.
A disappointment to a fan of swing sites, like swingertales and swingerquest.
I've seen some of the content available on Beautiful Agony, and I must admit I was rather taken back.
After being told what the videos were like, the fact that only the persons face is seen seemed ridiculous and unappealing.
However, when I actually watched a couple of the videos they were surprisingly erotic. Perhaps because the only thing to focus on is the person's face, whereas in a normal porn flic, I'd be looking elsewhere, obviously.
And theres also the element of imagination. The mystery of what their tits/pussy look like just adds to the experience.
As I said, I was highly skeptical about the whole idea, but had the joy of rethinking my opinion after watching the videos.
It's certainly different, and perhaps more erotic than most normal porn.
This site is almost platonic. Views of people experiencing orgasms definitely has limited appeal. While the price is low, there are other sites that provide better images of actual and faked orgasms.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
