Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The site that started my interest in lesbian porn and it's still at the top of the lesbian site list
Quality is near unmatched, very crisp and clear video downloads and outstanding quality photosets to download.
The other quality is high too. That's the believability and quality of the action. If these women are not really into lesbian scenes, they are damn good actresses
What was the old tagline? Pretty girls doing it right? Sounds right to me and explains the majority of their content.
Lots of tags and good searching capabilities
One of the few sites that can win me over without much talking, the models' mouths are usually full of something or something else
Cons:
There is no story! That's usually a deathblow for me, a dealbreaker, but see above, pretty girls doing it right. That's all the story I need. May not be enough for you.
How about the dumbest con ever? The women are too attractive. You know half the people that watch the scenes say, "there's no way she's into women!" Which is what makes it great to me. I like fantasies.
Bottom Line:
You know a site is really strong when it comes with a network and the network doesn't even get mentioned in the pros. Sapphic Erotica is now part of the Sapphix network along with Fist Flush and Give Me Pink. Making it one of the best networks. Unlike most networks, Sapphix has Sapphic Erotica as the breadwinner and Give Me Pink and Fist Flush as support or bonus sites.
Sapphic Erotica has been around longer than I have been watching online porn and I'm not that young. And knowing this will make a few of the other Porn Users laugh, I thought Sapphic Erotica was too hardcore back when I first got into porn. That didn't last for very long. And I'm glad it didn't. Sapphic Erotica was one of the first sites that made me feel real sexual attraction to women, even though, I have never even tried sex with women.
The content ranges from deep, passionate kissing and grinding tribbing to strap ons and more hardcore acts. It works perfectly for fantasies since you know, in fantasies, sex is never boring or repetitive. Which is a major compliment to Sapphic Erotica. Even if the scenes are repetitive, it's a good repetitive and it's some of the highest quality, technical and in action, porn available.
I can compare the scenes to other top lesbian sites like Mommy's Girl on Adult Time, but I don't think those scenes are near as good as these scenes. Stories are a great part of porn when done right. I'm not for sure lesbian porn has a good plot or storyline available. Let it be two attractive women testing each other out that turns into a torrid romp of wild sex.
The best part of the tags is the inclusion of positions involved in each scene. If you like 69, there's a tag for it and for every other lesbian niche position you can think of.
The models are almost all European. When I first started joining porn sites, European porn was on top of the porn world and this site shows why. The models, many of them, are 9s or 10s.
I have seen individual lesbian scenes on other sites that were better. I have seen lesbian scenes that were more hardcore, but I don't know of a lesbian site with this much consistent quality, action and technical quality.
The network is just a bonus, I didn't want to use "cherry on top", as the sites Fist Flush and Give Me Pink are two of the better sites from their respective niches. Fist Flush is a site focused on young women fisting each other and it's relatively extreme compared to other fisting sites. Give Me Pink is a site that once was one of the top solo sites. Pretty women, doing extreme things to their body and high quality close up camerawork. If you get your eye too close, you might get pink ... eye, sorry, couldn't resist.
I just don't think you're going to find a site like Sapphic Erotica in 2024. It stands so far and above its competition.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the sites under the Metart banner. This site features all the bells and whistles of the main Metart layout and features:
-Simplified layout, makes browsing the site easy.
-Premium photo sets, with first rate photographers doing the shoots.
So the photos are basically crystal clear, nicely focused, wonderful skin tones, etc.
-The videos are far superior to most videos at the Metart.com site: Two reasons for this:
-This site allows a far higher element of sexual hardcore than the main Metart site.
-Whoever is directing the videos (and the photo sets), is showing two women not only kissing, licking and sucking, but fucking as well (with a strap-on dildo, but it makes for a nice change from a guy boffing a woman).
-So the photo sets and videos are basically high-class glamour lez action with strap-ons, in wonderful color, with crisp, excellent photography for the videos and photo sets.
-The selection of models is top notch. These girls are often featured at other Metart sites,
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
but here, they seem to shine even brighter. Maybe it's just acting, but the girls seem to be having fun and are into the sex. Which adds sparkle to the photo sets and videos. I have often complained that most Metart videos are boring, no matter how lovely the Metart model may be.
But at Straplez, I enjoy looking through the photo sets, and really enjoy the videos. That might be because this is my first time at the site, but it's been a very pleasing membership so far.
-PU has a discounted price of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month.
-All content is exclusive.
-No download limits, which is becoming rare at porn sites.
-The models dress in attractive lingerie: nice bra and panties, nylons, stockings, etc. Which adds to the glamour of the scene.
-The newer videos are available in 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p, and 4k UHD.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Porn Users lists the site as "Strap Lezz". But the site calls itself "Strap Lez", with only a single "z" in the name.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Photos have a watermark, but it's small and usually located in the bottom right corner, so a very minor con.
-Like all Metart sites, this is a stand-alone site. You don't get access to other sites when you join strap-lez.
-The video coding seems very inefficient.
The 4k UHD file size is large, up to 12 GB.
By comparison, the 1080p video is only 1 GB.
What is strange, is that the 720p video is also 1 GB.
(All sizes were for the same video.)
You downsize to 360p, and the file size is 415 MB.
Just look at the 4k UHD, which is 12 GB at StrapLez.
On Metart, 4k UHD videos are 3 to 5 GB.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
If you are into lez action, I suggest giving the site at least a one-month visit.
I found this to be one of the better lez sites on the internet. Extremely attractive models, simple but effective plots (even if it's just two or more females hugging and kissing and licking before they get into the sex). Plus the elements of sophistication and glamour and quality settings and quality costumes. There is nothing cheap about the site, the photo sets, or the videos. This is a first-class website.
The site features attractive models performing as lesbians.
Since these are porn stars, I don't know how many of these models are real lesbians, or just performing for pay.
But the performance these women put on is both sensual and erotic.
You get regular updates, unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. Around 9 updates per month (a mix of photosets and videos).
Since the first month is only $9.95 (recurs at $19.99/month), I highly recommend checking the site out.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It’s my most consistent highly-rated site and it does not disappoint
Six updates per month and the last few months have included lesbian scenes
Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
Tags are accurate and the site is still one of the easest to use
4K downloadable videos if you pay the premium price, I pay $34.95 and get 720p and 1080p downloads
Downloadable picture zips only included if you pay at least for the $34.95 membership
The sexiest models in porn
Cons:
It’s not difficult for me but I imagine a new user would be frustrated with the membership tiers
Knowing if anything ever happens to my In The Crack external hard drive, I’ll have to pay at least $80 to download it all again.
Bottom Line:
It’s In The Crack, in this day of mega networks and cookie cutter porn content, In The Crack continues to just do what they do best. They have a simple equation, it goes like this get a top tier looking model, make her look pretty and even down to earth, then have her show how flexible and kinky she is. Sounds like my idea of a perfect date. In The Crack isn’t going to impress you with deep, psychological plots that revolve around the same half-dozen premises you’re used to. They’re going to impress you with gorgeous women doing the most kinky poses.
It says a lot for In The Crack when I say my favorite picture sets are from In The Crack. That’s probably the last thing they are known for, but their colors, settings and the way they dress and present the models is top-notch. I’m never disappointed with any of their picture sets.
I have also never been disappointed by their model selections. White, black, Latina, Asian, they’re all great. It’s also worth mentioning, over the last few months, In The Crack has added a few lesbian sets. Their lesbian sets are often considered the best in porn and I agree.
Here is the easy way to use In The Crack, look at the top of the page and click, “Collections”. That’s how I do it. The scenes are listed in descending order from the newest to oldest. I just go through and download every scene, every photoset and there’s no hesitation. The content is that good and it’s that consistent. I guess you could call it Simplified Porn.
Of course, while the content is simple to know what to download, joining isn’t as simple. I’ll help you out again, the $34.95 tier is the lowest priced option to receive downloadable zips for the photos. That’s the one I join. You also have downloadable videos and a monthly download limit of 300GB. You can go up to $39.95 tier and will receive the 4K downloads on top of everything included at $34.95 and the $39.95 tier includes a monthly download limit of 500GB. For those that want completely unlimited and access to 4K, too, there is the $69.95 tier. It has everything included and no monthly limit.
In The Crack makes some of the most explicit and kinky masturbation porn look classy. You don’t need a plot with their content. It’s all right there on the screen. The plot is all the things your mind is thinking about doing to the model. The models even move a little slower, smoother and are somehow 100% feminine, even with something up their butt. It’s sites like In The Crack that remind me of how much I enjoy porn but sadly, In The Crack also reminds me of how overproduced and glossy the mainstream is in porn.
I have tried finding faults. I have inspected the photos in their highest quality state but no faults. Oh, there is that one lesbian video from the early years of In The Crack’s life that has the sound muted. They even point it out before you download it. It’s as good of a site as I have ever joined.
Multiple navigation options that do make it easier to find what you’re looing for, but that is also part of the overwhelming.
Cons:
It's overwhelming. Too much of a good thing.
I have joined 3 different times and feel like I’ve only scratched the surface
Bottom Line:
I followed reviews of Sapphic Erotica, even back when I wasn’t willing to join a porn site. The previews from the site were often featured on referral sites and I always liked the preview videos. There is a lack of realness in the scenes, but authenticity is in the conscious mind of the beholder.
Not only are my only complaints about how big the network is and how good it is, there’s also the rarity of the older scenes often being the best scenes on the network – but only until you watch another scene. This continues for days, then weeks, then you join a year membership. At least that’s how it worked for me!
The site itself has everything you could ever ask for. Many tags, even some that you may not know what the tag means. The main focus of the network is beautiful women. Sapphic Erotica is lesbian content with models that steal the spotlight. You don’t even think about what the story or plot is. A story or plot would likely detract from the action.
The video resolutions are up to 4K and there are multiple download resolutions. You can also download the photosets and there are no download limits. It’s as close to perfect as a network can be for me. It’s the only network I’ve ever joined for a year.
The blend of sites does stay focused on pretty women, but each site has its own identity. Give Me Pink is a solo site with some of the scenes being extreme. The models, despite being 10s in looks and dressed nicely go for timid to out of control orgasms in minutes. Fist Flush is about as far into fisting as I am interested in and by just watching fisting scenes from Fist Flush is my own version of moderation.
Sapphic Erotica is the obvious star of the network. It really is good enough to join just it without any network sites included, but you do get the two extra sites. The lesbian scenes are very much softcore. You won’t see a lot of rough sex between the ladies, but that’s what I prefer. Give Me Pink almost is going too far for my interests. Fist Flush really pushes my limits, but that’s why moderation is good.
I don’t think you’ll find a better softcore “females only” experience than Sapphix.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of the purest, realest porn sites
Women of all ages, body types and experience levels
Really the only story I need porn to have
Artistic, dramatic, all from amateur, sometimes self-shot videos
Scenes are presented how masturbation is – climatic
Takes some time to get used to using the site, but sooner is more likely than later
Cons:
Download limit of 15GB per day. I have tried to hit it but haven’t been able to download more than 10GB per day.
There are no pictures. You can make your own from the videos, but there are no separate photo sets
Bottom Line:
I feel myself deserves an award for being the best and most accurately named site. All the content is about women – feeling themselves. I always thought this site sounded boring. It’s not. I was just dumb. Really dumb. There is so much beauty and eroticism in the videos. From seeing goosebumps on a young woman’s thighs, to seeing a woman quiver and shake with a screaming orgasm. I got the feeling a lot of these women didn’t even know how loud or vocal they are. This is one of those sites that what’s missing may be the biggest positive. There are no naked men or balls or dicks or preparation for the money shot. I have to believe the women on this site feel different about shooting these scenes than women being filmed in hardcore scenes.
At the core of the content, you are watching a woman with an exhibitionistic side performing for the camera and how many ever eyes she wants to fantasize is watching. I believe that is true. You see raw emotions. You feel the orgasms. You can even see the orgasms as contractions get in time with body quivers.
And that is the only story I need from porn. A woman wants to orgasm and wants me to watch her. No need for attempted acting or even acting natural. There is no acting on this site. It’s all real. Every orgasm, toe curl, nipple squeeze, moan, shriek, it’s all real. If I stopped right there, I would feel confident about scoring this site between 95-100.
I’m stopping there. There are close to 6,000 videos. There’s nothing to talk about with the videos except the 1080p download option.
The settings alone could be a part of story. Most of these look like a woman at a hotel or her own bed, masturbating and showing off her orgasms. I don’t even pay attention to if they have clothes on to begin the scenes. I don’t care if they are fully dressed. The thrill from these scenes has to do with watching the woman reach blissful ecstasy. Her insecurities, moral beliefs, are all removed for a 10-30 second eruption of orgasms.
I find myself surprised by how little the nudity or lack thereof doesn’t truly affect the scenes and their hotness. Women masturbating in their panties is a lot hotter than I thought it was. It’s because these women are really masturbating and not just performing for pay.
The most attractive part of any of the scenes for me is when the woman is masturbating. She looks at the camera and you can see her legs spreading more like she was shy, but it feels too good to be shy. There is a lot of the feeling of these models reach a point, in nearly every scene, where nothing, but that orgasm matters to them.
The people who own this site also own Beautiful Agony and I Shot Myself. Beautiful Agony is similar to I Feel Myself except it is nearly always focused just on the woman’s face. I Feel Myself shows the face and body trying to fight, hide, restrain, the embarrassing orgasm, leading to the tension, relief and release. You can learn a lot about the human body by watching these scenes. You can see every muscle that tightens up during orgasm.
It's definitely different, but for me, it is the unique one, while other sites try their more complex-view of porn. It likely is the strongest point of I Feel Myself. It’s simple, nothing complex, no dumb story to get in the way and most importantly, no biased director or producer telling the woman how to feel or moan or enjoy or sound.
It's performance porn. The whole world is the stage. The models truly look like they are performing for a sold out group of people.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ BDSM from a gentler view.
+ Women dominating other women and men.
+ Nearly 500 scenes
+ Unlimited downloads on videos and photo sets.
+ All-exclusive content
+ Comes with access to Adult Prime.
Cons:
- I feel like the site is mocking itself at times. Why is there a sweet side to domination?
- The scenes really need to be longer. Many of them last under 20 minutes.
Bottom Line:
I feel like I’m getting something I’m not supposed to get or that’s not even supposed to exist. Sweet Femdom. I believe this porn would turn some people off. Especially those who like the traditional gender roles. The content on here is like women taking it easy on the men they are dominating.
The site is huge considering it’s on the Adult Prime network which includes over 50 more sites. This one has 477 videos and 477 photo sets. One could make the argument that the videos are shorter than usual, and they would make a good point. The videos rarely last over 20 minutes and most are well below 20 minutes. On the other hand, unlike a lot of Adult Prime sites, Sweet Femdom includes over 100 pictures per photo set.
Everything you can download is unlimited. The videos are HD quality. I am at a loss when trying to figure out who the audience for this niche is. I have to think those who love domination porn will be put off by the softer, more tender moments in these scenes and those who want the softer, more tender moments, will be put off by the harder moments.
It's dichotomic to say the least.
The site, itself, would score quite a bit higher if the scenes were longer and there was more of a story to the scenes. I never understand why porn tries BDSM or dominance porn, but don’t explain the how’s or why’s of how this specific couple ended up in this stage of a relationship. It’s easy to understand the basics of BDSM and natural instincts. Those show man being the dominant one while the woman is submissive. How did we get to this woman dominating that man? It’s not natural. I believe that’s a burden of producing porn that goes against conventional wisdom or natural instincts. I believe even the most basic of plots would add a lot to these scenes. Something as simple as she caught him with her younger sister. Then, then that’s when we have a reason for the physically smaller woman dominating the physically imposing man.
And that’s when these tender moments would be more understandable. We could view those as the woman trying to remind the man of the good times of her being his submissive lover. It’s always one or two steps away in porn and this site is no different, in that regard.
A great network overall and many great niche sites like this one.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ The other site that started my interest in porn.
+ Like with Little Mutt, I cannot say for sure if Yanks is updating with new content, but I can say they have nearly 2,500 videos and 2,000 photo sets.
+ Videos are downloadable and top resolution is 1920x1080.
+ Photo sets are also downloadable in zip files.
+ Nearly 750 amateur models.
+ Includes access to an all-male masturbation site called Club Stroke.
+ Site navigates well and has useful tags.
Cons:
- There is reason to believe the new updates are just old content they are reposting as new.
- It’s almost all masturbation.
- Some video scenes do not have a photo set.
Bottom Line:
It is hard to review Yanks and Little Mutt at the same time. Mainly because I joined both of them in 2015 and these sites started my interest in porn. It’s hard not to compare the two sites to each other. Both are amateur and it looks like both have stopped updating with new content. But just like Little Mutt has some redeeming qualities, one could say Yanks has even more redeeming qualities.
The size of the site helps with the possibility of recycling content. There are nearly 2,500 videos and over 2,000 photo sets. You can download them to your heart’s content with no limit. The video quality on Yanks is very good too. You can download the majority of the scenes in 1920x1080 resolution.
They have a useful model list and have nearly 750 amateur models on their site. The bonus site – Club Stroke, is a good opposite site to Yanks. Club Stroke is solo guys masturbating. It’s not a very big site with just over 100 videos, but it introduced me to male masturbation porn.
Yanks focuses on solo women masturbating and having real orgasms. I believe that’s the most difficult part of porn – getting the woman to have a real orgasm. The orgasms on Yanks are very believable and some are even embarrassing for the female model having the leg-cramping, body-shaking orgasm on camera. I noticed in most of the scenes, the woman’s breathing gave away the real orgasms. I could tell their breath had been taken away for a few seconds.
Yanks even taught me a lot about myself and views on sexuality. I watched these female models masturbate to those great orgasms and thought about, it wasn’t their bodies I was looking at and thinking about. It was me thinking about having an orgasm that felt like the model showed her orgasm feeling. I do believe we are in one of the quandaries of porn. If my beliefs are right and I’m attracted to watching the women have better orgasms than I have had, shouldn’t it be similar for men? I have watched male masturbation porn and thought the guys that shoot a lot of cum look like their orgasm felt better than the guy that barely came a few drops.
It's at least interesting to me and I have Yanks to thank for me noticing my feelings may not be about taboo sexual attraction to other women and might just be me being envious of their orgasms.
I’m making this sound way too scientific. Unlike Little Mutt, which dropped from a favorite site to one I doubt I will join again, Yanks is still a favorite, however, if they don’t have new content coming out, it will be a short-lived return to my original positive and excited feelings towards Yanks.
Anyone could join this site and enjoy the content. The videos are good enough download quality and pictures are not bad either. The models are generally cute and playful. It’s very enjoyable porn and recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beyond all complaints about the way Mind Geek has directed Twistys – it is still one of the best sites available if you’re into beautiful women.
Downloads cost $15 more added to subscription price. It’s a pro to me. The download quality and quality of the content is as high as you’re going to find in softcore, lesbian content.
The picture sets are good enough to download in zips.
The Treat of the Month is a staple in porn and a fitting homage to old porn magazines.
Unquestionably one of the easiest and smoothest sites to navigate.
It is still updating.
Cons:
Besides taking downloads away, Mind Geek, has changed the focus from some male-female hardcore to none.
Potentially repetitive in the same ways old porn magazines were repetitive. I’m just not for sure if it’s fair to call beautiful nude women – repetitive.
Bottom Line:
Twistys was on my favorites list for nearly 10 years. After they were sold to Mind Geek, I tried to stay away from joining. I was able to justify not joining based on my negative feelings (and warranted) towards Mind Geek.
I do believe time heals nearly everything and it is how I am looking at my recent join of Twistys. The Treat of the Month is one of the best features on any porn site. It is similar to Playboy’s Playmate of the Month and Penthouse’s Pet of the Month. A model is picked as Treat of the Month, then she gets multiple picture sets and videos to show why she was picked as Treat of the Month. This feature alone is enough reason to still join Twistys.
Then there are the beautiful women and 20 years of them! Twistys is one of the only porn sites I would call a “Gentleman’s site”. The women are often wearing too much makeup and the clothing choices often are slutty looking, but you can’t deny the attractiveness of these models.
Once you pay the extra $15 for downloads, you receive access to download and own one of the best porn collections available.
Twistys Network is marketed and sold as a network, but that’s mostly a marketing ploy. There is a theme to this review. Yes, Mind Geek charges for downloads and took away most of the character Twistys had as a site, but the beautiful women are still there. My happiness and even giddiness of seeing new Treats offset the bad feelings of paying extra for downloads. The quality of the videos is excellent and it’s one of those sites that caters to photography fans with professional studio quality photo sets. The downloads feel worth $15. I just don’t know why Mind Geek doesn’t offer a membership with downloads. I had to join the site then add downloads after signing in.
The updates are still coming, but not at the pace we used to get from Twistys. I see that as offset by the overall quality of models and the content they are presented in. You’re not going to find many porn sites that make this type of porn.
It’s one of the few sites that doesn’t rely on a niche to make their content hot. Their models do that. You need more kinkiness? Just look at the bodies of those models. You should be having kinky thoughts about what you want to do to them. I believe this type of porn should be marketed as primer porn or shallow porn (like all porn isn’t shallow). This type of porn does want you to use your imagination and own creativity to create your own fantasies for each model. That may be a difficult sell in 2023.
The site also acts a history lesson in porn. You can see the different phases porn has been through over the last 20+ years. It is not all only solo, there is a lot of lesbian content too, but the solo content is why I join Twistys. It is still a veritable treasure trove of incredible looking models, but you may have to do like me and offset some of the “bad” Mind Geek has brought to Twistys to justify being a member.
There are over 5,000 combined videos and photo sets for your downloading pleasure. I doubt I will let it recur for another month, but do find the one month membership upgraded to include downloads to be a very good buy.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the greatest pornsites ever
- Over 2,000 scenes plus access to 2 other great sites.
- The prettiest "lesbian" site.
- Videos are available up to 4K download
- Photosets are downloadable
- Regular updates
- Includes access to Fist Flush and Give Me Pink
- Download speeds are great (90% my max)
Cons:
- Very little to complain about other than it's repetitive.
- Gets boring if you don't like looking at near perfect models naked and playing with each other.
Bottom Line:
There was a time when Sapphic Erotica was the top site across all genres. There also was a time that Give Me Pink was a top-level site. You get both of those now with one subscription. I do remember the days of paying $30 for each of those sites.
The videos are up to 4k downloads and there are over 2,000 scenes. Each scene includes a downloadable zip file of photos. The photos are not videocaps, they are legitimate studio quality photos.
Downloads are fast and easy. There are regular weekly updates along with the bonus access to Give Me Pink and Fist Flush.
Give Me Pink is a solo site showing beautiful models using strange and even large objects to masturbate with. Fist Flush is a very good, albeit small, fisting site.
You do receive access to all 3 and it is unlimited access. CCBill is the billing agent so you should feel confident about giving them your credit card details.
Sapphic Erotica has one downside and I'm going to point it out based on my own discussions with lesbians. The women at Sapphic Erotica are more for the viewing pleasure of men than lesbians. That's not to say lesbians won't like it, but this lesbian content firmly lands in the oddity genre known as straight-lesbian. That just means it's aimed at straight men who want to see 2 or more naked young women rolling around and having sex.
The site's navigation is very good and there is an extensive tagging system. The tags are almost too extensive. You can filter by location, then color of hair and action. It's overwhelming even for me.
The bet part is the models. These are Europe's best models dating all the way back to 2004, which was part of the European porn boom of the mid-2000s. You will see models you've never heard of and legends like Eve Angel, Sandra Shine, even Club Sandy.
It's one of the best bargains when combined with Give Me Pink and highly recommended.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
OB-GYN fans take note of the Czech site
Hundreds of hot Czech models showing you more than you may want to see
Closeups that are unrivaled.
Medical tools are used. You either love that or hate that.
Has a great mobile version of their site that is included
Cons:
See above, medical tools are used.
This is a very narrow niche and no pun was intended with narrow.
No bonus sites or content. It could become boring and redundant.
Bottom Line:
I have always liked medical based porn. Gyno is a favorite too. I do know and accept it’s not for all people just like most narrow niches are not. If you love gaping and medical tools like I do, you will love this site.
The site includes over 500 videos and photo sets. These videos and photos are focused on the woman spreading, stretching, medically invading, twisting and turning her pussy in every direction she can. There are fingers, toys, medical tools and the girls are hot as hell. You really think you’re a Gynecologist.
Videos can be downloaded. The videos have multiple resolutions available for downloads including 4K. There are pictures too, but in this niche, the videos being closeup and zoomed, really remove the need for the photos. The models are all from the Czech. They are all very beautiful. You will see some shyer ones who struggle at first with spreading their pussies out like this content calls for, but most of the time the model loses control and keeps stretching herself as far as she can. There is minimal pain in the scenes which can be a problem with this type of porn.
The content is basic in that it isn’t trying to sell anything except pretty girls doing very naughty things to themselves. That is the double-edged sword. A lot of these models spend part of the video just trying to get comfortable and although that adds to the authenticity of the scenes, it can break the hotness of the scene.
You will also never believe this, but there comes a time that you feel like if you’ve seen one pussy you’ve seen them all. This site could run into that problem for you. I don’t even know how they can fix that or add some variety. I am into the fetish of gaping and stretching, I do not get tired of it or bored.
I knew coming into this review that one of my favorite sites – PJ Girls – is narrow niche and potentially offputting and possibly even not attractive to others. I cannot see lowering the score because some people may not like the niche or get bored with the niche. It is a top site for me and that is what my score shows. It could be better for me too, but it would involve longer videos with longer gaping views from different angles, the very things some may dislike.
My recommendation is see if you like the niche before joining it. I did not know I have a fetish for gaping or pussy stretching. And on the other hand, I can see how some would not like that at all just like there are niches I don’t like.
They make up for most questions with the niche by including such high quality on their videos and pictures. I just cannot fault them for possibly being a niche you won’t like.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the X Empire network of 5 sites.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Navigation is easy. The site and network are laid out sensibly, so you can browse the entire site and network.
-You can watch videos in 0.5 speed, normal speed, 2x speed, and 4x speed. Seems like a gimmick to me, because watching in normal speed seems like the normal thing to watch. You can slow the speed down to 0.5 speed, if you want to examine some highlights, but I've never done this yet.
-The site (and network) uses a glamour style approach: the models are usually attractive to very attractive, the settings are expensive, the girls are putting on a show for you, the audience, and they look into the camera to invite you to watch and enjoy their performance. So there's a voyeuristic element to the videos.
-The videos are professionally shot: crystal clear images, good colors and good sound control, nice sets, the models wear skimpy lingerie that reveals their curves.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Videos are offered in 288p through 1080p. The last few years to newer videos have a 4K option.
-The accompanying photosets are real photos, and run around 150 photos per set.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The performance of the models is stylized. I much prefer the less-stylized performance of the models at the Wow network, which seems less artificial, more realistic. Or the more natural style of the Teen Mega World videos, which is less of a show, but more natural. I think the models at the Wow network, or the Teen Mega World network, are getting off more often during the sex, versus the models at Lesbian X, which are putting on a show, but it's fake sex, and I doubt the models are getting off very often.
-The model page has links to the model's videos, but no personal stats or history on the model.
Bottom Line:
-This is the lesbian site in the X Empire network.
-You get 169 videos at the site, with matching photosets.
-Most of the videos are of 2 girls having sex. There are some videos with 3 or more girls, but that is the minority.
If you catch a holiday discount, you can join for $60/year, streaming only. Download memberships cost more.
The sex featured at Lesbian X is bread-and-butter, not over the top calithenics. Which is good, except that the sex seems to be by the numbers, staged, without much real passion. So in spite of the attractive models, and the nudity and hardcore sex, the site doesn't hold my interest. And I get bored with the videos fast. I much prefer the lesbian sex at the Wow network, where the sex seems more real.
I'm giving the site a score of 83. You get access to the Lesbian X site, and the other 4 sites in the network. The videos are professionally shot, with crystal clear images and excellent colors, but the videos lack passion, and get boring fast.
The site is trying to create an erotic, glamourous image of lesbian sex, but it just doesn't work. Wow network and even Teen Mega World, which are going for a more natural approach to sex, works much better. Those networks present videos that are more natural, with sex you can watch and enjoy more believably.
I have nothing against glamourous sex: X-Art used to be a great site with lovely models, great videos and photosets that emphasized the glamour aspects of sex, before the site ran into financial problems. But Lesbian X is a disappointment for me, in spite of the attractive models and the good technical qualities of the videos.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It focuses on putting you in a woman’s bedroom or two women’s bedroom and watching them during their most intimate times.
Excellent camerawork that captures the model’s faces at the right times, it’s not always that explicit.
More updates than some networks and it’s just one site. Sixteen so far in April 2022 and it’s only the 11th of the month.
Emotionally charged scenes that will make you forget formulaic.
Real orgasms in under 10-15 minutes that will make you wonder what you’re doing wrong.
Much appreciated tags that are some of the most specific I’ve seen. Aimed at people with obscure fetishes?
Cons:
Some of the videos are under a minute and aren’t masturbation.
Real women from what I can tell that aren’t porn models. That’s going to be a con to some.
Bottom Line:
A site that surprised me a lot. Who knew a porn site could be named prophetically? This site should make anyone feel themselves. There is nothing high-tech with the site. It’s just an older looking site that looks like they decided to let their scenes speak for itself. I haven’t seen many of these niches before. There are scenes that I really liked of women masturbating while watching porn. That’s not something I see much in porn. There are scenes of women in a dark room with some clothes on, all clothes on, no clothes on, masturbating over their clothes, under the clothes and nude. The nice women hop up on their knees and give you a better view. The naughty ones are too busy enjoying themselves and don’t care who is watching or if you’re liking it. It’s almost too real. Possibly too real for some people to like even. Not me and not specifically you, just some.
The tags are an important part to me and part of the reason I’ll come back to the site. When they list “hairy” the woman really is hairy. They even have a tag for “pets”. Which is there for you guessed it. A pet decided to get in the view of the camera. They make sure to tell you there’s no bestiality. The tags include ones like “tattoo free” and “hands on” meaning no sex toys. There are ones for “flush” as a redhead, I know about flush skin. These tags tell you so much more about the parts of porn that people complain more about than those silly stories most sites have on the scenes. There is even a “watching porn” tag. I don’t think any site has this specific of tags.
The quality is surprisingly good. Most of the videos have 720p or 1080p download options. There is a download limit, but I have not reached it. It does seem small at 10 GB per day. But the scenes are short. There’s not much talking in any of the scenes. You get some moaning. And the tag I think really plays to people with fetishes is, “contractions”. That means the woman contracts during orgasm. I try to keep up with everything the tags said to expect. The older scenes are not as explicit as the newer ones. I believe they maybe changed their style of scenes or the women in the scenes changed. Some of these women – I am assuming all are amateurs, really go at masturbating and making sure you see everything. It is a style of porn I am not used to. I noticed there is a quote from a user of that site that says she cried the first time she watched a scene from the site. That could be more normal than we think. This site makes it very clear that these women want to be filmed, want to enjoy themselves without being insulted or stereotyped. You end up with some very good performances.
It may still fall short for some people. The only story is these women want to orgasm. There’s no stepdad is watching, and mom is with stepbrother in the shower. It does seem like a very different type of porn than we are used to. It looks more like a woman decided to get naked and said, “Okay, turn the camera on. I’m ready!” There are scenes that have more than one person and those have some talking. They even have a tag for talking. I just can’t explain how important those tags are and the best feature of the tags, if you scroll over the tag, it tells you what it means. Like “Tummy Girls” that means the woman masturbates some in the video while facing down usually with her butt up in the air. It even gives you some educational tidbits like, “20% of women say they masturbate facing down sometimes.”
I don’t know about recommending it. I would, but I have heard things from porn fans. Things that made me want to find different porn. This site really does that for me. I am sure on the score too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Solo, extreme, gaping, pretty and sexy women.
Averages 3 updates per month. It looks like they could have more than that, but nothing consistent with the update schedule.
High quality videos and photos. All are downloadable and unlimited.
Very pretty models that I think are nearly all European. There are a few that may not be.
Bipolar porn, she looks innocent, she’s acting innocent, don’t stick THAT in there! She does it anyway. Somehow, these models do that in a pretty way.
Good navigation and tags, but they do have a lot of tags. The most I think I’ve ever seen.
Cons:
It's no surprise this site is on Sapphix just like Sapphic Erotica and there is the white living room again. If a person recognized the background city, they could go watch these scenes in person. The windows have no curtains. It’s a joke, but the white background isn’t.
The scenes on this are different. A lot of the newer ones are just masturbation with some extreme parts. The older scenes are the most extreme masturbation I have seen. That’s going to be pro for some and a con for others. I don’t mind it, but believe it fits better in the cons. It’s not what you expect from solo porn.
Bottom Line:
I can set up the scenes on this site by saying the model will convince you she’s an innocent little dove (thanks all white background!). She will then tease and show a little skin. She will show how pretty she is. I look away and she has a baseball bat stuck up in her and her legs in a V. It’s whoa porn. You skipped some things on your way to that V. I like it just because it jumps from innocent to not innocent in a split second or V. The models look like they belong on a softcore, glamorous site. Seeing them with only their heels on and they left those on for grips. It’s a good change from sites that stay within the softcore niche. Yeah, she’s pretty, has a nice body, but I just don’t think a guy or woman is going to want her just teasing. I want to believe women this pretty make people want to gape them. That is a unique concept this site has going for it.
Its overall size is not as big as you might think. It “only” has 402 scenes and has been open since 2004. They had a lull in updates from 2009 to 2013. There is disparity between the newest scenes and oldest scenes. It really doesn’t seem like the same site even. I do believe just like with Sapphic Erotica, it’s the models that are making that difference. It could be production as well. There are some really pretty models in the newer scenes that do some extreme. I really like Candy Belle’s scene. It’s after the lull period. I know they have it in them to make the more extreme and even excited masturbation scenes. I never thought I would say a woman using a Magic Wand on her clitoris and has a dildo up her butt, was not extreme, but it’s not extreme in 2022. I think housewives do that now.
The quality is as high as I think you can get. Especially if you consider how long they have the high quality. You can go back before the lull and those still have 720p and 1080p downloads. They had 4K starting at the new year in 2015. The scenes are very long for solo porn. The Candy Belle scene I mentioned is 52 minutes long of her teasing, in the bathtub, on the bathroom floor, on a chair, using a Magic Wand, a very girthy dildo stuck to the floor, using the sprayer in the bathtub. She ran out of toys. You still don’t get the extremes that the old scenes had. The baseball bats, the needing an assist from another model just to get that bat in her.
It’s good for those that like solo, long and teasing scenes. They do a good job of showing how teasy the model is at the beginning of the scenes. That sometimes can last 10-15 minutes. I don’t know that everyone likes that. I do, but I like softer porn. I keep thinking I’m going to develop some of the teasing ability if I watch enough. I do believe the easiest way for me to describe is it’s different. I haven’t seen sites like this. The models do it all with a big, pretty smile.
It's a good site for when you feel like you’ve seen everything that porn has to offer which isn’t much these days. I’m sure that there was a reason, some demand even, for this site to be opened back up in 2014 after the 4 years of no updates. I have liked it the last few times I joined Sapphix.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
There’s nothing on this site except lesbian porn.
Pretty, mostly European models that I have seen on the 21st sites and even Nubiles.
Very high quality on the videos and pictures.
Updates on average twice per week. Sometimes they have as many updates as 4 per week. It’s not a consistent update schedule.
There are currently 1,817 videos and those are mostly long videos of 40+ minutes each.
Comes with two bonus sites: Give Me Pink (still updating) and Fist Flush (which has updated for the last two months)
Cons:
If you don’t like a lot of white backgrounds, the newer scenes are nearly all in a white living room. All the furniture is white. I’m not for sure what they’re going for with these white backgrounds.
In my different times as a member of this site, the quality of the sex has been hot/cold. I believe it’s because the nature of the niche is repetitive.
Bottom Line:
One thing I can’t complain about is how pretty the models are. I can complain that the models look a lot alike. When thy do get a darker complexion model she really stands out. Especially in the all-white living room. One of the better newer scenes has Alyssa Reece and Mia Split in it. Not only does Alyssa Reece have a darker complexion, the majority of the scenes captures the outdoor greenery and even some neutral colors like tan furniture. It makes a lot of difference! That scene is so much better than the other newer scenes, it makes me think that all-white background doesn’t work with pale models.
The quality is really high on this site and the network it belongs to – Sapphix. This network is focused on women. Give Me Pink is all women. Fist Flush is women fisting women. If you’re tired of seeing hairy asses and balls this is a really good network for you. The quality on the videos includes downloads up to 4K and those have been 4K since December 2015. They also give you the options of 1080p, 720p, 540p and mobile. You won’t see many of their videos with lower than 720p. Some of their 2005 videos have 720p and 1080p. They have been doing high quality for a very long time. That is a good part. The older scenes are easily better. If you like tribbing there’s a lot of it on this site. The quality of the older videos is important not just because those are better. There are more of them. From looking at the updates, it looks like, at one time 2005-2008, they were releasing a new scene every 2-3 days. I also believe the models in the older scenes were some of the top models in the world. It seems like the older scenes were more hardcore if that’s possible. There are a lot of 3 female scenes, some of those are 3 females masturbating furiously together. I don’t see that much in newer lesbian scenes. The videos are not only downloadable, but from what I see there is no limit. The pictures are very good quality and downloadable. Those are photo sets that have file sizes reminiscent of videos, over 500 MB each.
The only complaint I really have is about the newer scenes. That white background, the models not as much into it. When I look at the models in the older scenes, I’m not surprised the models aren’t as into the scenes. Some of those old scenes have three women that are legitimate 10s. You’ll have some color-shock if you watch the older scenes. They had blue chairs and hippy looking sheets, brightly colored beach towels.
The site is very big with nearly 2,000 scenes. A lot of the prettier, sexier models in the older days of the site have over 10 scenes each. It surprised me when this site become a part of the Sapphix network. I never had any problems joining this site and being satisfied with just it. It’s almost too big by itself for a one month membership.
This is very believable, to me, lesbian porn. These women look like they are loving it (especially older scenes) and they’re really pretty to look at. I just come away with the feeling that the production changed sometime over the last 5 years, and someone took it in the wrong direction. The newer scenes try to be more softcore, but the sex is not. The models are still doing 69s and rimming even on the white furniture. I would like to see the site go back to its older style which reminded me of the old Vivid DVDs. It was pretty women doing dirty things. Maybe the all-white background has made me view those scenes as more innocent. It’s not the models are just not as into it? It’s still an easy site to recommend for those that like to see pretty women naked and doing sexual things.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No site has flirted with 100 more than In the Crack but I have still yet to give it a 100. I think the average for In the Crack from me has been around 96 for about 12 years.
- This review is based on the In The Crack Plus membership which is $34.95/mo. It has everything I want and “need” with a membership. Bottom Line will have details.
- One of the few sites that will leave you torn between wanting a hot model and a nice vacation.
- In my opinion, the best quality photos and videos available from any site.
- Though there are lesbian scenes here and there, the majority of the site is solo content and that’s why it doesn’t get a 100 from me. Solo is my favorite. I may be a little biased. It is the best solo site on the internet.
- Fast downloads (see bottom lin
Cons:
- The tiered pricing is sure to bother some people. I admit, the first time I joined with the tiered pricing, I received the membership that doesn’t include zip downloads for pictures and was quite annoyed.
- Let’s nitpick, the site itself still looks like it did in 2012 and maybe 2007. Does that bother me? Not at all.
Bottom Line:
I have talked about the greatest compliments I can pay a site, and In the Crack has several of those distinctions. I was first a member when they were still having audio problems. The videos, the close-ups, the ways the models are presented, have all been copycatted. But none can fool me into thinking I’m looking at an In the Crack photo or video set. Take a look at their scenes. Tell me a site that has those colors in their scenes, those backdrops, those angles, those shadows, those what are they called? Women? It’s the prettiest porn site in the history of internet porn. Don’t shy away. This is not some run of the mill artsy, glam site. With all the prettiness and perfect colors, one could assume the action is safe and glam. Then you see a model do a split across a bathtub and see how many bathroom objects she can shove in herself. No hole is sacred. No emotion is either. Happiness, sexiness, arrogance maybe, and writhing, pulsating orgasms.
In the Crack hasn’t made it this long without being good at something. Count the years, over 20, and they were always at the top of the industry in quality. It's that unique, it’s that high of quality. And the models put on their best performances. I have a whole list of models that had their best performance on In the Crack. I said it in a previous review. Once you join In the Crack, you may not ever join another site.
I don’t remember when the tiered pricing started but I will say it’s not like the tiers or add-on prices that other sites use. In the Crack played it ethically and to help the potential members. Before the tiered pricing, In the Crack, was $34.95/month. They don’t do promos or coupons. They don’t need to. Their content speaks for itself. The tiered pricing was a move to help potential members. I’m sure they knew that the $34.95 price was steep to the average porn site member. They came out with the basic membership. It’s like a trial and it’s $9.95 for a full month. You can stream any of the videos in SD. You can also view the “small” resolution pictures. Not many sites do that. They’re giving people a chance to experience their content without spending $35. The next step up is a logical one, it’s called Stream. It’s $19.95 and you can stream in SD and 720p. You also can view the large pictures. The next step up was the one that got me awhile back. It’s called Standard. It lets you view all sizes of pictures; stream all sizes AND you can download the 720p videos. That’s where they got me. I didn’t realize you can’t download the pictures. The standard is $24.95. There’s something else to add to this. Starting with Standard, there are download limits. Those are listed on their site. They’re very upfront about it.
For me, since my one mistake of joining Standard, I don’t even fool with looking at the tiers. I want downloads on pictures and videos. You have to jump up to the Plus membership. It’s $34.95 the same price their site was before the tiered pricing. The Plus gets me everything I want. It has 720p and 1080p downloads. The big pictures can be downloaded in zips and it is the membership that will give the non 4K fans, the best experience. They have two more steps up, the 4K and the Ultimate. The 4K explains what it adds and it’s $39.95. The difference between 4K membership and Ultimate is the download limit. I don’t find their limits to be a problem. The Plus equals out to 300 GB per month. I usually hit about 80-150 GB per month on it. I do think the only way the limits really matter is if you have to have 4K. In that case, it’s probably best to join the Ultimate. It’s unlimited and you get 4K. The cost of it may make you decide you don’t have to have 4K. It’s $69.95/mo. If you have a fast internet connection and want 4K, I would do the Ultimate. Set aside a month per year just for In the Crack. It’s what I do.
You will see models’ prettiest content and possibly dirtiest content on this site. You don’t like pictures? Try the pictures from In the Crack. The only thing that stops the 100 is I know the price combined with tiers is just not going to set well with some people. The content itself is an easy 100. I wouldn’t even suggest them to change their tiers or price. It’s something you have to try and see for yourself that if (enter site name) is worth $19.95/mo, In the Crack is worth $34.95 or more per month.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best throwback-style solo female sites.
- Large site/series with over 1,000 scenes.
- Arguably the best-looking group of young models you will ever see. Especially if you’re into natural looking models not into glam.
- Newest videos have 4K, most of the rest have at least HD or 720 and 1080p downloads. (have to pay higher join price to get downloads, it’s worth it).
- Could stand on its own but comes with the stellar Cherry Pimps network.
- Fast download speeds at 90% of my max.
- Nearly 700 models and high quality photosets with downloadable zips.
Cons:
- It’s not updating, at least not specifically, the 2020/2021/2022 scenes that look like they would fit in this series are just being uploaded directly to Cherry Pimps now.
- Prices could be better. It costs $29.95 per month with downloads. The only promos I have found were for streaming-only.
Bottom Line:
Cherry Spot is like a trip back to the days of simpler porn. The kind of porn I love. Get a pretty model, give her a cute outfit that doesn’t look like she’s going to a ballroom dance and let her be herself. Not a porn star, not a sexual object, just a young woman that is turned on knowing someone wants to see her naked and enjoying her body. That’s what Cherry Spot does. It may do it better than any other solo model focused series or site does it.
The orgasms are real, the scenes are not that long, and the models hit those faces that you know they wouldn’t make if they were more worried about their image as a model. You can even see some laugh and roll their eyes in a playful way like, “I can’t believe I lost control.” The only site I know of that still gets models to do that on a regular basis is FTV. Cherry Spot is a part of Cherry Pimps network, and it does have its own section on the network. Part of that is because the network is so large. That is one way to save some money too, join for 3 months or a year. A year membership is only $99, and it includes unlimited downloads. It’s the only network I currently have an ongoing year membership to.
Everything is simple including the navigation. The scenes do not want to tell you a story. Just watch the model and you will know what they’re going for. She grins a lot at first, she takes some clothes off and maybe gives you a wink. She lays down on the bed or sits in a chair and her eyes tell you (at least me) to come to her and watch close. Someone at Cherry Pimps has a lot of experience in working with solo models. The models finger, toy, moan and spread wide for you to see. Man, or female watching, doesn’t matter, both know where to lick to make the model happy. Both know where to stick a plastic dick or a real one. The models do seem to use that style of thinking in their solo play. You can watch how many of the start out playing with their clit, then once wet, they stick their fingers in. I don’t know if they look, they give when they stick their fingers in is of how good their fingers feel going in or how wet and warm, they feel inside. I just know it works for me.
It helps that the models are all attractive with most being in the highest tier of attractiveness. I used to think solo porn struggled due to the models being too inexperienced. The models didn’t really respond to the solo play. These models do and love it. Should there be a pro for how good the production and direction are? That does look like the case. I have seen these models on other sites without near the enthusiasm they have when working with the Cherry Pimps. While the site is not updating, it’s not a complete loss since Cherry Pimps has the new scenes and updates that would have been updated onto this site. This just gives you a more focused, less searching, way to see the 1,000+ videos of solo models showing how solo porn should be.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. You can usually find a holiday special of $60/year. The regular price with a PU discount is $120.
-New Sensations has around 15 sites. You get access to all the sites, none require a premium upgrade.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. No captcha or other problems.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-They did a network update, and made the public page and member pages refreshed with bigger thumbnails that makes the network and sites more appealing.
-A lot of attractive models. You can find loads of attractive models at many hard and soft porn sites. I can't say these models are exceptional, but many are attractive to very attractive.
-You can stream videos, or download them, in 720p, 1080p, 4K in 2 different bit rates for each definition.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-Last update was in February 2021.
-A page of ads when you log in, before you get to the member's area.
-Ads on every member page.
-The plots are mainly simplistic. Most porn stars/models are not very good actors. So you're depending on the model's good looks and acting ability to create some heat. Some models are fine actors, or they have some chemistry that jumps off the monitor to make a photo or video have heat.
-Lots of toy use. That's a plus or minus, depending on your personal preference. Hitachi wand (the big-sized vibrator) and Sybian saddle (a vibrating dildo that a woman can ride) in different videos.
-A fair number of the videos are interview of the models. Again, a plus or minus, depending on your personal preference. If I like a model, I'm more interested in her interview.
Bottom Line:
Site theme is lesbians having sex.
I think the plots are minimal. Many of the plots involve sex between a younger woman and an older woman (older woman in her late 30s or 40s). Many of the older women have breast implants.
Ivy Wolfe is a slut. I think she retired from porn in 2018. Cute face, slender body. She can put on a show. When I say "slut", I don't mean to be dis-respectful. I'm teasing. Ivy is lovely (she's more like cute or slightly pretty) and fucking hot.
Compare her to Alya Stark (aka Arya Stark), who is physically lovely, but her porn scenes are more sensual, not the same eroticism or heat, but Alya Stark is so gorgeous, you just want to kiss and lick and fuck that gorgeous face and body for hours.
Both models put on a show that's believable, and the models really seem to be getting off.
Note: Ivy Wolfe appears in Four Finger Club and HotWifeXXX.
Alya Stark does not appear in New Sensations, but I used her an example of a lovely young model (physically) who puts on a wonderful show.
Some of the videos have really attractive women.
And the videos can be slow, sensual, fun. Watch Eden Arya (aka Eden Addams) and Riley Nixon having some fun. Video titled "Eden's Trust Riley Will Take It Further", posted 08/18/2017.
Bottom line: there are plenty of cute or attractive models at the site.
And many of the videos are definitely worth watching.
You just have to sort through to find the videos that appeal to you.
The main benefit of the site is that it's part of the New Sensations network, which has a lot of attractive models, and a lot of videos and photosets that are worth examining.
I don't think this is one of the better lesbian sites, because I don't enjoy too many of the videos. But that's just me. If you personally enjoy more of the videos, then the site will have more value for you.
But I definitely think the site (and the network) are worth joining. Especially if you can find a $60/year membership.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many beautiful Eastern European barely legal and twenty something young ladies
All the videos are available in 4K
I felt these were very natural and real orgasms.
Has good sensuality between the models
Easy navigation
Cons:
Only 37 videos. May not be updating as TBP shows 34 last February, one year ago.
Does not come with any other sites or extras.
Background music
Bottom Line:
I love seeing orgasms in videos, whether it is a heterosexual couple, a gay couple, a lesbian couple or a threesome with any combination including bisexual and transgender. I am very heterosexual, but I have to admit to a curiosity about women. I think most women are curious, but not all of us admit that. I have a friend that I have not experimented with, who is seriously into lesbian sex. She told me that you do what you do when you masturbate, but you do it to and with someone else. I have also heard that another woman can push your buttons in a different way than men are capable of. The dynamic is completely different. I also realize that I can’t speak from experience.
One thing I can recognize is if an orgasm is real or if a model is only going through the motions and faking it. When I see a woman tense up, lose focus, shake, even lose control, I know what I am witnessing. That to me is how I know it is the real thing. I can easily identify with the model and that makes me get off.
These women are Europeans, not Americans and to me they look very exotic. Mostly they are very fair in complexion and have either light brown hair, or blondes or redheads. In India we don’t have that kind of variety. Besides the fantasy of being with another woman, now there is also the fantasy of her being a stark contrast with most people from my native country. Another contrast is how young and eager these women are. I see attractive women in their early to late twenties who are still exploring their sexuality.
The scenes seem to be mostly spontaneous and not overly directed. The setup is there, but what happens looks to be whatever the women get in the mood for. In one scene, two women are in a secluded park. They do what comes naturally as they feel they are alone and not being watched or judged. In another, a female friend goes to visit a woman in the hospital. She is so happy to see her friend that they end up doing the deed. Ok it does not look like a hospital and it is all too convenient that no one stumbles into the room. You just have to go along with it as this is a porn fantasy, not Hollywood. But the sex works well and that is pretty much what I came for.
The sex is not abusive or femdom and it is not only soft pussy licking either. Basically you get just about everything that women can do together. You get pussy licking with a lot of clit sucking, but also ass licking. You get gentle fingering of both pussy and ass. You get massages using oil and there is always a happy ending. You get dildos, vibrators and Hitachi wands. You get some strap on use, but it is not as aggressive or abusive as some sites. You get scissoring that seems to work for the models as a last step towards an orgasm.
The site is easy to use and you can search, but there are no tags. The site does not include any other extras. The women are beautiful. The sets are fantastic. The camerawork is first rate. What more can I ask for? Well there are only 37 scenes and I fear the site is no longer updating. I like what I saw here, but I think this site belongs in a network as an extra.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I found the Eastern European models to be very pretty
4K is an option
Very different for a site with women who are alone (see below)
Bonus scenes as a reward for long term membership
Interesting pussy classifications
No download limits
Daily update of either a video or a photoset
Cons:
Not much variety in the models or the locations
The scenes can become boring if this is not your taste (see below)
No discount offered by Porn Users. This site is not cheap, but worth it for the quality.
Bottom Line:
Most sites that have women showing off their bodies are primarily photo sites with a few videos that are not well done. Some other sites focus on videos of women masturbating. While the videos on this site sometimes have masturbation, the ones I like the best are those where the woman is proudly exhibiting her girly parts.
Some of my friends and I have shared with each other that we have a fantasy fetish of being examined by a gynecologist. There is just a tingly feeling we get knowing a man is seeing what makes us women. While there are no men as doctors or as any other role on the site in any scene, the use of a speculum is a part of a medical fetish. Some scenes use an endoscope to have a camera show what is deep inside. Here you will also find a pussycam, as well as a metallic gizmo pussy spreader, both things I had no idea existed before this.
The main focus on the site is a lot of pussy spreading and even gaping vaginally. In some scenes, there is a second or even a third woman. You might expect some lesbian sex, but there is none. When the scene evolves to the point where I would have expecting pussy licking, fingering or clit massaging, they put on a show just for you. The focus changes from them and what would make them happy, to what would make you happy to see. What you see is the women spreading each other, showing each other to the camera and that often involves mirroring. I find that insanely hot as both women are doing the same things side by side and it makes for some unforgettable heat and striking visuals. Sometimes there is fisting or a focus on using dildos or wands on each other. I got the feeling that the site is made for me and my pleasure and they do most definitely try hard to please.
The type of scene that I liked best were the outdoor exhibitionist ones. In most of those the women were in a secluded safe place such as under a bridge. A quick glance to see if it is safe and then a little more explicit. Eventually they are there, as carefree with their bodies as the day they were born. Many of these women clearly enjoy the sexy show that makes them moist. Some other scenes were shot indoors on a bed or on a staircase. I liked those scenes as well, but there is something daring and stimulating about risking getting caught outdoors.
Many times I felt that the women were too attractive to do such extreme spreading, but that is part of what makes this site so effective. You come here for the models and they leave you speechless with their performances. Nearly all the models are Czech or from another Eastern European country. Those places have mostly thin white women, so there is not much diversity. A few are a little older, at least one is pregnant, and I found some are porn stars I recognize, such as Lexi Dona. Some may be amateurs, but I just don’t know. I was surprised to see two black women mixed in. That leads me to wonder, could I do this? I can’t, I am not that kind of daring or self confident. I can see this site as something I can relate to as a woman and that is saying a lot.
The site has tags and they seem to be adequate, as is the ease with which I used the website. One thing also worth mentioning is that pussies are classified as shaved with over 1100 videos, trimmed over 300, hairy 36, huge almost 500, tight 200, juicy almost 300, and tongue 90 videos, which is a pussy with an extra fold. I am sure there is an overlap here as a shaved pussy might also be a juicy one. There has been a history of a video or a photo update every day and the archive is large with over 1400 videos. You even get extra bonus videos for a membership of at least three months.
For me the site was interesting, but the scenes may get boring for those looking for more sex. This site works for me, but I think for some people my advice would be a one month membership. I would add that you get what you pay for. The site is well worth the price, but wish there was a discount.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The models are beautiful and varied in body type, race and most seem kinky.
- More anal than I am used to seeing on a lesbian site, of the 153 scenes, 91 are tagged as having anal but I think the number may be higher than that.
- The scenes are long (most are over 30 minutes) and you get to see all sides of each woman.
- The tags say 65 of the scenes feature “scissoring” or tribbing, again, that number looks a little low. (See bottom line)
- My download speeds are very good at 80-85% of my max.
- Useful, navigation tricks including a download scene button on the scene preview or main page, you can also favorite scenes which are stored in your favorites.
- Very little clutter, clean lines, only one ad at the bottom and nice layout.
- High quality on videos.
Cons:
- It’s not updating enough. It updates once per month and isn’t that big of a site as it is with 153 scenes.
- Tries to get too cute with some of the scenes like the inflatable pool filled with plastic balls. They have multiple scenes using the inflatable pool.
Bottom Line:
Lesbian porn is a genre I like quite a bit and there are specific parts I prefer in it. My favorites are tribadism, which porn has decided is either called scissoring or tribbing. It is the act of rubbing the clits together or even the thighs. I am not a huge fan of anal in male/female scenes but I do like it in lesbian scenes and even solo scenes, though there are no solo scenes on this site. Something that could be seen as a con to some is the use of toys and strapons. I don’t mind either in lesbian scenes. There’s something about my imagination thinking that means they are thinking about a man (me) being there with them.
This is more along the lines of hardcore lesbian porn. Even if the tags are right more than half of the scenes have anal in them. This is not like the lesbian scenes you see on a lot of the younger/teen sites. This is more involved. Something I regularly admit is I like different body types. Lesbian porn is one of the best genres, for me, to see the “chubbier” models and there are some on this site. I’m not even for sure why I like the chubbier lesbians. You also have the more “perfect” type models like Alexis Tae and Ember Snow. There are a couple of these scenes that top my list as the most hardcore lesbian scenes I’ve seen. The Alexis Tae with Adira Allure scene titled, “Hardcore Interracial Lesbians” is very intense. I’m surprised they stopped filming. I believe they could have made a 2-3 hour scene with just those two in it. Gia Derza and Scarlit Scandal also have an intense scene titled, “Extreme Desire” that makes me look at lesbian porn differently than what I’m used to from European studios. Those aren’t even the best scenes on the site either. I don’t know if maybe one of the model’s changed her name. The models listed are Karlee Gray and Kuleana, the scene is titled, “Violent Starr’s 1st Lesbian Anal”. It’s nearly 40 minutes long and I would be surprised if those two are not real life lovers. There also is one with the forever gorgeous Sophia Leone with Eliza Ibarra that shows this site also has the near perfect 10 models in some of the scenes.
I do question if the tags are right. Nearly every scene I’ve watched has “scissoring” but only 65 are tagged that way out of 153. Who is complaining? The flip side of things I like in lesbian porn are things I don’t like and this site avoids those. I don’t really like the lesbian scenes with more than 2 women in them. There’s too much going on when there are more than 2. Women already have two boobs, a butt and a pussy to look at, plus I look at the face and hair. I’m going to need more eyes if you put more than 2 women. That’s my way of saying there are not enough camera angles when you have too many women in a scene having lesbian sex.
The biggest complaint I have is they only have 153 scenes and are only updating once per month. In my many years of reviewing, I’ve said it several times, the best compliment I can give a site is for my biggest complaint to be they need more content. I wouldn’t feel that way if the content wasn’t good.
The technical quality on the videos keeps up with the looks and performances of the models. The newer videos have 4K download option. The oldest video has 1080p, 720p, 540p and the smaller mobile versions too. The picture sets are downloadable too. The pictures could have a higher resolution for my taste in photos but at least they have those. Speaking of the oldest video, it’s another one worth mentioning. It is Abella Danger and Chanell Heart in a scene titled, “Big Booty Interracial Anal”. It’s nearly 40 minutes and features Abella being as kinky as I’ve seen her with multiple finger anal fingering of Chanell. There really are 5-10 scenes on here that are worth joining just for those scenes.
They do explore other fetishes in a few scenes including pissing, squirting and you have some older women with younger women scenes too. This is one of those sites that would be perfect if it had weekly updates (minimum). This, from the real-life lesbians I know, is more like what lesbian sex really is like compared to the heavily romantic lesbian porn most sites have on them.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations networks (27 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
- 4K videos available (no extra charge)
- There's PLOT. I like the action has an explanation. Nothing is stale they mix in plenty of plot devices so each scene feels fresh
- Mix of MILF and new talent.
- Great talent including LAUREN PHILLIPS. Mercedes Carrera, Lexi Belle, Riley Nixon, Brett Rossi, Cherie DeVille. I discovered plenty of new (to me) talent here to (I'm guessing many new stars start out with girl-girl)
- Decent search (some tags but too limited), search bar
- Approx 500 scenes (warning! includes BTS/interviews) - that's a big back catalog for a site like this
Cons:
- Star rating system
- excellent production lighting/set/talent everything looks great
- Symbian and Hitachi are used so much they should be sponsors (LOL!)
CONS:
- No longer updating(?) The last update was 2/21
- When they were updating it was spotty 2X/month and then nothing for a while. Then 4 times in a month
- off theme. While they probably have 100+ "stretching" focused 4-finger banging shoots. There's a LOT (A LOT, A LOT) of other girl-gril action cross-posted here from other parts of the network.
- little diversity (unless you count hair color and trimming regiment). There are very few women of size (most are porn valley clones - the MILFs tend to be an exception). Hardly any ethnic diversity. (unlike the rest of the network were they seem to be putting in real effort
- No user forum/comments available
- No previews available either download it or stream it to see if it's what you're looking for
- Ads behind a paywall (seems like everyone is doing it these days)
Bottom Line:
I like the more extreme stretching theme. I wish they had more consistency. Basically, before you're gonna go extreme like that you have to build a really hot scene so I think those shoots are some of the best girl-girl porn shoots.
So despite all fourfingerclub.com has going for it I can't go any higher with the score. It seems like they're giving up on updates and they mix in a ton of off-brand content.
I have to give it to them they do a lot of stuff right but to move into the A range they've got to give us fans more.
Buy or Pass. Because of the strength of the network, I think you have to give this a buy. But don't put it at the top of your list.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Launched in 2011. All female action featuring mostly A-Lister talent (there were some short career girls in the back catalog. Some one and dones)
- Decent picture galleries. Normal progression strip then action. I will say the model positioning is better than most. Unlike other sites where several out-of-focus pictures are sprinkled in. Here everyone is a winner
- High-quality video. It's gotta be 1080 at least cause it looks amazing on my old monitor (no 4K for me)
- Some top scenes to look out for: Spencer Bradley, Liv Revamped, Skye Blue, Molly Stewart, Lauren Phillips with Lisey Sweet (I normally don't care for food play but these two were AMAZING together)
- fun silly vibe it seems like the talent all got along and were just being playful and enjoying
- hot dialog. I'm a fan of dirty talk so this put a big plus down when I noticed that
- Tags available
- Good descriptions of each shoot
- Streaming player has advanced controls (skip 10sor 30s, volume, full-screen toggle)
Cons:
PRO cont:
- like/dislike, favorite, watch later allow for flexible scene sorting.
- short plots than straight to the action. There's novelty and for sure a fun vibe that is apparent at every turn
- Professional production the action is always well staged and the direction is good. Staging, costumes and directing are always good. You can tell that they don't cheap out on details.
Good back log at just under 500 scenes
- update schedule about 1X/Week
CONS
- download will cost you extra (one fee gets you both .zip downloads of photo galleries and video shoots).
- ads behind the paywall. Heck, you have to click past an ad every time you log back in
- No previewing/trailer available. So you have to check out the pictures or skip through the video to see if it's your thing
- limited model diversity. Some ethnic diversity but not much. Most body types are straight from porn general casting. Tattoos are common (I think that can be hot but I know some are opinionated. Same thing with boobs)
Bottom Line:
While girl-girl isn't my go to most of the time I really liked this site. I appreciated the high production value. You can tell time and money was spent to make everything look beautiful. The talent is all top of the line. As girl-girl action goes I think this is solid and well done
Everything here is solid. So why not a A+ score (good question). If anything they could go with some more creativity. I'd like so see parody/"public"/Cuckoldress/etc. The site could be better with some series or something on-going.
- To be clear that is really knit picking. This sites is a home run and should be on anyone's buy list
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Time network. Which means you get a massive amount of quality porn with your membership.
-Customer support from FameSupport, which has a live chat line that is answered almost immediately. Support is 24/7, for live chat, email and telephone. Probably the best online support I've ever had, because of the live chat option.
-Videos are available for download and streaming from 160p thru 2160p.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. There is a daily download limit of 300 GB, which seems like a huge amount of data to download.
-There is a photo set gallery for each video. The photo sets run around 35 photos per set, which seems small.
-Lola Fae, Chloe Foster, Jill Kassidy, Sophia Lux, Bunny Colby, Scarlett Sage, are just a few of the attractive models appearing at the site.
Cons:
-As part of the Adult Time network, you also get navigation problems: finding all the content at this site, or at other sites in the Adult Time network, can be a real headache.
-The photo sets download with a default numerical file name. So you have to rename them with the model's name, site, title, and posting date.
-The photo sets are OK photos: could be much better quality, especially when the models are cute. They are better than some screen caps, but you wouldn't collect them for presenting the models attractively, even when the models are naturally attractive.
-The videos often have a plot leading up to the sex. But that just shows how poor some of the models are in acting. However, I forgive them for poor acting ability, especially when the models are cute.
Bottom Line:
There are plenty of lesbian sites online.
I think Girlfriends Films is a good lesbian site. Not great, but good.
You have some very attractive young models.
You have a mix of young and old lesbians, with different body types.
They add a plot to create greater meaning for the sex, but the plots don't mean much.
Add weak plots with weaker acting skills, and like most porn, you have to turn off your brain to enjoy these videos. There are some sites that have interesting story lines, and the models and stunt cocks do a decent to good acting job, but these are in the minority. Pure Taboo comes to mind, and Viv Thomas has some very fine scenes. But Pure Taboo and Viv Thomas are premium porn sites, watching their videos is like watching a cinematic movie.
Giving GirlFriends Films a score of 85. If you're into lesbian porn, the Adult Time network has several channels that fit the bill, plus other channels that have some lesbian porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Billed by Segpay which is very safe to use.
Inexpensive at only $14.95
Mostly American pornstars that I like
Links to discounts for other sites
Professional camera work and directing
Cons:
It has not updated since May.
Only 35 videos
Only three download options and the best is Full HD
There are tags for searching for what you like
Does not come with other sites
Bottom Line:
Despite the fact that there are only 35 videos and there may never be another update, I really like this site. Although I have never been with a woman sexually, I find the idea very appealing. I find most lesbian porn sites are not to my taste with a lot of overacting and fake moaning. In those mainstream sites, the production values are low and the appeal to women is nonexistent. In contrast you find here that the actual sex is very realistic and a joy to watch, with nice production values. Instead of the ordinary quality you see In most porn, these scenes look like they were made by video professionals. A few even have simple, but interesting special effects. The scenes are explicit but not overdone sleazy. There is a lot of licking, toy play, scissoring, fingering, strap on play, pussy shaving and even the use of a sex machine by the two women.
I recognized many of the models as they are Americans known for lesbian sex on other sites. The younger models are fresh with enthusiasm and seem to really enjoy the scenes. These younger models are portrayed as innocently exploring sexuality either with other young models or with older more experienced women. Some themes portrayed here are college age schoolgirls enjoying each other, sorority members getting it on, boss with younger employee, babysitter with mother. This gives the scenes an appeal that is using a uniform fetish, a college fetish, older/younger lesbian as well as dominant/submissive roleplay as there is also some light BDSM. The most popular scene is Girls Naughty Naked Night Out, which is a four way. Four young ladies of college age go to a strip club, where they laughingly enjoy seeing a stripper on a pole. They give her tips, but she does not strip or get in on the fun once it starts. What you see are women in short skirts, well made up, who are going out for fun as none have a date that night. This sounds like a fantasy I might have, or was something I might have done when I was younger. They come across as a group of good friends who know each other well. I could imagine myself having been in that group, getting giggly and silly along with them. This is porn that captures my imagination and is not just made to satisfy men’s fantasies about imaginary lesbian encounters. They do what comes naturally as a result of having been friends first. You can see the action evolving as the heat builds. They got hot and then I got hot. What could be better than that?
My only complaints include a minor one. When you open a page on the site, the video starts on autoplay. If you want faster downloading you have to turn it off. A much more serious matter is that the site appears to not be updating any longer. With 35 videos, I would appreciate a lot more. I want to ask if they have any plans to keep the site actively growing, but the only customer service links were for billing problems. What you do get is well worth joining for.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Comes with Lets Doe It Network
Labor Day Sale price of $9.94 for a month
Great looking pornstars and some I think are amateurs
Highest quality production values
Uses tags for easy searching, however searching is across the network
Cons:
Monthly download limit of 100 videos for the network as a whole
Only 80 scenes
Has not updated since September 2017
Bottom Line:
For me when I think of the word quest, I imagine a long complicated story with a hero looking for something rare and difficult to reach. In contrast, this site is about heroines finding female sexual empowerment by masturbating. These heroines could easily be me or really any modern woman. I could also imagine these videos being used as a teaching guide for women on how to satisfy those urges we all get. This quest can be fulfilled with a site like this showing how.
The women are all portrayed as pretty, but not different from you or me. The scenes start with interviews, with both them and the interviewer having difficulty with English. This helps me see their sincerity when they answer questions about their education, hobbies and non sexual interests. They laugh, they smile, they explain and it all makes me feel I know them and want to learn more. A few are described as pornstars, such as the superstar Alexis Crystal, but mostly they appear to be naturally beautiful young ladies who want to make a little money doing what comes across as what they do every day in their personal lives. Porn interviews generally don’t hold much interest for me, but these I loved.
The scenes vary in length, but the interviews are about a third of each scene. The models do what they said they like, using fingers, a few videos have fisting, dildos, other toys, but especially wands. Some videos would work well as commercials for wand companies. The orgasms are depicted as real and I am sure they are. In some the expressions on their faces are an indicator of the intensity, and in many their whole body shakes. I see myself in these models and their videos.
The feeling of the site is that the production is professional, even if some of the models are not. They use multiple cameras and the scenes focus changes as necessary. The makeup is great and so are the locations. As there are only 80 scenes, I was left wondering why there are not a few more. Surely there must be many more models who would be willing to do scenes of this quality. They are made to look their best and portrayed as women to be appreciated. But, the last update was four years ago.
This site comes with the Lets Doe it Network, which I really loved. Right now there is a special low price of $9.94 for a month and this site alone is worth a lot more than that.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
