Sir, thanks for checking up on me
My health hasn't been very good lately, so I have been spending a lot less time at the PU site. Getting old, I guess. I'm close to 80.
But a pretty girl is still able to make my heart beat faster.
LOL.
Take care of yourself.
You don't appreciate how important good health is, until it starts to go away.
But I hope I have a few good years left for me, to enjoy the world of porn.
I don't remember the sites from 10 years ago.
The star of the network, in my opinion, is the nubiles.net site, which is like an encyclopedia of young starlets just starting out in porn.
That is the main reason I subscribe to this network.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. This is becoming rare in today's porn world, where many sites either limit downloads, or make you pay extra for downloads, or eliminate downloads from some memberships.
-The site features many of the most beautiful women in the world. At one time (back before the internet), this would have been a massive selling point. But with sites like Metart (and it's sister sites), MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., sites with beautiful women are a commodity. It doesn't take away from the beauty and quality of the models, but it's human nature to devalue what is so freely available.
-However, the quality of the photography is excellent, and easily compares to the best that sites like Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy offer. The attractive models (I downplay the models, because many of these models are equisite and breathtaking and filmed with care) are a delight to look at.
-Site updates 3-4x per week.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Payment is easy: You can pay with a credit card (Visa or Mastercard), PayPal, or Crypto. I'm old-fashioned, but if you pay with Crypto, I've read that if you're a US citizen, you will have to include on your income tax report your short-term and long-term cryptocurrency gains and losses on Form 8949. Not reporting all crypto gains and losses is considered tax fraud.
So I'm glad I haven't had this problem yet.
-The mix of women is broader than traditional sites like Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy. You get your normal selection of white models, but you also get a strong element of Black, Indigenous, and people of color. This will be a plus for PU members who are craving something beyond the white models normally seen.
-I don't think of this as a mega-site like Metart or MPL Studios, but there is a large amount of photo sets and videos packed into the site. The layout is easy to navigate. The quality of the images is top-notch. You have hundreds of glamorous girls for your
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):viewing pleasure. Hundreds of lovely girls in thousands of photosets, hundreds of videos of these stunning models, the videos are mainly solo shoots, with the girls moving around and exposing their lovely bodies, having some sexual fun with other female models or masturbating by themselves.
-Listed price is $29.95/month. But PU offers a discount of $14.95 for the first month. Or if you look around, you can probably find a $9.95/month discounted special.
Hundreds of lovely girls in thousands of photosets, hundreds of videos of these stunning models, the videos are mainly solo shoots, with the girls moving around and exposing their lovely bodies, having some sexual fun with other female models or masturbating by themselves.
CONS(START 0F):
-I think the cons are basically minor for the site.
-Personally, I'm not a big fan of tattoos on women. But it's becoming more and more common over the years. And many of the Watch4Beauty models are into tattoos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Normal for almost all porn sites.
-My biggest con is that I wish there was more content of most of my favorite models at the site. Some models do one or two shoots, and then move on to other web sites.
-Years ago there used to be a few bonus sites, but they dropped them. However, the site contents is well worth the money to join, if you are into lovely young women stripping and showing off their bodies for your viewing pleasure.
-I'm more familiar with the download system used at Metart, Femjoy, etc, where you can easily select the video of your choice and the file defintion, or the photo set of your choice and the file definition, but the Watch$Beauty system, while not as refined, is still usable.
-Sometimes the file download speeds seem sluggish. I wish they were faster downloads.
BOTTOM LINE
The emphasis is on the photos. There are hundreds of videos that are definitely worth watching, but the true value, for me, is the photo sets.
I could stare for hours at Rinna's 2 photo sets. She's such a luscious model, young, vibrant, fresh, lovely, charming.
In summary, I believe I've listed the main reasons for joining this site. Gorgeous models representing a wide variety of ethnic types, top class photography, a mix of high-rent locations where the girls are having fun exploring their lucious bodies. They freshen up with the offerings with casting, peeing, masturbation, girlsinlove. So they put more thought and care into the shoots than most softcore photo sites.
The PU internal email system has been broken for years.
I know for a fact that many of the emails I've sent through the PU internal email system were never delivered.
In a normal email system, if an email you sent is not delivered, you get an automatic message stating your email was not delivered.
But not for the PU internal email system.
So, unless the intended recipient responds in some way, letting you know he/she never got the email, you don't know if they ever got it.
PU needs to hire an expert to continually work on the site update it to keep it working.
But I don't think they have the money to fix the problems.
I was told years ago that the coding for the PU site was written in an old software language that not many coders use any more.
So that's part of the problem. The PU system is breaking down, and that's why all members are now listed as newbies, with 0 reviews to their name, because the software program that kept track of the number of reviews a member had accepted stopped working. Or why you can't review a site in less than a year, even though the rules say that you can review a site in 6 months after your previous review of the site.
But at least the site is still here, even though many of the fine members we used to have have vanished.
Wraith, good to hear from you, buddy.
Seems like interest in the PU site is slowly going down, older members finding better things to do.
I think the spandex, latex, and pantyhose is just to add to the element of sophistication of the costumes. Or you can think of it as a fetish thing. Personally, I'm not into fetish spandex, latex or pantyhose, but I do think it adds slightly to the overall vibe or sophistication the site is trying to inject.
Not a big thing, in my opinion, just adding a bit of fluff to the mixture.
I'm new to the site, but plan to go over the videos and photosets when I have the time.
Many of the girls are from the Metart stable of models. But I appreciate the clear, crisp images, the vibrant colors of the sets, and the lovely models. Who seem to be putting on a great show, one that is more believable than most of the hardcore lez action at other sites, especially the teen-themed lez sites where the plots are basically silly.
At this site they appear to be trying to show the attraction between two or more models that turns into a hot, seductive scene.
But it's early days for me at this site. Maybe I will lose interest quickly, which I hope not. Because from my brief introduction, this site seems like a keeper, for me.
I do remember the old PU days fondly, where there was a real community spirit, with members constantly jumping in with new, fresh reviews, comments, ideas. But maybe that's partly because of the glamour that time presses on our memories: "Remember the old days, when things were better." But if you look closely, the better things are what's taking place today. We just don't realize it until much later.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the sites under the Metart banner. This site features all the bells and whistles of the main Metart layout and features:
-Simplified layout, makes browsing the site easy.
-Premium photo sets, with first rate photographers doing the shoots.
So the photos are basically crystal clear, nicely focused, wonderful skin tones, etc.
-The videos are far superior to most videos at the Metart.com site: Two reasons for this:
-This site allows a far higher element of sexual hardcore than the main Metart site.
-Whoever is directing the videos (and the photo sets), is showing two women not only kissing, licking and sucking, but fucking as well (with a strap-on dildo, but it makes for a nice change from a guy boffing a woman).
-So the photo sets and videos are basically high-class glamour lez action with strap-ons, in wonderful color, with crisp, excellent photography for the videos and photo sets.
-The selection of models is top notch. These girls are often featured at other Metart sites,
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
but here, they seem to shine even brighter. Maybe it's just acting, but the girls seem to be having fun and are into the sex. Which adds sparkle to the photo sets and videos. I have often complained that most Metart videos are boring, no matter how lovely the Metart model may be.
But at Straplez, I enjoy looking through the photo sets, and really enjoy the videos. That might be because this is my first time at the site, but it's been a very pleasing membership so far.
-PU has a discounted price of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month.
-All content is exclusive.
-No download limits, which is becoming rare at porn sites.
-The models dress in attractive lingerie: nice bra and panties, nylons, stockings, etc. Which adds to the glamour of the scene.
-The newer videos are available in 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p, and 4k UHD.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Porn Users lists the site as "Strap Lezz". But the site calls itself "Strap Lez", with only a single "z" in the name.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Photos have a watermark, but it's small and usually located in the bottom right corner, so a very minor con.
-Like all Metart sites, this is a stand-alone site. You don't get access to other sites when you join strap-lez.
-The video coding seems very inefficient.
The 4k UHD file size is large, up to 12 GB.
By comparison, the 1080p video is only 1 GB.
What is strange, is that the 720p video is also 1 GB.
(All sizes were for the same video.)
You downsize to 360p, and the file size is 415 MB.
Just look at the 4k UHD, which is 12 GB at StrapLez.
On Metart, 4k UHD videos are 3 to 5 GB.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
If you are into lez action, I suggest giving the site at least a one-month visit.
I found this to be one of the better lez sites on the internet. Extremely attractive models, simple but effective plots (even if it's just two or more females hugging and kissing and licking before they get into the sex). Plus the elements of sophistication and glamour and quality settings and quality costumes. There is nothing cheap about the site, the photo sets, or the videos. This is a first-class website.
The site features attractive models performing as lesbians.
Since these are porn stars, I don't know how many of these models are real lesbians, or just performing for pay.
But the performance these women put on is both sensual and erotic.
You get regular updates, unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. Around 9 updates per month (a mix of photosets and videos).
Since the first month is only $9.95 (recurs at $19.99/month), I highly recommend checking the site out.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $75/year. Or $400 for a lifetime membership. But I've read one PU member complaining he paid for a lifetime membership to Hegre, then it somehow got cancelled. I've read other people saying their lifetime memberships to other sites have been cancelled (to Playboy+, for example.) It even happened to me, at Glam Deluxe, while it was still alive.
-Some of the most gorgeous women in the world have appeared nude at Hegre. Except the same can be said for many of the best softcore sites on the internet: Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc. etc.
-The quality of the photographs is first-rate.
-The technical features for viewing the photographs is outstanding. One of the best sites for viewing photo sets online I've ever seen. Can flick through the photos, or examine them in detail.
-Photo sets are available in original, large size, medium size, and small size definition.
Cons:
-The photos are basically boring and sterile for me. Yes, there are lots of beautiful models, but there is a lack of eroticism to the photos. For one thing, the photographer seems to have created his photo sets by setting the camera to automatic, and it goes click-click-click-click while the model barely moves or changes her position. For another, he often cuts off part of the model's face.
I think the photographer is treating the model as a statue or a piece of meat, not as a real human person you want to relate to.
-Years ago, Hegre was softcore photosets. But for many years now, the site has featured mid-core and hard photos and videos.
-Maybe it's just me, but the Hegre hardcore photos and videos are just not arousing or exciting. The site seems sterile to me, in spite of the gorgeous models. If you have the same model at Hegre and at Metart or MPL studios or Femjoy (which are basically softcore), I much prefer the Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy photo sets, because the model seems
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
much more human.
Note: I'm now into my 70s, so I'm not as sensitive to nudity or semi-nudity as I was when I was younger. But I fail to appreciate most of the content at Hegre, while I can still find images from Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy that are enjoyable or arousing.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
The photo sets are technically first-rate photography, but in spite of the lovely models, I find the photos sterile.
I appreciate the technical features of the Hegre site: how easy it is to flick through a photo set, to enlarge any photo to examine it, the quality of the photos. Except the photos are sterile and boring. Boring because the images are a montage of a camera set to automatically capture a composite of the model who is barely moving, so each photo is almost an exact duplicate of the photo before it. Seems like a quick way to create a boring photo set, to me. With no thought to make it meaningful.
Then why am I a member for over a year?
Because I originally signed up for a year's membership, and then forgot to cancel.
Hegre has some truly lovely models. But I just can't appreciate the photography. Or the videos, which are now hardcore. I have nothing against hardcore, but I don't enjoy the hardcore at Hegre.
What I've written is my own personal opinion.
Most other PU member reviews that I've seen have rated Hegre in the 90s, and think it's one of the better high quality sites on the internet.
So, I suggest joining the site for a month, to see what the site has to offer, if it appeals to your tastes.
You might find it is a quality site that is definitely worth joining for a year or more.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Probably the finest softcore porn site in the world. The site empasizes photo sets, but also has thousands of softcore videos.
-The site has thousands of models, many of them some of the most beautiful models in the world.
-The models are mainly white Eastern European teens, but there is a large number of models in their twenties and thirties as well.
Most of the older models started their careers as teens, and continued as models for years afterward.
-The site updates with 4 models each day, except for the first day of each month, where you get updates for 6 models. No other site (softcore glamour) comes close to the daily update rate of Metart.
-The photography at the site comes from hundreds of professional photographers, the largest stable of photographers of any site I know of.
Cons:
-The amount of softcore content at the site is huge. And that is a problem: You don't appreciate the quality of the photo sets because there are so many gorgeous models on display. That's human nature.
-The site structure is organized for easy navigation. The search is excellent. That's a plus, obviously, but people take the excellent organization and search capabilities for granted. Again, it's human nature to discount what you have in abundance.
-Most of the Metart videos are boring, in spite of how lovely the models can be. I don't know why. Softcore videos can be erotic, but I find that most photo sets are far more erotic than the videos. I'm guessing that there are too many factors that go into creating a video, and that it's easier or simpler to make an erotic photograph than an erotic video.
Bottom Line:
Metart is the finest softcore site I've ever found. Many of the models are some of the most beautiful women in the world. You have a vast amount of photosets, well over 2,000. You have over 4,000 models. You have no download limits for streaming or downloading. You have a daily update rate of 4 models each day (except for the first of the month, when you get 6 models).
Almost all photo sets have over 100 photos per set.
Metart started around 1999, so if you have your favorite models at the site, you can probably find several of her sets over time.
There is a brief model listing for most models, which give her physical attributes, and most model listings have a brief bio, which might be accurate (or wholly made-up, which is often the case with porn, going back to the days of Playboy and Penthouse).
Basically, I think Metart is the best softcore porn site on the internet. Because of the huge amount of photo sets of thousands of attractive girls. And the ease of navigating the site.
The membership price is no higher than any other softcore site, in spite of the massive amount of content.
However, some PU members might want Metart to have a more diverse selection of models: most models are white, slender, Eastern European teens. There are some Black, Asian, Latino models, but they are definitely the minority.
I'm giving the site a score of 98, because I think Metart is, as I said, the finest softcore glamcore site in the world.
And the support staff is superb. One of the best I've found. They are responsive to any emails asking for help from members, responding within 24 hours usually.
The PU site has a discounted price of $5 for the first month.
Any PU member who has not been a member of the site should grab that bargain.
And PU members who have been previous members of the site should also use that chance to see what new content is available since their last membership.
Like I said, Metart is the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. You get access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The network updates weekly. But this site gets one video update per month, which is very poor. Actually, the update rate is less than 1 update per month. They put videos from other sites in the network into this site, and I'm counting those out-of-site-videos as part of the update rate, since it's often difficult to tell from a video whether it really belongs to this site or should have been put into one of the other network sites. Or maybe a video is double-counted, and the same video is put into the Unlimited MILFs site and also put into a different site such as Family XXX.
-Videos for the last few years are offered in 360p through 4K definition.
-There is a photo set for each video. And it has a zip file. But the photo set is only offered in one definition for downloads. Except I don't like any of the models at this site, so I passed on downloading.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos at the site are exclusive to the network (exclusive to the network, but you can find a lot of the videos from this site at a different site in the network).
-As far as I can tell, there is unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading for the site and the network.
CONS(START OF):
-Navigation is poor. They don't put the posting date for each video in a convenient position.
-The links are slow to respond. You click on a hot link, and can wait a minute or more for the page to change to your destination.
-A lot of the models have breast implants that are large to huge. I'm not a fan of breast implants, especially oversized breasts.
-A lot of the models aren't very attractive.
-There is a lot of screaming and yelling to show fake excitement. Play these videos on low volume, or your neighbors will wonder what the fuck is going on.
Bottom Line:
Site features videos where the stepmom has sex with her stepson. There's very little lead-in to the sex, almost no plot, other than they establish that the older woman (in her 30s or older) is the stepmom and the stunt cock is her stepson. And then they suck and fuck and whatever. Which gets old fast, since the models aren't that attractive.
I much prefer other sites in the network, such as Family XXX or The Lesbian Experience, where there is more of a story, and the models are better looking, and usually younger. And there are less implants. And a lot of the models have tattoos, which I'm not a fan of.
Videos run around 30 to 35 minutes, which would be a good length, if there was some story to give meaning to the sex, which there isn't. And since I don't find the models attractive, the site is basically a waste of space for me.
But watch a few videos, and maybe you might enjoy these videos. Maybe yes, or maybe no.
I realize I'm being very critical.
The reason is, I do enjoy watching some of the videos at some other sites: either I enjoy the stories, or the more attractive models, or the visual sex, or a combination of those factors. So, why should I watch the videos at this site, which feature models that I don't find attractive, and almost-no-plot stories, and sex that is basically boring?
So the site is a waste of my time.
And the navigation is poor: Not only are the hot links slow to load content, but moving around the site to explore what it has to offer is slow and cumbersome. And the search is poor: you enter a model's name, and it will give you a bunch of names in return. And if you do get to the model's page, it probably won't list all of her content at the site or network.
They need to get a software engineer to re-vitalize the site and network, and make it easier to use.
You can often join this site during holiday specials, for $60 a year. But the question is: why would you want to join for a year?
Most PU members would only join for a month, and download whatever they want from the network.
And then rejoin a year or two later, to see if there is any new content they might find interesting.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A low-cost entry to a massive amount of teen porn. On holiday specials, you can join for around $48/year (including downloads).
-Unlimited streaming and downloads for most memberships. Formerly, they didn't include downloads for this site (that was accurate 2 years ago). But they now allow unlimited downloads for most memberships. You need to check whether the membership you are signing up for includes downloads or not.
-You can stream the videos on your desktop, tablet, mobile or tv.
-The site has over 1500 models. Mainly from Eastern Europe, but also some from the United States.
-Videos usually run around 20-30 minutes.
-Some of the acting is actually good. Normally, I cringe watching stupid teen porn videos, because the plots are so foolish, but the models do a pretty good job acting like innocent girls until the stunt cocks start to turn them on, and then it's standard teen suck-lick-fuck with some really attractive teen girls.
Cons:
-Content and channels are subject to change. So if you find some videos you really like, it's best to download them to keep (assuming your membership includes downloads-which is the best way to go: there's little reason to choose a streaming only membership, since you can find streaming + download membership for an even lower price).
-Very limited information about the models. Which can be wrong. Lana Rhoades is listed as a Czech Republic porn star, even though most sites state she was born in the US. Actually, they list most of their models as Czech, no matter where they come from.
-Default file title rarely includes name of the model, or the site it came from. So you have to manually rename these files.
-I haven't found the zip files for the photos sets yet. The video download is easy to find, but if there is a zip file for the photo sets, I will have to contact customer support.
Bottom Line:
-I don't know if you call this a site or a network or a porn aggregator.
The structure is that they get anywhere from 3 to hundreds of videos from about 98 different sites.
Many of the sites you won't recognize, even if you have you have extensive experience with teen porn sites.
But you also get content from sites you probably recognize: Vipissy, ItsPOV, Club Sweethearts, Wet & Puffy, Analized, I Kiss Girls, We Like To Suck, Private Casting-X, and a bunch of other sites you will find familiar.
So you get a wide variety of porn teen niches.
For a very low price.
Wait for a holiday special, when they offer dirt-cheap memberships. And then play around with the join page, since they often offer different prices for the same membership.
By playing around, I mean, look at the price offered, then start to switch to a different site, and see if they offer you a lower price for the different memberships.
I joined for a lifetime membership for $150, including unlimited streaming and downloads. But the first offer was $300 for the same membership.
I also saw a yearly membership with streaming only for about $60, but they also offer a yearly membership for about $48 that includes streaming and downloads. I'm not talking about different times of the year, but the offers on a single day(normally during holiday specials).
What do you get?
Over 2000 videos.
Over 1500 models, many of which you might recognize if you are into Eastern European teen porn.
Daily updates.
24/7 customer support. (I haven't tried customer support yet this time. Didn't bother using customer support my previous membership, since I never had a problem with the site.)
The site structure is basically easy to use. You can search for the models you like (which is time-consuming, since you have over 800 models), or you can sample videos from different studios (they call porn sites studios), or just browse
You can like/dislike and create playlists.
The content is basically teen-oriented porn, but it covers many different niches.
For a very low price, you get access (unlimited streaming + downloads) to a wide variety of content from many teen porn sites.
Most of the videos offered include 480p and 1080p options.
You can join for a one-month special for around $4, to see what the site has to offer, and then decide whether you want to take a longer-term membership.
I think the site offers a lot of good content for a very low price.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This site was formerly called Club Seventeen. The site was re-branded years ago, because the legal age for sexual consent is mainly 18 in the US, and some people were nervous about its content due to possible legal problems. So, Club Sweethearts makes the site safer to use.
-Club sweethearts ( under the Club Seventeen title) has been around since the mid-1990s serving teen porn in Europe.
So you get porn starlets from a range of years from about 1995 through 2023. The models are mainly European, though you do get some American models.
-As a member of Club Sweethearts, you also get access to the Adult Prime network, which has 60+ sites covering a wide variety of niches, although most of the sites are teen oriented.
-The videos have a runtime around 20+ minutes, and are offered in 1080p, 720p, and 540p, 720p, and 1080p. The newer videos from the last few years might offer 4K resolution, as well.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You get over 26,000 video at the site, plus, as I said, many more thousands of videos from the other network sites.
-The videos and photosets are mainly exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. Many other sites are either restricting the number of monthly downloads, or charging extra for downloads, or eliminating downloads of videos altogether. Adult Time, one of the biggest porn networks, has a relatively new system of eliminating downloads from a membership. Adult Time used to offer downloads with a one-year membership, but now the monthly, yearly, 2-year, and 3-year memberships are all streaming only.
CONS(START OF):
-Login is easy, but requires an easy-to-read captcha.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Price is in euros, so usually a small extra fee with a credit card payment.
-Minimal information about each model.
-Each photo set has a single definition zip file.
-The photo sets have an amateurish feel, like they were shot by an amateur.
Bottom Line:
The two main sites in the Adult Prime network that I enjoy the most are Club Sweethearts and Digital Desire. But you have content from over 100 different studios, most of them teen-orientated.
The models are mainly white European teens, with a scattering of models from the United States.
You get over 4,000 models (including the male models), in the Adult Prime network.
You can sort the models alphabetically, when they were added to the network, or by the studio.
Although Club Seventeen is teen porn, they cover the basics: solo, masturbation, lesbian, boy-girl, group sex.
If you are into teen porn, Club Sweethearts is a fine join. Because you get a boat-load of quality teen porn (by quality, I mean it's good to really nice content), and you also get access to the Adult Prime network, which covers a wide variety of teen niches.
The site (and network) often gives a special holiday discount.
You also get access to free weekly cam shows and thousands of recorded cam shows.
For a relatively low price, you get unlimited streaming and download privileges to an amazing amount of teen porn.
I only wish they remastered the older content, to try to bring it up to the stunning quality you get at Metart or Femjoy or MPL Studios, because there are a ton of attractive teen models at the site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This is a softcore site. No hardcore action that I can find. That is a pro or a con, depending on your preferences.
-The site features some of the most gorgeous models in the world. However, there are many porn sites, both softcore and hardcore, that also feature many of the most gorgeous models in the world. So what was, pre-internet, very limited access to beautiful naked models, is now basically unlimited access to beautiful naked models, of all ages (18+) through the various internet porn sites.
-The site content is exclusive. This includes the photo sets and the videos.
-Navigation is simple. You have a limited number of models, and each model has both photo sets and videos. So the site is easy to navigate, unlike a megasite like Adult Time.
-You can favorite the models.
-There is a bio sheet for each model, which lists the basic physical facts and a tiny bio.
-Your choice of billing processor. I used Segpay, which appears to be the default processor.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
The site also uses Vendo, Epoch, Segpay, 2000Charge, Centrobill, WTS or PayGarden.
Note: I did a charge-back with a Vendo membership several months ago, because I didn't recognize the charge. I contacted Vendo, and tried to have the charge get re-processed, but Vendo said they take charge-backs seriously, so they refused to allow me to to subscribe to that site through Vendo. Vendo also blackballed me, and when another site that I had a membership in for years was suposed to renew, Vendo cancelled the membership, instead of processing the payment. I called the credit card company that was supposed to fund the recurring membership, and they told me they did not decline the membership fee, but, that no payment request was made. I also have another membership through Vendo that is supposed to renew this month, December, and that will also be cancelled for non-payment by Vendo.
It's not the end of the world, because I have too many porn memberships, anyway.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
So Vendo is saving me money.
Even though I have had many memberships through Vendo over the years, and never had a problem with them, until the single charge-back a few months ago.
CONS(START OF):
-An expensive site. You only get access to this one site, with no bonus sites that I'm aware of.
The PU discount is $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month. Or $99.95/year (recurring).
And the listed site membership prices are often higher.
-You only get 25 monthly downloads. But you're supposed to get unlimited streaming.
I believe the 25 monthly download applies only to the videos. My guess is that you are allowed unlimited downloads of the photo sets, but if I find out differently, I will update this review.
-There were 2 pre-checked cross-sales on the join page. Both cross-sales turn into expensive memberships after the 3-day trial.
-The file name for the photo set and the video does not include the name of the model, or the date posted. A sample photo set zip file default name is: 12994-gallery.zip.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The models are gorgeous. Mainly Eastern European (from Russia and Ukraine). Mainly white. This is a glamcore porn site: by that, I mean it's softcore porn, where you get models in glamorous costumes, but strictly softcore action. This is a girly site, no men allowed, from what I can tell. Little to no overt sex. The model might touch her own body, but if there is masturbation allowed, I haven't found it yet (this is only my first month here, so I've only seen a small fraction of the site content.
The videos are artistic, beautifully filmed, to showcase the attractiveness of the models. There is background music to the videos, which is best played at low volume or muted.
I don't know why, but the photo sets at Superbe appeal to me much more than the photo sets at Hegre.
Hegre is a softcore/hardcore site which emphasizes glamcore photos, but also has softcore or midcore videos as well.
So the Hegre site has masturbation and some male/female action.
But the Hegre photos seem sterile to me. Even though the Hegre models are uniformly attractive or beautiful, the sets lack any heat or passion. While the Superbe photosets, although entirely softcore, can be extremely erotic.
Hegre sometimes has a habit of cutting the model's face out of the photos, which I find annoying. Hegre uses attractive girls, yet he cuts out the model's face, and focuses on other parts of the model's body. Maybe it's a fetish thing with him.
Superbe started around December 2020, so it's still a new site. The videos are offered in 240p through 1080p definition.
The photo sets are only offered in one definition zip file.
If you are into softcore nudity of lovely young models in their late teens and early twenties, I definitely think Superbe is worth a visit.
Normally the membership price is overly expensive, but they have holiday sales where the pricing comes down.
Currently you can join for one month for $9.95, which I think is a cheap price to explore which of these lovely models you can make your current favorites.
The main negative about the site is that you are limited to 25 video downloads per month. But I believe there is unlimited downloads for the photo sets, as well as unlimited streaming.
I'm giving the site a score of 90, because you get weekly updates, as well as a nice backlog of photo sets + videos for many of the models.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the mega sites in porn. Hardcore porn across a wide range of areas. Mainly teen-oriented.
-Navigation is good, but since you have so much content at the network, it's can be tiresome scrounging through all the content that does not appeal to your tastes.
-The quality of the content varies, since the network has been, in one form or another, around for well over 30 years. Or maybe I should state that parts of the network has been around for over 30 years, since Adult Prime itself, could be considered a newer version made up of much older parts. The same way Adult Time has parts that are over 20 plus years, but that the Adult Time name itself is a recent synthesis of older sites and networks.
-There are stars in the Adult Time network that, by themselves, are worth the membership price: Club Sweethearts (formerly Club Seventeen) and Digital Desire are two of the stars of the Adult Prime network.
-The network has multiple daily updates.
-No streaming or download limits.
Cons:
-The quality of the videos and photo sets varies widely. You have videos and photos posted 10-15 or more years ago, that don't have the definition that many PU members desire today.
-Not a major con, but navigation can be a little confusing.
Adult Prime has a newer channel of MetArt network, that is supposed to give you a sample of the Metart content.
This is an upgraded feature, that you have to pay extra for, it's not included in your basic Adult Prime membership.
But since I already have a MetArt membership (that I paid for separately), when I click on the link to see what the Metart channel at Adult Prime has to offer, I am transferred to the Metart.com site, and it takes me a few moments to figure out what's happening, because I have opened a new Metart.com webpage, as a Metart.com member, and that page is not part of the Adult Prime website.
Bottom Line:
-Although the Adult Prime network is not as well advertised as the Adult Time network, it's a worthy competitor.
The sheer amount of content is amazing.
I enjoy the Adult Time network more, because more of the Adult Time content appeals to me. But a person could spend endless hours going through the content at either one of these massive networks, and get far more than their money's worth.
Occasionally, Adult Prime will have a discounted membership price during a holiday, but the discount won't be much.
However, for hardcore porn, I think that Adult Prime is one of the best bargains in porn. If the content is appealing to you.
Most of the content will be exclusive to you. The quality of the content varies widely, but think of it as a treasure hunt, where you can find some content that will either bring back fond memories (the Digital Desire site), or interesting videos for hardcore teen sex.
There is also a lot of fetish material, for PU members who are into old-young or bondage.
So this network takes a more scattershot approach to porn than the Adult Time network.
I'm giving the network a score of 95. I think it's extremely impressive, and it gives you your money's worth. Assuming you appreciate what the network has to offer.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network.
-Membership in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network, for no additional charge.
-Membership in the network gives you unlimited downloads and unlimited streaming.
-The videos at the network are mainly professionally shot: clear, crisp images, good colors, good sound control, nice costumes (mainly normal street clothes).
Cons:
-Erratic update rate.
-Ads on every member page, take away from the useful screen content.
-Popup window of ads also hides part of the screen.
-Navigation is poor. Hard to get a simple listing of the videos at the Fresh Outta High School site.
Bottom Line:
I think the site (and network) is a worthwhile join at $60/year, if you can find it listed for a holiday special.
That's the price I joined for.
But lately, I've seen prices of $95.45/year on a holiday special, or even $149.95/year.
Which is a ripp-off, in my opinion. There are far better sites at those price points: better navigation, better quality content, a wider selection of models.
The content at Fresh Outta High School (and the New Sensations Network) is good quality hardcore porn, but there are better networks that will give you not only a wider selection of high quality porn, a more extensive selection of models, and content that is easier to use. In both the softcore and hardcore areas.
New Sensations has been around for over 20 years.
They've created a large amount of exclusive content: over 7,000 scenes, over 2,500 porn stars, with sites covering different niches.
But the internet is vast, and has thousands of competing sites for porn.
I would not put New Sensations, or the Fresh Outta High School site, as one of the stars of the internet.
But for a low membership price, I think it's worth sampling. And maybe even a longer join, if you enjoy the site (and network).
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The network gets multiple weekly updates.
-The video quality of the scenes is good to excellent: good videography, clear visuals and good colors, costumes are acceptable, not cheap, ragged clothes. The acting is better than average by the models.
-The membership price is low: The list price is $149.95/year, but there is a PU discount of $95.40/year, but $60/year is offered at holiday specials throughout the year.
-No download limits.
-No streaming limits.
-You can stream or watch the videos in a variety of definiitions. The newer videos from the last several years are available from 360p through 4K.
-There is a story for most videos, that add meaning to the scene. This is an improvement over the stupid plots shown at many teen porn sites where the plots involve parodies of horny teens fucking under the unsuspecting presence of their step-parents.
-The videos and photo sets have a posting date.
Cons:
-The biggest con is the site stopped updating in 2018. I don't know why, because I thought it was one of the better sites in the network. My guess is they didn't want to put the time and effort into making story-driven videos, although the other sites in the network also feature story-driven videos, but with flimsier plots.
-The network is divided into sites. But many videos don't clearly show what site the video belongs to.
For example, if you select a video, it might take a while of searching before you can decide what site the video belongs to.
This makes navigating the sites more difficult.
-Adds take up a lot of space in the member pages. Before you enter the member's area, you are hit with a page of ads.
Get past the introductory add page into the member's area, and there are ads on every member page.
-The search function is clunky. You entre "Amber Moore" in the search box that states "Search By Model Name", it returns an alphabetical listing of the letters in the alphabet,
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED);
along with 15 thumbnails of random models that are both male and female.
The next step is to click on the letter "A" in the listing (A is the first letter in Amber Moore's name), and that brings up another 15 thumbnails of both male and female models, whose names might start with A, but probably won't start with A.
You click on the letter A again, and this time, it returns 15 models, both male and female, that start with the letter A.
The model names are not listed alphabetically. So you have to check each model to see if the model name "Amber Moore" appears in the listing.
A very clunky search box. Built by a programmer who either forgot his programming lessons, or didn't bother to learn them in the first place.
-The models page is poor. It might list one or two of the video content of the model, but it can often leave out her other content at the network. For example, the Amber Moore model page lists "Daddy's Favorite #3 - INTERVIEWS" and "Amber's Teen Pussy Is Step Daddy's Favorite", but it leaves out 4 of her other videos at the network.
BOTTOM LINE(START of):
I think that for a low price(the $60/year holiday special price), you get access to a lot of good quality porn.
The models are mainly attractive teens in their late teens and twenties.
The videos and photo sets are professionally shot, with clear, crisp images, good lighting, good colors, good sound control.
The plots, while not oscar-worthy, are better than the stupid parodies or non-plots used at many teen porn sites.
I'm giving the site a score of 89.
This is based on a price of $60/year.
I wouldn't pay $90/year or higher, because there are other fine sites that, for a more expensive price, give you a better experience for your porn dollars: Better navigation, a more extensive listing of models, slightly better photo quality. The photo and video quality at the New Sensations network and its sites, is good, but it is below the quality found at Metart, Femjoy, MPL Studios, and other fine-art sites.
However, the New Sensations Network is hardcore porn with an emphasis on videos, and the sites I mentioned (Metart, Femjoy, MPL Studios) are mainly softcore porn.
I think any one of the New Sensations network sites is worth joining for $60, because if you join any one of the sites in the network, you have access to all the sites in the network, without paying extra.
And you get unlimited streaming and downloading, without paying extra.
But I would hesitate about paying $90 or more for a yearly sub. There are sites where you get more bang for your buck.
You get the same 4 sites with a new or old membership.
They have added 2 new sites, but they are separate from the 4-site-membership.
I have no idea how much content the 2 new sites have.
They seem to be using most of the same models as from the 4-site combo, and the same type of high-gloss video-shooting style.
But the two new sites require a separate membership from the 4-site combo.
X-Art was around for a very long time. It used to be strictly softcore glamcore. Then it was taken over by new management, and they started introducing hardcore, but still with an emphasis on glamcore and on lovely young models.
The colette site was started much later, with many of the same models from X-Art, but with the same glamcore-hardcore style.
There were evidently some questionable practices by the owners/managers of the X-Art site, by suing people for downloading X-Art content. I didn't follow the details on what was happening with that. I thought that X-Art, for many years, was one of the best glamcore sites on the internet, whether it was softcore or hardcore, because of how lovely the models were, and how they were photographed so exquisitely.
A shame the site ran into problems.
The backlog of photos (and videos) should be worth something, but it will probably go into internet dust.
My guess is that you're probably right.
I'm strictly a porn user, not a porn insider or someone who has inside knowledge of the financial rules for porn sites.
But there are a number of porn sites that no longer accept credit cards for membership.
Since I don't want to bother with cryptocurrency, and don't trust it, I am effectively barred from those sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: I am giving the site a score of 95. That's not because of how perfect the site is: it's not perfect. But what impresses me so much is the sheet amount of hardcore content, for a very low price. Covering a wide variety of niches. With unlimited streaming and downloads. So I am willing to overlook that there are problems navigating the site, because of what is offered at such a low price.
PROS(START OF):
-Very low-priced memberships. Can get a month's membership for $6.99 with a RabbitsReviews discount.
-There is a huge amount of videos on offer. Supposedly, over 500,000 videos at the site, from about 2,000 studios. Many of the studios are first-rate studios. So this is a great place to sample or view the type of offerings from sites like Porn Fidelity, Teeny Lovers, etc.
-A large amount of daily updates.
-The videos have a small, unobtrusive watermark that shows the title of the video, and the site it came from.
-The model listing shows 14,055 porn stars (both female and male).
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
That's a huge number of porn stars to sift through. That's good and bad. It will take time to find the porn stars you're interested in watching.
-The model listing gives a small thumbnail of the model, plus the number of videos (and photos, if listed). Even though the thumbnail is small, it's clear enough to show you what the model looks like.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-The model listing shows a wide range of models, in age, physical type, etc.
CONS(START OF):
-Different videos have different ranges for streaming/downloading options.
Many videos only have 240p-360p-480p options.
However, even a 480p definition video seems clear and crisp on my laptop monitor, so I'm not very disappointed by the low-definition videos I've seen so far.
Actually, watching these videos on my 12" laptop monitor, I can't tell the different in quality between a 480p video and a 1080p video. Maybe it's my poor eyesight: I'm in my 70s,
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
and I wear both distance and reading glasses, but I really can't tell the difference between watching a 480p and a 1080p video. The difference would be more apparent on a larger monitor. But my 12" laptop monitor is 1080p, so it's a monitor that is supposed to be fine for watching videos.
-The download options are lacking. Normally, you can choose the folder where you download photo sets or videos. But with Fap House, unless you are using a download manager, the content automatically downloads to your "downloads" folder.
-I just joined this site a few days ago, so I'm still learning to use it. But some videos, when you play them, they stop playing after two minutes or less, while the runtime is supposed to be 20 minutes or longer. That's for online streaming. The downloaded video file plays normally, with no shortened runtime.
-The model listing seems a jumbled mess. It's not listed alphabetically by model name, but listing in apparently random order. Since you have over 14,000 names, you really need an alphabetical listing, and other ways to sort the models' names.
-There is a search box to search model's names. But most porn stars have multiple names for different sites, so that is not as useful as you might think.
-Also, there are some false positives when you do a search for a model's name.
For example, search "Carolina Sweet", and it brings up a video for "Carolina Sweets", who is a different model. So I don't know how you're going to find the video content for "Carolina Sweet" at the network.
-A lot of videos don't name the model. You play a video, you might remember the model's face, but not her name. So how can you identify the model? You can't.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
For a very low price, you get access to a tremendous amount of hardcore porn, covering a wide array of niches, from a huge amount of porn sites and studios. I used to think Adult Time was the biggest bargain in porn. But this network seems like a worthwhile rival to Adult Time. And in some ways it might offer a better bargain:
the price of membership is far lower.
$6.99 for one month (which is what Rabbits Reviews shows).
The prices listed at the PU site are not current.
PU shows:
Monthly: $9.99 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $23.97 (3 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $299.99 (Lifetime)
1 Year: $71.88 (recurring)
I joined for $199.99, which is the price that's shown when you use the PU link to Fap House.
That's for a lifetime sub. No rebills. No extra charges, for streaming or downloads.
PU lists a lifetime sub for $299.99.
Even though a lot of videos don't name the model, if you're a long-time fan of teen porn, you will recognize many of the faces of the teen models at teeny lovers. It's like a poster-child of teen porn models from Eastern Europe from 8 years or more ago.
I still think Adult Time is one of the best bargains in porn today. It gives you a quality product covering a wide range of niches, for a low price.
The price at Fap House is lower. But the overall quality is more mixed.
Having said that the quality is more mixed, I think that, whether you're a beginner or a old-timer in porn, Fap House, because of the tremendous amount of hardcore porn, for a very low price, is definitely worth a join.
A massive number of niches.
Content from over 2,000 studios.
An incredible amount of hardcore porn: over 400,000 videos.
Unlimited streaming and downloading included.
Definition ranges from 240p, on up to 4K on some videos.
Navigation seems basic, but doable. With the vast amount of content, large amount of models, you will need to spend a lot of time searching for the content that appeals to you. But it should be easier, if you start your search, by selecting the studios and sites that you're already familiar with, that have content at this network.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-My favorite site in the Nubiles Porn network. This site is like an encyclopedia of young porn starlets early in their career.
-The bulk of the models are Eastern Europe (mainly from around Russia), but you also get a good representation of models from the USA.
-Almost all the models are white, ranging in age from 18 to very early 20s. So if you're into young teens, this site should hit the spot.
-Navigation is easy. Easy to explore the entire site, or to switch between sites.
-With cookies enabled, login is almost automatic.
-Login and site pages are secure.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-You get 3 new models each week.
-Site is still updating after 19 years in the business.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month, or $99.95/year. But if you wait for holiday specials, you can join for $84/year.
-There is an excellent model index that makes finding the models fairly easy. But many of these models use multiple names, so you really need to use a separate index of porn stars.
Cons:
-Site features young models, late teens, early 20s. No models in their 30s or older, that I have found.
-Site features young white models: Black, Asian, other ethnicities are barely represented.
-You get around 4 videos and photosets of each model. But once that has been posted, it's very rare for the site to feature that model again. Which is a shame, because some of these models really deserve to be featured again, because they can be so attractive.
Bottom Line:
Note: there is some confusion about whether Nubiles.net is included in a membership to the Nubiles Porn network. It is included, but some PU members have wondered if it is included. My guess is that's because Nubiles.net is not listed as prominently as most of the other sites in the Nubiles Porn network, at the Nubiles Porn network itself.
But if you check the drop-down menu of sites included in the Nubiles Porn network, you will see that Nubiles.net is included.
It's easy to overlook that Nubiles.net is included in the Nubiles Porn network, and I think that some PU members have paid for a separate membership to Nubiles.net, while having a membership to the Nubiles Porn network: so they are paying twice for the same access.
I think of this site as more of an encyclopedia of young starlets instead of a normal porn site. Because the videos and photosets while good, are not erotic but more like nudies: You see the girls naked, and maybe they are masturbating or occassionally getting fucked, but the site lacks erotic heat. Or maybe I'm just getting de-sensitized to beautiful teen flesh on display.
Since the site started around 2004, the earliest videos and photosets have lower resolutions. But it's still interesting to view many of these porn starlets, most of which have long since retired, at the start of their careers.
Nubiles.net is only part of the Nubiles Porn network, which has about 21 sites in total.
But Nubiles.net is the best site in the network, with thousands of young porn starlets on display.
Sir, was there some reason your reviews were deleted and you only got 1 entry in yesterday's raffle?
I was surprised, and thought you deserved credit for 2 reviews.
I see that your reviews are now re-posted with today's date.
But those reviews were originally posted around June 20, and should have been eligible for yesterday's raffle.
Call me finicky about small details.
LOL.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main draw for the site is the cute models. These are Eastern European girls, mainly late teens or early 20s.
Slender, white girls, that Russia is famous for flooding the internet porn sites with. If you're familiar with Russian teen porn, you've seen many of these girls featured at other porn sites.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Exclusive content. The videos are original to the site.
-Can switch between sites easily.
Cons:
-The videos seem washed out. I don't like the skin-tones of the models. Maybe if I had more control over my monitor features I could slightly correct the colors, but it really detracts from the attractiveness of the models.
-The videos are not clearly dated.
-I believe the site stopped updating years ago. Before then, the update rate was very slow or erratic.
-Little or no information on the models.
-The text description of the video is worthless. Did the writer even bother to watch the video before writing the description?
Bottom Line:
I wish I could rate the site higher. But the lack of updates (I think the site stopped updating years ago), and the washed out colors of the videos, combine to make this site a wasted opportunity of showcasing attractive young models.
u
The site has 297 videos, which is a large amount, considering how slowly the site updated while it was still active.
One interesting fact is going back to the earliest videos at the site, and watching how young some of these Russian stunt cocks look. You've seen these same Russian stunt cocks hundreds or thousands of times if you're into Russian teen porn, and it just strikes me how the Russian stunt cocks can last for years in the business, while the lovely young teen models get used up within a few years.
Maybe it' just me, but I watch these videos with the attitude of an observer: there's no heat or passion from the videos, just young teen flesh on display that should be arousing, but is not. Maybe I'm getting older (I'm in my 70s), and porn doesn't do it for me any more. Except I do respond to some videos at better sites, or to lovely softcore images at Metart or other sites.
This site lacks heat or much to interest me. Maybe someone else will find it more appealing to their tastes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 1 Pass For All Sites network. You get access to around 30 different sites.
Most of those sites are teen oriented.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. Unlimited downloads is becoming rare for porn sites.
-Videos from the last few years are offered in 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2160p, in MP4 format.
Sometimes, the 720p or 1080p definition might be missing.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-Segpay was the default biller for me. Not as well known as Vendo or CCBill, but I've had no problems with Segpay.
-Limited information given for the models.
Bottom Line:
Network stats:
Total Girls: 1314
Total Photos: 1,332,666
Total Videos: 12,248
Total Content: 13,776.64 Gbs
Watching the first video with Lisa and Camille, it's just a simple, honest-to-God piece of enjoyable teen hardcore. Lisa is a petite, long-legged, energetic cutie. She's not beautiful, but she is fucking attractive, and she does a wonderful job snogging the stunt cock and lesbo-playing with her attractive female roommate at the same time. This is not glamcore sex like you find at X-Art (which stopped updating around November 2022, and will probably soon vanish into internet heaven). The videos are more like you will find at Teen Mega World, and not as glossy as the videos at the Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn).
If you get a holiday special, you can join for 12 months for around $90, which includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. A lot of porn sites are either charging extra for limited downloads, or eliminating downloads altogether. So the price is right for joining.
I enjoy the simple plots of the videos. For two main reasons:
The simple plot requires very little acting on the part of the models and the stunt cock, so it doesn't tax their limited acting talents.
The simple plot, once you accept that the models and the stunt cock are playing horny young teens who want to fuck, avoids the cringe-worthy plots shown at many hardcore teen sites, that showcase empty-headed teens who fuck and suck in front of their step-relations (step siblings, step mother, step father). I know that these empty-headed teens are supposed to be a parody, but the plots and actions are so stupid it interferes with my appreciating the hardcore video action.
The quality of the videos is good to very good: good camera-work, good lighting, good skin tones (which is helpful, since you can really appreciate how attractive these teen models are), good sound control, OK sets (not the cheap apartments many teen porn sites start out using at first).
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
