Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company Stripe Media, Inc.
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-11 of 11  

Visit Yanks.com

1. Yanks.com (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
PalmTrees (0) 06-14-23  07:29am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + The other site that started my interest in porn.
+ Like with Little Mutt, I cannot say for sure if Yanks is updating with new content, but I can say they have nearly 2,500 videos and 2,000 photo sets.
+ Videos are downloadable and top resolution is 1920x1080.
+ Photo sets are also downloadable in zip files.
+ Nearly 750 amateur models.
+ Includes access to an all-male masturbation site called Club Stroke.
+ Site navigates well and has useful tags.
Cons: - There is reason to believe the new updates are just old content they are reposting as new.
- It’s almost all masturbation.
- Some video scenes do not have a photo set.
Bottom Line: It is hard to review Yanks and Little Mutt at the same time. Mainly because I joined both of them in 2015 and these sites started my interest in porn. It’s hard not to compare the two sites to each other. Both are amateur and it looks like both have stopped updating with new content. But just like Little Mutt has some redeeming qualities, one could say Yanks has even more redeeming qualities.
The size of the site helps with the possibility of recycling content. There are nearly 2,500 videos and over 2,000 photo sets. You can download them to your heart’s content with no limit. The video quality on Yanks is very good too. You can download the majority of the scenes in 1920x1080 resolution.

They have a useful model list and have nearly 750 amateur models on their site. The bonus site – Club Stroke, is a good opposite site to Yanks. Club Stroke is solo guys masturbating. It’s not a very big site with just over 100 videos, but it introduced me to male masturbation porn.

Yanks focuses on solo women masturbating and having real orgasms. I believe that’s the most difficult part of porn – getting the woman to have a real orgasm. The orgasms on Yanks are very believable and some are even embarrassing for the female model having the leg-cramping, body-shaking orgasm on camera. I noticed in most of the scenes, the woman’s breathing gave away the real orgasms. I could tell their breath had been taken away for a few seconds.

Yanks even taught me a lot about myself and views on sexuality. I watched these female models masturbate to those great orgasms and thought about, it wasn’t their bodies I was looking at and thinking about. It was me thinking about having an orgasm that felt like the model showed her orgasm feeling. I do believe we are in one of the quandaries of porn. If my beliefs are right and I’m attracted to watching the women have better orgasms than I have had, shouldn’t it be similar for men? I have watched male masturbation porn and thought the guys that shoot a lot of cum look like their orgasm felt better than the guy that barely came a few drops.

It's at least interesting to me and I have Yanks to thank for me noticing my feelings may not be about taboo sexual attraction to other women and might just be me being envious of their orgasms.

I’m making this sound way too scientific. Unlike Little Mutt, which dropped from a favorite site to one I doubt I will join again, Yanks is still a favorite, however, if they don’t have new content coming out, it will be a short-lived return to my original positive and excited feelings towards Yanks.

Anyone could join this site and enjoy the content. The videos are good enough download quality and pictures are not bad either. The models are generally cute and playful. It’s very enjoyable porn and recommended.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Yanks.com

2. Yanks.com (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
MrBison (0) 06-04-19  01:33pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: • Huge collection of unscripted solo and lesbian videos and photosets
• Real amateur girls, with a wide range of looks and body types
• Lots of behind-the-scenes content: interviews, bios and profile pages for all of the girls
• Streaming and downloading is available in different resolutions (maximum is 1920x1080)
• The site is organised well – there’s a directory/list of the girls, separate pages for the masturbation and lesbian videos, separate pages for photos and videos, etc
• Yanks has some kind of partnership with ATK Exotics, ATK Hairy, Wet and Puffy, and Girls Out West. You don’t get full access to these sites, but you can view a lot of content from these sites directly on Yanks. A nice bonus to have.
• The site is available in a few different (European) languages
• There are updates every day (sometimes more than one), and a calendar that shows you what updates are coming
• Secure payment and membership (they use Epoch)
Cons: • The site has a pretty dated look. It almost feels like you’re in the early 2000s compared to other, slicker porn sites. For example, one of the payment options is ‘snail mail’!
• A lot of the updates are just interviews with the girls. These can be nice, but there is a LOT of this ‘bonus’ kind of content
• Because the girls are really amateurs and not pro ‘performers’, the scenes can sometimes be so realistic that they’re boring
• Not much variety in the scenes. Most of the time you see the girl lying on her back masturbating until she cums, then enjoying the afterglow.
• The videos have a low-budget feel a lot of the time. The lighting can be basic, locations and furniture are often boring or ugly
• Short videos (usually 5-15 minutes)
Bottom Line: Yanks specialises in videos and photosets with amateur girls, mostly in masturbation scenes but also with many lesbian scenes. I’m a big fan of amateur videos, and Yanks girls seem to be ‘extra’ amateur. I love that Yanks gets girls who look like they wouldn’t usually do porn. They’re often in regular/everyday clothing, many of the girls seem charmingly awkward in front of the camera, and ‘performances’ are really authentic. The girls have a range of body types, but usually they are slim, with natural breasts and pubic hair – natural looks are the most common. There are interviews with the girls before (sometimes after) the action, plus they all have bios that give an impression of their personalities.

Most of the ‘action’ videos have a short introduction, then the girls get naked and masturbate with their fingers, or a dildo or vibrator. It’s not very ‘artistic’ but the camerawork is good: you get lots of pussy close-ups, orgasmic faces, and full-body shots. Except for some unscripted conversation with the girl filming, all you will hear is the breathing, moaning, etc from the girls. There’s no music, no story, no transition shots, just relaxed intimacy and basic recording of the action.

It’s similar with the lesbian videos, the atmosphere is very amateur and authentic. You can look forward to seeing girls fingering and licking each other to orgasm, and in one video there’s even some EXTREMELY hot pussy-slapping. Because of the chemistry between the girls, it never gets theatrical or over-the-top. Still, the orgasms are real and hot, and there is often squirting – fantastic!
Something unique is that Yanks uploads the application questionnaires that the girls complete, so you can read their private thoughts on sex, masturbation and their bodies. This seems pretty legit to me, and I’ve never seen it on a porn site before. Yanks is obviously very serious about keeping things amateur and ‘real’, and I appreciate this a lot.

I have a few criticisms, of course. I personally like the ultra-amateur/unpolished look of most of the girls, but this will for sure be an issue for a lot of people. There’s no glamour to be found, in the girls or the locations or even the filming style. This is part of the Yanks charm, but it would be nice if they could avoid the ‘cheap hotel’ feeling of some of the locations. The videos are all pretty similar, too, which is weird considering how many there are! It’s not hard to get a bit bored with seeing the same positions and ‘techniques’ in so many videos… The photosets also have a particular style. The girls look great, but the pictures can have a rushed or cheap look. It’s almost as if I was taking the pictures, not a professional photographer. Some will love this, some will not. It’s a question of taste, but I think it’s worth mentioning.

Everything on the website works quite well, but I have to mention the dated look. It’s not a dealbreaker, but there’s something weirdly old school about the layout and visual design of the site. Photosets can be very irritating to view. When you click on an image preview, the expanded image is barely bigger than the thumbnail. You then need to click a ‘zoom’ button if you want to see any of the detail. Luckily you can download the photosets to get around this problem.

Yanks has been releasing amateur masturbation and lesbian videos and pictures for a long time now (since 2004 or so). By my count, there are 2286 videos – even if you don’t count the interviews and behind-the-scenes content, this is huge. It can be a bit same-y, but the size of the collection makes Yanks pretty good value. If you have a thing for super amateur solo and lesbian porn, this is a really solid site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Yanks.com

3. Yanks.com (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
exotics4me (0) 04-08-17  11:54pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A long running site that offers good (mostly) amateur masturbation pictures and videos.
- Good TBP/PU discounted price, especially if you haven't been a member for awhile or even ever.
- Navigation is good, but can be a bit wonky at times, my main problem is the picture near the top of the main page, it scrolls when I try to scroll the website.
- Good technical quality, newer videos have 1080p option and photo sets are downloadable in zips, the XL photo sets are 3000 long end.
- Well above-average DL speeds, about 80-85% of my max download speed (on porn sites).
- Updates daily, most days have multiple updates.
- Maybe the strongest pro is the models, for the most part, seem to be real amateurs who bring themselves to orgasm.
- This could be a con for some, there's also some "bonus" content from ATK Exotics, ATK Girlfriends, ATK Hairy and Wet and Puffy.
- One of personal preference, most of the models dress in normal, everyday clothes to start the sets.
Cons: - Watch me not win over any fans with this one. I really don't like ATK Hairy. I understand there are men and women who like seeing hairy women, but the underarm hair is just too much. One can look over at some of my old ATK reviews where I also complained about the Hairy content.
- Nitpicking here much like Raging Buddhist's recent comment, I don't like the interview videos. Seriously, why would I care what an adult model says about the adult video industry?
- One that all sites using amateur models runs into, a lot of the models are shy. That's a con for me, but could be a pro for others.
Bottom Line: I last joined Yanks way back in 2011. I did enjoy the content back then, but I thought the site lacked a certain personality I like a site to have. I compared Yanks to I Feel Myself back then and still think they're similar. The "personality" I look for is the opposite of shy. The transition from dressed to fully nude is still lacking in the majority of the videos. Most I have watched start nude and end ... well, nude. That's just a personal preference and lets have some understanding here, I've reviewed and been a member of over 200 sites. At this point, there are just things that annoy me. I'll even explain the clothed to nude preference. It lets me see what the model would look like if I saw her in person at the store.

One place this site scores high with me is its picture sets. Which continues my clothed to nude preference. The vast majority of their photo sets do start clothed and end nude with flash/teasing in-between. I enjoy these photo sets as much as the videos.

I put a con on the Hairy sets. It looks like Yanks also has their own Hairy models. Believe it or not, burn me at the stake for it, but those turn my stomach. I've told it before, I shave my head, I hate most body hair and have been this way for most of my life. But, a little neatly trimmed bush is fine, see my all-time favorite model Eve Angel. We're not talking about bush though. We're talking hairier armpits than mine. And those models are right there in the updates with no way for me to remove them from my view.

Most of that complaining isn't that bad. I like Yanks and am glad I returned. They have a lot of models I really like. Was glad to see a little heavier model like Jennavive Marie. There's some older models too. And all in all, the masturbation and orgasms are about as real as you're going to see in internet porn.

Navigation is good. They even have the bonus content from the other sites in drop-down boxes so you can easily switch from Yanks content to whichever bonus site you like. There's another side too. Straight male masturbation site called Club Stroke. Which I think is an underused concept on porn sites these days. My wife likes porn too so she can check those out. I've always wondered why more sites don't try this gender mix format. Download speeds are very good across the sites.

There's a lot of content, by my count:
2,120 videos
1,353 photo sets
Those are just the Yanks only numbers and don't include the bonus content from the other sites.

Here's the problem and it's what Raging Buddhist commented on, those video numbers include interviews, playing around videos and what I would consider non-porn videos. Which is why the navigation is considered just good. There's no way to remove the videos you're not interested in. A quick fix? Put a masturbation tag on all of the masturbation videos and add a new option in the videos drop-down box that is just masturbation to filter those out or in, depending on your perspective.

Still, the content is good and the photo sets are very good. Sometimes photos can convey teasing better than video since it captures the model before she stops teasing.

The overall technical quality is very good for a site with this type of content. As far back as I've looked, 2011 or so, has at least a 720p option on the videos. And if I were to complain anymore it would just be to say they seem to be worried more about their overall video numbers than they need to be. This is a fairly underpopulated niche in 2017 porn world. No offense is meant to the models who tell their stories or talk about the politics of the porn industry, but to put it mildly, it's just not interesting. Some of the greatest solo girl websites have used interviews and behind the scenes with some effectiveness, the ALS sites come to mind and Twistys old content when Shap was still around. It's not a big negative to me. It's just once I get caught up on the content I've missed since 2011, it will probably be awhile before I come back. Though, I don't think I'll wait 6 years again.

I'm giving the site a boost from my 2011 score since this type of content isn't easy to come by. And I'll continue to stress how important the pictures are to my score. It's a very good site to me or at least to anyone like me who hasn't been here in awhile. There's even some girl-girl content in there too, but I've mostly burnt out on girl-girl. I believe if they incorporated some type of tagging system to separate the non-porn videos from the masturbation videos, I'd add a few more points to the score. The biggest point reduction right now is there are a percentage, 20% or less, of models I don't like at all. I could see this site scoring a 90 or higher if a few things were fixed. I would recommend it for a monthly join. Especially if you like photos. I've looked over dozens of the photo sets and liked everyone of them.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Yanks.com

4. Yanks.com (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
soloporn (0) 01-28-16  02:45am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 1,900+ exclusive videos, video streaming and downloads, quality up to 1080p.
- 1,200+ exclusive image galleries with tens to hundreds of images, quality up to 2000x3000, downloadable as zips.
- 600+ models including 28 models together as lesbians, 78 new models added in 2015.
Cons: - Basic website, outdated
- Inconsistent tags (e.g. Big Breasts, Big Tits)
- Galleries, photo quality and inconsistency (e.g. exposure changes in set)
Bottom Line: My first time on a porn pay site, after being hooked by an Aeryn Walker masturbation video on the internet. From the stars to the true amateur, from the imperfect to the blonde bombshell, Yanks features a range of models largely featuring in solo masturbation scenes at home with only the most daring in more public locations — from bush walking trails to public bathrooms.

Exclusive videos and photo galleries from Yanks are uploaded daily, with content from Girls Out West and ATK Exotics/Hairy padding out updates. New scenes and galleries of models are uploaded over weeks, making it tempting to keep your subscription to ensure you have all content from your favourite models.

Models are introduced through handwritten questions and answers before you get to know them and their masturbation habits a little more with on-camera interviews. You find out and hear the wildest stories from the models as they reveal their perversions, from first time anal, to their swingers club gangbangs. Once you get to know the model (or if you choose to jump straight in), you are treated to watching the girls in their bliss as they masturbate — with fingers, magic wands, buttplugs — in any way that brings them to real orgasms.

Models can be chosen by sorting through tens of pages, with a nice thumbnail of the model presented alongside their name, date added and member rating. Models can only be sorted alphabetically, by most popular and most recent. Finding a model by body type or ethnicity requires you to search videos and galleries and it is dependent on the suggested tags for a scene or gallery.

The recent masturbation scenes on the site are high quality with most running for at least ten minutes. Pick the right model and you will be engrossed in every little move and every little sound she makes from the beginning to as she orgasms.

Photo galleries feature a lot of shots, however many are similar and repeated. Photos aren’t the strongest point of the site but the models should still blow you away as they expose their personality and every part of their body to the camera.

The site offers bare basic functionality and can take time to get familiar with everything. Once familiar, it is fairly easy to navigate Yanks content.

As a first timer to pay porn sites, I hesitate to make comparisons but if my impression is anything to go by, Yanks can’t compare to the biggest primarily amateur sites, however if you sign up at a discount price, you will find Yanks hard to beat.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Yanks.com

5. Yanks.com (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
RagingBuddhist (Disabled) 03-29-13  01:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ***Edited Review to lower the score - see replies***

+ Video quality is good
+ Flash preview
+ Model index
+ Search by category
+ Advanced search by key tags
+ Screen cap preview for video
+ Zips for both picture sizes
+ Comment section on all updates
+ Download speeds very good with a download manager
+ No apparent download limit
+ PU discount
+ Extra sites (see bottom line)
Cons: - Layout looks dated and cluttered
- Page to page speeds very slow
- Random order updates
- Picture quality seriously lacking - especially the large
- Some serious tattoos showing up (Yes, a personal dislike)
- Bonus video links not valid
- Signed out seemingly at random
Bottom Line: TECHNICALS:
> Video is available in 5 downloadable formats MP4 HD 1280x720 @ 4500 kbps, MP4 720x406 @ 755, WMV 1024x576 @ 3100, 3GP 704x576 @ 1500 and 3GP Low 352x288 @ 1200. The in browser flash player features similar resolutions & files sizes.

> The pictures are available in two sizes and both in zip files - 1280 and 2826 long side. But the quality isn't up to today's standards. The larger pics look grainy, like they were upscaled with a basic photo editor. Now including a few Girls Out West picture sets, they're only available as small 1000 pixels long side.

> It's hard to get a fix on the update schedule or figure out how to explain it in print. Sometimes there are two releases on the same day with any mix of masturbation video, an interview, a "cum face" clip or a biography, sometimes it's any one by itself.

> The page-to-page speed looks like it's hampered by some sort of security. Clicking back or forward, I noticed seemingly random numbers preceding the page URLs. I think that also has something to do with my getting logged out at times. That caused some of the downloads I had in queue on my download manager to download to 35 kilobytes, meaning they had to be downloaded again.

EXTRAS:
Whispering Lily is one of the extra access sites listed as a masturbation social network and a place to chat with other members and browse personals. I'm not too interested in that sort of thing but tried to check it out for the sake of this review. Unfortunately, I kept getting logged out and getting a server error when I tried to get back in. I stopped trying.

ClubStroke.net is a masturbation site featuring guys. Not my thing, so no comments forthcoming. :grin:

SoloTouch.com is the place for masturbation stories - with referral links to still more sites. STOP WITH THE ADS!

The 31 bonus videos all date back to 2004-2007 and haven't changed since my last signup.

The bonus videos feeds show this message: "The website that brought you here is not authorized to link to this video feed". A real WTF moment.

THE BOTTOM LINE:
It seems I didn't wait long enough to sign up here again. The updates still include biographies, "cum face" short 20-30 second videos (like those on Beautiful Agony), and non-nude interviews. While I'm sure there are fans of these, I still don't call them update material - especially the bios which aren't called an update on any other site I've seen. They're still just four pages of questions and answers. It's a masturbation site and that's what I want to see. I'm not interested in knowing what her first time masturbating was like or about the waterfalls in Oregon. I also wasn't too thrilled with having to figure out whether a video was an interview or a full episode. They do list the time of each video, but you have to watch the animated gif preview or go to the screen caps to see what's what.

One of the biggest things that had drawn me to this site in the first place was the girl next door look to the models. I don't like glam, I like average looking. Tattoos, piercings and fake tits were almost non-existent. The latest models are now putting that to rest. Girls with full sleeves, large skull tattoos, nipple and body piercings are distractions I can do without.

I don't know if they've changed or I just didn't notice it my last time in, but the layout and navigation definitely need streamlining. If you can, picture this: The home page shows three columns, "Cumming Soon" preview thumbs on the left. In the middle are Recent Updates, Social Network links, What's Hot, Member Poll and some ads. On the right, Social network links (again), Most Popular Girls, another ad, Most Viewed and Most Popular updates and support links. Way too busy for my taste. There are too many links that jump you to different parts of their network - and far too often they link you to yet another offer to join another site. One minute you're in Yanks, the next you're in WhisperingLily. And damn if there aren't ads on every page. Stop trying to sell me something and give me what I signed up for! And that's what I see as the biggest shortcoming of the site. After over a year since my last time in, I only downloaded about a hundred masturbation episodes. That might sound like a lot, but they're about 10-minute average length and over a full year's worth of content. If the pictures were clearer, I might have saved a few more of those sets as well, but the quality just isn't there. As was noted in another review, this site has a lot of potential but somehow manages to fall short. Even with all the positive aspects I see, the cons really hurt the overall experience. The core material is really good, with (unlike another well-known masturbation site) well-lit, "see-it-all" scenes. I would only recommend this site to a first time subscriber or someone who doesn't mind waiting a long time for the full scenes to build up.

(Continued in replies)
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Yanks.com

6. Yanks.com (0)

Pay
Newbie
92*
qualsite34 (0) 06-04-12  05:29pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: One of the best collections of authentic looking amateurs on the net.
Most girls are extremely attractive, intelligent, articulate, and very likable.
Huge selection of videos. Most have both interviews and individual masturbation scenes.
Excellent value
Site features written biographies of each model, similar to Abby Winters.
Site is very active and updated regularly
Cons: Video quality could use some improvement although it is totally acceptable. As with most sights that have been around for a long time, the quality improves as you go along.
Bottom Line: This site is a hidden gem. I would rank it up there as one of the top amateurs sites on the net today. Here you have a very large collection of authentic looking college intellectual bohemian co-ed types primarily from the Northwest usually performing their first porn shot. Believe me, these are not the type of girls you expect to be doing a porn! In any case, The girls are usually very positive about the experience and it shows. The typical format is to open with an interview of the model in street clothes with no makeup, conducted by a very cool laid back female who really knows how to relax the girls and get them to open up about themselves. This serves as a warmup to one or more masturbation scenes. If ever there was a site that fit the term "Organic porn" this would be it. Very highly recommended!!!!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Yanks.com

7. Yanks.com (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
exotics4me (0) 08-03-11  03:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 08-12-11  06:49pm  (Update History)
Reason: Problems with canceling
Pros: - A site based around mostly amateurs, the female orgasm and real masturbation. As a plus, if you have a wife or girlfriend, that likes porn, you also get access to their site that is focused on male masturbation.
- Price is good through TBP
- Newer videos are 1280x720, will further this in BL
- Newer pictures are near 3000 long end and come zipped.
- Taking a shot at around 400 models, surprisingly, for an amateur site, nearly all the women are attractive. I think that's a big plus. Even the older (mid and up 40s) models that would normally not appeal to me, do here.
- Call it a pro or con, there are some pornstars on here. Ramona Luv seems to have been on nearly all amateur sites in 2004-06 and she's here, Aaliyah Love is here as a guest model, I don't mind them, but some might. I would love to see more Ramona.
- Decent search, it works, but the whole navigation of the site could be updated, reminds me of Little Mutt in how the site works.
- Very good download speeds
Cons: - The videos are not that clear, not even the 1280x720 ones. It could be lighting, could be the amateur "effect", but the older videos are hard to watch on a big monitor.
- Inconsistencies, one model, Isabella, has a high video download option, it's 720x480 and a bit blurry. A newer model doesn't have high video download option and the medium option is clearer than Isabella's high option.
- If I could convince them of one thing, please stop the video from streaming when I click on it to download. Firefox users should turn to No Script, trust me, some of these videos are orgasm focused so there's nothing like one starting and a loud moan roaring through your house at 4 in the morning.
- My main feeling here in the cons is that it needs updating, not the actual content updates, but the site. It took me 10 minutes to find the download link for photo sets.
Bottom Line: We had discussed a little about this site being like I Feel Myself. It's not a lot like it, but it does have short 40-60 second videos of the woman's orgasm face that are spliced from the actual full body videos. So if you're into I Feel Myself and just seeing the face during orgasm, you will like those, I really didn't since they are so short.

Next up, interview videos. They're everywhere. Since they don't an interview tag, I scanned through the videos archives and these interview videos look to come about every 5th update. I really don't like interview videos and they take up the space of an update too. I do understand the use of them on a site like this since it's more convincing that these girls are not pros, but the pros have ruined interviews for most of us. For what it's worth, most of the girls on here seem genuinely sweet and playful.

I don't know what the deal is with the videos not looking good.

But wait a minute, the content is really good. If you're into strip, tease, which I am, you may not like these videos. There is almost no tease, it's get naked, masturbate for 7-10 minutes, orgasm. This isn't as bad as it sounds. It does add to the girls probably being filled with anxiety, nervousness. Some of the girls are much more confident and have more fun with it.

The unusual masturbation techniques used in some are interesting, erotic even, but I'm not for sure how sexually arousing they are to watch. Maybe that's me, I don't find a girl rubbing her clit against the corner of a bathroom sink to be arousing. I'm guessing what is being shown here though is that this is how the girls are comfortable masturbating. I don't believe there is a fake orgasm on the site. You get some squirters, some that make a milky mess in minutes and what I think they have going for them the most, the girls are really good-looking girls. There are few here and there that don't really appeal, but most look like regular, cute to really pretty girls.

They're all not skinny or in perfect shape. I was really surprised that I liked the 45 year old Barbie Lynn's bathtub shoot. I think they are going to sell most of these models on being real, erotic instead of drop dead gorgeous.

These are the numbers I'm coming up with based on their search engine.

Nearly 1,000 videos, and as said earlier the interview ones and short orgasm face ones are included here. Still, the site has grown since I was last on it. From the way I read it, they had several sites and decided to put all the content on them on this site. I don't remember them having over maybe 400 videos last year.

I will say they could be more clear about what you get. When I click "our sites", it shows me having access to the male masturbation site Club Stroke and having access to Whispering Lily, this is a community site that has a forum, shows the new updates at Yanks.

This is where it gets confusing. Also listed in "our sites" is Solo Touch. This shows as being a male and female masturbation site. Well, to enter it, I have to register a profile on Whispering Lily. When I go to Whispering Lily it says that all their content has been put on Yanks or Club Stroke, so I have no clue what this Solo Touch is or if its female content is already on Yanks.

A little frustrated that some of the models only have pictures. I understand that not all are willing to do videos, but I still want to mention that to potential members. Another frustrating one that I think is very important, some of the picture sets are only 15-25 pictures. Again, I understand that those are older sets.

May sound like I have mostly negative feelings here, but it's not true. The frustration comes from how good this content is and how much better it could be.

They stick with the solo theme really well. There are even dozens of videos of two girls masturbating together, but not really touching each other. This is a whole other level of erotic since you get the feeling they are drawing some inspiration from looking at the other masturbating. A few do go into girl/girl and those scenes are really good if you're into lesbian porn.

Updates don't seem to follow a set schedule. For the last month there are 25 updates, those 25 breakdown like this, 8 photo sets, 10 masturbation videos, 5 interview videos and 2 of the orgasm face only videos.

Overall, I really like the site because of the models. I will be keeping the majority of what I download, which is rare for me. And it's nice in a way that the videos are short 7-10 minutes, even at HD, are only 200 MB or so.

On recommending it, if you need tease in every video then maybe not. If you're looking for something different than the normal porn these days, this site is highly recommended. I think it's much better than I Feel Myself and would compare it more to Little Mutt or maybe even FTV in some ways without the glam. I would recommend it. I'm enjoying it and it will slip into my normal rotation of sites. More of Ginger P would be nice too!
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Yanks.com

8. Yanks.com (0)

Pay
Newbie
70*
TrashMan (Disabled) 01-23-09  08:12am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: +Site search which works well
+Homepage has every list (keyword "LIST") you could want - top rated models, latest videos, latest pic sets, latest updates, etc.
+Site celebrates female masturbation, so you get videos with some odd, but entertaining female masturbation techniques (check out a scene from Mercedes where she uses the edge of a table to get off)
+Two formats (WMV,QT), and two qualities (low,high) of videos offered on most videos (some just offer WMV)
+Images are high quality
+100% exclusive content with girls you have never seen before. A few girls here and there have done professional porn vids, but for the most part they are newbs.
+Theres a headshot for every girl in the directory
+Yanks provides scans of introductory survey that each girl filled out when they applied for Yanks (using their porn name of course). So you get every bit of information you want to know about a girl - measurements, sex habits, likes, dislikes, etc. It is fun to know this stuff about a girl.
Cons: -Watermarked videos and images
-Disappointing library size
-Girl directory not alphabetized
-Can't download imagesets as ZIP files
-No free bonus material. There are two bonus pages totaling 5 types of bonus content: links to buy porn hardware (like dildos and fleshlights), links to "trusted" partners (nothing more than links), friends links (sites which have offered a bit of their junkier content for free to Yanks), streams (junky streams like Lightspeed, which themselves are limited), and actual bonus sites on the Yanks network (except they are not automatically included with Yanks membership). Like I said, no bonus material.
-Videos with multiple girls are featured on their own page. E.g. Mercedes has a video with a girl named Jordan. Instead of this update appearing on Mercedes' or Jordan's page it appears on a separate page for "Jordan and Mercedes"
-Homepage only shows latest 5 updates, no page to show more, and videos are not tagged with dates after being pushed off the homepage
Bottom Line: Overall the site is very underwhelming and feels like it is lacking, mind you the layout has not been updated for years. The site is still updated, at what exact rate I do not know (since I can only see the last 6 updates), though it seems like it averages out to a little LESS THAN one update per day. The material is high quality (good resolution video, good resolution images) and enjoyable to watch, just I wish there was more of it. Each girl has only one or two videos, maybe 2 or 3 image sets and that is it. What is a little more disappointing is that the videos generally have no associated imagesets and the imagesets generally don't have associated videos - which sucks because there are some image galleries that get my blood rushing, that I would love to see in full motion.

Personally, I would have liked if this review applied to the other sites in the Yanks network (Billies Bitches, Girls and Fingers, etc.) but it can't because each site requires separate membership (I mean I guess you could sign up the same username and password on each site, but you still have to pay extra each time).

$10/mo is rather cheap, but VideoBox is also $10/mo and you get 5 full DVD's per day, which works out to 35 DVD's per 7 days, or an average of like 150 individual scenes per 7 days. Compare this with Yanks.com which adds something like six or seven scenes per 7 days - underwhelming to say the least.

Am I going to say to avoid this site? No, because there is some really unique stuff on here, like the masturbation techniques of some of the girls (e.g. Mercedes), and there are also a content from a few girls that I like whose content is hard to find (e.g. Adara Star under the alias Adera). But, the 70 rating is warranted; there is a lot this site can do to improve, and the first thing would be to update their outdated page layout - get with the Web 2.0 revolution, please!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Yanks.com

9. Yanks.com (0)

Pay
Newbie
78*
nygiants03 (0) 07-24-07  10:26am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - only 9.95 a month because of TBP dicount
-Frequent updates( small updates), a couple times a week
-Seems to be genuine female orgasms
-111 models
-260 videos
-374 pic sets
- exclusive content
-110 stories about girls and masturbation
Cons: -No extra websites come with it, not even yanksvideos website.
-Only 2 video formats quicktime and WMV, in both high and low . Video quality lacks, some fuzzy videos
-not enough good closeups or girls who cum milky wet
-No full scene video of everything such as interview and masturbation into 1 video.
-Models could be better looking
-pics are average at best
-only 48 extra pics, and 27 extra videos of poor quality
Bottom Line: -Seems like there are a lot of videos but really it isn’t that much, every girl has a short interview which is a movie. Also some really short clips . Also some of the pic galleries are just sheets of papers where the girl answers questions about orgasms.

-A few lesbian videos , a few male help videos in which he uses a vibrator on the girl, and mostly solo masturbation.

-Comes with some free videos and pic sets from girlsandfingers, solonation, billiesbitches, masturbationpages, yanksvideos, whisperinglily, clubstroke, mr.skin, I Shot Myself, Beautiful Agony, I feel myself, Sologirls, The Female Orgasm, Masturbating porn stars, and squirt it. Usually about 4 full videos per site and 3 pic sets. Varies though. It also comes with some stream sites like cherry spot, swallow my net, jizz jugglers, and about 15 more. Very low quality though.

-There is a chat area and forum but that’s for free, you don’t need to be a member to partake.

-The main reason I joined is for the 9.95 reduced price from $29.89. This site is definetly not worth 29.89 or 19.95 for that matter. But for 9.95 its worth joining. You get to see girls using toys and their fingers to get off, some orgasms are more intense then others. These girls are mostly amateur with only a few pornstars such as Nicole Brazzle, Taylor St.Claire, Sarah Blake, and maybe 2 more. But basically all the other girls I have never seen before on any other porn site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Club Stroke

10. Club Stroke (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
LoveThyself (0) 02-17-07  05:10pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I think the best thing going there are the user photos and stories. Doesn't take too long before you start to recognize the same models in the photo shoots, but the user pics are real and always getting updated. Stories are a great read, too. Have had some good interactions with some of the other members there, as well, and the only thing better than having fun alone is doing it with someone else, so that's always nice.
Cons: I didn't see anything wrong... the previous review felt the site was hard to navigate, but quite frankly I had a far more difficult time moving around this site than I did Clubstroke.
Bottom Line: I think it's a fantastic value for the money. TONS of user photos (very nice specimens!) and some great stories if you like to read. Also, for the bi-crowd, there are bonus areas that will take you for a spin with some quality girl-content, too.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Club Stroke

11. Club Stroke (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
Sparticus (0) 01-19-07  07:53am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good forums
user submitted pictures/vids
personals/clubs
Cons: not much content
a bit hard to navigate
Bottom Line: the best part are the forums, the member section could use more content.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-11 of 11  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. None

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.