Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Many amateur models looking for their big break
- One new video/model per week
- Download speeds are good (80% my max)
- Navigation is good enough considering the large size of the site
- Models of all races and body types and all are attractive
- Around 1,200 models
Cons:
- A big con, no pictures and of course, no picture zips
- You used to receive more bonus sites with this membership. Now, you only receive Casting Couch - HD.
- One new video/model per week is good enough but it would be a lot better if that included a photoset
Bottom Line:
Casting porn is one of the easiest forms of hardcore porn for newcomers to get into. That is essentially what Net Video Girls is. A casting pornsite, but the same company that owns it also owns Casting Couch - HD and at one time included access to Backroom Casting Couch, Exploited College Girls and Black Ambush. That was one of those networks that was almost too good to be true and well, they broke it up into two sites or networks. I don’t know why and don’t need to know why. I just know this was a much better value and deal when all the sites were included.
These types of casting sites are filming with their hands tied … so to speak. These casting scenes almost always need to show the female as innocent but horny and desperate for money to make the scenes seem realistic. I don’t know how much, if any, that hampers the performance by the ladies. It makes joining this site a hit or miss, mixed bag. It seems like every model I am really attracted to, has a terrible or average at best, performance. That’s not the site’s fault, I don’t think, but when you’re only getting one new video a week, a dud really hurts the site. It’s why I would have pictures available and downloadable. Pictures aren’t as easy to mess up in as videos.
Even saying that and missing those other sites that used to come with Net Video Girls, this is still a good to very good site. It helps that I don’t join it more than once a year. That balances out the dud videos/models. I get 52 new ones to offset any poor performances.
They do a good job of presenting the models as amateurs. The clothing choices are trendy for the time period the scenes are filmed in. It isn’t a site that is heavy on the makeup. The scenes need very little description. The woman talks a little, she tries to usually convince the camera of her innocence. The sex is predictable and I think it has to be. These are auditions. Each position receives X amount of time.
I do give them credit for their models. I like seeing the different body types, races and they have a good blend. It’s interesting to see if the different body size models react differently to certain positions. The one thing that’s not interesting is wondering if the model is going to be willing to accept the offer she receives. You already know the answer. That is one of the weaknesses of casting sites.
It’s a good site that can be and has been available in a bigger and better package deal.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A nice clean site that is easy to navigate with icons that quickly get you where you want to be.
-Each video is tagged with multiple keywords but you can only search by one keyword at a time.
-There are over 1300 videos to choose from that go back as far as 2001. (Needless to say quality is quite poor on those early videos.
-Their video resolution has followed technology so that they have added from their original SD to now include HD as well as 4K for any video produced from 2016 to now.
-They update on average with 10 to 14 new videos each month and each video is dated.
-They have a wide selection of models to choose from with an emphasis on natural looking women and surprisingly a few of them even became top performers in the industry.
-They offer cam content but I'm not a fan of that type of porn so can't add anything.
Cons:
-The site is a bandwidth hog that rarely allow you to do more than download one video at a time or navigate the site itself. Let alone the net. Trying to download more than one video is not recommended.
-Videos start automatically instead of waiting for the user to click on the start button.
-Obviously the further back you go. The worse the video resolution gets. The early stuff is 320p.
-Not necessarily a con but their 4K videos are huge files that are above 4G and some go as high a 6.5G.
-The video are all handheld and Tripod shot so it's a mix of eclectic and static.
Bottom Line:
*I have had my eye on this site for years but I was always nervous to join because they have such a piss poor preview section and needless to say I was really nervous to invest money for fear I would regret it but boy was I wrong. This is one of those rare sites that you should not judge by it's cover.
*Granted if you aren't into POV/Handheld porn than don't bother to go any further but if you can live with it than you will find that the guys knows their stuff.
*I really like the fact that most of the models are natural looking. I would prefer to see less ink on some of them but they aren't the more common and you can often overlook it. There are a few older women but the vast majority are late teens to primarily 20 year olds.
*The sex is pretty hot and the women really look into it. There is a mix of vaginal with quite a few anal videos as well(80 at last count). You also get a nice mix of g/g with b/g.
*The only major negative is the bandwith the site eats and you are talking to a guy that as ultra-high speed internet. I can normally download huge video files from other sites while still surfing the net but you can't do that here and if you are into 4k videos than be prepared to wait at least 20 minutes for the file to download before you can download another one or surf the net.
*It's also very annoying that the videos start automatically because that means that once you select a scene than you will wait a few seconds for the player to buffer the video before it starts.
*The guys talking can be annoying to some but it didn't bother me and he mostly does it in the beginning when he is doing this pseudo-interview.
*Now this is supposed to be a network of sites but seeing as they all seem to be shot from the same locations and the action is about the same in all of them then I wouldn't necessarily call it a network but I also don't care because it's the content that's important and it's amazing.
If you don't care that it's handheld/tripod porn than this is an excellent site to join.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- This site appears to use genuine amateur/first time/indie performers - or at the very least does a far better job of presenting the female performers as amateurs than most other sites. Despite the casting aspect being an obvious set up, most scenes appear to depict genuine enjoyment and orgasms as far as I could tell...not too much over performing involved.
- Huge back catalog of content, with newer scenes filmed in 4k, and great download speeds without limit.
- Membership gets you access to Casting Couch HD & Net Girls. The vids on these 2 sites are very similar to Net Video Girls - the only real difference being CCHD has a black male stunt cock. Therefore, not entirely sure why they're marketed as 3 different sites - but the content's quality across the board, so no complaints from me!
- Front facing doggy is a camera angle they use in most scenes, and I think it's now my new favorite!
Cons:
- As seems to be the trend with similar 'amateur casting' or 'girls first porno' sites - they make sure the male performers are kept anonymous through a combo of POV filming, and using camera angles where the male's face is obscured. This limits available sex positions and camera angles - and I'm fairly certain the male performer can't fuck at maximum effort while holding a camera in the case of the POV, therefore the performances aren't as intense as they could be in some scenes.
Bottom Line:
Female performers on the more amateur end of the porn star scale, appearing to have a genuinely great time in many of the scenes - makes this a must join for me.
If a site like this could just find an able male performer willing to be shown fully on camera, so we could vary the positions being filmed up a bit more, and ensure he's giving the girls maximum pleasure, this would be a near perfect for me. For now....it's pretty close!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
These sites have a lot of Pros:
1) Thousands of videos that offer decent quality until you get into the 2011ish time frame which is to be expected
2) This site specializes in the Girl Next Door who you could never date but could pay for as a escort. Seriously these girls are hot and not your typical porn star types.
3) The last year of each site offers some 4k quality which is not a lot overall but is something at least.
4) 6 incredible sites for the price of 1 and the feeling of each site is different enough that you can tell what site it probably comes from.
5) Weekly updates for each site is typical
6) These guys are the Kings of Painal & Frontal Doggystyle pornography literally the best in business
7) These guys will also occasionally employ girls who are not pretty in the conventional sense but who make up for it in enthusiasm.
8) They do a good job of setting up the scenes with a good written description of what takes place.
9) They offer a low budget formulaic charm
Cons:
These sites have some cons:
1) It can be difficult to log in and to log into the other sites on your membership. Literally I am experiencing this bug as we speak. I am not sure if they are undergoing a redesign or are changing what they offer with a subscription but this can be quite maddening.
2) The tag system is nice but under utilized and the search function is very hit or miss. There is huge room for improvement here.
3) For some people the lack of Pornstars will be a automatic pass. Other than Jill Kassidy and a few minor stars like Tanner Mayes you will have a hard time finding a good quality scene with a known name on this site.
4) The password system is a little silly and very difficult to use when logging in. It shouldn't be, it seems simple. But every time I have joined this site at some point the password becomes a issue and log in problems do happen.
5) I am not saying they gate downloads or speeds. But this site was slow for me and I had to do one scene AAT.
Bottom Line:
Lets talk about the cons of this site first:
Something has to be done about the log in system. Money needs to be spent to combine these sites into a simpler to use site like what we see happening with Adult Time and Evil Angel. It is inexcusable to have so many log in issues in this day and age. And since I join this site fairly often I think it is fair to say this is a recurring and long reaching issue.
So here is some constructive criticism. Pay someone to update the sites all into 1 site just like Adult Time does. Let the user make the password. 1 log in and password should be enough for all content in my humble opinion. THEN we can move on to things like more accurate tags for porn scenes and better overall search functionality. The current search system is abysmal. I don't typically talk about con's first but I wanted people to know up front the kinds of issues these sites struggle with.
Now let's talk about the good of each of the 6 major sites and there is a LOT of good:
Net Girls: This site seems to specialize in Threesomes (Most of their best scenes are threesomes). There is a lot of Frontal Doggystyle, I love the way they interview the actresses & you can feel the passion and real orgasms.
Casting Couch HD: This site seems to specialize in Inter racial Porn with Chris from Hollywood. A very well endowed Ebony gentleman who seems really good at putting the actresses at ease. He likes the girls to twerk, dance and have a silly time. This site likes to focus on a LOT of thicker girls and not traditionally pretty girls. As for the sex there is a lot of Frontal Doggystyle, Missionary, Cowgirl and Lips that grip.
Net Video Girls: This site feels like the big daddy of the first three sites. It had the most keeper scenes for myself. This site has a lot of 1 on 1 action featuring Frontal Doggystyle and some anal. The interviews and sex has a very real feeling to it even though we all know the context is made up. These escorts know they are not just filming for a calendar lol.
Backroom Casting Couch: I know taste differs from person to person. But for myself this is the #1 casting couch fantasy site. I draw a distinction between this kind of casting and the kind you will find with Pierre Woodman. This is mainly focused on local Strippers, Beginners, Escorts and bad girls. Whereas Woodman films the very top talent. This site has a LOT of Painal scenes, this is where sex is obviously uncomfortable for the actress but is still 100% within consent and legal. The reason for this is simple, these are not top of the line porn star professional anal actresses. A typical scene will have a interview, multiple camera shots at the same time, one on their facial expressions and another on the sex act. This site features a lot of flexibility, enthusiasm and Anal / Painal.
Black Ambush: This site features a well endowed Ebony gentleman featuring a lot of rough sweaty sex with eager beginner actresses. There is a lot of Anal, Frontal Doggy and hard sex. The actresses are mostly of the Caucasian variety making this a good gonzo interracial porn site.
Exploited College Girls: This site features a lot of college age beginners and escorts. There is some Frontal Doggy, some anal but it is very much a mixed bag of what you are going to get. The main draw of this site is getting to know the girls in the interviews and enjoying the way they have sex. In particular the Ashlynne scene is one of the greatest scenes in my collection a lactating full breasted redhead who does Frontal Doggy and Anal.
The Bottom line and some final thoughts:
The bottom line is this is a quality site I feel like every collector should join at least once. Some of the scenes are simply legendary. No other site does Painal and Frontal Doggystyle better than these guys do it. Despite all of its flaws it still manages to be best in class in a lot of respects. From the interviews, the quality of talent and the passion in the sex.
I could make a list of the 10 must have girls and their scenes from across these 6 sites. Ok so lets take a moment to talk about ugly actresses or as I put it not traditionally pretty girls. There are several of these actresses in these sites whose passion, enthusiasm and bodies more than make up for their short falls. I found myself enjoying some of these scenes the most of all because its something you never see in porn (Except for Facial Abuse & Desperate Amateurs). I imagine quite a few lonely housewives and money hungry girl friends ended up cheating on these sites and it adds some realism porn is often lacking.
Of particular interest are the failed scenes. I love that they upload the failures and you can see disaster as it strikes. A few of which re shot later to great success.
If you are willing to put up with a bit of hassle to get high quality and unique casting porn then look no further! These sites are best in class hence the score, I hope you liked my review.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Amazing models that appear and very believable as amateur models appearing the first time in front of a camera.
- Great dirty talk from some models.
- Shy and reluctant girls with naughty daring sides.
- great group scenes fffm and ffm.
- fast downloads.
Cons:
- The site is quite dated I guess in today’s world with it’s look.
- Still logs you out lots, which is annoying.
- Some vids are rather long with too much interview making the size of the file quite large.
Bottom Line:
I have to say this site I was really surprised to how far it’s come since my last visit and have to congratulate the site producers for creating some of the hottest porn I’ve seen anywhere in today’s market. Sure there’s still good porn been produced, but for me I do find lots of today’s market repetitive and a little stale, with a tendency to stick to the same kind of trend amongst most sites. Net Video Girls seems really genuine even though I think most of the girls are proper porn stars but they don’t act and have that token pornstar look. It’s made to look authentic and real like these women are walking in to make a calendar shoot to earn some cash and get a foot in the door of the modelling world. It’s not long into the shoot when the guy tells them if they want to stand a chance of making it in the industry they have to perform a little and flirt with the camera. They soon get the idea and he always tells them that they are free to leave but won’t get paid, in fact I think he tells them that it’s the first introduction and won’t be paid until they are chosen to be part of the calendar.
Anyway what really stood out on the site for me is the beauty of the women, I rarely join sites these days if I don’t discover many natural beauties, here there’s lots and to be fair to them some are really great actresses which I always feels helps in porn. Also a highlight for me here is the way they talk dirty, the guy encourages them to flirt and talk dirty to turn the guys on who might be watching this, for me it’s a huge turn on for a girl to tell us what’s she’s doing and what she’d like to do. Often ignored in porn is communication part, OK maybe a story beforehand but once the sex starts they tend to be quiet and maybe just blow someone for 15 mins, for me I like some sort of dirty talk too. Anyway not all girls do it here so there is a mix but some and the standout movies for me did feature lots of chat too.
What make NetvideoGirls are must join for those who like casting vids are the women, I found so many knockout vids here and far more than most sites that are going straight into my awesome+ folder, sure there lots of women also I didn’t bother downloading cause I didn’t fancy them and I only download now scenes I really will watch again and not just once. I basically ditch any scene that doesn’t have watch again value. Also that’s not all this site has going for it, I also love the group scenes with 2 or 3 girls and a guy, but I also love their lesbian scenes too, here they give you lots of models who return with a girlfriend or come in to show another model the ropes and then they start to make out with them. There are some great combination scenes here with really unscripted magic for the eyes.
Stand out models for me here were, Katrina, Becky, Marissa, Lauren, Margaret, Katrina, Ivana, Emma, Angelina, Charlotte and Adriana.
If I had to pick a model that literally blew my mind it was Angelina, oh my god, when watching this I knew she was special cause she was so shy at first, for me that is a huge turn on cause I adore shy girls but have a naughty side, Angelina had supermodel looks and really don’t know how they found her to do the vid but thank god they did, I would join the site literally to see this woman.
One great thing with joining the site is you can network access to a whole group of other sites too; I’ll try and get around to reviewing some of them also soon, exploitedcollegegirls.com, backroomcastingcouch.com, nebraskacoeds.com and more. I joined through exploitedcollegegirls.com as it mentioned more sites you got on their join up page. I think you’d get all the sites on joining through netvideogirl but they didn’t list them all. I know nebraskacoeds and its network of sites joined up to add to the whole network last year to make it even better value.
Would I recommend this site, yes totally recommend it, when I joined 3 years ago again via exploitedcollegegirls I think and it was ECG that was the highlight but Netvideogirls has come on leaps and bounds and I found lot more girls I preferred here now than I did on ECG and Backroomcastingcouch which is very similar to ECG.
Last time I rated this site 78 but now I have to rate it 92 and as a whole network I’d rate it all 95.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
"Unsuspecting" women tricked into sex
Interracial casting
Wide variety of women
Cons:
Lack of male talent
Lack of vocabulary
Overuse of same words and phrases
Extremely long BJ scenes
Gives waaaayy too many directions, just shut up and enjoy it sometimes
Constant camera adjustments
Too many instances of dead air with camera on clueless woman
Lack of enthusiasm from male
Bottom Line:
I used to really enjoy this site but if you've seen 1 episode, you've seen them all because it's the same male talent, Chris, and he's absolutely horrible. If they would mix it up with different black male characters that know how to use different phrases and words and doesn't follow the same tired script over and over again, I would sign back up in a heartbeat
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very good site/network of "amateur" content.
- Navigation is surprisingly good, there's a lot of content, but all can be accessed from the toolbar at the top of the Net Video Girls site.
- There's multiple "sites" included: Net Video Girls, Backroom Casting Couch, Exploited College Girls, Black Ambush, Casting Couch HD and Broke Model.
- Some of the sites include picture sets that are downloadable as zips ... but there's a con involved here.
- Download speeds are extremely fast for me, hitting right at 90% of my max download speed consistently, the average porn site downloads at 50% of my max speed.
- Nice diversity in models, both in body type and race.
- Have liked it enough to let it recur for a second month.
- There are weekly updates. Though, these vary by site. But overall there are new scenes across the network.
- Another that will border on pro/con depending on the user, some of the videos are very long. I've seen as long as 93 minutes.
Cons:
- The biggest con is the inconsistencies. Some of the sites have filenames that name the model, other ones have the name of the site and nothing else. Some of the sites have picture sets that you can download in zips. Other ones don't even have pictures you can view. Some of the sites have dates on the content. Other ones don't. These are minor and common annoyances, but annoyances nonetheless.
- I'm having video resolution inconsistencies, but maybe it's because I'm downloading some of the older videos and they just have them listed as "HD"? One of the ones I downloaded as HD was 768x432 resolution.
- No pictures on the Net Video Girls site.
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying I really like this site or network of sites however you see that. The majority of these models look like real amateurs, some chubby, some slim, some in-between, and there's a good variety of races as well.
I really don't like that Net Video Girls doesn't have pictures. Several of the other sites do have downloadable picture sets. Then there's the inconsistencies, I don't have enough knowledge of computer programming to know why a non-HD video would be listed under HD, but it's not that big of a deal. I consider as low as 720p to be HD. Their newer videos also have 4k option, so they're putting out high technical quality content overall. It's just their older content is worth looking into too and that seems to be where the inconsistencies show up.
The length of the videos and size of videos also varies greatly. I've dowloaded scenes as large as 2.5GB and as mentioned above, as long as 93 minutes. I'm not complaining about that. It just should be known that the videos can be very long considering it's one scene.
There is a more natural feel to this site than most amateur sites, like the really long scenes, compared to some that are only 20-30 minutes. That makes the scenes more believable to me. Some of the models seem to really enjoy teasing as well, which is why I don't understand the absence of pictures on Net Video Girls.
The amount of content you receive with the site and the network is impressive. I would say it's the largest amateur site I've been on. They're not doing any favors though on content count or exact numbers. Each year (dating back to 2000-01) has a list of calendar girls, most of the earlier years it was 12 per year, but over the last few years there's been more than 16 per year. That's just on Net Video Girls. Then Casting Couch HD has a similar setup back to 2013 and no set number per year, but there's more than 12. A little cleaning up would help these sites.
But the overall picture here is there's a lot of content between the seven sites they list in their network.
Luckily, the navigation lets you move from one site to the next and a model list and there's those fast download speeds to mention. I've seen a few known porn stars, but most of these models are genuine amateurs. You also find something fairly rare here and that's two amateur models in a scene together (girl/girl).
The filename problems seem to just be on Net Video Girls, where all the scenes I've downloaded are named netvideogirls(dot)hd(dot)mp4. So, you'll need to either manually rename them to the model's name or let your computer rename them to netvideosgirls(2) and so on. I've just renamed them to the model's name since one amateur site I was on recently didn't even give you a model name. This one at least does that.
I would recommend it to anyone who likes the casting, amateur-type site, it has a lot of content, good technical quality and the good blend of model types. And if it shows my own enjoyment of it, I let it recur and have been a member for nearly two months now. Just be warned of the inconsistencies listed above.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- First timers and amateur girl next door types
- Performances can be quite real and spontaneous
- Unique style
- First time anal scenes
Cons:
- Sites navigation is very poor
- Rather dated web design
- Lots of scenes are drawn out too long
- The logging me out all the time
Bottom Line:
I initially joined this site because of a certain girl I recently discovered looking through some Nubiles movies, I'm one of these people who downloads movies from sites often then simply moves on to another site without really watching lots of the videos, it happens lots with solo girl movies, I just often don't feel in the mood most of the time for solo movies so they are put away for a rainy day. Anyway I did have that rainy day and came across a model called Molly Maddison, and oh my, she is like my perfect model, really cute, tall and has a great slender figure. I figured at first that she was Eastern European for some reason but no she was in fact American. The movie sadly dated back to 2009 so she isn't even making porn anymore from what I discovered, huge shame but what I did find out is she did two movies for this network back in 2009 also. She features in one at Backroom Casting Couch and the other at Exploited College Girls. One of them which was anal so I couldn't believe such a sweet girl had done anal so early on I had to join just to see more of her. I'll reveal more about this video later.
So about the netvideogirls site in general, first off I was instantly disappointed when I joined because the videos had this extra small thumbnail image of the girl/girls and then when clicked it would show a guys feet in nearly every video to begin with and to find out if I wanted the vid I had to zip through half way or into the video to see if I actually liked her enough to download, often this would result in the video player getting stuck and taking ages trying to catch up with the stream, so often I got frustrated and simply gave up on that video, there were no images even on this site to see if I wanted to download. So that wasn't a good start but I knew it was an amateur site I accepted and developed some patience, you can find some gems in these types of sites and to discover more girls like Molly or Danielle as she is known on these two sites I figured it might be worth the hassle.
Another thing that really wound me up though and its one of my bug bares on certain sites, that’s the process of logging you out after a certain time, here it seems set to an hour of even less and you are still surfing the site and bang you’re out, you lose the page, worst still, when you put your login details back in it refuses them, it would only allow me back in when I cleared my cache, if it logs you out of a site on the network which isn’t the site you joined up (which was netvideogirls in my case) it wouldn't even let me in with the login details after clearing my cache so I had to go back from scratch all the way back to netvideogirls.
Now to the good, so yeah it isn't without its issues I have to admit but if you battle on and can oversee these and give it a go then you will find some really cute girls that really stand out as being really unique in its style of porn. I know casting videos are nothing new but I have to say these I did find to be some of the best I've seen. The guys who do the casting are usually 80% nice to the girl and try to make them feel comfortable and inform them what to do and if they are willing to go that far. There is also quite a few anal scenes too here which was nice to see (ok not as many anal scenes as I initially had hoped for but quite a few). The videos themselves are usually in an office or hotel/motel room so that would get rather samey but it was all filmed quite real and that’s an element that appeals to me.
The Molly/Danielle scene though on Exploited College Girls, if I'm honest I found a bit of a roller coaster to watch, elated to know she did anal in the scene but then when watching I couldn't help but feel really bad for her, she looked so unhappy and not really into it at all. I think it was one of her first ever scenes and she'd been wanted to do porn for a while and maybe she didn't know what to expect or how far she'd have to go. If the girl doesn't seem to be into a scene for me this totally does nothing for me, I want to see her smile and be into the sex, not like she is going through hell just to make a little money. Anyway she did go on to make other scenes so that was good it didn't totally put her off.
Another reason for me joining was seeing Uma Jolie do a scene on netvideogirls, she comes along to an audition with her friend who is also now a big porn star, Megan Rain and there’s another girl and a guy, the scene itself is really good, I'm a huge fan of Uma Jolie from discovering her on FTV Girls, her look back then was more innocent with the brown hair and natural minimal makeup. So this was really early in both girls careers and Uma looked simply amazing, OMG them eyes and that body are a lethal combination to a guys heart, it was a shame she had a bf at the time though so she was often in the background and not having sex with the guy just with the girls.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The premise is great; get naive girls into your 'studio' to pose for a calendar, and gradually persuade them to take their clothes off and have sex. There are a lot of scenes, most of the girls are cute, and their reactions look genuine. Plus, the camera man isn't your usual overweight sleezebag. Although you don't see him often, on the few occasions when you do he looks normal enough, and you can believe that the girls would want to fuck him.
Cons:
The site design is antiquated. There's no search facility, no photo sets, and the video quality is terrible by today's standard. The site goes back to 2000, and you could forgive the quality on some of the early movies, but to be turning out poor-looking 480x360 and calling that "high quality" is a joke. The other real issue is that a large number of the download links simply don't work. I did report this, although there were way too many to report individually (I'd guess at about 30% of the total number). I did get a swift response, but the issue itself wasn't resolved.
Bottom Line:
It's still one of my favourite sites from the last few years, but to get a good score the broken links would need to be fixed and the video quality would need to improve - if not HD, then good quality SD should easily be possible. I enjoy netvideogirls, but the bottom line is "buyer beware."
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
I enjoy that many of the amateur young ladies are not in the profession. There may be a few that eventually went on into the profession. But the huge majority did not.
The idea of innocent young ladies coming for interviews are seduce into sex seem very real with this site. They all seem to really enjoy the sex. Great to see a teen in heat to get fucked or to suck a cock.
Cons:
The format of the model is confusing. Would have like to see the model listed with their video. Gets confusing when a model has more than one video and they are returning and not know when was the first time they appear.
Schedule of new video also seems confusing.
The video themselves are sometimes confusing when u view one and the models on screen doesn't start with the model that u choose.
Bottom Line:
I really like the site. Will go back there soon and be a member. I find that the sex is hot and the babes are hot. If u like the seducing bit of innocent young babes this site is for you.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+One of the original "reality" sites. NVG acts as a "fake" Calendar photo shoot.
+Very early vids for some notable girls (Eva Angelina, Sarah Blake, etc.)
+Newer updates (2008 and on) have a flash stream of the vid on the girl's page
+Updates categorized by year (each year has its own page. makes it easy to determine shitty update schedule)
+Every update has a PROPER headshot. For a site that offers no preview streaming and no screecaps, this is a major plus. Too many times I see sites without previewing options that offer their listing thumbnail as a non-headshot making it hard to determine the girl in the video.
+Rejections page is fun - shows the girls who somehow failed. However they are more staged than the real videos (and probably never been updated)
+There are BTS vids, but again, they are rather outdated and poor quality.
+Unlike other sites (both RealityKings and NaughtyAmerica), NVG has not deleted a single file on their server because of "old age" or "poor quality".
Cons:
-Limited number of updates PER YEAR (anywhere from 15 to 60 updates)
-Earlier updates (2007 and earlier) have no preview trailer
-In the 8 years they have been doing this, video quality is still as shitty as ever. Yes, there have been improvements over the years (vids originally were previously only available as MPG, and only split-scene), but vids continue to be 320x240 with no high def option.
-Poor girl naming (Luna Lane=Annie, Faith Leon=Faye, Isabella Soprano=Melody, Chelsea Romero=Alexis etc.)
-No site search
-Site hasn't changed in 8 years, still Web1.0 HTML style
-Homepage sucks. Just a short list of updates (text form) with some text about security and shutting down accounts.
-Updates not tagged with dates. Once the update is off the homepage (which lists last 5 updates with dates) the date is gone.
-No bonus material
-Expensive, and no trial
Bottom Line:
NetVideoGirls is a relic of the way porn pay sites used to be done. HTML design, MPG and Real Media offerings in both DSL and 56k qualities in split file, and no streaming capabilities. They were one of the first websites I know of to do reality-based pornography, with this site acting as a front for a photoshoot calendar (not a bad idea, but has been surpassed by the idea of driving around in a bus picking up innocent girls on the street). You would figure with reality porn taking off that they would update their site to compete and rake in the cash. Not the case. Their website has not changed in any major way since their inception (sure they added some minor things like WMV downloads, full-scene downloads, abolishing of real media on newer updates, etc., but again nothing major), they continue to spit out updates in low quality 320x240 resolution, there are no HQ image sets, production quality is still terrible as ever, and on and on and on.
Asking $30/mo is a lot, especially for a site that does not update as often as we have become accustomed to (thanks to sites like VideoBox and VideosZ) and that offers updates that are very poorly encoded. Again, like other junky sites reviewed, my list of Pros are short on meaningful items and long on minor things which don't count towards a very high rating, and unlike junky sites which know they are junky, NetVideoGirls offers 0 bonus material (usually a site which knows it is junky offers a lot of bonus content to make up for the junkiness).
The only redeeming thing about NetVideoGirls is that they offer videos from some better known pornstars from their earlier days (Luna Lane, Sarah Blake, Eva Angelina, Chelsea Romero, Isabella Soprano, etc.), the only problem is that the names of the girls are all wrong (or lacking a full name, Eva Angelina is named just Eva), so you will be relegated to browsing by looking at the headshots which will make it more difficult than it should be.
Rating is 61 because those very old videos of some favorite girls are a lot more arousing (because of their amateurish nature) than newer vids with these girls in the business today.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
