Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bills through CCBill and Epoch which is a poor choice.
-No download limits
-18 to 20 year old Eurostars, very attractive but very thin for the most part
-The models are not shy, many play to the camera
-The models start off in ordinary street clothes
-Sample videos and discounts for Nubiles and Puffynetwork
Cons:
-Expensive for what you get. There is no discount through PU.
-Prechecked cross sell for Puffynetwork
-The videos are split into clips
-No way to search
-Standalone site with no extras
-Archive site, not updating. The last was February 2017
-The photos are boring low quality screenshots.
-Horrible videography. The site is as bad as it gets.
Bottom Line:
There are many sites that focus on attractive women showing off the goods. Most of them are photo sites with second rate videos. This site has very weak photosets that are screenshots of the videos. Here the videos are the prime focus.
Basically it is similar to In The Crack. The shoots are split up into parts that feature certain parts of the action. The first is of stripping with not much nudity, then another short clip showing off breasts, butt and vagina. Next is a few short clips of masturbation with fingers, dildos and other toys, and/or vibrators. There is usually a very believable orgasm to end the shoot. Nice as far as the setups. However each scene within the shoots is about 5 to 6 minutes and must be downloaded individually. There should be a way to download them as a single clip.
If you like speculum scenes as I do, there is no way to search for them. It has been very long since I have been a member of a site so unfriendly to members. The navigation is a mess. If you look at the updates, you see that they stopped adding new ones to the list in 2015. However, the latest videos are from 2017. What??
The only way to download at all with any logic is to checkout the listing of the models. By my count that means that there are 128 actual shoots, but split up into as many as 9 scenes for each. The last video comes in at 1920x1080, 12000 kbps. Beautiful quality, however they never finished putting the shoot up. The video abruptly ends as the site stopped updating. Again, why?
The scenes feature some very attractive and drop dead gorgeous Euro models. They are not at all shy and do fairly well. The problem is that the videography is awful. There are far too many scenes shot on a diagonal and far too many that are gynecological. Sometimes the focus is so close up that the screen gets only part of the subject. Half a vagina is not sexy or erotic. Move back a little and show the model as a sexy woman, not as a collection of parts. This site ranks among the worst on the net for creating eroticism.
In all fairness, I liked the handful of lesbian scenes. They definitely have some decent chemistry between the models. I am not a big fan of lesbian videos, so this surprised me.
How this site manages to take willing sexy models and makes such lousy videos is a mystery to me. Maybe it is just lack of interest.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bills through CCBill and Epoch
-No download limits
-18 to 20 year old Eurostars, very attractive but very thin for the most part
-The models are not shy, many play to the camera
-The models start off in ordinary street clothes
-Sample videos and discounts for Nubiles and Puffynetwork
Cons:
-Expensive for what you get. There is no discount through PU.
-Prechecked cross sell for Puffynetwork
-The videos are split into clips
-No way to search
-Not updating. The last was February 2017.
-Standalone site with no extras
-Archive site, not updating. The last was February 2017
-The photos are boring low quality screenshots.
-Horrible videography. The site is as bad as it gets.
Bottom Line:
There are many sites that focus on attractive women showing off the goods. Most of them are photo sites with second rate videos. This site has very weak photosets that are screenshots of the videos. Here the videos are the prime focus.
Basically it is similar to In The Crack. The shoots are split up into parts that feature certain parts of the action. The first is of stripping with not much nudity, then another short clip showing off breasts, butt and vagina. Next is a few short clips of masturbation with fingers, dildos and other toys, and/or vibrators. There is usually a very believable orgasm to end the shoot. Nice as far as the setups. However each scene within the shoots is about 5 to 6 minutes and must be downloaded individually. There should be a way to download them as a single clip.
If you like speculum scenes as I do, there is no way to search for them. It has been very long since I have been a member of a site so unfriendly to members. The navigation is a mess. If you look at the updates, you see that they stopped adding new ones to the list in 2015. However, the latest videos are from 2017. What??
The only way to download at all with any logic is to checkout the listing of the models. By my count that means that there are 128 actual shoots, but split up into as many as 9 scenes for each. The last video comes in at 1920x1080, 12000 kbps. Beautiful quality, however they never finished putting the shoot up. The video abruptly ends as the site stopped updating. Again, why?
The scenes feature some very attractive and drop dead gorgeous Euro models. They are not at all shy and do fairly well. The problem is that the videography is awful. There are far too many scenes shot on a diagonal and far too many that are gynecological. Sometimes the focus is so close up that the screen gets only part of the subject. Half a vagina is not sexy or erotic. Move back a little and show the model as a sexy woman, not as a collection of parts. This site ranks among the worst on the net for creating eroticism.
In all fairness, I liked the handful of lesbian scenes. They definitely have some decent chemistry between the models. I am not a big fan of lesbian videos, so this surprised me.
How this site manages to take willing sexy models and makes such lousy videos is a mystery to me. Maybe it is just lack of interest.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very good quality videos
Decent sized collection
Dates back to 2007
Almost entirely young (under 20), petite, slender attractive models (no unibrows, etc....some eastern block teeth, though.)
Several popular European models from when they were younger
Most models are shaved but a few are trimmed or full.
Every update is dated
"Bonus" videos from other sites like Wet and Puffy
Cons:
The site IS updating, but only one small addition once a week.
When updates occurred before, they were once or twice a week but were very small. one video segment from a larger set, just screen caps, just photos, etc.
A few choice photo sets, like one of Caprice, have broken links.
Some MPG/WMV videos are actually avi. No idea why.
No scoring of videos or sets.
No ability to tag favorites.
Downloads are very slow.
The price ($29.95 USD) seems a little steep for the content, but not outrageous.
Bottom Line:
This is another "18" site
Mostly solo but some girl/girl sets
Stripping, masturbation, penetration, some speculum, some peeing, some panty stuffing.
The name says it all. Some serious close-ups of mostly really cute, young models!
The site video content is very similar to InTheCrack.com (ITC) and it also reminded me a little bit of ALSScan.com (ALS) or First Time Videos (FTV). ITC does a lot of close-ups and ALS is almost entirely teen models. FTV is another site similar to this one except this one is almost entirely indoor shooting. The collection here is nowhere near as large as those sites, but it is larger than many other similarly priced but lower quality sites
The girls are all eastern European and several have been on other sites over the years. Caprice and several others will be easily recognized, although some have different names here. There are also many that I don't recognize from other sites. Most are quite pretty and many have that "cute" factor that is solid gold for teen sites. Sadly, as is the case with many semi-pro eastern European models, their expressions can be a little off by American standards...a little goofy, frightened or spooky. Fortunately, the majority of the videos are not focused on faces at all.
At first I thought the site had stopped updating. I think that was because navigation for the site is a little tricky. The Videos page shows recent updates but the Photos page shows mid 2015 as the most recent update. And the upate log page has not been updated since 2015. Some udpates can only be found by scrolling down on the "home" page. The page only shows 6 sets from mid-october back to September, so anything that might have been here between September of this year and July of 2015 might not be showing up anywhere. They are not updating in the update log, in models, etc. Updates are occurring about once a week and they are single videos of a larger model set, or images, or bonus content. Honestly, this is one of the most confusing sites I've seen when it comes to finding stuff.
Some quick stats:
126 models or female couples
About 725 video segments
About 25 20 meg photo sessions (1333x2000)
Screencaps for most videos
Sets date back to 2007
There is an update log (through July of 2015)
Everything is dated.
Videos come in multiple formats, usually 3 sizes. Unfortunately the format of the files is often incorrect (MP4 instead of WMV, AVI instead of MP4, etc.) The sizes are usually correct, though.
Downloads are slow. Very slow.
Navigation is pretty basic. You can view by update or by model or you can view the update page or look at the update log to see all updates through mid-2015. I have no idea why they continue to post updates on the home page, but do not add them to the log or update model info. Something is kind of messed up with that.
There is a search function, sort of, but it allows you to search by a specific attribute or video activity like anal, boobs, cervix, discharge, finger, gape, etc. Kind of odd, but it does seem to work, at least with newer videos.
One thing I like is that all of the videos include a little synopsis of what goes on in them....similar to ITC but without the check marks for the best videos.
Also, the file names seem to make sense. Girls name and segment number.
There are about 21 bonus videos from Wet and Puffy, Wet and Pissy and Nubiles.net. These are full length videos, not just teasers.
Bottom line: I'm giving this site a 77 because a) it has some really good solo girl content, but b) navigation is very basic and links are broken or mislabeled, c) the webmaster is not posting/cross referencing updates correctly, and d) downloads are very slow.
If you like "InTheCrack.com" but also have a preference for the younger models, this site might be worth a visit. Take a look at the models and know that none of them are the least bit shy.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Original content
-Video files appear sharp, clear, at good quality
-Dwn managers work as well
-Skinny teen girls (est europe), most of them shooted also in other sites (teenmegaworld)
The lesbo scene are quite interesting, but there aren't a lot of this kind in the site.
Cons:
-The daily vieo limit it is very boring; they says that you have 7,5 GB per day and 4,5 per session, but nothing said to you how long is a "session" ? Often the session limit does not work(you can download less than they says); when, after 1 hour you have disconnected you try to dwn again, but it does not works !
Boring.
-Not so large content; there are a lot of video files but they are at 120 kb average sized, about 5 min., so you can't say that the website has "a large content"
- I don' like Photo in general, but these are videocaps not real photoshoot sessions.
-About two update a week, that is not enough if you consider that a video scene it's about 5 minutes each !!
Bottom Line:
You can for a month get a membership, it is a nice content, but in my opinion you subscibe the site only once in your weblife....
I don't intersersting in pics so I can't judge the difference with others site.
The content is quite good and the teens who play scenes are skinny and beautiful, similar to other networks (est europe teen girls), semi-pro.
After you visited you can say that the site could be an "extra content, bonus site" of another one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
•18 CloseUp is a niche site themed at CloseUp erotica of the female vagina and anus. The site keeps true to the fetish that their trying to offer to a niche market. It’s a newbie site and they need to keep working at it but they have the right theme and focus.
•HD for the very latest videos.
•Models are improving in xxx role
Cons:
•Much smaller site than what I expected. I should have known with just 30 models not to expect a big site. Members can pretty much download the site in a few evenings without a download manager. The HD files are small. I downloaded clips pretty fast. Don’t ask me speeds but it’s a minute to three per download.
•The site sold me on the preview menu and initial marketing. Plus the TBP Reviews. The site did a good job on fluffing the selling pitch rather well if they got me to join. I feel short changed.
•HD Video? The way they reviewed the videos on TBP you would have thought they had the very best in industries standards in HD technology.
TBP Reviewer’s compared them to IntheCrack? Not even close in video quality or level of erotica. A few HD but a majority was lesser quality. I thought their HD videos quality was not even close to what I’ve been seeing on other up-close sites that have been around for a long time. Even with the option of $29.95 HD membership.
Bottom Line:
•The Zip Files of the actual screen shoots are poor.
•Navigation? 2 out of 10 in the modern web site design. Area that needs direction as they grow to make the site much better.
•Weekly Updates. I wish the site would just update one model instead of updating clips of 4-5 models from sometime ago. With today standards for adult internet sites asking for one complete model a week is not that much to ask for?
•One lezzie set. Just one and its not even close to Sapphic Erotica quality.
•This con is one that drives me crazy. The camera person is a male ape with a retard IQ or a maybe a horny bull dyke bimbo getting off seeing pussy. If I had to hear those video cams click and unclick and the cam JO making a racket with that cam I was going to scream. Whatever the fuck the dummy camera JO was doing with constant movement distraction over and over in some of the clips I have no idea. This site needs to get a professional camera person if it wants to improve. The current cam people are terrible. They take away so much of the site.
•This is a con is for other sites too. Shaved Pussy? Shave it bald! More and more I’m seeing newbie models that just walked onto a porno set ( which this site seems to have for a first time shoot) that are not ready. Oh their horny whore sluts for sure wanting to spread their cunt and finger themselves! It’s becoming obvious the girls where hairy maybe before the shoot and shaved or they haven’t been working much and they let their cunts grow in. The shoot requires they shave their pussy. To my liking. Their cunt’s on the site looked just shaved all red and with razor burn. I’m fine with that! In fact I like it. The site wants the girls cunt shaved all around the ass and cunt opening for visual fetish which is what should be part of the production. My issue is the girls are spreading their ass and cunt but there is a lot of missed hair and razor stubble which is a total turn off. Is it too much to ask for a real bald cunt? Can’t anyone kneel down and spread an ass to see it the girl was totally ready? Their porno models fee usually consist of prepping the girl? Why sites can’t get this simple thing right will continue to amaze me. ALS is one of a few that get it right. Call them if you need instructions. Inspect the cunt please and make sure it’s clean shaved!
• More Lube! Not every girl is going to get naturally wet during a video. Viewers want to see wet cunt pure and simple. If the model is not getting wet help her out. Lube is cheap. Lube the cunt heavy. It makes for much more better erotica.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Awesome quality (vids are in Full HD 1920x1080 @ 8000 Kbps)
+ Beautiful models aged 18-20
+ Very regular updates (twice a week)
+ Amazing close ups
+ Great anal action and orgasms
Cons:
- No Boy/Girl action
- Too few lesbo vids
- Site organisation is confusing
- No search feature
- Too few Hi Def pictures
Bottom Line:
If you're into watching beautiful teens masturbating, stretching their pussies and assholes, gaping their holes in close up and playing with all kinds of toys to make themselves cum or even having fun with each other, you will definitely like 18closeup.com. The only thing that's missing is a good b/g action here.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
