Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Extremely high-quality photography and HD videos
- Already plenty of content despite it being a relatively new site
- Exclusive content and exclusive models
- Regular updates, all dated (3 galleries and at least 1 vid a week)
- All content is downloadable, with ZIPs available for galleries
- Two super, super-sexy models who are both very confident
- No ugly tattoos, fake breasts, lots of piercings etc
- Great quality photography and slickly-edited video
- Lots of variety in terms of shooting locations, gallery themes etc
- Nice, clean (if basic) navigation and previews of future updates
- Well-used comment and gallery/video rating system
- Ability to bookmark your favourite photos/sets
- Both models are outstanding teases without showing too much
- Billing by CCBill with reduced cost rebills
- Simple login with ability to choose own username/password
Cons:
Points marked with * don't bother me personally:
- Search system doesn’t seem to work
- Previews are a bit too vague, particularly for video updates
- Videos are a bit too arty-farty and can be slow-moving
- Daily bonus photos aren’t varied enough
- No interaction with/from the models (eg, blog)
- Currently only two models*
- Some might not be happy Katie/Ella aren’t totally nude*
- Pricey compared to some sites*
Bottom Line:
I nearly didn’t review this as I know a lot of people don’t ‘get’ non-nude sites, but for me a good tease site can definitely hold its own against even a lot of porn sites as for me the thrill of the chase, and the art of tease can be extremely sexy in my opinion.
A quick bit of history first: Famegirls.net replaces Fame-Girls which is now an archive site. Previously there were three models; the famous Sandra, Virginia and Ella. Sandra retired, and recently Virginia also retired. Vlad, Ella’s photographer, decided to start a new site on his own, and introduced Katie, who is new to modelling.
The site is only a few months old, but already it has 36 galleries (5,000 pictures), and 19 videos, and with three galleries (averaging 100-150 photos) and at least one video every week, it’s growing fast.
Both Katie and Ella pose nude, with very little being left to the imagination apart from between the legs. They come very close to showing everything, though, particularly Ella. They are both supreme strip teases, though, and for me, little is sexier than a beautiful girl, slowly, sensually taking her clothes off and having fun as she does.
The galleries are set in number of locations; either in the studio, normally with a plain background and props, or often outside on a deserted road, beautiful meadow or idyllic river. Even on the outside shoots, the image quality and lighting is exceptional.
It’s a lot more sexual than the previous site in terms of poses, the style of photography, the detail and things like the Ella pouring milk over herself in one set, or Katie smothering herself in oil in another – it’s more than just glamour now.
Although sets are generally the same format, each gallery brings something new to the table. There’s always a strong narrative, the costumes vary from bikinis to dresses and everything in between, and both Ella and Katie seem to have a huge variety of poses so it somehow never gets repetitive.
Currently there are 35 galleries and around 4,500 images.
Images are 5760px on their longest side, and have a
translucent simple white logo in the corner. Each gallery is downloadable as a zip file. You can also choose to download the zip file with six different image dimensions from 640px on their longest side all the way up to their original size.
There are also 20 videos available. All are 1280x720, HD, MP4 and are around 5-10 minutes long. They’re beautifully shot, but generally a bit too arty-farty and slow-paced, although there are exceptions (eg, the latest Katie video where she’s in a sauna). At least one video is added every week.
Members can rate and comment on both videos and galleries. These seem like well-used features, and comments aren’t censored or even moderated from what I can tell.
Navigation-wise, you can view Ella’s sets, Katie’s sets, or videos. You can also add sets and photos to your favourites and view just those. There is also a search function, but I’m not sure it actually works – it would be nice if you could search for ‘lingerie’ or ‘bikini’ or some kind of tag, but every search term I tried didn’t return any results. The navigation is fairly simple but definitely fit for purpose.
Another little criticism is the daily bonus photo, which is not included in normal sets, ‘such as pictures from real life, artistic shots, or working moments’ – since I’ve been a member, every day it’s been a picture of Katie from the same shoot, albeit a different picture. It would be nice if these could be more mixed up so one day it might be (for example) Ella at the beach, then Katie on a shoot, then Ella shopping etc... at the moment it’s just like being slowly drip-fed a gallery day-by-day.
At the moment it is only Katie and Ella modelling. I know the webmaster is looking for another model, though. Both Katie and Ella compliment each other with both being extremely svelte, with incredible figures. Ella is blonde, while Katie is raven-haired. Neither have lots of piercings or any tattoos which is good to see. So far, there’s only been one video with the pair in, so fingers crossed for more.
My last criticism, possibly my biggest, is that there’s no interaction from the models in terms of behind the scenes footage or candid photos. I know a lot of people don’t care for this, but on a site like this I think it’s important. I don’t blame them for not getting involved with comments etc, but maybe Vlad (the photographer/webmaster) could consider a blog with more of a behind-the-scenes/off duty look at these gorgeous girls?
This is a great website with great photography and is incredibly sensual. The girls are both gorgeous, Ella is incredibly experienced and Katie is already confident and exciting in front of the camera. At the moment it is on the pricey side, but Vlad has a long history of being extremely reliable with updates, and content is continually being added and I definitely feel like I’ve got value for money compared to a lot of smaller amateur model sites.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
This site consists of only three models: Ella (age 18) Sandra (19 and Virginia (age 18). All are hot as a pistol, and each set of pictures I see of these beauties leaves me salivating to see more.
This is a non-nude, renewable, and non-renewing pay website. But don’t let the “non-nude” throw you, because although the genitals are skillfully concealed, these girls are so appetizing and photographed in such erotic attire and poses that your imagination does all the rest for you.
Note: Each girl also works at SEV-archive.com, which are separate sites of their earlier work and giving you eye-popping views closer to the peak of their youth.
To really better appreciate and get the most out of Fame-girls, one might do himself justice by first perusing the archives.
The content is 100%exclusive, have Zip’s, offers easy navigation, touts premier Hi-Res images.
151+ Galleries (avg.126 pics each) €25.00/$31.76 per Mo.(recurs at €22.00 Euro/mo. Small water marks but non-obtrusive.
Cons:
There are no videos.
Updates are trice weekly, but only features one of the three girls at a time, therefore you have to wait on your favorite model.
No visual break-down or presentation of regional prices. All monies are in Euro, and don’t be surprised if you’re surprised.
You won’t see pussies (at least not whole ones). Enough, though, to feed the imagination and certainly what you see is mouth-watering.
Display of tits are bolder, but minimal.
Too many outdoor shootings, as well as more waste on the gals cutting up and making cute facial expressions.
Volume of pics, although substantial, are less than one would expect. I went through almost all of them in two settings.
Pricey. A greedy bunch; but the girls (especially Ella) are so damned addictive that caution is thrown to the wind.
Bottom Line:
I came upon this site soon after it opened, which got me swept up by it's three tender, young models. These sexy Russian gals have a fresh, natural beauty and innocence that ..well, rocks! -- Happily disturbing some of my dormant, virility hormones and getting them off their collective asses.
Hark! Let me repeat: although the models are photographed in provocative settings, and shot in ingeniously clever ways to trick the eye, those juicy, budding little hair-sprinkled mounds (nestled between the legs) unfortunately hide behind fabric -- but to keep us coming back, we’re thrown just enough eye candy to keep our appetites wetted.
Pictures portray the girls frolicking and involved in playful antics, others are mood embodying, and, of course, the good stuff -- high octane poses that test the testes.
Worth repeating, probably because of the overall volume, this site being reviewed seemingly picks up later in the girls careers. The archives of their earlier work is individually seperate and noted on this reviewing site’s tour -- Which, again, I suggest you examine before hurriedly launching into this one
These girls are a good example of less being better. By that I mean creative tease stepping front and center showcasing arousal at it’s finest. Contrarily, The repetitious, pussy-close-up-images continuely being churned out now by this business have become overkill. Can one imagine the sight of a pussy as being jaded?
In conclusion -- For those who might fancy a diversion by retreating to a milder-erotic, theater of porn -- then a ticket to this site could be rewarding. Of course, at the same time, a charge conceivably exceeding $30 is something to think about.
I’ll be going back to Fame-Girls, because I want to follow those young ladies’ growth in this business. Especially, when and if the time comes that the strategically located “fabric” is pulled aside, or comes off.
I recommend only that one who might be interested, to visit Fame-Girls, take the tour, and decide on those merits if it's worth the trip.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
