Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Back to my comfort zone with one of my all-time favorite sites.
- Hey, it’s 2023 and it’s still updating and a lot.
- Solo models for the most part and they get kinky.
- Good, downloadable photos and 4K download videos or 1080p.
- Very good download speeds (90% my max)
- Still love those solo scenes with a guest watching and helping.
Cons:
- I think most people expect this site to be dead.
- If they updated the looks of the site it wouldn’t look as dead as it does.
Bottom Line:
The good news is of course, the site is not dead and I would even say it’s making a case
for at least getting a Web 3.0 website. There is a new update every 5 days. Each update includes video and photoset.
It used to be considered somewhat controversial of a site. There is the better known, ALS Scan, and it is owned by the same person. People like me, collectors, wanted an explanation for why some top models were not on ALS Scan, but instead were on ALS Angels and caused us to have to join it separately. The closest answer we received was that ALS Scan is for petite and smaller built women, while ALS Angels is for slightly more full figured models. Yeah, there were a lot of eyes rolling. With all that said, can we even complain about that now in 2023? Porn has changed, the ways we join sites have changed.
ALS Angels, for me, is and has been superior to ALS Scan for the last 5 years. I know that is an opinion and that’s why I shared it. For me, ALS Angels has more models that fit the look I prefer. One thing none of us will disagree on is the easy to spot ALS videos. The owner of ALS has great relationships with most of the models. They are more laidback on this site and more natural.
What makes ALS Angels stand out for me are the scenes with more than one woman. The scenes where a helper is brought in and from the best my eyes can tell, it becomes unscripted. I have made many jokes and laughed about Eve Angel’s solo scene where the helper ends up fisting Eve. Eve, who rarely talked in her scenes, says while giggling, “You’re really good at this!” That’s instant chemistry, even tension, you won’t get from a scripted scene.
I’m glad to report the content is still very much ALS content. The masturbation scenes always go a little further than the viewer expects. The outdoor scenes have some of the best natural lighting use of any site and their pictures, I’ve said it before, can compete with sites like Met-Art.
Other than my usual Eve Angel fanboying, there are many great models on here. Dillon Harper has some of her best scenes on this site. What a personality she has and a sense of humor. Sophia Knight’s scenes on here are probably better than everything she filmed in her career. A couple of my favorite models and scenes from ALS Angels are of Hennessy and Cipriana. Both of these ladies are known for being raunchy and loving hardcore scenes, but here, they are soloing and just being pretty and sexy.
Don’t let the outdated website make you believe the content is lower quality. The videos include UHD 4K downloads and those are as sharp as any ALS video ever has been. The pictures are over 5000 on the long end and are just as enjoyable to view as most of the videos are. There is attention paid to the way the zip files are edited and it’s like watching a perfectly executed flip-book.
If there was more to complain about, I would do so. It is hard for me to believe how consistent and high-quality ALS Angels is, while I feel like ALS Scan, has taken a few steps backwards. ALS Angels may very well be the best site on the internet when it comes to models with a little meat on them.
You just don’t get much better than this site. Consistency, in my opinion, has become a huge part of scoring a site these days. And there is nothing but high quality consistency throughout ALS Angels’ site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- ALS Angels, the bustier, lesser-known, sister of ALS Scan.
- I think it's a very underrated site that many probably don't know exists.
- If you like slick shaven models, this site is for you, ALS stands for All Ladies Shaved.
- These models look older, more physically mature than ALS Scan's models. Though there are exceptions.
- Continues to churn out 2-3 updates per week and the site dates back over 10 years.
- CCBill is the biller
- Download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Like ALS Scan, the videos are very high quality and on top of that, you get very big, great quality photo sets with each scene/set. These are photo sets not screencaps and can range from 300-500 photos.
- Has some unique scenes that bring a helper into a solo scene, some gynecological scenes, some fisting, a little bit of everything in the solo genre.
- Excellent models, a lot of these newer models are models I only know from ALS Angels.
- One of the few sites that I like the BTS videos from.
Cons:
- As each year passes, ALS Angels navigation and layout grows further away from 2010. Come on, guys, do something with the navigation.
- The standards for being on ALS Angels instead of ALS Scan is becoming very blurred. A very recent model is 5'3" 99 pounds with 32B boobs. How does she land on the curvier site? No offense to the model is meant, quite the opposite.
Bottom Line:
I can be a bit grouchy at times and this might be one of those times. I've been a loyal supporter of ALS since 2007, have joined ALS Scan more than a dozen times and the same for ALS Angels. Joining two sites to see all of the ALS models and content is frustrating. Here's an offer of a truce: Fix ALS Angels so it navigates better, make it look like it was updated this decade, and I won't be as grouchy about having to join two sites to see all of ALS models. This is becoming a rather abusive relationship at this point lol. I go on ALS Scan and it has this near perfect navigation, everything is organized, updates more often than ALS Angels then come to Angels and it looks like it's 2009 again.
This wouldn't bother me so much if ALS hadn't shown they can make changes or improvements. They have, even on ALS Angels, there's no nicer feature than they have on their scenes. You don't have to click anything to go to the set, then click a download button. The links are right there beside the set so you can just download them without going through all the clicks other sites make you go through. The same with their excellent photo sets.
I have complained in the past about the model separation. It used to be a bigger deal to me, back when Eve Angel was active and they insisted on Eve being on ALS Angels instead of ALS Scan. I bought the explanation of her having bigger boobs and curves in her hips but these newer models on ALS Angels are tiny. I mentioned 5'3" 99 pounds, 32B on one, there's another that's 5'6" 103 pounds, 32B. Another is 5' 105 with 32B. How do you get smaller than that? If I say much else, it's going to be very offensive and I'd rather not.
Done complaining.
I gave them a 100 and took off 15 for the complaints. These complaints have been here since 2009. Really done complaining.
ALS Angels offers as much or more as any solo models site. They perfected this "helper" niche, where a model/genuine helper, oils the model, is playful with the model, flirts with the model and depending on the helper, might even slip a lick in or a good rub or two. It's unique in solo model porn. It never seems planned, the helper is planned to be there but the actions seem very natural. An example I've probably used before is an older Eve Angel scene. The helper seems completely blown-away with Eve's sexiness. She's oiling Eve's thighs, looks at the cameraman/staff and says, "Does she like girls?" Eve isn't a native English speaker but Eve says, "Yes!" The helper leans over and gives Eve a lick or two. The helper most-likely didn't ask for pay! You could see how excited she was to get to lick Eve. There's another where a helper is helping Eve start fisting herself then the helper just starts fisting Eve. And Eve in her rare English moment says, "You're so good at this". You see real chemistry, a spark and as far as I know ALS is the only site that does that type of scene.
There are the ALS fetishes, from speculums, gynecological inspections, 12 clothespins opening the woman up, there's some anal play, there are fists, helpers' fists, fingers and despite all the variation of the solo genre, they do it in a way that the woman looks like she's loving all of it.
Their picture sets are up there with the best in the industry. Besides having big resolutions, zip downloads, their models are dressed very normally, you will sometimes see a bikini that might not look like something someone would wear for anything but a porn shoot but for the most part, they dress like I would expect them to dress in everyday life. Their makeup looks nice but it's never overdone.
I mentioned in the pros that I even like their behind the scenes videos. This is because some have the helper in them and you'll get the cute, playful moments where the model grabs the helper's head like she's forcing her to give her oral and you'll get the laughing moments between the model and helper. I'm thinking those type of scenes bring in a little exhibitionism for the viewer since the helper is often dressed fully. Some voyeurism, especially in the BTS videos, kind of like you're a fly on the wall getting to see how the model and helper act towards each other when not recording the masturbation scene.
The navigation problems (this isn't complaining) include the "main" tab taking you to 8 newest updates with two buttons after those to take you to "photos" and "videos". Both of those are one long page of updates. The model list is your best bet unless it's a newer model, then just click on their newest set and it will take you to all their sets.
I would call it a true collector site because the content is exclusive and unique. You're not likely going to find similar sets as you find here or bigger, better photo sets, the photo sets are photos not screencaps and range from 250-500 photos in each. I will recommend it to anyone who can look over the complaints, as the content is excellent for anyone who likes any kind of porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge quantity of material.
Many popular models here.
Body types tend toward curvy/larger breasts.
Generally one release a day
Newer videos are good and in HD.
Newer photo sets come in high resolution.
Mostly solo/lesbian site but some newer B/G scenes.
The girls appear to be having genuine fun.
Videos are dated.
Cons:
Site design, presentation and navigation is horrible.
No search functions
Some releases are actually re-posts, remastered or previously unpublished sets of older material dating back as far as 2001.
Teeny-tiny thumbnails for photo shoots.
The narrow range of sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes things a little monotonous after a while.
Rather than break sets up into fetish types, each set includes the full range of material for each model (strip to speculum or whatever)
The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here.
Un-named billing service posts site name on CC.
Bottom Line:
I haven't been a member of Als Angels since about 2005. Amazingly, the format and overall type of content seems EXACTLY the same as it was then. Really. The site design may have changed a little from 2005, but it is just as clunky.
It is very difficult to determine volume because of the antiquated layout.
About 3500+ photo sets/videos
Several hundred models
1 video and 1 photo set a week (some recycled or previously unpublished old material)
Combination of US and Eastern European models
Most videos are of photo shoots
Mostly solo girl, lesbian and fetish sets
Videos are dated but photo sets are not.
No scoring.
No search functions.
Horrible navigation.
ALS Angels is the other site run by the guy who runs ALSScan, now a part of the Met-Art network. ALS Angels is still independent (NOT part of Met-Art network) and it includes many more full-figured and popular models (Like Lucy Li). It also includes some material that used to be on ALSScan, like the old body-paint and nude-in-public sets. The type of material on this site is identical to the type of material on ALSScan, but the models are not limited to the super-young, relatively thin girls on on ALSScan.
ALS Angels is mostly a lesbian and off-beat fetish site, but there are a few newer boy/girl sex scenes. The girls on this site are more large breasted, curvy, perhaps a little older, but all are shaved and many are quite beautiful. A few headliners like Lucy Li are easily recognizable without much make-up.
Just like ALSScan, practically every model gets fisted at some point. There is also an odd fascination with otherwise un-viewable areas of the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uterus looks like. Many models agree to use an embroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the vagina or rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it neither sexy, nor flattering. In a word, this stuff makes the models clinical.
The girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt.
Each set, regardless of age, starts out with the girl wearing a skimpy outfit or ALS signature tiny bikini and the girl undresses, lubes up and spreads. it can be quite nice up to here. Then they break out the bottles, vegetables, fists, vacuums, inflators, speculums and embroidery hoops. You might like it, at least at first.
The photographers have a very good rapport with the models and this shows in the sets. They are encouraged to please themselves and are often helped by another girl.
Navigation on this site is among the worst I've ever seen for such a large site. There is no search function. Models are listed alphabetically with an index. Photo-sets are displayed 10 sets across with no dates, names, or other info about the set with over 1000 sets on ONE PAGE! Once you open a photo set, you get between 5-10 pages of images, 6 images across, that are also very difficult to see. The sets are large, but many images are very similar.
You get two size options for display and 2 size options for downloads.
For me, the most frustrating thing about this site is the all-inclusive nature of every single set. I'll compare this to In The Crack, for example, that has many of the same types of scenes. Here, you get one scene or 1 video that includes everything from stripping to fisting to, speculum use to peeing in THE SAME LONG VIDEO or photo set. I don't want that. I want to see these beautiful girls naked, maybe oiled up and spreading, but that's about it. ITC separates out the sets so I can download the scenes I want and pass on the ones I don't. ALS should be doing the same thing. Compartmentalizing the fetishes will make the basic sets much more appealing to non-fetish folks and allow the people who like specific fetishes to just pick them. Win Win!
I also don't like that the photo sets aren't dated. You have no idea if the photo set you are opening is from 2001 or 2017. That's OK if you are a first-time visitor, but not OK if you are looking for material that has been published recently. ALL SETS SHOULD BE DATED. This failure troubles me enough to take away about 10 points from the score.
Bottom line: If you like ALSAngels, you will probably like this site. Keep in mind, though that the models are curvier here, which is a good thing, but the navigation is terrible.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very, very attractive models
- High quality & professionally shot
- Newest videos are HD (some 1080p some 720p)
- Newest photos are very high resolution
- Photos are zipped for convenient download (caveat below)
- Slight discount compared to ALS Scan site
Cons:
- Limited amount of content when compared to sister site ALS Scan
- Comparative price to ALS Scan site is not competitive enough for the amount of content (should cost less)
- Older zip files are a pain in the butt to download
- Lots of recycled content from photo shoots several years old
Bottom Line:
All the quality you expect from the ALS crew is here. The only problem is that there isn't much in the way of "new" updates. There are a lot of video posts from older shoots and they're just 720x540 max resolution. 5 years ago, that would have been cutting edge but many of their competitors have gone to all HD.
The main issue is that it's a limitation in the type of content they're posting. Way too much of it is from models they shot several years ago and are posting as "remastered" footage. This is fine and dandy if it wasn't being the main update content and just a side project. If the models weren't shot in HD years ago, then they have to make do with the footage they have. But it doesn't feel like they put much effort into seeking new models that fit the Angels image, which I much prefer compared to all the ultra-petite models on ALS Scan.
Their older photo sets are a pain to download too. There's no unique naming convention to all the zip files. They're all generically named by model and number of photos (max of 30 photos per zip file), so you really have to be on top of organizing the JPEGs as you unzip them. Fortunately, the newest shoots are downloadable in one big zip file.
I focus a lot on videos since that's what gets me to join. The visual quality of the newer HD stuff is fantastic. The older stuff, even the remastered videos are just average. But at least it has all the quality of ALS style shooting you come to expect. And they don't skimp on the footage. Many of their videos run 10-20 minutes.
Download speed is good. Not great, but not terrible. The download manager I use on the Mac works fine with their site so I'm happy there. I configure it to download with two connections per file and it has no problem letting me do so. On slow nights, files will come in at around 200Kps. Faster nights get me up to around 700Kps so if I have a couple of files coming in at once, I can fully saturate my Internet connection.
They had some downtime in November and added 2 days to everyone's subscriptions. The migration to a new set of servers caused a few broken links, however. I'm glad they did the right thing but it would have been nice to get a proactive email telling their subscribers about the outage.
All in all, if you like the models they have on their site (Andie Valentino, Eufrat and Lexi Belle are by far my favorites), then it's probably worth a one month subscription to get what you want. Don't expect too many "new" updates though, half of them are recycled and use the older resolutions.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The bustier, curvier sister site to ALS Scan
- High quality is the norm here, a discount is available to drop the price to $19.95.
- Picture sets are some of the largest I've seen, expect 3300-3800 on high end and around 200 photos, some have over 300 even! One of the newer picture sets of Angelika Black is 426 MB! That's getting your money's worth.
- Newer videos come in the beautiful 1920x1080 True HD and those are also huge, over 1 GB per movie on some of those.
- Download speeds are very good and using browser's DL manager allows resume if broken or paused.
- Most of the top models are here and some I haven't seen before too.
Cons:
- This is a pet peeve con of mine that might not be a big deal to others, the older picture sets are broken into pieces, takes 4-5 separate files just to get one full set. Newer sets have the option to download full set.
- Site can still be a bit confusing, will explain in Bottom Line
- Some videos are just photoshoots, but in their defense, they do list the videos as "masturbation" or "photoshoot".
- Update schedule isn't very clear or consistent
Bottom Line:
I had been a member on ALS Scan several times back in 2005, and was one of the ones that sent emails to Alex asking where models like Eve Angel, Sandra Shine and the more curvy models were. As a result of the emails that many sent in, they decided to open this site ALS Angels that is of the more curvy models than ALS Scan would normally have.
Since then, I usually join both at the same time, and really wish they would just make that an option, instead of needing to join each separately.
The picture sets are downright huge. Near 4000 high end on pictures and 300 pictures in the set, you are looking at close to 500 MB for a picture set. The videos might be the most crystal clear I have seen. Technically, very few sites come close.
Now, ALS Angels really is a very select site of top models. Thing is, I really don't know that I've seen all the models. On the main page there are these tiny "covers" that really do me no good, so I end up going to "featured models" which has roughly 100 models in it and each has multiple picture sets and videos. I think it kind of gnaws at me, wondering if I am missing some of them, but these 100 or so feature some of the best, Eve Angel, Sandra Shine, Andi Valentino, Angelika Black, Silvia Saint, Regina Ice, Tea Jul, Stracy, Eufrat, I mean if that isn't Heaven, I don't wanna go!
There also is a feature that they have been running for a while where they offer a DVD of theirs of one of the models to download. Luckily for me, I joined awhile back and they had the Eve Angel DVD as the featured one. I'm not for sure on what schedule this changes. This is a nice bonus to their regular content though.
There is the problem with the update schedule. Just going to read directly from it right now. From February 1st to 20th there was 9 updates, next update is listed as February 27th, so that was an update every other day, now it will be a week. Not for sure what is going on there.
I almost feel bad saying 92 since there are a few questions with the updates and when the DVD changes, but the content is just too good to not score it high. I'm not for sure but some of these models are real knockouts that I have never seen, like this new one Jennifer Love, not the same as the Latina hardcore model of the same name.
Their content of my favorites is some of the best I have. Eve's content with them is some of the best I've seen. Regina Ice's content with them IS the best I've seen of her and they do take these models to more kinkier actions than most do. I personally could do without the speculum play, but that is really the only complaint with the content.
Consistent updates, better interface to find models, and it would be one of my top 2 or 3 sites, maybe even top if the updates followed a normal schedule and the DVD switch was consistent, and full zip downloads on all picture sets. Those aren't unrealistic and would match the already incredible quality! Recommended, especially if you like curvier models!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ ALS Scan quality: hot girls shot beautifully
+ Fast downloads
+ A bigger breasted version of their original site
+ Primarily solo girl content, but it's not soft
+ Girl-girl content is very nice too
+ Same insertion, speculum, Rocket, peeing, fisting standards
+ All Ladies Shaved: that makes them Angels to me :)
Cons:
- Videos only archived since Feb 2007
- Updates are not daily, average 3-4 times per week
- Same prices as ALS Scan, yet far fewer models and content
- Too many Euro models
- Yes, content can be repetitive and clinical
- Continues bad practice of not fully releasing all of a model's content if she's not "popular," thus some models have very few scenes or videos
- Same director's blog as ALS Scan
Bottom Line:
The bottom line is I love ALS Scan, but Angels...is just not the same.
I think the score of 80 is common because these guys just know how to shoot well, and make great choices in who they shoot. These are not bargain bin babes, or well-worn veteran models with decades under their garter belts, but gorgeous, and frequently amateur, models who only get as nasty as they feel comfortable doing. The action is not forced, and it helps to produce a fun and happy mood.
Despite their choices in models, I prefer the American ones over the Eastern Europeans. At ALS, about 1/3 to 2/5 of the models are Euro, but here, at least 50% of the 88 models are Euro. Don't get me wrong, these women are gorgeous, but I would love to see more Americans. It seems there should be plenty of choices in our 300 million+ population, but they still have a lot of Euro girls -- not nearly at the levels of other sites -- but still too many for my specific perverted tastes.
Newer hi-res photos get as big as 3800x3500, and new HD videos are available in 1280x720 DivX or MP4, or big 1920x1080 WMVs. Older pics and vids are considerably smaller, and sadly, they only started archiving their video releases subce Feb '07, so there is nowhere near the amount of video content as on their sister site, and the releases only come about 3-4 times per week.
Other reviewers have adequately explained the routine monotony of photo shoots, but these can still produce hot content. It's just that a lot of stuff is BTS and you can get lost in the repetition of it.
This site says it "presents the more mature looking models with generally larger breasts" in comparison with ALS Scan, but beyond that there is little difference, and "mature" is frequently only a few months more so, and the "larger breasts" are about the only thing that keeps these models out of the petite teen pack found at the original site.
Devout ALS fans have no doubt checked out this site, and it is worth it for at least a month to collect stuff from models only mentioned on ALS. Those who are brand new to the world of All Ladies Shaved may want to check out ALS Scan, unless larger breast sizes are an absolute must in a membership.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Updated:
09-26-0809:35pm (Update History) Reason: Add more details.
Pros:
+ Gorgeous Models
+ High quality videos
+ Remastered content from a few years back
+ Realistic, "what you see is what you get"
+ No music in videos
+ Long videos (15-20 minutes on average, some almost an hour!)
+ Inexpensive
Cons:
- Very clinical, lacks seduction and passion
- Repetitive photo layouts and videos
- Not alot of content, roughly 75 models
- ZIP files for photosets are broken into several files with the same names, requires alot of folder management when unpacking to keep the sets from getting mixed up
- Updates are very infrequent, maybe 1-2 per week
- Slow download speeds, does not work with a download manager
Bottom Line:
The other reviews here are pretty accurate about this site. There is high quality content, and hot models, but the site is rather clinical and can be repetitive.
Almost every model has the same sequence of photosets: one or two speculum scenes, tongs, the "ALS Rocket" (a device for examining the cervix), and an occasional cucumber or fisting scene. You may get the impression each model is following an instruction manual, with the same "routine" of poses from model to model. To the photographer's credit, the photosets are amazingly consistent, and professionally shot.
However, seeing each model do "the same old thing" can get boring pretty quickly. This is especially true of the speculum photosets, personally these are a bit too "up close and personal" for me, plus the models just sit there as if they're in the doctor's office, although they always have beautiful smiles.
Unfortunately, the videos also seem contrived and follow the same formula, the videographer asks the model the same questions: "so you're going to masturbate for us? Well you just go ahead..." and then the model lubes up and gets busy. There is no build up, no flirting with the camera, and the videographer always makes his presence known. Once he stops talking and the model gets into herself, the action can be pretty exciting, most models appear to really enjoy themselves and there is no faking.
If only there was more intrigue and build up, another reviewer here likened the experience to coming out Christmas morning and finding your presents unwrapped. The videos lack passion and seduction, although obviously that's not the videographer's goal. Personally I like the seductive, fantasy aspect.
One huge plus I give this site above others, is that they re-master and re-release older content. Alot of people don't like this, but personally I think it's great. If you've been "collecting" for a few years, you probably have alot of vids that are 320x240 (or worse). Don't you wish you had some of your favorite old vids in HD? Even going back into the 90's...One day someone is going to make alot of money remastering old porn classics.
Bottom line: Great quality. If you ever had fantasies about being a gynecologist, then you'll love this site.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Gorgeous girls.
Great video quality.
Easy site navigation.
Exclusive content.
Fisting and other extreme content.
Large amount of content.
No more content rotation.
Cons:
Updates aren't as regular as Alsscan, only 2 movies per week (Tuesday and Thursday) and a pic set here and there.
Not as much content as Alsscan.
No specific director's blog. Alsscan's director's blog talks about Alsangels updates.
New models not added as often as other sites.
A single model's content is released over a very slow period of time.
Bottom Line:
This site is basically Alsscan Jr. in a way, although the emphasis is supposed to be that these ladies are a tad bit thicker, or have bigger boobs. It seems like they don't always separate the models precisely due to this criteria, but for the most part they do.
Simply put, if you like Alsscan and have never joined Alsangels, you should definitely give it a shot. But if you're trying to choose between the two I would suggest Alsscan, as it has much more content and more regular updates. Only 2 new videos per week with Alsangels, and I find that disappointing since some of the updates are just remasters of old content. Since I've been a member off and on with both sites for years, it is common to see movies I already have on my hard drive released as "remastered", when I would rather see new material altogether. On Alsscan it works well, but since updates are just 2 per week with Angels, it can lead to infrequent updates of interest. However, someone brand new will not have that problem, so it's all positive in that situation.
Model quality is excellent and all content is exclusive. You will not see Alsscan content on Alsangels or Angels on Als. Since they stopped rotating content there is a decent amount of videos built up, but it still pales in comparison to Als. All pic sets are available as well.
Content is the same as Alsscan, with solo models and some lesbian action. Lots of fisting and extreme insertions. Also, Alsangels is cheaper than Scan by a bit.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Most of the videos are 720x540, the older ones are being remastered if they are lower.
- Content is 100% exclusive
- As of right now, in the video section there are 3 full very high production DVDs, besides the video of clips. The DVDs each focus on one starlet, with masturbation and g/g clips. Also are sold on ALS DVD site for upwards of $25 a piece
- ALS has a micro-thong that most of the women wear in at least one set that looks very nice
- Only the very best of models on here
Cons:
- I guess the rotating content could be a con
- The video section looks small, 36 video clips plus 3 full DVDs (8 chapters each), on the other hand, I liked each video clip enough that I have yet to delete any of them.
Bottom Line:
I had never heard of ALS Angels, but had heard of ALS Scans. I had always heard of the rotating content, which changes every month or every two months. The thing is, I happened to get in on the content rotation in the right 4-8 weeks. As the 3 DVDs are of Breanne (really pretty), Sandra Shine and Eve Angel. Those 3 alone equal 24 clips that range from 12-25 minutes each. Then there are 36 other clips, a few more of them are of Eve Angel, another of Sandra as well. The rest are almost all major Euro stars, Angelina Crowe, Britney Austin, no skip over clips for me.
Pictures, this can be a little frustrating. The zips are divided into 3 sections 1-30, 31-60, so you have to download 3 separate zips.
I guess the hardest part about reviewing this site is that I have been a member for a little over a month, but the rotating content hasn't changed yet, so I can't guarantee if you go there, say next week, that this same content will be available. Having said that, I still have to think that with the overwhelming quality of pictures and videos, and the impressive list of models, there would be something for everyone.
On those DVDs, each one is cut into 8 chapters, on ALS DVD site $20 at least per DVD. The free ones that come with this site are a lower quality, 1MB+ 720x540, yeah, they consider that a lower quality, same exact clips as the DVDs which go up to 5MB HD. I've really enjoyed it, when the rotation hits, I will post a comment to update what is new. Recommended!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Photos: low res: 1600x1000 900x1400 High res: 3000x2000 3500x2300 1900x2700 2200x3300
Individual photo sets generally range from 80 to 100 pictures.
Presently 74 models in 358 photo sets.
Videos: DIVX @ 320x240 in full or in clips
Windows Media @ 640x480 w/newer at 720x540
Presently 96 videos on site: new release, bonus DVD, and directors choice.
Videos typically range from 12 to 30 minutes.
Updates of at least 2 videos and 1 photoshoot/wk.
No download limit and no DRM.
Cons:
Front members page is a bit of a bandwidth hog.
358 thumbs on that page requires approximately 8MB to download.
Bottom Line:
I was a little perplexed why the owners of ALSScan put up a similar site such as ALSAngels. But, after going through the content, I've found some distinguishing factors. It's the models. Yes, (as with ALSScan) the women are lovely and obviously enjoy themselves. And, yes, there are no pubes, artificially augmented breasts, penises or stretch marks. And, yes, there are, toys, fisting, fingers, tongues, smiles, a little peeing, and orgasms in a variety of indoor and outdoor scenes, all served up in original content. But, the more voluptuous models with whom the staff at ALS have worked will appear on ALSAngels. And, by voluptuous, I don't mean rubenesque. Think of women like Sandra Shine and Eve Angel, instead.
Judging by the thumbs of the photoshoots, you might think there's almost no girl-girl on the site. But, approximately 20% of the videos feature girl-on-girl or girl-assisting-girl interactions. And they do it better than any site who's initials appear on the compass rose.
Few of the women who've appeared on the ALSScan site appear ALSAngels. And, after browsing both sites, I've yet to find any duplicated content. Given the production values of excellent clarity, lighting, framing, volume levels, no banners or watermarks in the videos, and no spam or pop-ups on the website, ALSAngels presents their product with the same concern for quality of the viewing experience as demonstrated on the ALSScan website, but with a slightly different focus (no pun intended...).
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
