Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site that I meant to join multiple times. It’s what I am going to call personal porn. Not really POV, but some of it is.
It’s a good-sized site, but the numbers may be a little off. I have noticed a lot of remastered scenes coming in as new updates.
The models are cute to very pretty. I don’t know how much I believe the amateur part. I recognized a lot of names. There are 568 models.
The remasters include a 4K download option, but I don’t see it on the other new updates. There is a download limit that probably makes it make more sense to download the 1080p or 720p.
A continuing trend I am seeing on more sites, the ability to join through Epoch using Paypal.
Pretty colors in the scenes and backgrounds. They do something with the lighting that causes it to be bright and clear, but soft.
Cons:
This may be an unfair con. I noticed the amount of “new” scenes that are just remastered old scenes. I’m putting it in the cons because of comments left on those videos like, “Wow great scene! Can we see her again?” The watermark says 2007. They’re not making clearly obvious on remasters. Some of those do, but not all and those are counting as updates.
Since I joined, they have updated 4 times (weekly) and 3 of those were remasters. I don’t mind that. I hadn’t ever been a member before. I do want to mention for those that have been a member before.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site and the site I think they also own called Swallow Salon. Amateur Allure probably was a groundbreaking site when it started. The first thing I noticed was the manipulation of lighting. Those bright lights should be a lot harder to look at in a video, but they are either using soft light bulbs or some kind of filter. The action is very clear and there’s no blaring lights in your eyes.
The scenes are mostly the same. The models are supposed to be amateurs and there are 568 of them. Some of them likely are amateurs. Others include ones I know by name like Kiara Cole, Aidra Fox and Adriana Chechik. It could be where the scenes are remastered and maybe they were amateurs at the time.
The scenes stick to a formula which is common for this style of porn. I do believe this is a site that women may like. I have noticed in the comments there are comments about the guy and different guys that are in the scenes. Including seeing a few that said, “He’s hot!” There may be some appeal for straight women and gay or bisexual men. There is a focus on the guy’s dick. I believe if I watched this porn about 13-15 years ago, I would have been very impressed with it.
There is a download limit, but I cannot confirm that. I have not hit it. If you download the 720p or 1080p, I don’t see why you would hit it. It is 25GB per day. I don’t mean to be negative about The Best Porn Review, but maybe things have changed? The review was posted in late February 2022. I read it before joining and could see that there was a lot more to the site than the review said. It makes it sound like this is a blowjob only site. This site has full sex, doggy, cowgirl, missionary and the only part that really highlights the oral is the cumshot. The review also said there are hundreds of 4K blowjob videos. For example, the April 1st, 2022 update does not have 4K download. The remasters do. A lot of the new updates are remasters. Of the last 10 updates, 6 are remasters and 4 are genuine new scenes. None of those 4 have 4K downloads. I do think that matters with a site like this one that has been around for well over 10 years. Some people may not value those 4K remasters, if they have them in a smaller resolution. It also was mentioned as a potential problem with the download limit. Saying the videos average 6GB per scene. I haven’t seen one that is 6GB, even for the 4K option. The 1080p files for these scenes are 1-1.5GB each and the 720p files are 700MB to 1GB. This has thrown me so far off my normal reviewing style. I’m now noticing not all remasters are 4K. My advice is don’t let that be a dealbreaker. I haven’t hit a limit and have downloaded 72 scenes and the photos are worth looking at. They also feature the light manipulation which makes the pictures clearer.
These scenes are near cookie-cutter. Blowjob to start, doggy, missionary, cumshot. I do believe the camera angles and lighting made it groundbreaking years ago. I liked the site well enough to try Swallow Salon too. Good site overall, but it does become repetitive.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
An unusual site to me. It’s mostly pretty and cute women teasing and giving blowjobs. There is some sex in scenes beyond the blowjob.
Based on my time on Amateur Allure and receiving a promo offer to Swallow Salon which I joined from, I believe the two sites are owned by the same person or group. They are doing the same thing here with a lot of remasters being posted as updates.
There are some fetishes on this site. The women wear a uniform that looks like a cross between Star Trek and a nurse. The women swallow. There is a lot of teasing and smiling from the women.
There are 213 models. I recognize a lot of the names. It’s definitely leaning towards the cute, pretty look from the models. There is even giggling in the scenes.
Video and photo quality is very good
Cons:
They are posting some kind of compilations along with remasters as new updates. The compilations just look like maybe from Amateur Allure. I don’t see anything in the newest scenes that looks new or that the watermark agrees with it being new.
The room they are in is strange. It looks like a possible padded room or a poorly designed sci-fi room. The lights change colors during the scene. I found it distracting.
Bottom Line:
I described a lot of the site in the pros and cons. I feel like is a polarizing site. That room alone could be a problem for some viewers. Background lights that look like Christmas lights changing from green to teal to red. Add the strange uniforms that makes me think they were going for sci-fi porn. The models are plenty cute enough and pretty enough. They do seem to have fun in these scenes. There’s a lot of laughing and giggling. It looks like to me the site is dead. That should have been a con since they regularly charge $30 for this site. It’s far from a $30 site. The scenes are short, other than the compilations you won’t find many over 20 minutes. It seems like a waste. The models are into it. They’re all dressed up in their uniforms and looking cute. I feel like the models are just the supporting actresses to this guy’s dick.
The site is not very big. Especially considering the Amateur Allure compilations started showing up as updates around the time Covid started. That’s 2 years of no real updates unless I’m missing a few. I don’t have much knowledge of this site. I am thinking the ones that have 4K are remasters. None of the watermark years match the release year and most of those are 4-6 years difference. If you’re an ex-member that doesn’t care about 4K there may not be anything new on here. If you do like 4K and want those, you will have to deal with the daily download limit.
I’m starting to think this site is wanting to make me second guess my original thought on a score. I was checking the download size for the 4K ones, but I don’t see any. Including one that says, “Remy Lacroix eating her protein in stunning 4K”. There is no 4K download option on it. After seeing that, I’m not going to back and change my words since it’s not my fault if they lied. I am pointing it out that I do not see any 4K downloads. I see 1080p, 720p, 480p and a mobile resolution.
That’s not a big deal to me but may be to others. I would still recommend the site, but not at the regular price. I would even recommend it at a lower price just because the models are well above average and seem like they’re having a good time. I talked about the colors, some of the scenes with laughing and giggling almost look like hallucinations with all the changing lights in the background. It’s different and unique, but that’s not always good.
I think if you can get a promo on this site with Amateur Allure it’s worth a membership. It’s definitely not the extremely impressive site I was expecting.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Many Videos (+/- 680)
Cons:
All videos are overexposed.
All models grotesque overstyled (make-up).
Not many facials (just a few drops in the mouth).
Repetitive (if you saw one video, you saw all).
The "amateurs" are more or less pros (just the male actor is an amateur).
Expensive for a stand-alone site.
Bottom Line:
After 3 or 4 videos I was bored. I think the "Exploited College Girls" site offers more interesting videos although there are not so many videos, and of course the "Porn Pros Network" videos are better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Affiliated with Amateur Allure
- Inexpensive
- Beautiful models giving incredible blowjobs
- Updates with one scene per week
Cons:
- Very small site
- Not enough female nudity
- Only one video choice
Bottom Line:
I know Amateur Allure has attracted some very different reviews. I fall solidly in the fan group as AA is likely my favorite adult site on the internet. So when AA posted an update on that site that had a slightly different look and had a watermark for Swallow Salon I immediately headed over there and joined too. I cant say for certain, but it looks like Swallow Salon is affiliated with Amateur Allure and done by the same guys.
Like AA, SS is formula-driven. Some people really dislike this but I think that if you have a good formula why mess with it? The premise is that the male talent is visiting a salon where beautiful women give amazing blowjobs and swallow cum. Also like AA, SS uses just one set in this case its an enclosed small space with thin opaque coverings and there are multi-colored lights outside to create an interesting effect. The male talent is usually seated for most of the BJ with the model kneeling in front of him. They usually swap to him standing at some point before the cumshot. Like AA, SS features some of the most beautiful models in porn (who are usually just beginning their careers so theyre still fresh) giving some amazing blowjobs. Most of these blowjobs transcend the ordinary and are closer to cock worship with lots of licking and good use of the tongue. There is lots of eye contact too. Every blowjob ends with a cumshot in the mouth and the model playing with it for a few seconds before swallowing it.
The biggest negative for the site now is its small size. There are only nine scenes available now. The site is growing slowly with a new scene being added every week. To be fair to the site, they do compensate for the small size by offering a low membership fee of $16 USD. I like the site enough that Ill just keep a recurring membership at that price.
Two subjective complaints I have about the scenes are that the models wear a short and sexy white smock that you might see in a place that gives blowjobs, but in most scenes we never really get to see the model without it. Yes, they will hike the short smock when on their knees, but with the stunning looks of the models here they really need to have the remove the smock for the latter part of the scene. The second subjective complaint is that unlike AA where the blowjob transitions to sex before going back to the blowjob for the finish, SS only has sex in one scene. That isn't too bad given the quality of the blowjobs, but personally Id like to see some sex too. With the model naked.
There is only one option for downloading each scene. The scenes are all MP4s with most of them at a relatively low resolution of 960x540. The bitrate is fairly high (pushing 7,000kb/s) though and the framerate is 29fps so those scenes still look very good. The most recent update was in 1920x1080 with the same bitrate and framerate so maybe all future scenes will be at that higher resolution.
I know many readers might question my score, but given the high quality of the scene offered here I think its justified. The low price offsets the small size and I hope the site continues to grow. Im usually willing to put my money where my mouth is and say that if I like a site Ill add it to my list of sites I rejoin regularly, but Ill go one step further here: I like this site (and the low fee) enough that Ill just stay a member. If you like sensual blowjob sites with beautiful women this is definitely worth subscribing to.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Video quality, (1280x720@4,5MBit) not great but ok and worth the "HD" label.
Lots of scenes.
Cons:
Camera work and light, way to bright on the closeups and very unnatural light.
Downloaded ~20 of the later scenes and so far i am pretty sure i saw most or even all girls already somewhere else.
The "male talents" are below "porn standard".
(No big loads or big dicks but a lot of self stroking instead)
Download speed only ~1,5MB most of the time.
Background music, in most scenes only very silent and no problem but in some it is really annoying.
Bottom Line:
The only thing that should be "Amateur" (the girls)is mostly not but the rest is, like male talent and camera work/light.
Not a good combination, also scenes are VERY repetitive.
Maybe some of the older scenes are better but the newer ones are definitely no reason to stay a member for me.
Worst for me is the camera work, i usually like close ups but if they are so bright that the skin of the girls looks like paper they are just annoying, make me want to wear sunglasses in front of my TV.
Combined with weak male performers, slow downloads, background music and boring scenes this site makes more wrong than right.
Edit:
Others write about 1920(1440)x1080@8-12MB Videos.
Best i can download is 1280x720@4,5MB and also 720 is the highest setting for streaming.
Looks not bad but is not the best HD out there.
No idea why others report different, maybe they downgraded or you need to be member for longer to get access to higher quality ?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 580+ videos
- HD available
- Lots of download options
- Many lesser-known models
- Some A-listers early in their careers
- Beautiful models
- HD available in approximately 400 videos
- Owners are remastering old videos
- Remasters dont count as updates
- Regular updates
- Serves a few underserved niches
Cons:
- Daily download limit
- Some may find the scenes repetitive (see below for details)
Bottom Line:
I joined this following my interest in casting site. While this isnt a true casting site it is close enough that it made it worthwhile joining. The site follows a simple but effective formula: models show up to tape a POV scene with lots of oral and usually some fucking.
Before deciding to join the site I read the reviews here and at TBP. Two recurring comments were obvious: the scenes were too formulaic and many of the models arent amateurs.
While I agree that the comments on these two facts are accurate, I think how you see them is more subjective. There is a definitely a formula here: there is a short interview, the girl gets on her knees and gives the guy head (with various POV camera angles), there is some vaginal sex, there is more head with an oral pop shot, some cum play and a swallow. Then there is another shorter scene where pretty much the same action happens. There is nothing about this niche that requires such a set formula but I like it and it works. The goal is to show off the model and the formula works well to do that.
As for some of the models not being amateurs, this is also true. There are many well-known models here but that doesnt detract from the site. Some of the best known adult stars are here, but theyre early in their careers. If youre like me, this is a strong draw to the site. Also, even those models that arent as well known are often listed on index sites but that also happens with many other amateur sites too. Porn is fantasy based so if I get to see an A-list model early in her career Im still happy. To be fair, often when the model is an adult star the site makes note of that and doesnt try to hide it.
The site currently has close to 600 videos, with most around 20 mins long. The newer scenes are uploaded with a lot of choice. 95%+ offer streaming, and downloads are available in Quicktime, mobile (for phones and higher res for tablets), WMV (HD and SD). Newer videos are 1920x1080, 8,000-12,000kb/s and 29fps. Some others come in at 1440x1080 and 1280x720. Approximately 400 of the videos are HD and that will increase since new videos are being added (one per week) and the older videos are being remastered to improve them. This seems like a sure sign that the site owners actually care about giving the best product to their customers. The good news is that the site doesnt count the remastered scenes as updates, but the bad news is that the oldest videos on the site are low resolution and often only offered in Quicktime. I dont know how often remastered videos are uploaded.
Photos are offered and are available as zips, but this really is a video site.
Site navigation is simple, but on a simple site why complicate things?
The site supports download managers for queuing downloads, though TBP reports that download managers are blocked for simultaneous downloads. Links seemed to time out after 30 minutes or so, which is reasonable.
This wont be a negative for everyone, but if youre a fan of anal then there isnt much here. The site lists six anal scenes (which isnt accurate since there is at least one other that isnt listed), but only three of the anal scenes are actually exclusive.
The site bills itself as being mostly about oral, but they sell themselves short. There is vaginal intercourse in almost every scene and if youre a fan of lingering cum play, sucking after the guy has come and swallowing then youll appreciate the site too. One other niche that I like but is rare is where the guy stays fully clothed and the woman is naked. That happens in a lot of scenes here and was a pleasant surprise. One of the reasons that the model may stay clothed is to hide tattoos. Some models Im familiar with had clothes that hid tattoos, and the camera angles stayed away from any visible tattoos.
Im no fan of download limits and Ill never see them as anything other than a negative but in this case the site has at least set a reasonable limit or (nominally) 25GB per 24 hour period. While that is the stated limit, my experience was that I was cut off at anything above 22GB. I was also cut off at below 20GB which leads me to believe that any streaming also counts against you. The problem with that was that the only photos of the model were in the banner on the page so I often ran the first few seconds of the video to see if I liked the model. Doing that seems to count against you.
The bottom line is that this is an excellent site that has a lot to offer. While I dont agree with all of the choices the owners have made, most of that is subjective. Some people have complained about the price, and it is higher than average, but considering that this is an independent site with 580+ exclusive videos of beautiful models, the site is an excellent value. I definitely recommend joining, and Ive already added the site to my rejoin list.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- great production value. He uses a wireless mic on the girls and tons of lighting so you can see everything.
- A unique light is used which makes a model's eyes "pop" it's very drawing and striking.
- giant catalog with over 500 videos
- great quality 1440X1080 7.5 mbps
- .wmv and .mp4 available
- all exclusive content
- pictures available with zips
Cons:
- Every shoot follows the same linear progression. The girls may be smokin' hot - but even I have to say it gets boring.
- some anal, 3ways, handjobs etc. but there really is no variety to speak of.
- Girls shoot under different names for this site. So you may have a favorite and won't be able to find her.
- Pricy especially considering there's no partnering sites.
- preview section is a highlight reel. I like to see inside a few scenes to get a better sense of the action. I CAN NOT say I was in any way deceived. This is a quality site.
Bottom Line:
Each shoot has the same routine. Hot girl in a nice dress (like what she wore to the prom or something). She blows him, he takes her in a couple o f different positions. She takes is load in her mouth. They go at it again; he usually finishes with a facial.
The quality on this site is top notch - but the same thing over and over is dull.
This is a good site. They could sure mix it up a little bit, or reach out so some partners so there's more variety.
Every shoot is a winner, (but here you quickly get the feeling "seen one seen them all")
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. Recent videos very high quality (models and image quality)
2. Astonishingly fast download
3. More content than I expected
4. If you like the niche, this does it well
Cons:
1. Same format for each scene - often rather sterile
2. All models essentially 'playing the same role' led by director
3. Rather clunky layout - a little difficult to browse
4. Will anyone ever figure-out why that ambient background music is used...?
Bottom Line:
Thankfully, no problems here with the reported download limits. Older videos are hit-and-miss, but recent stuff is very high-quality POV.
I had to drop a quick review to express bafflement over the download speed - I just got 6.5MB/sec! For perspective, that's *20 times* faster than I download from Videobox on a fast day. It was like dragging a file from a USB drive.
Older videos are sometimes flaky - overexposed and rather like watching Casper give head. The guy is rather too 'present', asking the same questions and following the same formula with each girl. The cost is high. And I don't expect many regular updates. But I imagine most people sign-up for a month and just grab the stuff they want.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Sexy model interviews at the beginning of each clip.
+ Full intercourse worked in between blowjobs.
+ Consistently attractive models.
+ Good download speeds/download manager friendly.
Cons:
- A little pricey, especially considering the amount of content.
- Only one update a week.
- The Web site isn't intuitive.
- Scenes are repetitive. (It is a blowjob site so somewhat expected.)
- Girls in a state of full or partial dress during sex scenes.
Bottom Line:
Amateur Allure delivers on the blowjob niche. If you want to see hot girls happily sucking cock, that's what you get!
The new video updates are published in 1080p. Slightly older videos are in 720p. If you really dig into the archive the clips are lower resolution/bit rate. The production quality is consistent throughout.
The monthly rate is a negative for this site. Considering the amount of content, number of updates (currently once a week) and lack of any network access make $36 a month a little pricey compared to the competition.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Amateur Allure deserves a new review, because they have upgraded the site to HD! (Thank you for listening!)
And it is true HD: 1920x1080 29,97 fps coded around 4500 kbit/s, so yeah... true fullHD with a reasonable bitrate. Bravo!
All the things in the past are still as it is (in a good way):
+ the most incredible attractive girls (around their twenties), all _very_ eager to perform.
Engaged in hot sexual acts in perfect glamourous lighting! Thats that 'allure' thing. They'd do it all with full devotion: Tease, smile, undress, suck cock on their knees, being fucked hard from behind, drooling into the camera and even swallow (multiple times) as if they were having their best meal ever! Using a spoon if hey have to. Truly Amazing Content.
+ What else? Great make-up and setting.
Cons:
Unfortunately, also the cons remained more or less:
- Only one update per week (on friday).
- Ridiculous high priced in EUROs ... 36 EURO for one month? Come on... that is 45 USD! Please... one (low)rate for all! We horny Europeans will thank you for it.
- Ridiculous expensive on single month base (better price with 3 months or more)
- The site owner is obviously still struggling with time and resources (yes, playing with beautiful glamour girls can be exhausting - I am sure)
- HD conversion of old clips is way behind.
Bottom Line:
Quality and originality comes with a price.
Now that Amateur Allure has gone HD, they have excelled themselves into an even higher level. Great Stuff... original content, hypnotic lighting in their eyes.
For example: Look at Remy LaCroix, the upcoming star for Elegant Angel ... check her out on AmateurAllure to discover how *possesed* she is with sexual hunger (don't worry, she got plenty of nurishment here).
This is still a relatively small site with amazing original, even unique content in high quality. The downside is: it is so addictive, you need more - but you only get one update a week :)
As with the term 'amateur', I finally understand the name of this website. Amateur does not refer to the girls (anymore)... since these are hardly amateur... The term 'amateur' refers to the website owners! (in the most best positive ways)!
Personally, I don't actually care whether the girls are amateurs or not... My dick can't tell the difference and I find it utmost pleasurable to watch them do the most outrageous sexual acts as if they were under a secret spell. These girls are really hot and Amateur Allure, makes them feel good too.
My advice to the site owner:
+ Thank you for upgrading to HD
+ Hire an intern to upgrade the old content to HD to provide better value with minimum effort
Or... sell the formula to a bigger site / network :)
I give amateurallureHD a big recommendation, although a bit expensive on monthly base.
European members might want to switch to the 'netcash' option, since this will quote the same amount in USD. (This trick still works).
Subcribe for 90 days for a better value per month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The highest of high quality in terms of talent and video.
-Simple interface.
-Fast downloads.
-Easy to cancel, no games, no cross-sells.
-See girls early in career who never swallowed again or do so very rarely.
Cons:
-Highly repetitive scenes with the same 3 acts in every one.
-Thin content with only 500 scenes, no real bonus networks
-Updates are infrequent for such a high cost
-Streaming doesn't work well, if at all.
-Older videos have limited download options.
-Aliased names of Pros are annoying and misleading. Majority of girls are from agencies and are not amateurs.
-Download limits, both daily and simultaneous.
Bottom Line:
High quality website, but it's all the same. Every scene is the next, with few exceptions. The quality is there, but it all runs together. Shoot, open, questions, swallow, repeat. Showing the load is cool now and then, but allowing it to be more natural and un-directed would be better at times. Needs anal, MMF, MFF etc. No behind the scenes, no fetish stuff aside from the robotic swallows, no variety.
Its cool they are independent and probably working on a shoestring budget, but the content is razor thin. 500 scenes or so can be legally ripped inside a week, then what? What will bring you back? $36 for a few new scenes a month will not cut it, no way no how. It would take another 500 scenes for me to rejoin. So, on that front, 100gb of space gets you everything, which is good or bad, depending on your point of view.
I marginally recommend the site, as they would do themselves proud by expanding it a bit. After a week, I have a lot of good jerk material, but I am bored. The really good sites give you a reason to stay, this one does not. It doesn't make it bad, it just makes it limited.
UPDATE: Rating lowered to 75.
As of July 2012, they imposed a 4 file simultaneous download limit, in addition to their 5 GB p/day limit. What this says is they don't have a good volume of content and they focus on the items that add no value. The only thing that is amateur about this site are the guys who run it.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
The strength of this site is the attractiveness of the models, though in the two years since I last subscribed the quality has fallen somewhat. Thomas recruits some impressive girl-next-door types -- fully clothed at the start -- to stop by and visit. While the site is obviously dedicated to oral, many models engage in intercourse, and these tend to be the most erotic scenes, with camera angles that include a close-up of the model's face. The site is easy to navigate, and if a particular model interests you, you can link to her other performances from the current scene.
Cons:
Thomas seems like a fairly likable guy, but as he becomes aroused, he can get rather annoying, constantly referring to the models with terms like "silly girl." (Ay caramba!) Also, the plot of these scenes rarely changes, which is disappointing because the model typically doesn't reveal her nude body -- of interest to me -- until after the first Thomas climax. Also, as with similar sites, there's that insistence that the girl "show us" what she's about to swallow (sigh), and there are few facials. Finally, the girl-next-door trope is often an illusion, since so many of the models are porn starlets pretending to be unknowns.
Bottom Line:
Look, if oral is your thing, you won't be disappointed with a one-month subscription to this site. But you'll probably find no reason to stick around longer than that, because you'll have seen what the site has to offer, and that can be stimulating only for so long. (I'm surprised this site keeps going, frankly.)
In that month, you'll enjoy lots of attractive girls on their knees, beginning fully clothed (which I'm a fan of), then gradually disrobing throughout the scene. (That's not as erotic as it sounds, although it could be if more care were taken with this element of the performances.) You'll get lots of awkward smiles from the models as they respond to Thomas' dumb and obvious queries. (Thomas: "What are you going to do now?" Model on her knees: "Suck your cock?")
Thomas occasionally mixes it up with straight sex scenes (always erotic, especially given the focus on the model's face and body), but it almost always ends with the patented deposit in the mouth, which, I assume, is why most subscribers pay the monthly fee.
The music fascinates me, because while the models are recruited (clearly) for their innocent looks and youthful personalities -- in truth, some seem not to be into the sex, though they can be a pleasure to look at -- the music has this dark, seamy quality about it, which casts an aura over the scene that, for me, creates a delightfully sinful mood.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ This site features the most incredible attractive girls (around twenties). I don't know how they do it, but all of them cooperate as if they were under a powerful pleasure spell or somekind (must have something to do with that sinister background tune and the bright ring lighting).
Among the latest killer blond models feature: Sophia (spelled as Sofia) Sutra and Samantha Saint. What an enjoyable feast to see them perform in perfect glamourous lighting! Thats that 'allure' thing. They'd do it all with full devotion: Tease, smile, undress, suck cock on their knees, be fucked hard from behind, drooling into the camera and even swallow (multiple times) as if they were having their best meal ever! Truly Amazing!
+ What else? Great make-up and setting.
+ Large archive: I count 240+ scenes
+ Among these archived scenes, precious gems can be found like Samantha Sin and Courtney (yeah!).
Cons:
- Only one update per week (on friday). No HD - but it's still ok: 800x450 @ 8Mbit/s (but nowadays we'd appreciate HD badly, right?)
- Only two formats: WMV and MOV.
- Old clips are still around - but with ancient formats (320x240) and so on.
- Expensive on single month base (better price with 3 months or more)
- The site owner is struggling with time and resources (yes, playing with glamour girls can be exhausting - I am sure): news items have not been updated. But hey? as long as the updates are coming, it's fine by me.
Bottom Line:
Quality and originality comes with a price.
Quality also cost energy and resources to make it.
This relatively small site is amazing with regard to original high quality content. The downside is: it is so addictive, you need more - but you only get one update a week :)
As with the term 'amateur', I don't actually care whether the girls are amateurs or not... My dick can't tell the difference ;) The girls are hot!!
My advice to the site owner:
+ Hire an intern to upgrade the old content to high res (800x450) to provide better value with minimum effort
+ Upgrade to HD if possible
+ Roll longer POV shots while she is on her back (these are really addictive scenes to enjoy!)
Or... sell the formula to a bigger site / network :)
I give amateurallure a big recommendation, although a bit expensive on monthly base. European members might want to switch to the 'netcash' option, since this will quote the same amount in USD.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Lots of cute girls, currently the site has roughly 180 different girls on it.
-Lots of archived content. Although most girls only do one set, there are a fair number that do 2, 3 or lots of sets. I'd put the number of actual sets in the 350ish range.
-Almost all sets have a pic set that accompanies it, except for the really old sets, and recently they have added a option to download the picset as a zip file.
-All vids are shot POV style, which I personally love. I know it's not some peoples cup of tea, but I'm counting it as a pro.
-All girls swallow, it's kind of the whole reason the site was created in the first place.
-Most videos available in WMV, MOV and the newest ones are available as a download for your iphone. Also I like that for all the newer videos you can either download the whole thing, or just the end with the cumshot and swallowing.
-No DRM, need I say more?
-All exclusive content. No rehashed scenes here.
Cons:
-It's been said before, the site has a formula. Talk, Suck, Fuck, Suck, Swallow, Strip, HJ/BJ, Lick off fingers. It's rarely deviated from, but there are some that are different.
-The director (Thomas) uses these weird ring style lights to bring out the girl's eyes. It's kinda neat the first time you see it, but it gets old... fast.
-Being how I like POV, it really annoys me that the site breaks POV for the sex scenes and some of the BJ scenes.
-Spermcam, luckily they don't do it as often anymore, but they will cum in a girl's mouth, then get a super closeup of the sperm.
-4GB cap per day. I'm ok with a DL cap, but seeing as how the newer vids are about 500 MBs, that seems restrictive.
-Older videos are only available in Quicktime, which is a format I dislike.
-Internally the site is harder to navigate than if you aren't a member, seems weird to me. It's not hard to navigate, just not as easy as it is if you aren't a member.
Bottom Line:
This is my second time being a member of this site. I went back because I was offer a 50% discount. Not that I wouldn't have gone back eventually on my own, but I'm a sucker for a good deal.
The guy who run's the site (Thomas) came up with the idea that girls swallowing is awesome and I agree.
For a long time I avoided the site because of the Quicktime file format, but after added support for WMV files I quickly joined. Personally I love the site, the content is great, I have some minor gripes but for the most part I really enjoy the content.
Side note is that for many years Thomas was the only person behind the camera, recently it has switched and a new guy (Ray) has started filming about half the scenes.
Bottom line is I love this site. I will end up coming back again and again.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Very attractive girls, mostly 18-22.
-Sticks to the niche of pretty girls performing blow jobs with swallowing.
-179 girls with many having more than one scene.
-The latest updates can be downloaded as scenes or whole videos.
-At least one photo set for each video.
-The archive goes back to 1999.
Cons:
-Only 2 download options-Quicktime and WMV, 800x450, 2177kbps for the most recent update. Decent, but no comparison to the better sites on the internet.
-The scenes are extremely repetitious. The girl sucks his cock, there may be vaginal,and the guy comes in her mouth. Then the camera focuses on the cum in her mouth, the girl strips, shows off her body, gives him a handjob, he comes on her fingers, she licks them off-nice, but every scene is identical.
-Only one stunt cock, who also is the only cameraman. Sometimes poorly shot videos as a result. The money shot often focuses on her hair, chin, the wall, etc. In all fairness, I couldn't do better. After all, who can film well while coming in a pretty girl's mouth? There is a real need for a real professional photographer.
-Blabby stunt cock/cameraman.
-Daily download limit. I was locked out at 6.64GB. No DM support.
-Boring photosets. Except for the money shot photos, the photos were either not explicit or were diagonals. Useles
Bottom Line:
In 1999, Thomas felt there was a need on the internet for a site featuring blow jobs with swallowing, performed by pretty barely legal age girls. He delivers what he set out to do.
However, I think his creativity as well as attention to detail ended at that point. Every scene is virtually a clone of each other. The girls, although nice to look at, are very similar. Almost without exception, they are White, the same age, dressed in similar nice clothes, almost identical makeup, earrings, you name it. Almost no variation even on the most unimportant aspects. Does every scene have to be in the same room, from the same part of the room? In ten years he could have moved the couch to another wall. Obviously he doesn't have a steady girlfriend as she would have moved the couch at least once a year.
Almost half of the videos are available only in Quicktime. He states on the site that when he started in 1999, Quicktime was superior to WMV. It is time to move on and leave Quicktime in the museum of old porn sites. I found that the WMV videos also could not play on my WD Media Player. It is probably an older version of WMV.
As a result, not one video I downloaded could be played on my video setup. Even the Arcsoft Video Converter that came with the video player could not convert the files to a format it could play.
The site has a great concept, but comes across as a site run by an amateur. The girls should be the amateurs, not the site itself. For a stand alone site without any extras or network, this is far too expensive. You can find a better value elsewhere.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
*gorgeous girls
*fast downloads
*lot of content
*delivers what it promises
Cons:
*poorly archived
*doesn't show the girls naked enough, some girls not at all
*bad camera angles
Bottom Line:
Well worth the one month cost, unfortunately I bought the 3month deal. I loved looking at just about every girl on the site. But, I am a boob man at heart and there were too many gorgeous girls that never showed their boobs. Also, I want to see more of the girls body during the action.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ very attractive women
+ unique visual style, no other site shoots like amateur allure, visually appealing to me at least
+ all updates can be seen in tour
+ Thomas just seems to be a cool dude, unlike "counterparts" at Exploitedteens or exploitedcollegegirls
Cons:
- older videos in quicktime only, I generally don't like quicktime videos
- pictures not in any type of zip or download manager friendly format
- sex in each scene is usually way too short
- daily DL limit appears to be about 8 gb, though do you really need more than 8 gb in one day?
Bottom Line:
This is one of my favorite sites out there, one of those that I want ALL content on the site saved after my subscription is over.
(I don't understand those who have recurring monthly subscriptions unless some incentive of a new group of content is available each month)
Good Scenarios, not cheesy or poorly acted, This is POV porn that actually works! The reason I think is not just because of the models that are in the scenes, but also the format in which it is shot. High quality close ups and no quick cutting from angle to angle. To me, this is one of the most "real" sites out there, Thomas doesn't drone on about how great the girls boobs are, or hard his member is, he just appreciates the situation for what it is, a (usually) very hot girl who is there to enjoy the action.
Yes, the sex part is very short compared to most videos on other sites, but here it sort of adds to the atmosphere, you can use your imagination on how long they actually went at it, or what happens in between.
Obviously, the cumshots/swallows will bring a lot of people in, and it is very well done.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ High Quality Videos
+ Videos Available in QT and WMV
+ Nice Photo Sets
+ Clean Design
+ Very attractive "Amatures"
+ Haven't seen MOST of the Girls
+ Young Talent that looks like they just stepped off a college campus.
+ Good Customer Support
+ Cool scene structure and idea
+ Models really seem to enjoy working with Thomas
Cons:
- Website does not support DL Managers
- Photos are not available in Zips
- Daily (24 hour) Download Limit
- Download limit is ONLY 4 GB
- Download limit is NOT apparent when joining site.
Bottom Line:
This website is very good. I really appreciate the quality of the work, the fresh looking models and the overall quality of the website.
This is not my typical demographic, usually preferring much more "Hardcore" action. (MeatMembers, Platinum X, BrainPass, JM Productions). That being said, I really like what this offers.
This website would have score at least TEN POINTS higher without the download limits. They should remove the limit and/or reduce the price. With today's speeds, you can rip through 4GB in an hour. If they were to have a limit, it should be much higher.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Excellent video quality - The best I've ever seen.
Rock solid update schedule.
Beautiful girls.
Every scene has at least one full cum swallow
Cons:
Maybe 30% of the girls are real amateurs. Big Con.
Almost every scene is almost exactly the same.
Doesn't deep throat the girls enough but it's not a deep throat site so it's not his fault. I just personally wish he would deep throat them more. :-)
Bottom Line:
This site has been around for a long time. Probably sometime in the late 90's. So, he's gotta be doing something right. AmateurAllure and BrokeAmateurs are my favorite sites. AA has been one of my favorites for years. BA is pretty new I think.
Anyway, the girls on AA are so beautiful. Granted, maybe 30% of them are true amateurs. Generally that would be a HUGE turnoff to me but they're so pretty that I give AA a pass on it.
Here's something I've noticed. I've seen girls on AA who I was able to tell have been on other porn sites but he makes them look so good that it's really hard to tell. I don't know if it's his make-up person or how they all dress very classy but I think it's pretty cool that he can take a girl who's done a ton of porn and make her appear so great that it's hard to tell.
I like the way he gives them gentle playfuy slaps on the ass. More erotic than some porn where they just wail on the girl's ass. Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge an of some hard ass-slapping. But, he pulls it off in his own way.
The video quality is the best I've seen. I love it when they are coming off deep throating his cock and you can see their saliva running down the shaft of his cock.
I've seen some other reviews where people have said certain sites are too expensive. AA is a little more than some other sites but I think he deserves the extra. He produces a great product and geesh, you can DL like 150 videos on a one month membership so I don't think any complaints about pricing are appropriate.
If you want quality sites like this one to continue to make a product we enjoy, then be glad to pay for it.
Only real cons that I would mention is the repetitiveness of the scenes but not really that big of a deal for me. Every site has some flaw. If that's the biggest they have then I'm thrilled.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some of the most beautiful models I have seen on the internet
- Quality on videos is good enough, 600 on high end, but a nice near 2000 bitrate helps out
- The site as a whole has a pretty classy feel for the most part, it has almost what I would call, playful curiousity from the girls.
- The pictures look nice, but see cons
- Download speeds are blazing for me, nearly 1,400kb/s
- Original models, or at least most are for me. Some are known porn stars, but I'm guessing maybe 25% are amateurs.
- Funny comments from Thomas, though he does get boring after awhile, reminds me a lot of Dream Stash in that sense.
Cons:
- Price, $33 is just too much, it should be at most $24.95.
- Pictures are barely reaching 1000 on high end and cannot be downloaded in zip files.
- Thomas, as funny as he is at times, he seems to be stuck on the same joke from clip to clip.
- Sex is like Sex by Numbers, nearly every scene follows the exact same pattern, and combined with Thomas' repetitive humor, the site itself becomes repetitive
- The big one, split movie scenes on older videos. I am at the point that I won't even download these unless it is a favorite actress of mine.
Bottom Line:
This site wowed me right off the bat with the gorgeous models. The site also has a modern look to it, and overall, has a classy look and feel to it.
Then there is the content. Sex, blowjobs, and cum in mouth which is swallowed. Everytime. No body cumshots, just right in the mouth and on the face. I'm not a big fan of facials, so this becomes repetitive very fast. Still, the models are gorgeous and they will keep you coming back.
The pictures are disappointing, such gorgeous women, but no hi-res and no downloadable zips? It makes the pictures virtually useless. The video quality is good enough at 600 high end, near 2000 bitrate, but then there are those split scenes, which are also all but useless to me. I have a strange time with the videos as well. For some reason they are letterboxing on my monitor, not for sure why, but that looks odd and makes me click on the letterbox hoping it will go away.
The site still has some models that make it worth joining. It kind of makes you feel like you are on a date with a woman that is out of your league, but you keep spending money on her. The only real cons are the repititive nature of the videos. By the 3rd one, I knew what was going to happen and when. I keep coming back to how beautiful the models are though, and that should be stressed as the #1 Pro that outweighs all of cons. The preview is pretty good, check it out and see if the models catch your eyes like mine, then for one month only it is highly recommended.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
The strength of this site is the attractiveness of the models. Thomas recruits some quality girl-next-door types -- fully clothed at the start -- to stop by and visit. While the site is obviously dedicated to oral, some models engage in intercourse, and these tend to be the most erotic scenes, with camera angles that include a close-up of the model's face. The site is easy to navigate, and if a particular model interests you, you can link to her other performances from the current scene.
Cons:
Thomas seems like an amiable guy, but as he becomes aroused, he can become rather annoying, constantly referring to the models with terms like "silly girl." (Ay carumba!) Also, the plot of these scenes rarely changes, which is disappointing because the model doesn't reveal her nude body -- of interest to me -- until after the first Thomas climax. Also, as with similar sites, there's that insistence that the girl "show us" what she's about to swallow (sigh), and there are few facials.
Bottom Line:
If oral is your thing, you won't be disappointed with a one-month subscription to this site. But you'll probably find no reason to stick around longer than that, because you'll have seen what the site has to offer, and that can be stimulating only for so long.
In that month, though, you'll enjoy lots of gorgeous girls on their knees, beginning fully clothed (which I'm a fan of), then gradually disrobing throughout the scene. (That's not as erotic as it sounds, though it could be if more care were taken with this element of the performances.) Thomas occasionally mixes it up with straight sex scenes (always erotic, especially given the focus on the model's face and body), but it almost always ends with the patented deposit in the mouth, which, I assume, is why most subscribers pay the monthly fee.
The music is fascinating to me, because while the models are recruited (clearly) for their innocent looks and charming personalities -- in truth, some seem not to be into the sex, though they're a pleasure to look at -- the music has this dark, seamy quality about it, which casts an aura over the scene that, for me, creates a delightfully sinful mood.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
*Strange as it sounds, the site's greatest strength is Thomas. Not only is he charming enough to put the girls at ease, it's super-hot for example when he matter of factly puts a fully clothed girl on her knees to start sucking.
*In addition to being cool, many of the girls are pretty hot and not seen elsewhere.
*I especially love the fantasy episodes, where they act out some silly scenario around the blowjob. Obviously they can't do it all the time, but they do think of some funny ones.
Cons:
*There are no partial clips, and only some of the episodes are available in WMV as well as QuickTime.
*Site design is a little basic: it can be hard to find a specific girl.
*Thomas's physical condition and endowment leave something to be desired.
*The name change issue, as has been remarked on elsewhere, is indeed irritating.
*I'd prefer he stay away from the gadgets - that "Spermcam" is pretty silly.
Bottom Line:
The bottom line is this is one of the great porn sites. As a one-man shop, it's quirky and clunky, but I'm hesitant to recommend a slicker operation.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- serves my No1 fetish perfectly: all girls swallow
- before they swallow, there's some nice cumplay
- nice variations on the swallow theme: sometimes they take cum directly in their mouths, sometimes they lick it off their fingers, sometimes they drink it out of a shotglass, or get fed spoonfulls of cum after a facial
- very cute, natural girls, many of whom you won't find anywhere else
- girls are treated fery friendly
- humurous tone of the dialogues
- excellent video quality
Cons:
- most scenes are cut into 3 clips. I really prefer to be able to download full clips - this is possible with the new movies (starting February 2007)
- girls should get naked earlier - they mostly undress only in the last quarter of the movie
- the fuck scenes suffer from the POV perspective, here an additional cameraman could improve the videos
- very heavy focus on blowjobs and swallows - my biggest pro could of course also be seen as a very one sided pornsite with repetitive content
Bottom Line:
Amateur Allure was actually my very first pornsite I subscribed to (5 yrs ago). I've been back every year since then, mostly for one or two months. I also checked out many other blowjobs sites, and Amateur Allure is clearly my favourite.
Highly Recommended if you're into blowjobs and swallows.
On the other hand: if blowjobs and swallos are just something you enjoy on the side, then this site is probably not for you, because you won't get much more. The fuck scenes are short and the whole thing is VERY HEAVILY oriented towards the BJ lover.
The site has improved considerably in the last years, video quality is getting better and better, scenes can now be downloaded in one big clip, and you can now chose between Quicktime and Mediaplayer.
Suggestions for future improvements:
- more focus on the body of the girls
- girls naked after the first few minutes
- occasional fuck scenes filmed by cameraman
- more two on one scenes
- scenes with two men would be nice (this is missing completely)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of horny girl next door types. Many not seen elsewhere.
Very similar to Rodney Moore in style.
Regular updates and interesting and unusually personal Blog.
Recent upgrade in quality of videos - Windows Media Files now supported although quality is similar to the Mov files. Full movie files are also now supported, where before you could only get small clips.
The download times are very fast.
Cons:
The videos are done with an annoying fisheye type lens.
Video quality could use further improvement.
Photos are below average quality (By todays standards)
Bottom Line:
Not bad. One of the better amateur sites out there for videos of never before seen girl next door types. The score would improve considerably if Thomas were to ditch the fisheye lens and provide HD quality full video files of current and past models.
See Simons Scans for an example of how to do this.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Visually of a high quality. If you wish to see it, are looking at it, then it is and clearly. The images are clean and in focus, not blurry, amber and god knows what. SInce what is looked at can actually be seen, maybe this isn't porn at all.
Cons:
-photo could be really, really good, but are halfass.
-once a week uploads. Sounds like one a year memberships.
-suffers from the same old same old that comes with such a niche focus.
Bottom Line:
I really liked the clarity of the images both photographic and video, but that doesn't same the site from the sameness of itself and the once a week update. A nice site to join and then leave after a month. Don't worry, there are no surprise here, so you won't miss things if you aren't a member for a while.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
