| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Jade1's Reply
They did NOT change codec.
Still same old AVC/h264 that they used ever since they stopped using.wmv.
They just cut bitrate from 12000 to 6000(and less, seen videos with just 5000 and even 4300).
And it shows extremely.
blurry, no details, skin is now a mess of color banding and compression artefacts.
Really sad to see them go from benchmark, to a good compromise, to down to as bad as 1080p can get.
(the point where it is so starved of bitrate that 720p downsample with same bitrate would look better.
|
09-20-18 12:00pm
|
Review
2
|
Wow Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Quite a few 60fps videos (1080 and some 4k)
(So far the first site with 4k60fps videos i could find) |
| Cons: |
After i joined i'm only GOLD member, to see all videos you need to be PLATINUM member.
You get platinum after 60 days membership or by paying 69$ extra it seems (Diesel Access).
Needless to say that many (the best ?) hardcore/4k scenes are platinum only...
Bitrates on the 4k files are WAY to low.
On the scenes i downloaded so far only 17-22 Mbit.
(for comparison, Legalporno has 32Mbit for 30fps4k, looks much much sharper and crispier)
This was a real disapoint after the initial exitement over the 4k/60fps video format.
The 60fps are great because it makes scenes look much more natural and fluid compared to the standard 30fps on most sites.
But 4k is, as it is on most sites just a label used to lure in quality seeking customers. |
| Bottom Line: |
Since this is a quite expansive site already i'm pissed off by this additional platinum paywall.
Even more so because it was not clear before i joined.
And as mentioned above i'm disapointed that their videos don't look as good as they could if they where not bitrate starved. |
|
07-04-16 02:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
3
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
A 5scene/month limit would be OK for me if it was high quality scenes i can enjoy on a big screen.
But this is not the case here.
I klick on 4k download but the video i get is 1280x720, thats 1/10th of 4k...
(File name ends with -01-4k-full.mp4, so not my mistake or just a bad link)
And even their actual "4k" resolution scenes have max. 6MBit, so look clearly worse than standard 1080p scenes on many other sites.
(And .... compared to true 4k scenes with 20-40Mbit on quality sites)
That explains why they have scene and not GB limit i guess, their files are so tiny that you could still grab all of them with a reasonable GB limit in a month.
(my 5 scenes have total 7,7GB, that's half of what i expect for one proper 4k scene)
I really hate sites that do that misleading spec thing.
If they want to limit traffic/provide only medium quality OK, but then stick to 720/1080 with decent bitrates or make a reasonable download limit for big files.
But don't advertise with "4k" if you only provide them with 25% of the needed bitrate or just rename 720p files.
|
05-26-16 10:44am
|
Review
4
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Video quality, (1280x720@4,5MBit) not great but ok and worth the "HD" label.
Lots of scenes. |
| Cons: |
Camera work and light, way to bright on the closeups and very unnatural light.
Downloaded ~20 of the later scenes and so far i am pretty sure i saw most or even all girls already somewhere else.
The "male talents" are below "porn standard".
(No big loads or big dicks but a lot of self stroking instead)
Download speed only ~1,5MB most of the time.
Background music, in most scenes only very silent and no problem but in some it is really annoying. |
| Bottom Line: |
The only thing that should be "Amateur" (the girls)is mostly not but the rest is, like male talent and camera work/light.
Not a good combination, also scenes are VERY repetitive.
Maybe some of the older scenes are better but the newer ones are definitely no reason to stay a member for me.
Worst for me is the camera work, i usually like close ups but if they are so bright that the skin of the girls looks like paper they are just annoying, make me want to wear sunglasses in front of my TV.
Combined with weak male performers, slow downloads, background music and boring scenes this site makes more wrong than right.
Edit:
Others write about 1920(1440)x1080@8-12MB Videos.
Best i can download is 1280x720@4,5MB and also 720 is the highest setting for streaming.
Looks not bad but is not the best HD out there.
No idea why others report different, maybe they downgraded or you need to be member for longer to get access to higher quality ? |
|
02-19-14 02:47pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
5
|
Brazzers Reel
(0)
|
|
01-28-13 05:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
6
|
Lesbea
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very good content, never saw such perfect girl/girl scenes before.
Very good filmed and edited.
Easy to navigate and fast site.
High Res. pictures zipped for download
Lots of video formats to choose from. |
| Cons: |
Only 30+ scenes so far.
Non exclusive (see bottom line)
HD video could be a bit better, only ~5Mbit/s for 1080p. |
| Bottom Line: |
The Intro from their site say all you need to know:
"Lesbea is an exclusively all-girl website dedicated to capturing genuine and intimate girl-on-girl sex with gorgeous and alluring women from around the world. If you love to watch women deep kissing, making love with genuine passion and feeling, and giving each other real orgasms, then you have come to the right place!"
If you are mainly interested in super hot girl/girl scenes i doubt you will find much better than this.
If you also like boy/girl and solo scenes you better join danejones.com where you get alle the scenes from Lesbeo but also the other stuff (~90 scenes total). |
|
03-08-12 11:13am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
7
|
Lesbea
(0)
|
|
03-08-12 10:18am
Replies (2)
|
|
