Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
– Formerly Tug Pass, a handjob focused network, but offers more than just handjobs.
– Unlimited video downloads and most have 720p and 1080p
– Download speeds are good (80% my max).
– Includes access to Handjob Hub
– 15+ sites are advertised as part of the Nookies network.
– Quantity in a relatively rare niche is the biggest pro.
Cons:
– Many years of joining Tug Pass and have heard quite a few negative comments about the attractiveness of their models. Rebranding doesn't change that.
– No 4K for the resolution lovers
– If you were going to judge the entire network on technical quality, it would be average or at best, slightly above average.
Bottom Line:
I remember reviewing Tug Pass a long time ago and within minutes, someone replied and commented on the models being old and unattractive. Old, I don't think, can really be subjective, but attractiveness is. I am not saying those models from the older scenes were top tier in looks, but this is a handjob site, not a glam site.
I can tell you the models started getting younger and more attractive, but we get to see the pro/con at work. Those older, less attractive models, really seemed to enjoy playing with dicks. Sure, you can make the joke that they don't get many in real life, but can't deny their performances are great. The newer, younger models do sometimes seem more bored than anything and I think that's expected with handjob porn.
Once beyond that, you have a network here, Nookies, that offers one of the biggest handjob collections you will ever find. Their videos and pictures sets are both over 3,000. Not all are handjob only, there are scenes of nearly all male/female niches.
I believe having more than just handjob scenes has helped the network. Having unlimited downloads is a major pro, too. The video quality is good enough. That is my way of saying, unless you're wanting the highest video quality possible, you will be happy with these videos. I still am mostly downloading 720p. I won't give the long explanation, but the short one says I have some vision damage and really can't see a huge difference between 720p and 1080p and see even less with 4K. I do believe video resolution preference has a lot to do with how long you've been viewing online porn. HD was such a major step up from SD. It makes HD more than good enough for me.
The handjob genre is covered well. Several of the models, especially in older scenes, were and maybe still are experts in milking and edging.
Navigation is good, but could be better. I've been using online porn long enough that I rarely need navigation or tags to lead me to what I'm looking for.
Besides the unlimited videos, you can also download unlimited photo zips and there's the added “bonus” of being able to access Handjob Hub Premium.
Handjob Hub Premium is owned by Nookies and is a handjob tube site. A lot of the content on Handjob Hub Premium is from Nookies, minus the cumshots, yeah, not kidding. They do have some scenes not from Nookies so there's a little bonus to the content. It's just not as big of a deal as it is advertised as.
The Nookies scenes do not cut out the cumshots.
I am scoring this network higher than I expected when I joined it. Some of the reasons include: The newer scenes are trying to add new elements even to the handjob scenes. They seem to be aiming for various niches like voyeurism and teasing. Personally, I would rather see a site or network, trying something different and unique, than adding 4K videos. The older scenes relied on the woman taking on a nearly dominant role, while the newer scenes show the male, while physically in the submissive role, turning it into more of a neutral role where the woman is getting as much out of the physical stimulation as the guy is, without the woman needing the dom role. I like it. It's a real evolution in human sexuality. It's nice to see a woman enjoying herself making the guy cum, not because she's feeling superior.
Maybe it's the key to porn’s future success even? So many females seem to struggle with anything presenting themselves as dominant. These newer scenes are showing a compromise, the middle ground, where the male and female are more focused on being playful and enjoying their sexuality, instead of worrying about who is dom and who is sub.
A good network that's somehow, in 2024, improving themselves instead of rehashing their past success.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It’s a network dedicated to handjobs and blowjobs
Huge with nearly 3,000 videos
Downloads are unlimited
It is 100% exclusive
Over 1,000 models
Female models have improved greatly
Cons:
This is very clearly at least one old network combined with newer content and you can tell by the quality
I have noticed some of the older scenes have the cumshot edited out
The models in older scenes weren’t much to look at
Bottom Line:
I didn’t research this network before joining. I’m not even for sure researching it would have helped or would have changed my interest in joining it. There are scenes from a site I was a member of awhile back called Club Tug and I think the majority of the older scenes are from a network that has closed down. I’m guessing Nookies is the new name, rebrand,
The good news is, the newer scenes have much more attractive women in them than the older scenes. You also can download the newer videos in HD quality. While the focus is on blowjobs and handjobs there are hardcore sex scenes on the network as well.
The older scenes are not only lower video quality, but often have women in the scenes, that I find unattractive. Kind of like a B-list of porn stars.
Nookies at least shows progress. Besides the models being more attractive, the scenes and video quality are much better and the women are younger, which I think fits this style of porn.
I can say that I have only beein watching and downloading the scenes released within the last year. Maybe it is just me, but when a porn scene features a female, her hand and a penis, the attractiveness of the woman has to be pretty high.
If you’re curious or want to do the research, I didn’t do until after joining the site, go to the TBP page and look at the included sites. A lot of those sites have been around for awhile and were once part of another network.
The main reason I’m positive about this network is the new content is very good. I’m guessing they have new producers and it really shows in the quality of the scenes. It is mostly still just blowjobs and handjobs and I seriously doubt there is much you can do to improve this small niche. I do believe picking more attractive women is a step in the right direction and it really works in their newer scenes.
It’s a good site as long as you understand it is a reboot of a previous site. There is plenty of newer content that is at least worth looking into for a month, but I don’t think there is any long term interest. Lesson of the review, be sure and research a “new” site that has around 3,000 scenes
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Newer site on the Tug Pass network and in my opinion, the best site in the network.
Pretty models (most)
Scenes give full view of the nude female model while she pleasures a dick through a milking table.
Updates once per month (very important to the review).
65 scenes, all available to download in 1080p and unlimited downloads.
Photographs with each scene are downloadable and often show more than the videos do. Possibly because of different angles?
Cons:
It’s a small site and only is updating once per month.
It’s a narrow niche, every scene is nearly exact in execution.
Some unattractive models including what they list as GILFs
Bottom Line:
I was going to review the network Tug Pass as a whole, but believe this site is more important. This will cover both the network and this site Mylked. Mylked is clearly a newer site on the network. It only lists one update per month. The older sites say they are updating weekly (recycling). The sites you should look into if you are interested in joining this network are: Mylked and Shady Spa, those from the best I can tell, are the only ones definitely updating with new content. Mylked has at least some positives going for it. The female in the scene is laying under a table. She is fully nude, sometimes she is masturbating and most of these models are at worst, cute. Every scene is the same. The female model is laying under the table while a dick is sticking through a hole in the table. The female rubs the dick, she sucks it, she masturbates herself while doing it. It’s similar to a gloryhole scene except the model is laying down instead of on her knees.
The 65 scenes can all be downloaded in 1080p which is another sign this is a newer site on the network and possibly damages the view of several of the other sites on the network where 480p and 720p are the highest quality downloads. All scenes on all the sites in the network only have one download option. The scenes even on Mylked are very short with less than 10 minutes being common.
I felt this site earned a review with the attractiveness of the models compared to the other sites in the network. These may be pro models even. Jessica Marie, Freya Von Doom, Honey Hayes and Reina Ryder are the 4 newest models. I don’t recognize them or their names, but they are attractive (pretty or cute), they have nice bodies that they show off while pleasuring the dick sticking through the table.
In comparison to the other sites on the network, these models are much more attractive. I rarely go into attractiveness in reviews unless just saying pretty models. I feel like a lot of the models on this network would be turn offs for viewers. I can’t say I have experienced that on a network before, not on this scale.
The pictures on Mylked are also much better than on the other sites on this network. There are around 100 photos in each set and while it does look like they are screen captures, they show different angles than the video shows. I said this in a previous review of another site on this network, I don’t know if this is a negative or positive. It’s a site I joined to watch dicks being teased and pleasured. I ended up finding my favorite site of the network, Mylked, shows more of the female and I’m not a lesbian. There has to be a bigger picture at work here. The attractiveness of the models on Mylked make the scenes more enjoyable and there’s irony in that. This is the one site on their network the male can’t see the pretty woman pleasuring him. The other sites have the “average at best” female models right in the men’s view. This site, as much as I liked it -- possibly because of how much I disliked the overall network, is still repetitive and small. I do believe if you check out Mylked, I don’t know how much the preview shows of the models and also Shady Spa, if you think you would like either or both of those sites this network is worth joining for the discounted price. I believe if you don’t think Mylked and Shady Spa would interest you, the network as a whole won’t interest you. There are some good scenes on Club Tug, but they are 480p. I will end with while reviewing Mylked, I clicked “switch sites” and they have a different add-on showing up that you have to pay extra for, Mylked’s “switch sites” tab has “Gloryhole (unlock)” in it. When I was reviewing Shady Spa and Cum Blast City, the “switch sites” tab had “Tug Spy” or Spy Tug (unlock). If I were them, I would work on improving the content they have instead of possibly starting other new sites they don’t offer with their network. I mention this because their newest site, Edge Queens, was locked from me accessing it for nearly a week.
This network is a mess. Mylked is a good site as long as you accept every scene is going to be similar. I am giving it an 80 for the pretty models who do a good job of showing off their bodies while pleasuring the male.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site I thought I might like based on me liking a site that had dildos squirting fake cum on women.
316 scenes total and they are listing updates, but there were 276 scenes on the site in 2015.
Newest videos are 1080p, no other download options other than downloading the scene in parts.
This usually lands in the cons, but the scenes are short and it’s a pro.
Photos of the models posing with downloads.
Cons:
This will be the first time I ever listed this as a con, the women. There are some average looking women on here and they are the best looking women on the site.
There’s not even humor involved despite the fake cumshots.
The women trying to act like the cum is real.
The edit in every scene where I assume the male attaches or connects the cum squirter.
The older scenes are 480p
Bottom Line:
I joined a site a while back called Slime Wave. I thought I would hate it, it has dildos shooting large amounts of cum on the women. I liked it. I thought this site would be similar. It’s not. This site instead of having strategically placed squirting dildos, just has a man getting a blowjob, then he says he’s going to cum. The woman moves back, there is a video edit, and the continuous flood of cum squirts “out of his dick”. As much as I enjoyed Slime Wave, the site which is similar in its gimmick, seemed to lose my interest when the edit happened. I am not for sure if the man has some sort of sprayer he is squirting the fake cum from, but do believe that is what I didn’t like about this site. With Slime Wave, the fake cum was being shot out of fake dicks (dildos) with no man in sight. With this site, a real man with a real dick, is shooting fake cum out.
I have been a member of two different sites with clear edits in their scenes. I believe that may be the most off-putting action possible in a porn scene.
The site is large with 316 scenes, but I didn’t find myself interested in watching more than the ending to see if all the scenes have the obvious edit. From the ones I watched they all had the same edit right before the cumshot. I don’t understand the thinking behind this or the arousal for the viewer. It’s like watching a reality show only to find out it’s fake on the last episode. When one of my pros is the “scenes are short” it probably isn’t a good sign. Most of the scenes I watched, you can’t see the time on the scenes until you start watching/streaming or download them, were around 7 minutes. These look like they could just use the content from their other sites for the first 95% of the video, throw the edit in and introduce the gimmick of the real dick shooting gallons of fake cum. I wasn’t going to review this site until I noticed the dates on the scenes do show the site as updating weekly. I have read various member reviews about this network recycling their content and based on the The Best Porn review there were 276 scenes in 2015. There are only 316 scenes in 2021, but they show weekly updates. I am sure if there were weekly updates there would be far more updates in 6 years than 40.
I do find the site to be a negative on what is at best -- an okay network. The women try to act their way through the scenes on this specific site. They try to act like the fake cum surprises them and excites them. It has too much of a parody feel to the site. Which represents the biggest problem this site causes the entire network. The women on this site “act” like they do in their other scenes on the network. I also have now found my most disliked part of porn, an obvious edit in a scene.
The women on this site are average looking at best. There really isn’t anything that positive about this site other than network access. This site combined with their newer sites in the network makes me think a full network review will be sufficient instead of reviewing all the sites in the network. If you are familiar with Slime Wave or any of the sites that use fake cum shooting from dildos, do not believe this site has the same appeal. The sites with dildos shooting fake cum look more like a fetish and go into the Wet And Messy niche. This site fits the edited and should have been scrapped -- niche. Maybe they have scrapped it, but showing that it’s still updating weekly only makes it worse. This is one of my lowest scores for an individual site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A slightly different take on handjobs, blowjobs and teasing/edging.
42 scenes, but includes access to the 10 site Tug Pass network.
Variation of model types and looks.
1080p quality downloads on all 42 scenes.
Currently updating, but not much consistency to the updates.
Cons:
The consistency in updates, 2 new updates in January, 4 in February, 3 in March, 2 in April, 1 so far in May.
Unless I am missing something you can only download the videos in 1080p. I first thought it was streaming only, but realized to right click and save as.
I love variation in model looks and body types, but I don’t think everyone will have the same appreciation I do for the variation.
Scenes are short
Bottom Line:
The biggest reason I joined this network was I saw where they added a new site called Edge Queens. Women edging men is maybe my favorite niche in porn and it’s hard to find it unless you go to the sites that you have to pay per scene.
Shady Spa is a newer site too. The scenes are set in a spa or massage parlor type setting. One of the 42 scenes has 2 women, the other 41 only have one woman. The oldest scenes feature models wearing germ masks, I assume those were recorded when Covid first started up. The scenes are more straightforward than I expected. There’s a very short massage at the beginning of most scenes. Which to me is the most important part of these scenes. It’s trying to separate itself from every other handjob site. While the short massage is disappointing, the scenes don’t even really try to convince you they are anything other than a handjob scene or even a porn scene. The masseuse walks in while the man lays on the massage table, almost nude, or at most dressed provocatively. When I watch a porn scene with a theme, I want to believe the theme even if it’s outrageous and unbelievable. A masseuse walking in with a string bikini, pubic hair showing, nipples showing, does not make me think this is a “spa”. Even the dialogue works against the site’s theme and it’s because of how the masseuse is dressed or not dressed. A female masseuse walks in with pubic hair showing, nipples fully exposed and says, “Do you have any problem areas you need me to work on?” I want the male to say, “Well yes, I am here for a massage, put some clothes on.” If you are going to need some inkling of believability this site isn’t going to do much for you.
The model variation is good. There are some that look very young (18-22), some that look as old as maybe 40. There are very slim models, more average size and some that are on the larger side of average-sized. There is a good mix of races. Of the 42 scenes, I am playing a guessing game on a couple of these, at least 12 of the 42 scenes have women who look black, biracial, Latina or Asian.
I do like that there are more than just handjobs. Some of the scenes are as much blowjob as handjob. There is teasing. What I would describe as close to edging. The older models seem better at making the scenes more in-depth. The one scene with two women is probably the best scene on the site and should be something they consider doing more often.
The looks of the models is something I rarely criticize and I won’t on this site either, but I will say with a lot of these “models” their reactions and what seems to be genuine enjoyment, even arousal, tops their looks. Which could be a good thing since looks are subjective. I would think you could stick a perfect 10 model in these types of scenes, but if she’s not really into it, her looks wouldn’t save the scene. These women in these scenes are also clearly not actors. I have to think their enjoyment is genuine and that helps a lot.
I don’t think any of these models are professional models. I just wish there was more to the scenes. The scenes only average about 12 minutes. That includes the 1-2 minute massage at the beginning. It kind of feels like the guy is paying for a handjob/blowjob and the woman isn’t there to make a porn scene. She’s there to make him cum and get the scene over with.
I have looked everywhere for other video resolutions and formats, but I don’t believe there are any extra versions. You get 1080p on all 42 scenes and the only other option is to download the around 12 minute scenes in 5 parts. They do have pictures and those can be downloaded. The pictures are mostly of the model posing which you don’t see in the video.
It’s not a bad site, but it could be a lot better than it is.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Fast server
+ A cheap join with the PU discount
+ 10 site access
+ Easy navigation (Due to dated layout - See cons)
+ 150 models
+ Easy cancellation
Cons:
- Layout very reminiscent of early porn sites
- Ridiculously low resolution video offered as new?
- Recycled content
- All files named 'high'
Bottom Line:
This is one of those times when I wish we could rate lower than 50. I'd give this about an 8 and feel like I was being generous. Did you happen to catch that I listed the ability to easily cancel a subscription as a plus? That's how sad this is. (By the way - the sole processor is now Rocketpay) I immediately knew it was a poor decision to sign up here when I instantly recognized an Alyssa Hart video on the first page that I'd seen the last time I was on the site years ago. The episode is named the same - with a different date than the file I had saved from my last join. The update schedule isn't really a schedule at all. Even with an apparent and pathetic once a week update, a site that's been online for going on eight years means there should be way more than the 216 videos available.
Their idea of high quality video and mine are way different. 720p video might have been considered high quality 25-30 years ago but this is 2020 where even 1080p is looking to fade into history with 5K video creeping into the world of online porn. Calling 720p high quality kind of ties in with the layout of the site. Everything about it looks like a 1990s site, giving me the impression that it's a real low maintenance affair. A plain white page, scroll down 12 episodes per page with a page jump at the end. Oh - and an ad with Trusted Partners. Gotta sell, sell, sell, right? And who, in 2020, still offers split scenes - especially when the average size of their files is under 300 megabytes? And PLEASE, people, stop forcing people to rename every file.
The only real positive I see here, if you want to call it that, is that I can update the old wmv files I had to mp4 and fill in the few episodes I'd missed between signups. Bottom line? Skip this site and all their bonus sites. They all suffer from the same poor layout and just about all same piss poor resolution videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network dedicated to handjobs and making you sign-in a lot.
- Marked improvement since my last review in 2017, models are prettier, new themed sites, there's only so much you can do with a dick and a hand, but all kidding aside, there's nice improvements here.
- Good PU discount, their homepage doesn't show the discount and says it's $29.95 but once you click to join it gives you the $14.95 option.
- Easy to use navigation and while the network hub doesn't work the way you might like it to, I actually think it's better this way, will explain.
- 11 sites total, all except one are handjob/blowjob/tease related.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- Downloadable videos (still can't believe that's a pro these days) and downloadable photo sets.
- I'm not for sure if it's the biggest handjob site/network but I'll get to the numbers in the bottom line. I think based on my memory it is the biggest handjob network.
- No ads beyond a page of ads when you first sign in.
Cons:
- The video download options and quality and filenames need some work. You have one full scene download option or you can download them in 4 parts. The full scene downloads vary from 480p, 720p or 1080p. You don't know what it will be until you've downloaded it and they're all named "high".
- This was a pro for me, it might be a con for you. The network hub shows all the sites available. When you click one, you have to login to it. That's frustrating for some but I will explain why I prefer it.
- Update schedule is kind of all over the place.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined this network it was after seeing a few of their scenes on tube sites. I think those scenes came from their site Club Tug which is the big site here. It was mostly older women, sometimes with a younger woman helping, in what was similar to CFNM with edging thrown in. They've since added multiple new sites. I think a common complaint for the older scenes was the models weren't always attractive. The newer scenes on their newer sites seem to be higher level models.
One con I didn't include is one I haven't ever figured out whose fault it is. Rocketgate is the biller. I have used them many times and I don't like that they store or remember your purchases and try to get you to sign up without putting your payment info in. One of the cards they have on file for me expired 2 years ago. Even worse, here on this site, it rechecks the pre-checked cross-sale, it also changed the price from $14.95 to $19.95. If the biller is doing this these sites need to let them know it's going to hurt their business.
The con about the hub requiring you to sign in on each site, which kind of makes it not really a hub. I like this better because you get a member's area that is exclusive to whatever site you sign into. So, when you click the model's list, say on their site Mylked, all the models are on Mylked. You don't get network-wide results. I prefer that. They do give you a randomly generated username and password so you have to keep on your notepad to remember it or copy/paste it in.
Club Tug is still the big site here. It has 436 scenes by my count, the hub says it has 500+, but just doing simple math of 12 scenes per page, 36 pages = 432 + 4 more on the 37th page. It's updating once a week. This site has a wide range of scenes from one woman giving the guy a handjob/blowjob while another woman watches and masturbates to grannies giving handjobs.
They have Tease POV which has 75 scenes and looks to be updating once per month. These are really good scenes that include more creativity than most handjob sites.
A newer site for them is Finish Him, it has 78 scenes and these are more like edging, some have two women, very good scenes. These newer sites they have really have added some life to the network. It updates once per month.
The newest site, Mylked, is the traditional milking table type scene where the woman lays under a table with the man laying on the table with his dick through a hole, kind of like horizontal gloryhole. There are 41 scenes on it and I would say they are some of the best on the site.
This is where it gets more complex. Cum Blast City looks like fake cum but after watching multiple scenes it looks real. This site would be very popular for those that like seeing a woman covered with cum. It has 320 scenes. The more I look at it, it looks like some of the scenes are fake dicks with fake cum, others are real dicks with real cum that must not have had sex in a decade.
Over 40 Handjobs has 240 scenes here and they're what they say, some are just an over 40 woman giving a younger guy a handjob, others are an over 40 with a younger woman giving a guy a handjob.
A fairly rare one with Ebony Tugs, there's 50 scenes of black girls over varying age, attractiveness and body type giving handjobs.
See Mom Suck is next with 112 scenes. This one isn't as good. Some of the mom's look like they just stepped out of the 1980s. Just being fair.
Mean Massage has 131 scenes, some of this is humiliation, but it's not that bad and some of it is quite good.
Teen Tugs has 211 scenes, these are very good and do good job of following the teen theme except for the few models that look like they probably have teenage daughters.
Last is Petite 18, it's out of place here, it has 71 scenes and they're all regular porn sexual intercourse scenes.
I did that so I could add the scenes up. That's 1,694 handjob-related scenes and I'm not counting the Petite 18 scenes in that number. I'm positive that makes it the biggest handjob site on the internet.
I spent more time on this than usual. It looks like the sites Mylked, Finish Him, Tease POV and the newer Club Tug scenes are the ones with 720p or 1080p videos. The rest of the sites seems to 480p. I based that on downloading the 4 newest scenes from each site. I'm not going to take anything off for those but those 480p ones aren't helping the score either. I sit close enough to a 32" monitor that 480p isn't terrible. I'm more bothered by the filenames all being "high". I have a folder full of "high", "high (1)", "high (2)" and so on. I think with a little work there they could score even higher. I'm giving them a 13 point boost over my last score. They do seem to be working on improving the site and adding new scenes with better looking models, plus the higher video quality.
The different scenarios they use does make it a little more unique than other handjob sites, too. Recommended to tease, handjob/blowjob fans.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Tug Pass network
- Adds to the popular step niche
- 10 sites in total
- Appears to be updating
- Bills through Epoch
- Supports download managers
- TBP discount
Cons:
- Streaming only (the other sites on the network allow downloads)
- Undated updates
- Generic porn
- Generic file names
Bottom Line:
Family Lust was recently listed in the Whats Hot section here as an addition to the Tug Pass network. I didnt do any due diligence on the site or network and ended up joining. Its not a bad site but it isnt great. At least the TBP discount kept the cost low.
Im not necessarily a fan of incest or step porn except that as someone who likes the scene setup as much as the sex these kinds of scenes often do that well. The setup usually comes from the need for some explanation as to why step-siblings or step-parents and step-daughters are having sex. Or maybe I just lead a sheltered life and this is normal.
In the excitement of seeing a potentially new step site I went for my credit card before doing even basic research on the site or network. I have to blame Alyssa Hart and Hope Harper for this too though, as they figure prominently on the tour pages and Im smitten with both of them.
This site is part of the larger Tug Pass network. The site layout and navigation arent bad but they arent class-leading either. This is a pretty middle-of-the-road site. This site is likely better suited for someone who takes a buffet approach to porn since there are better sites out there generally and in this specific niche.
The site currently has 44 scenes available. I cant give clear information on when and if the site updates because the dates given for the scenes only give a month and day and nothing on the year. Many of the models in the recent scenes are still active so it is possible, and even likely that the site still updates. If it does update, however, the latest scene is listed as Mar 21 and the one before that as Mar 05 so its at least two weeks between updates.
The scenes here are all relatively generic for the niche and while they have some good looking models the scenes themselves are just average. There is nothing that caused me to immediately run to my keyboard and encourage others to join. The models here dont really fall on a range so much as they fall on one end or the other of a range. They are either 18-20 and petite or MILFs. Likewise with race: the models are overwhelmingly Caucasian.
The biggest disappointment I had on joining the site (and admittedly the information was there for me to read) was that Family Lust is streaming only. The odd thing about this is that it is on a network of 10 sites where all of the other sites appear to allow downloads. I get that streaming is popular, but as a porn collector I prefer to download.
Im not able to give an indication of the resolution but even the oldest of the scenes look pretty good so Id guess that the lowest streaming resolution is 720p. Some of the new scenes look like they could be 1080p. This reveals another issue though: there are no options for resolutions. You take what youre given.
The site also offers screenshots. I dont collect photos but I can say that these alone arent worth the price of the membership. My preference is photos apart from the screenshots which are usually going to be different from the scene I can view.
There are other sites as part of the network (and those allow downloads). Most of those are listed here with the specs so I wont drag this review out. Of the scenes I downloaded throughout the network the older ones were of lower quality. The three resolutions I saw were 1920x1080 (4000 kb/s), 1280x720 (3000) and 720x480 (2000). I found no scenes where there were any options for file resolution and an annoyance is that all of the files have a generic name so youll need to rename them as you go.
One scene on the network that isnt listed here is Tease POV. Honestly, this site saved the membership for me. This site has 59 scenes with sensual, erotic blowjobs from some of the hottest models in the business. I am confident in saying that this site is updating even with the date limitations noted above.
The site allows download managers and I found the download speeds to be fast and consistent. Another plus is that Epoch is the biller so you can be confident that your information is protected.
Deciding to recommend this site or not is difficult. If you arent a big porn collector and you dont have a lot of experience with porn paysites then this is a good site to consider, especially at the discounted price. But if you are a more serious collector you can find better easily. If you are a collector looking for step porn then you need to know that this site is streaming only. This isnt a bad site (or network) its just that it could be so much better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network almost exclusively dedicated to handjobs.
- There's probably more handjob content on this network than any other site or network, I'll get to that and the numbers in the bottom line.
- Download speeds are good.
- Eight sites are included in the network, but probably should just be combined into one site.
- Had some problems with this network when I tried joining their "full access" trial, so I came back as a full member and the problems are at least fixed.
Cons:
- Underwhelming. I think that word sums up the network as a whole. A lot of the models have no business being called models. The navigation is very bad. It requires a login for each of the 8 sites, despite having a network hub page. The video quality ranges from average to terrible.
- Just a note on this, back several months ago, I joined this network on a trial subscription. It originally worked as a "full trial", but after downloading 12-15 videos, it started booting me off the site. As mentioned in the pros, I didn't have these problems once I joined as a full member, but anyone considering the trial should be aware.
- Well, eventually you find a good scene, if you figure out how to find the scenes.
Bottom Line:
You might find this hard to believe, but I'm having trouble counting the number of scenes on the network simply because there's no way for me to find them. I kid you not, if you go to the homepage, this is what you're going to find:
Three mentions of new sites added to the network.
Latest prize giveaway
Two newest "Bonus Sites" which are also listed above in the "new sites" links.
A top 10 Most Popular Scenes list
A top 10 Top Rated Scenes list
The 5 latest updates
If you go to say the Club Tug site and login you are presented with the same page from above except it now has the top 10s from just Club Tug and last 5 updates from Club Tug. Eventually, you'll click on "updates" and find a scroll-a-thon through the scenes on the site. There's no filter, no way to search, but there is at least a model tab to find models you like.
I don't know whether this is sad or even real, but you receive a pop-up letter from the webmaster explaining how they offer the best customer service and feel free to email him.
Here's some numbers I have found:
Roughly 600 videos across the network. The newer videos are 1280x720, but a lot drop into the 480p range. There's no real way to know how new any of these scenes are. There's a date, but no year. Looks like they update 10 times a month, which is a respectable number.
I was pretty rough on their models in the cons, but it's true. I understand the concept of beauty if in the eye of the beholder, but there's some terribly bad looking women on this site.
Which is where I will shift gears a little. There's some well-known models here as well. There's quite a few pretty models. And as said, the newer videos are 720p quality. The newer sites, TeasePOV, Mean Massage, and Petite 18 are all good overall. Tug Job itself has plenty of good scenes on it. So, it's not all negative.
I think they could move all of the "sites" onto one site, put a decent basic search engine on it and they'd have an above-average site. As it is, you better have a good mouse with a good scroll wheel and some patience. There's good content here you won't find anywhere else or at least I've not seen before.
Quite a few of the scenes go into plots similar to CFNM sites. The Mean Massage site goes into femdom and cum-controlling. Some of it covers fairly rare content, but you'll have to find it. For me, one month was more than enough. I wouldn't pay the full price for this network. There's just too many headaches and cussing my monitor for full price. Maybe they'll get it cleaned up some with a new interface? Until then, I can't recommend it except for those who love handjobs.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Decent sized site/network with lots of clips, but not very large data-wise since the videos aren't huge
- Improved video quality since last review
- Allows download managers
- Good download speeds
- Pictures sometimes available along with videos, although sometimes just for viewing and not always as .zip
Cons:
- Ads behind the paywall.
- All videos are named the same thing ("high")
- Some links to photo sets that go nowhere other than a "back to video" page.
- No video quality choices.
- Directing/editing isn't well thought out at times
- Older videos are still really low quality
- $30 seems a bit overpriced.
Bottom Line:
I was a member years ago and was unimpressed, but I thought I would give Clubtug another shot since I saw some bigger names listed as models. The network/site has definitely gotten better. It still comes across as amateurish in a lot of ways (yes lots of amateur models, but also an amateur site), but it's improving.
My feeling was that it's mostly a handjob network with a bit of intercourse (Tease POV IIRC), but don't expect much beyond masturbation and a bit of oral here and there.
There was a large popup ad for other sites after you login that you have to click "no thanks, continue to the site" (or similar) to get to the site you paid for, and ads throughout the site. Each site on the network required an individual login as well, but the sites don't seem to log you out frequently, so I'm okay with the individual login requests.
One of the big problems with the site in the past was tube-quality videos (or worse). This has improved, and according to VLC the newer clips are 720. There are no video quality choices, however, and the old tube-quality clips are designated as "high" exactly like the new 720 clips, so there's no way to know which you're getting until you view it.
The videos are fairly watchable now, although there are some bad choices like stationary filming, poor visibility from bad angles, or attempting to use a macro ring to light up-close scenes similar to Amateur Allure. I don't care much for it there, and it's even less successful here. The lighting washes out the models' skin and they lose most detail in their face/body, and the cumshot washes out the same way on the stark white, flat face. I appreciate trying something new, but it's a shame the actresses like India Summer and Alexis Fawx weren't just filmed with a good lens on a mid-level Canon SLR with decent natural lighting.
Other problems are things like models giving a handjob while fully clothed and then abruptly wearing bra and panties before abruptly being naked. I don't think a storyline is necessary, but 30 extra seconds of transitioning through the models undressing would help the scenes overall.
That said, there are some good choices like POV scenes with a naked model sitting between a (laying on his back) man's legs with HER legs open as she masturbates him. Those scenes are fairly inspired and were nice to see.
I think $20 is probably a more appropriate non-promo day-to-day price, but the site's owners have brought in some bigger names like Veronica Avluv, Dava Foxx, and India Summer, so the $30 isn't unreasonable in light of attracting and paying talent. I personally would recommend the owners get more of Christina Sky(e?) and the actress named Harley. Both seemed fairly interested in what they were doing, and that goes a long way in making the scenes believable/enjoyable. Not to mention you can probably get five or more scenes for what India or Avluv charges for one. FWIW, there are still some less attractive models and the videos from my first review are still there, but the quality of models has improved over the last couple of years.
Bottom line: I reviewed the network under Clubtug last time and they only earned a 62, but the details have improved enough that I'm adding ten+1 points for them putting in the effort and making it a decent site. It's not an especially innovative or outstanding site, but if there are more than a few actresses there doing things you enjoy watching, it's probably worth checking out at least once, especially if you can get a discounted rate.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining the site gives access to a few other niche type sites including Cum Blast City, See Mom Suck, Over 40 Handjobs, Busty Direct, Teen Tugs, & few others.
- The site overall has a decent amount of content but I'm going to review the site as a network which contains plenty of handjob material with decent scenarios which are the essence of the network. I will elaborate in the bottom line.
- Content appears to be exclusive to the sites and network.
- No DRM protection.
- Photos are available to view or download in zip format.
- Navigation is straight forward and content is easy enough to find by showing updates viewed by date of update, rating, popularity, or name. Updates can also be viewed by a model index with the same views as above.
- Some other discounts to other sites not associated with the network can be used by clicking links on the site.
- Average scene descriptions with decent screen caps to know what kind of scene the video or photo will be when browsing.
Cons:
- Videos as a whole on the network vary and range from poor to below average. However, nothing is above average in this category. We are talking about 320 X 240 to 720 X 480, most with ~2,500 kbps bitrate.
- Photos are small as well with some being actual photo shoots to just screen caps from the videos. There are usually just a few dozen pics in a set and highest resolution is around 1000 X 668.
- Site design is bland and there is no attempt to really be a top tier site in this category. However, navigation is easy enough.
- Model selection can range to absolutely gorgeous to sub par. It just shows how the site is as a whole which equals wishy-washy selections.
- Overall, there is not a lot of content for the network. This actual site has the most with around 202 at this time of review. However, the other sites are averaged around 60 scenes with even some only as much as 4 or 5 scenes.
- Some scenes are on other sites within the same network sites and only update once a week.
Bottom Line:
First off, I want everyone to know that I am reviewing this site as a network. Therefore, I will review the sites in the handjob/blowjob niche because this is the main overall theme of this particular site and network.
Club Tug seems to be the main site of the network with a overall handjob theme as a whole. The scenes within this site vary from solo handjobs to group ones. I suppose I will say this next because it is the basis as to why I joined: these sites within this network are extremely niche orientated! Meaning, almost all the themes revolve around a story of a handjob or blowjob happening for a taboo reason, it is not just "hi, strip, handjob, cumshot, scene end" content. Therefore, the site has decent creativity which results in some steamy scenes. This site here has it all, from the little girl who gives her teacher a handjob to the stepmom giving her stepson a handjob before a big date so he's "relaxed". Overall, the directing is average and the dialogue can range from dirty/sexy to stupid/straightforward. Therefore, each scene has a life of its own which can range in theme and quality. It is by far not consistent which is its blessing and its curse.
Over 40 Handjobs is exactly how it is described. Like the other scenes in the network, it is theme oriented but features strictly older ladies. However, there are some scenes with a younger model who "catches" her giving a handjob and helps. But, it is mostly solo older models giving young men handjobs for some weird/taboo reason. Like the other scenes in the network, the acting varies and models do as well. I have seen some of the nicest natural older ladies to the old ones with the huge bolt-on titties. Looks range and it is all in the eyes of the beholder.
See Mom Suck is a site which features older ladies not only giving handjobs but blowjobs. Each scene usually consists of a younger model giving a blowjob, get "caught", and then the older model joins in for whatever reason and "teaches" the younger one how it's done. But, some scenes might just feature the older lady only without a younger lady, of course, blowing the young man for some taboo reason. The dynamic between the older and younger model can vary from great dialogue and sexy rapport to just overall embarrassing with one model outshining the other or them both just looking dumbfounded with poor acting. It all depends which brings me to the point I've made before, the consistency is well, non-existent.
Teen Tugs differs by bringing the younger model to the forefront only in a handjob scene. Sometimes it is a model by herself, with another, or even in a group. Of course, keeping with the overall theme, the handjobs usually occur with a taboo subject as to why she is doing it. This ranges from trying to get a good grade from a teacher to her getting revenge for a bad date from a friend. This is the newest of the sites and only contains a few dozen scenes.
Now that I've talked a little about a few of the network sites, I would like to comment on the overall stuff. Most of the models in this network are used again in each of the sites. So, when giving the tour to look at, if you like a most of the models on one site, then you are most likely to see them on all sites. Also, the themes tend to not vary. Therefore, if you have seen about a dozen types of scenes or reasons why they are giving a hj/bj, then it is usually repeated again with different models. So if you are in to theme orientated porn with a bit of a plot which results in quirky reasons why these models would be jerking or sucking some guy off, then you are at the right place. Therefore, that is what this network really is, theme oriented. You really have to be in to the reality type thing to appreciate the scenes offered here. This would probably be the main reason to join, as it was my main reason.
With that said, do not expect to be blown away by the content here. Yes, it has really steamy themes and decent models doing decent acting, but not all the time. Some editing can be poor and the dialogue excruciatingly bad which makes one wonder if any direction was done before a scene at all. Plus, the site Cum Blast City actually brings in a horrible fake penis which eventually squirts massive amounts of fake jizz on the models, but first makes them actually jerk and suck it like they are even remotely turned on. It creates this strange aura for the model which results in uncomfortable acting and cringe worthy scenes that are almost unbearable to watch. I avoided this site quickly and was pretty mad cause a lot of the better models participated in the site.
Overall, the network offers some great scenes that are niche orientated. The quality is low, so if you want to join, you better be ready for this. It's surely not for everyone and needs to be tweaked for the future. With the right changes, the network could produce really good niche and theme oriented scenes, but for now, only a selected few will be ready for the site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Allows download manager (DTA)
- Decent download speeds when accessible.
- Some photo sets are zipped.
Cons:
Some truly unattractive women. 50% or more if I had to guess. Not beer-goggles women. I mean actual homely and/or fat and homely women. It's easy to pick out the (attractive) pros' videos because they're the ones you don't squint and scroll past.
***HORRIBLE VIDEO QUALITY***. The highest setting looks to be 640x426 @ 2700kbps WMV, and most vids are around 100MB. Think 1998. Remember the old free Bang Bus clips you'd find in xxx galleries? Yep, that bad.
Add to that poor lighting, bad angles, etc.
Seriously, the video quality is so bad that sometimes I only knew the guy had orgasmed because I saw a change in the woman's stroking tempo.
Joined on Saturday morning. Their server was overwhelmed and inaccessible by 9am and I couldn't view any pages until that evening. Fortunately:
Very little content available. Divide that by half (unless you like homely women in low-res videos) and you've got an entire network that you can browse and download in less than 1/2 a da
Bottom Line:
Avoid.
Overpriced and outdated. Fortunately I clicked through to the signup page and then attempted to leave. I was offered 10 days for $10 and decided to try it.
I still feel a bit ripped off because one day is all you need. Clubtug has 13 pages with 12 vids each. Cumblastcity, seemomsuck, and over40handjobs have less than a dozen pages total with 12 vids on each page. I'd give you an exact number, but the server is inaccessible again.
UPDATE 1/22/12- Total pages of the four sites mentioned above is 30, with 12 (fewer if it's the last page) vids on each, and many repeats between sites.
My DTA queue has just over 200 videos lined up for download and I've seen every page. If I saturated my DSL line I could've had the entire network (well, all I wanted) downloaded in a few hours.
BTW, many of those other sites have repeats. Maybe only 35% of the videos are worth getting after you factor in the ugly girls and the redundancies.
I can only go on my opinion, and no one can account for personal taste. I like clavicles, tan-lines, and almost-invisible hair in backlit photos of thighs. Other people won't find that appealing. But dang there are some unattractive women on this site. More power to you if that's your thing, but I'm guessing you could find an ugly woman site with higher quality videos and photos.
That said, the photos are occasionally decent, although they're web-viewing size only. It doesn't redeem the site, but it should be mentioned. Unfortunately not every video has photos, and those that do aren't always zipped and available for downloading unless you're willing to click and save each individual photo.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
