Review Replies (6)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Wraith0711 (0)
|
This site and network are a ripoff, they start all hot and heavy then slow way down or stop updating after a few months. Some of the videos are weird to like the petite 18 holly hendrix scene, it looks like trying to watch a TV in the mid 80's while someone is running a microwave lol.
I too took the opportunity to update to the mp4 format last time I joined.
Also something to add to your review, in all fairness is when joining this site you get access to their network. And aside from the petite 18 site real sex is a rarity.
|
02-22-20 05:00am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Wraith0711 :
I did list 10 site access as a positive but with the big picture being a shitshow, I didn't feel it was worth diving into it in detail. I'm just glad it wasn't a $30 loss.
|
02-22-20 09:01am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
exotics4me (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Wraith0711 :
I liked this network and still do. I thought the Petite 18 site was the only waste on the network. If I want to watch sex, I join a hardcore site. The newer sites they've added are at least interesting. If anything it seems like they have trouble listing their sites as they get new ones. I received an email from them (went to spam) that said they had added a new site called Shady Spa. It's found nowhere on the network but if you click it in the email it takes you to it and they have I think 8-10 scenes on it so far.
I think everyone is being a bit over-critical lately. Would you go to a pizza restaurant expecting cheeseburgers on the menu? It's a handjob network. Just being realistic and not at all trying to be an asshole. This network seems to be ran by a small group with no major backing.
|
02-22-20 12:41pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
exotics4me (0)
|
We've been here a long time, RB, and while you did just give the 50 to one of the sites in the network and not the network as a whole, don't you think 50 is a bit extreme? I don't care either way. I just reviewed the network an 88, it has more handjob content than any other site or network in the genre. It has mostly amateur models. While it doesn't have 4K or 5K videos, it does have 720p and 1080p on the newer sites and those are still the standards for high quality or high definition. On the recycling part, I do see that too but not on the newer sites. They're doing what every network does. They have dead sites, they have sites that are updating.
You even said you were able to download better versions of videos you liked before. That alone should put it over a 50. I also do think reviewing a site in a network that has 4-5 newer sites that are updating, without even mentioning those sites also goes against a 50. We're going to end up with a bunch of Brazzers, Reality Kings, type sites with no variation in the content.
|
02-22-20 12:53pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #4 - exotics4me :
No, I didn't rate the network because I only joined to update what I had from TeenTugs and ClubTugs which are pretty much the same site with different watermarks. On both of those sites, when I see episodes that I had years ago being touted as a new update, I see red. That alone I think warrants a low score. Calling that 480p video new? More points off. A 1990s looking layout? Still more points off. Every file named the same... yeah - more points off.
Because of your reply, I went into the other sites to see what's what. (Well... every site but CumBlastCity because the obviously fake cumshots look stupid to me) As I see it, this is just a low end Brazzers type site, with very little variation in the sites they have up. Every site in the network has the same style landing page, the same dated layout and pretty much the same resolution videos. Yes, there are 720 & 1080p videos to be found. But, as an example, the first update in Over40Handjobs is a pathetic 640x426 resolution. That's beyond ridiculous in 2020. So, even adding in the other sites, I see no reason to change my score, although I wouldn't rate it all at the same 8 I would have given TeenTugs.
As it happens, some of the "better content" I thought I'd find looks worse than the original wmv files. The file sizes on some of mp4 versions were half the size of the original wmvs and I would have had to correct the aspect ratio on most of them because they were off. I actually got better results by re-encoding the wmv files myself.
|
02-22-20 01:40pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
exotics4me (0)
|
REPLY TO # - :
What happened with me is I had a review of the network from 2015 and only gave it a 75. Which is a very low score from me seeing that my average score is 86. When I came back to the network a few weeks ago, they had added Mean Massage, Mylked, Finish Him, Tease POV and the one you have to go to on your own since they have no links for it, Shady Spa. These sites do seem to be updating and have 1080p videos.
So, I went by if I gave it a 75 for the whole network in 2015 and they've added 5 sites that are at least a little more creative with 1080p and regular updates, I should give them about 2.5 points per new sites for the effort to at least trying to improve. One thing to add here, while Tease POV is an interesting site, it features the model sucking, handjob, talking dirty, the downloads are terribly slow compared to the rest of the network. I would go as far as saying 90% slower than the rest of the network.
|
02-23-20 12:18am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
