Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
PU/TBP discounted price of $14.95.
Billing by CC Bill with no regional pricing from the UK.
Exclusive content.
Photos available in 3 sizes, small 667 x 1000px, medium 1333 x 2000px and large size varies between 2000 x 3008px and 3744 x 5616px.
Zip downloads in the 3 different sizes.
Good sized photo collection, 136 models in 665 photo sets (74,000 total photos).
Fast downloads, I was getting close to 6 MB/sec, pretty much my maximum speed.
File names (zips) include model name/set name.
No problems using my D/L manager (DTA).
Video downloads available in 4 formats, avi, mov, mp4 & wmv.
Cons:
The last update was over 6 months ago.
Video section is small, only 30 movies.
Content is very softcore, mostly solo nude posing.
Zero diversity, the models are all white, slim and young.
Errors, a number of photo sets contain a few corrupted jpg images, some images with an errant watermark appearing in the middle of the photo, 3 photo galleries with missing zips had to be downloaded picture by picture.
Bottom Line:
Skokoff is a solo photographer site featuring the work of the similarly named Skokov who had 120 plus photo sets at Metart between 2005-08 before going solo with this website. Back then he was one of my favourite photographers at Metart as he always seemed to have the knack of finding some of the freshest, youngest looking talent to photograph and that trend certainly continues on this site. Whilst not all models here have stats or bio info those that do are virtually all Russian with given ages between 18-21. Some of my long time favourite models who appear here include Emily Bloom, Natasha (the girl from Ero Nata & Helen's Planet) & Irka (Sweet Ira).
The earliest content on the site dates from June 2008 and the site updated fairly regularly until around 2013. The biggest negative about the site is that since 2013 the updates have become somewhat sporadic sometimes going weeks, months and at one point nearly 2 years without any new updates between 2016 and 2018. The site seemed to come alive again in August 2018 with 30 new photo sets added between then and May 2019 but has now again gone 6 months without posting anything new at this point.
The site has a nice uncluttered layout with large preview thumbnails of the models and galleries and none of the junk you get everywhere else these days such as ads, up-sells and live cams. The navigation is simple and functional with just categories for galleries, movies and models. You can sort each section by most popular, alphabetically and by newest or oldest.. You can also rank the models and sets, submit comments and add to favourites. There's no search engine but I'm not sure it's really needed on a site this size, the models are all young and beautiful so you'll probably just want to start at A, work your way through and download every photo set. It took me less than a week to download the entire site.
The photo collection is the main attraction of this site. If you are into softcore photo erotica sites such as Metart, Femjoy and MPL Studios then you will surely appreciate the content at Skokoff. It's the same type of thing, beautiful young models photographed in a nice variety of indoor and outdoor locations, also a mix of sets that start out clothed, some partially clothed as well as plain nude sets from start to finish. The sets are mostly solo with a handful of two girl sets. Whilst the girls get fully nude including open leg shots they don't show any pink, there's no finger insertions and no masturbation or toy use.
Those who prefer videos will want to give this site a miss, there are only 30 movies here and they all date from 2008-2009. Of the four available formats I opted for the mp4 files, 24 of the 30 videos were 1280 x 720 semi hd with bitrates ranging between 1500 to 3000k, the other 6 came in at 720 x 576. I noticed the avi files had a larger file size so I tried a couple to see what they were and they were also 1280 x 720 with a higher bitrate around 4000k. Typically for this kind of site though I found the videos boring. Several are photo shoot type videos, some are girl takes a shower and rubs soap into her body, girl rubs oil into her body, girl rolls around on a bed caressing her body, girl in a pool splashing water...you get the picture.
If you're into softcore Metart style photo erotica and not joined here before then this site is worth a month with the PU discounted price at less than $15 to download the collection. You wouldn't want to stay any longer given the sporadic nature of the updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Secure sign up with paypal through Epoch available.
Easy cancellation.
Excellent site preview.
Exclusive content.
Includes access to two solo model bonus sites Ero Nata and Ero Katya which used to be stand alone sites costing $30 each.
View photos online in 3 resolutions, low 667 x 1000, medium 1667 x 2500 and high 3744 x 5616. Zip downloads also available in all 3 resolutions.
Up to 5 download options for movies including 1080p in wmv, mp4 and mov.
Excellent file naming, movies and zips include model name and title of the set.
File sizes displayed for all zip and movie options, also run times and posting dates.
You can rate the models and sets, leave comments and add to favourites.
Cons:
When I signed up the site was displaying an offer price of $14.99 but the options to sign up at that price through Segpay and CCBill were not working so I was forced to sign up via paypal at double the price.
Regular updates came to a stop in September 2017, only 1 photo set and 1 video since then.
No in browser streaming of the videos.
No way to search or sort the content other than the basic categories movies, galleries or models.
Bottom Line:
AV Erotica is a site featuring the work of Russian photographer Anton Volkov, one of the more popular photographers from Met Art back in the day. The site has been online since July 2007 and has been updating with new photo sets pretty much on a daily basis for most of the last 10 years, it was only in 2017 that the updates started to ease off to about every other day and then in September ceased altogether. It was because I noticed the site had stopped updating that I felt compelled to sign up and preserve everything to my hard drive for safe keeping in case this is the end of the road for AV Erotica, fearing it might be another site disappearing into the internet graveyard.
The site has a total of 246 models in 3401 photo sets (265,956 pics) and 530 movies. The models are mostly of Russian and Eastern European origin, mostly between the ages of 18 to mid 20s although there are also a handful of older models in the 30 to 40 age range, mostly white and slim with not too many fake breasts or tattoos. If you click on “models” it will take you to a single page featuring a preview picture of every model in alphabetical order with no other way to search or sort them. Clicking on each model's preview picture will take you to a page featuring all her movies and photo shoots along with a few basic stats and a brief paragraph of background information. Other than the model index you can browse galleries or movies via a year and month listing down the left hand side of the screen.
The content itself is very softcore, pretty much the same as what you would find at Met Art, beautiful girls posing naked, they show everything but that's as far as it goes, no masturbation or toys. Probably half the photo sets start with the model clothed, partially clothed or wearing lingerie and half start out naked although in a lot of the cases I get the feeling the photo sets that start naked are just a continuation of sets that started clothed (i.e. same background/location). There is a good variety of locations from studio shoots with plain backgrounds to stunning outdoor shoots. I particularly enjoyed looking at these stunning young beauties displaying everything they've got in beautiful outdoor locations, there were even a few risqué shoots in public places.
As with a lot of these types of sites I have to admit I found the videos pretty boring. Mostly they are just 10 minutes of a girl taking off whatever she's wearing and then rolling around naked on a bed or walking around in a field or wherever she happens to be, just showing off her body but not really doing anything that might turn you on. However the resolution of the videos is great with the 1920 x 1080 videos having a 7k bitrate. Going back before mid 2015 you start to lose the full hd but you still get a very good quality 1280 x 720 at 8000k option.
Bonus Sites
I had thought about doing separate reviews of the bonus sites but there's nothing much different to say about them, they're just more of the same kind of content that you find at AV Erotica so I'll just give the basic info here.
Ero Katya: Solo website of Katya, an attractive Russian 20 year old blonde with largish natural breasts. This is an archive site having been active between April 2008 and October 2010. The site has 123 photo sets (8,014 pics) and 13 videos which run between 5-9 mins. Photos max at 4300px and and the best video resolution is a 1280 x 720 avi at 4500k.
Ero Nata: Nata as she is known here has been one of my favourite models and one I've collected for many years. She's appeared at many different sites over the years under various names even having another solo site called Helen's Planet at one point which I don't think is around anymore. Nata is a slender, small breasted Russian brunette. This is also an archive site that was active between March 2008 and December 2010. There are 150 photo sets (9,889 pics) and 15 videos of Nata here, all solo content. The photo and video resolutions are the same as listed above for Katya's site.
I'm scoring the package of three sites an 86 for the beautiful girls and high quality photo content, if they had not stopped updating regularly it would have been higher. I think anyone who prefers videos would rate it lower though. Anyone who enjoys sites like Met Art and Femjoy should probably join this site at least once.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Open and honest tour showing all updates along with the date they were added to the site.
Trusted billing, choice of CCBill or Epoch using Paypal, no cross sales.
Exclusive content.
110 lovely young 18 to early 20s Ukrainian models.
Good quality photos and videos (but mostly not HD).
Good download speeds, I averaged 4 MB/s.
Download manager worked OK, I used Down Them All in Firefox.
Zip downloads for photos.
Unique file names, zips and videos contain date of issue and name of set.
Cons:
Site has not added any new content since February 2013.
Expensive for an archive site at around $30.
Only 1 picture size option and 1 video download option (avi).
No In-browser streaming of videos.
No search engine or tags.
No file sizes shown for the downloads.
This is not a con for me personally but it's worth noting that this is mainly a solo site so little to interest those looking for hardcore action apart from a tiny number of bonus b/g videos.
Bottom Line:
Nu Dolls is now an archive site that was active between October 2007 and February 2013 when they suddenly stopped updating. I do like the fact they are honest about this in the site preview showing all the updates with dates on them and not trying to deceive you by rotating the content or dates. The site has a total of 688 sets most of which come with a photo set and matching video, around 62,000 photos in total. Despite the fact the site has been dormant for over 3 years I can confirm that the site is still maintained to a high standard, I downloaded every single photo set and video and didn't find a single dead link or failed download anywhere. Download speeds were good and my download manager worked well, I was able to queue up 30 to 40 video downloads at a time in Down Them All and return to the computer after doing something else to find them all successfully downloaded.
The content here is absolutely my favourite type of content, young 18 to early 20s models dressed in sexy outfits, lots of sexy lingerie, stockings and high heels, posing and stripping before spreading their legs and showing off their pussies. Some sets include masturbation and there is also occasional toy use. From the information provided it would appear the majority of models are from the Ukraine and typically have slim natural bodies and thankfully hardly a tattoo in sight. There's a good mix of indoor and outdoors locations in the shoots. Quite a number of the outdoor sets feature the models flashing or posing naked in fairly public places. In the videos I found it quite amusing watching one model being photographed naked while standing behind a tree in a public park, looking nervously over her shoulder while people were walking past only yards away. In another video you can watch Sabrina flashing and walking naked along the side of a road as traffic drives past.
The navigation is basic but functional. The heading “Catalogue” brings up all the sets spread over 12 pages which you can sort by date, rating or alphabetically. You click on one of the sets and you get a page with a magazine style cover photo and three links, “View this Gallery”, “Zip Archive” and “Download Video”. You also have a model index which again you can sort by date, rating, name and number of sets. Clicking on a model will take you to her portfolio page where you will be able to find all her available sets and will also include some basic stats and usually a nice piece of background information, usually 2 or 3 paragraphs. You can rate models and sets and add to favourites.
The majority of the photo sets are 1397 x 2104 px in size with only those issued in the first year, up to late 2008 as far as I can tell, being at the smaller size of 1033 x 1549 px.
The earliest videos on the site from 2007 up to mid 2010 are in the resolution 576 x 320p with an average 2000k bitrate. Given the small resolution I was pleasantly surprised how crisp they looked even at full screen on my 24 inch monitor. From mid 2010 the video resolution jumped up to 960 x 540p with a 4000k average bitrate and those looked almost as good as hd. From mid 2012 the video resolution jumped up again, the properties information on the files is blank but I'm 99% certain they look 1280 x 720p in size so you're looking at somewhere around 80 to 90 of the videos on the site being in HD. You only get the one download option for each set and they are all avi file types.
Overall a nice little site if you enjoy this kind of solo content and a real shame they stopped updating but it's worth a one month join to download the archive.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- High quality photography (2592x3872 portrait, 3872x2592 landscape in high quality)
- User-friendly site design/layout. Everything works!
- A number of very attractive models, especially Vera (Annabella, Irishka and Natasha also very nice!). Site features 93 models in total. Site has models index page - (http://www.skokoff.com/models.html)
- Zip downloads: available in high, medium and low quality
- Download managers permitted
- (Tongue in cheek) The back button doesn't stop working as with some other sites (eg Metart)!
- Cams/liveshow section available (have not checked it out myself though)
Cons:
- Somewhat limited content as site only dates back to June 2008 (52063 photos in total). If site stays in operation, and updates keep on coming, this situation should obviously improve in time.
- Site does feature video clips but only 29 in total
- A little bit more in terms of models biographical info would be nice - eg likes, what they do outside of modelling. A biographical page attached to the end of each zip download (as happens with more recent Met-Art sets) would be great.
Bottom Line:
I like to have my fingers in several pies at once, both hardcore and softcore and recently joined Skokoff to fulfil my ongoing desire for the latter. This is a very good site, though it cannot compete with the likes of sites like Met-Art (where I'm also currently a member) when it comes to sheer numbers/quantity of sets. Rather something more akin to a 'boutique' site where I have personally ventured mainly in order to pick up specific sets - but have indulged in the other material going whilst I'm around.
Nice and easy to use site, zips available - unlike my next destination - Rigin-Studio - where zips have been done away with (nominally, according to the owner, in an attempt to combat piracy).
Skokoff had been on my radar for a while and I finally got round to becoming a member about two weeks ago. Happy that I did.
A softcore, mainly photo site you will not find any masturbation/toys here as is seen at sites like Nubiles or Teen Dreams. This is an erotic photography, and not pornographic, site :-) There are a number of sets with 2 girls posing together, kissing and sucking of boobies/simulated fanny-licking permitted!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Billing by Epoch with no regional pricing
No longer need to subscribe to the separate issues, one subscription of $29.95 gets you access to all the content.
Site updating 2 to 3 times per week with each update consisting of a photo set and matching 5 to 6 minute video.
Latest photo sets look good at 1400 x 2108px (around 70 sets) with the rest still fairly decent at 1008 x 1518px
Recent videos 960 x 540 usually around 4-5000kbps
Good sized collection with 90 models and 790 photo sets, most with an accompanying video
Zip download for all photo sets
Cons:
Navigation takes some getting used to
Zip files all have the file name “images” so need to rename everything yourself.
Only 1 download option in .avi for the videos
No video preview or screencaps, no run time or file sizes listed.
Older videos only 576 x 320
Only 1 size option for photos
Content not dated
Some of the oldest photo sets look too dark.
Not a con for me but maybe too softcore for some
Bottom Line:
FM Teens features a nice collection of Russian/Ukrainian teen models stripping out of sexy outfits to reveal their cute teen bodies. Whilst a lot of the older content on the site featured 2 girl shoots they’ve had a change of direction and all the content added now and for the last 300 plus updates has been single girl shoots so the balance of content is now around two thirds solo to one third 2 girl shoots. The content is very softcore featuring mainly striptease and posing, I saw little in the way of masturbation or toy play and even in the 2 girl shoots you’re not exactly going to find much hot lesbian action, mostly just striptease and light touching.
As a softcore photo fan myself I loved the collection here with most of the models looking like real teens to early 20s, having slim bodies with small to medium natural breasts so not a site for silicone fans, you’ve definitely got to love the skinny teen look. Whilst you have plenty of the usual teenie style stripped socks and pig tails sets what I really liked here was the large amount of sets where you see the models dressed up in stockings and high heels.
I found the navigation a little awkward here at first. When you first log into the members area you are taken to the updates page where you see thumbnails linking to the latest 33 updates. You click on a thumb, you then get a larger preview pic with the option to “browse gallery online”, “download zip” or “get movie”. It’s only when you click to browse the gallery online you then go to a page where you discover the models name and clicking on her will bring up all her other sets. You then have to go back again to the previous page to download the zip. There’s no direct link in the members area for a model index and it wasn’t until day three of my membership that I actually discovered you can browse the content via the model index from the tour page of the site with the option to sort the models by most recent appearance on the site, alphabetical, by rating or most votes.
I’m not a great fan of video content and the ones I watched here did nothing to change my mind on that. The videos here usually just feature the model doing a sexy striptease followed by lightly caressing her body, nothing much to get excited about. The production is quite amateurish too with no sign of any professional editing and the video camera being operated by somebody who has trouble even holding it still.
Overall I enjoyed the site and my score is for the nice photo collection of softcore teen models in sexy outfits which is my favourite niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+40 different adorable, natural young women who smile a lot and make eyes at the camera and aren’t usually photographed staring into some mysterious and distant void
+No fake tits, and very little in the way of tats (exception: Vlada, with a big one on her belly and a “V” right above the ...)
+Exclusive content
+Photo quality is pleasing to the eye with sharpness and color
+Variety of indoor and outdoor shoots (though I’m more of an indoor man myself)
+191 photosets and 212 videos to date, usually combined into a single set (the extra vids are b/g hardcore or masturbation)
+Fast downloads of zips and vids that peak between 660-670 kbps (20MB nominal connection; using Firefox)
+Built-in “Doofus Recovery System”: If you accidentally close all windows to the site, you can return without having to log in again
+Nice design and good, straightforward navigation
+Extensive blog area might be of interest
+Visitor’s area gives you a good idea of the content
Cons:
-First post was late Oct. 2007. That’s 10-11 photosets per month.
-Pics are 1549 pixels on the long end; for a site at this price, there should at least be 3000px photos as well. (That would make it more competitive.)
-Some sets have less light than I’d like, but I guess that’s a matter of taste. They’re not overly dark.
-Vids are only downloadable in avi (576x320)
-Vids have gotten shorter than they used to be (approx. 10 min. to approx 5-6 min)
-Models who have the same names: Anna (4), Natasha (3), Tanya (4), etc. require you to give them additional (or alternative) names if you want to keep them straight
-Too much play with the props sometimes: body parts viewed through spaces in chaise lounges, flowers all over the body (or sticking out of the Miracle-Gro), sand all over like tempura batter, a star-shaped dollop of cake icing above the ass -- stuff like that
-They have stopped doing hardcore (OK by me, but maybe not for the die-hards); last time was end of Nov. 2008
Bottom Line:
Because the updates come approx. every 3 days, this site is better to join for the increasing size of its archives than it would be for the updates. And that’s what I’ve done, having not been a member since May of last year.
The girls are lovely for the most part, and as I said, natural in their charms. That’s a big plus for this site.
Some of them have been making their mark at other sites as well. "Anna S" at HegreArt (also at MetArt and FM Teens) is absolutely stunning! "Anna" the extremely alluring dark-eyed brunette is also at FM Teens, TeenDreams (as Tantsi), FemJoy as Paulina, JustTeenSite as Anita, and MetArt as Atena.
While I could list a few more, I'll just have to mention Viktoriya, who has smitten both Denner and I. This girl needs MORE exposure! I have seen her at JustTeenSite as Victa, but that was some time ago. Really, she should appear in oodles of updates at every high-quality softcore site in existence.
One little picky thing they could do is have each gallery open in a new window. It is a picky point, though, as I’ve discovered that right-clicking on a gallery link in Firefox allows for the same thing.
It seems that after a nearly year-long flirtation with occasional hardcore additions, they’ve decided to stick strictly to the softcore niche. Frankly, I’m glad just because it will be clear that this is a softcore site.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of "completely nude" sets
- High Resolution photo sets
- Zipped content
- Exclusive sets
- Good site navigation - uncluttered design
- Online favorites section (galleries & movies)
- Works well with site ripping software & download managers
Cons:
- not much variety (lots of outdoor shoots)
- Nice blog section hasn't been updated for a couple of years
- nothing you can't get on (IMHO) superior sites such as FemJoy and MetArt
Bottom Line:
Don't get me wrong - I like the site. I like my porn to feature insanely beautiful girls. You know - the kind of girls that on an unfair planet you would never get to see topless - let alone spreading their labia. Just occasionally this site delivers one of these creatures and this was what tempted me to AVErotica in the first place. But...it doesn't appear to be happening enough to keep my hard earned money going to Mr Volkov. THere are currently around 130 models on the site and a quick browse through the mug shots only meade we really want to investigate around 10 in any more detail.
The site is well laid out if a little simple and feature light. The set rating feature seems underused (even the "Top Rated" models seem to have only around 80 votes each) so isn't very reliable. Not a big deal to me as I tend to download everything and keep everything but...
Video content is of a high quality but updates are only once a week and most have one of those awful Kenny G style soprano sax soundtraks.
If you're a fan of very naked, usually quite pretty Russian girls in fairly explicit poses then this site is probably for you - especially if you can't afford the membership to MetArt. Nut But I'd be suprised if you kept the membership going for more than a few months. Personally - I'll probably join for a month every other year or so and use download mangers to rip the last year's content as both download speed, no DLManager limitations and full archives will make it a good deal.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Lots of attractive girls who probably sign their contracts in the Cyrillic alphabet.
+All-exclusive content.
+None of those blasted toys!
+Galleries updated every other day June-October 2008; daily in November.
+Pics in 3 sizes: small 1000px; medium 2500px, and large 3008 or 3872 or 4368px.
+All sizes of pics available à la carte or in zips.
+Nice, clean site design that is set up to be easy to use. (But see the cons ...)
+Extensive visitor’s area. You can see everything the site offers except for the gallery thumbs and full vids. And there are photo samples in all sizes.
+All videos in WMV (424x240), QT, and HD DivX (1280x720), which is the best, of course, with no choppiness.
Cons:
-Unruly thumbs: Have been greeted in some galleries, even new ones, with nothing but empty image-tag X’s, not thumb pics. “X” occasionally marks the spot in some other galleries, too.
-There’s also the “swollen thumb” -- a tiny fraction of the top left of a pic where the thumb should be.
-Some clicks for enlargements expand to a full-screen “404” error page.
-Wandering watermarks: At least one gallery had the watermark not in the bottom right where it belongs, but in some pics hovering like a drone close to the model, etc.
-Oops! I’m a visitor! Some links in the members’ area expose you to the public space. (Click “members” for re-entry with no additional login.)
-Slow downloads. 30 min. for a 324MB vid. Started at 175Kbps; eased down to 139. And a 140MB vid clocked at only 105. A photoset crawled its way to me at 70.
-Only 14 videos. Sorry, but this is a photography site, even in motion. Flash-flash! The mood music helps a bit.
Bottom Line:
You might have heard of Skokov. That’s how it’s spelled at MetArt. Well, my friends, I did check the artist page there for material here that might qualify as “non-exclusive.” Fortunately, I found none.
The girls here are mostly very lovely. Some of the better-knowns are Lena, July (Sandra at MetArt, Judy at FemJoy), Katerina (Rina at MetModels, Cat at FemJoy), Vika (also at FemJoy), and Natasha, the ubiquitous Helena-Larissa-Nastya-Nata-Natalie. 53 models in all so far, that ain’t bad!
The photography is tasteful and professional. The settings suggest a certain opulence, yet it is not overdone. I just wish there was more brightness in more of the sets. And I do hope for more sets of July and Lena. There’s only 1 of each so far.
As I got into the site, I was thinking, “This is very smart. The clean design, the simple and easy navigation by models or by galleries ...” But then I started seeing the flaws, as noted in the cons. Somebody needs to get their act together and make sure that the thumbs work, and that they’re there to begin with.
And what’s with the watermark right above Katerina’s head in “Beautiful Red” 047.jpg? And in 080? To the left of her face in 035? And why is 053 missing both the thumb and the pics?
Well, in spite of its flaws, I’d still recommend this site to now-forewarned photo lovers. The pros outweigh the cons, even though the cons are annoying. And I’d say now is the time to fix that stuff, before the site gets any bigger.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Absolut cute girl
Easy navigation
three different picture resulution ( up to 2.912 x 4.368 pixels)
Pictures are not too much compressed (big sizes are ~1.5mb)
I'm not a big video fan, but the videos seems also good
Cons:
It's mostly a NonNude page
Each set looks like the other (first with clothes, than show the breast)
Bottom Line:
I'm sure, everybody will know this cutie (Helena from glamedeluxe and helensplanet, Natasha from Met-Art, and so on..).
For me it's unbelivable how a such boring site could exist with such a hottie
A real shame for the webmasters/producer of this site.
I recommend to stay away from this site.
If you like the girl, join another site where she is posing regular. The other sites knows how to make amazing photos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Easy navigation
+Solo model Nata (known also as Natasha, Natalia, Helena, Larissa, etc.). is very cute and sexy!
+All exclusive content; nice quality pics
+Pics in 1000px, 2500px, and 4300px
+Zips in all pic sizes
+All videos in 3 formats: wmv (424x240), quicktime (424x240), or avi (but see those cons!)
Cons:
-WARNING: Most of the photos on this site contain full or partial NON-nudity, which may be offensive to some subscribers.
-The “About Me” part of the web site makes a big deal about how Nata likes to pose nude. What, I feel I must ask, is the relevance of that to the photo content of this site???? It’s teaser stuff! (I guess all that “About Me” nudity stuff is supposed to be part of the tease, too, eh? Great. My balls just changed to a different shade of blue.)
-Only 36 photosets to date
-Updates every 3 days, so you’d be getting about 10 changes of clothes per month
-Only 7 videos to date; downloads only at about 380-400kbps (20mb connection).
-WMV and Quicktime videos look BAD.
-Trouble with avi. My version of DivX player (the latest) tells me the vids don’t support “seeking” and wouldn’t play.
Bottom Line:
Nata’s been at a number of other sites (ATK Premium, FemJoy, GlamDeluxe, JustTeenSite, MetArt, Nubiles, PeterJanhans, Pretty4Ever, TeenDreams, and her own Helen's Planet) ... NUDE. Yes, nekked as a jaybird. And lookin’ good!
And here’s an excerpt from the “About Me” section of Ero Nata (corrected for word spacing): “As I've said before, I love to be nude. But to me, posing in the nude allows me to express myself in a way that many girls rarely get the chance to do: Express themselves in a sensual, sexy, feminine, beautiful way, in all their natural glory. And besides, the photos and videos will last longer than a simple memory. Also, it is very thrilling to know that people all over the world will see and enjoy all my natural feminine charms.”
Come again?
There is very damn little nudity here in the photosets. Exception: One darkly lit set in a shower. For $24.95.
The videos have nudity (except for “Swing,” which is upskirt naked pussy and a bit of titty), but they look terrible fullscreen in wmv and QT (small dimensions), and they aren’t working in DivX! And there are only 7 vids anyway.
For the money, there are much more content-loaded tease sites out there with a variety of models (OnlyTease, for one). But if you’re nuts only about Nata NOT au naturelle, then here ya go. The photos, anyway, since the videos are dicey.
Which hurts the score. Plus the lack of content overall AND of course the misleading statements about nudity.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Excellent quality in videos and photosets
Some great looking models - teens of (only) easteuropean origen. A few more average looking teens.
TEENS: sexy outfits: high heels, neglige and nylons (no socks or whatever)
Zip for photos (photos: 1549x1033)
Videos: AVI only (576x320) - but crisp! (full screen)
Updates looks ok for now - very new site
Updates seems to come almost dayly.
90 vids - a little less photosets
Most softcore - some hc
Good preview
Easy navigation - layout a bit simple.
Exclusive material
Cons:
Softcore videos/photosets has the upper hand
HC secondary - HC mainly in videos
Hardcore sets (video) are a bit strange - (great quality), but a little weird editing - like old softcore fucking-films. BUT some of the videos with everything, bj, threesome, fucking, closeups and so on.
BUT nok like any other average easteuropean site - this one has it's own style.
Download is mostly a bit slow: My average has been 350 Mb/sec.
Bottom Line:
I was taken in by the preview - thanks!
This site (even if it's US-based) has some of the most fine looking easteuro-teens. Some of them has only been seen at FM Teens - and they are just great!
A small, naughty blond: Viktoriya is a soft-star at FM Teens. But here she's doing hc b/g in 2 videos (I'm still thrilled here) and a great vaginal-balls video (6 videos of this doll)
What's great too is, that you do not get disapointed about number of videos compared to photosets - it ads up.
There is now about 90 vids, most softcore, but all in great quality - man, even if the average size is about 200 Mb.
NB: My foremost liking for this site is that these teens are not pseudo-look-a-like with mosyly pigtail and small cotton-socks.
These girl are in high heels and /or nylons - sexy, if you ask me!
This is a new site and the amount is still just average for what we PU's are used to at more qualified sites at around $30.
But it looks like they do a good job in updates - by all means not every day - but ALMOST! And the updates is always with videos - and sometimes with photosets from the same video.
I've "cooled off" here after a week of membership, but I can recommend this site for lovers of euro-teens in sexy outfits in fine quality videos
And the photosets are really fine too (Drooler: you may disagree).
Bottom line: Great site - a bit like FM Teens but without all the pseudo lez-thing. And those solo-videos are among the best in this field of east euro-teens.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+NO TOYS! (Yes, it can be done!)
+All exclusive
+Photos in 667x1000, 1667x2500, and 29xx X 43xx.
+Zips in medium size only, but they’re heavy, and the galleries have lots of pics. (Example: 5 zips I had of one model equaled about 650MB.)
+High quality, data-rich images. A medium-sized with a plain green background was 656K; a large was 1.72MB.
+Videos, smallest to largest file size, in wmv, Quicktime, and DivX
+Galleries from 07/07, daily from 11/07
+Server speed
+Easy, sensible navigation
+Can rate and/or comment on models, galleries, and videos
+Visitor’s preview shows a lot about the site
+Do check out the blog area. The writing is clear and focused and the stories told there might interest you. The English is almost perfect. They must have a great Russian-English translator. (Assuming that Volkov is Russian. Ukrainian? Other? I don't know.)
Cons:
-For video fans: Not that many are up so far. 26 to date. Videos started in 9/07 and there’s a new one each Tuesday.
-For 1280x720 stalwarts, just 16 of the vids are that size.
-Videos can be boring
-Too many photos of the model looking away from the camera
-Galleries usually have no clear organization; I recommend a "narrative" approach of stripping to total nudity with implied sex
-Blurriness in some photos was a bummer, especially of what would have been splendid ass shots of Goldie (oh my!). Overly dark pics less of a problem, but sometimes were.
-Would you like all of the models? I didn’t, but I liked enough.
Bottom Line:
Anton Volkov (hence the “AV” in the site name) is an established nude photographer with quite a corpus of work at MetArt, where he presently ranks #10 among their 60 listed artists. Several of his models there are also here, including Alice A/Malina, Irina, Julia, Katya, Leticia, Nusia, Olivia, Riana, Tati, and the especially awe-inspiring Lena, Goldie/Zlata A, and Nata (aka Helen, Larissa, etc.).
There are no duplications of MetArt material here. And yes, this is a purely softcore site, and I hope it stays that way.
Vids: With softcore vids, it’s especially challenging to keep the viewer enthralled. I recommend this basic idea: “I am undressing for you ... I want you so bad ...” The model has to get aroused, look often right into the camera, and feel passion for someone who’s not physically there. The POV is the viewer, having a very memorable day.
Dasha’s vid of turning around on a bed, looking very bored and clueless as to what to do was a total bomb. Olivia’s “In Corset” was better, as she had some magnetism, but it still didn’t hold me. And that’s all the predictable boredom that I cared to undergo to write this review.
$24.95 for access to several months of exclusive, quality content was a good deal, in spite of the flaws, without which the site would have rated higher.
What it needs most is a more consistent visceral "connection" between the models and the viewer, in the pics and the vids.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Many fine young Russian (?), Ukrainian (?) women with LOTS of sex appeal
+Exclusive content
+Pics at 1010x1515; good (albeit quirky) size choice
+Very good image quality from Issue 9 up: very few pics are blurry, dark, or color compromised. At least from that point, it seems to be a real priority.
+Zips
+Speedy server!
+No DRM
+Visitor’s preview: good samples of the lovelies and a taste of the clunky way it’s organized, too
Cons:
-Organized, but very awkwardly
-In issues 1-8, images are really amateurish.
-Big watermark gets on the goods!
-More g/g than I care for
+All vids in avi only; a smallish 576x320; some look pretty cheesy.
-Too much body covering with strings of beads, frilly see-through garments, puzzle pieces, bath goo, smeared-on foodstuffs, knick-knacks balanced on butts, and flowers. Lots of flowers, sticking out of butts, etc. (Why the high price? The FLORIST! These are GOOD flowers. Not cheap!)
Bottom Line:
Here’s what it’s like getting photo zips here. I login and work down to an issue, #13. Two models, but no names, so 2 clicks back up and over to the model rating page, the ONLY place where the names are. Oh, they’re BOTH named Natasha! Ok, “Natasha lighter” and “Natasha darker.”
Back to the issue #13 page, scroll down a few screens, then open to the pages of a gallery of “Natasha lighter.” The address bar shows “13-12,” which helps. Issue 13, Gallery 12. Ohh, nice! Get this one! Then alt-left arrow to get right back to the “gallery list” page -- the only place the link to the zip is. (Click the “home” button inside the gallery and you’ll lose your place; you’ll be at the TOP of the issue page and have to scroll down again, looking for that number 12. No, they don’t label the galleries by number, either.)
Extract the zip. A folder named “images.” Open that to find another folder, named (drumroll) “images” (cymbal crash).
The above, times 20 issues and counting x the number of galleries you download.
It’d be a helluva lot easier if they’d 1. put the model names and gallery numbers where they’re USEFUL, and 2. flatten the navigation. See, you have to go one step above the photo galleries to access the videos, too. It’s “old fashioned” web design, up and down the tree.
All the same, I was very pleasantly surprised by how much I got from this site. And at least content quality improvement is getting priority.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive content and most of the girls/teens/models are also exclusive for this site.
Have not seem most anywhere else.
Good video-quality - AVI
Fine 1010x1515 photos
Zip
Good download speed
Cons:
High price: $ 39.95
Earlier videos tend too much to sappho
The performance and editing of videos are a little too boring for approx.75%
Slow updates - not sure how often, but certainly not daily..
Bottom Line:
This site is now a gathering of former FM Teens in separate chapters - and expensive chapters where you former had to pay $ 29.95 for ONE.
Now its all here with FM Teens from 1-17.
That means there are at this moment 17 different sites with two girls in each site and with approx 16 videos each. That makes the amount pretty good. (photos are the same in number of sets).
What hits me here are the girls/models. There is a fine variations of easteuropean teens - blonds, brunettes and reds. And some of them are just sexy and pretty. The style is both sweet and sexy - the later videos with some great masturbation-scenes - and with the right/swell sound of a dildo doing it's job.
But else this is just softcore - and even the many lez-scenes seems quite innocent. Except from the small bonus-site (Young Pink Teens) where the two girls from the Issue 8 do some serious licking and dildo-fucking - it's maybe some of the first lez-scenes I really enjoy.
Take a look at the preview - it's pretty good and gives the right idea of what you get - especially when you want to judge the models look.
At first I'd have rated this site a little bit higher, but when you go on things seems to fade a bit because the content and style is the same and the same....
But bottom line: They have some fine, sexy and rarely seen teens here.
If your're into softcore easteuropean teens on video, I can recommend it. The photos are ok, too.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
