Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A low-cost entry to a massive amount of teen porn. On holiday specials, you can join for around $48/year (including downloads).
-Unlimited streaming and downloads for most memberships. Formerly, they didn't include downloads for this site (that was accurate 2 years ago). But they now allow unlimited downloads for most memberships. You need to check whether the membership you are signing up for includes downloads or not.
-You can stream the videos on your desktop, tablet, mobile or tv.
-The site has over 1500 models. Mainly from Eastern Europe, but also some from the United States.
-Videos usually run around 20-30 minutes.
-Some of the acting is actually good. Normally, I cringe watching stupid teen porn videos, because the plots are so foolish, but the models do a pretty good job acting like innocent girls until the stunt cocks start to turn them on, and then it's standard teen suck-lick-fuck with some really attractive teen girls.
Cons:
-Content and channels are subject to change. So if you find some videos you really like, it's best to download them to keep (assuming your membership includes downloads-which is the best way to go: there's little reason to choose a streaming only membership, since you can find streaming + download membership for an even lower price).
-Very limited information about the models. Which can be wrong. Lana Rhoades is listed as a Czech Republic porn star, even though most sites state she was born in the US. Actually, they list most of their models as Czech, no matter where they come from.
-Default file title rarely includes name of the model, or the site it came from. So you have to manually rename these files.
-I haven't found the zip files for the photos sets yet. The video download is easy to find, but if there is a zip file for the photo sets, I will have to contact customer support.
Bottom Line:
-I don't know if you call this a site or a network or a porn aggregator.
The structure is that they get anywhere from 3 to hundreds of videos from about 98 different sites.
Many of the sites you won't recognize, even if you have you have extensive experience with teen porn sites.
But you also get content from sites you probably recognize: Vipissy, ItsPOV, Club Sweethearts, Wet & Puffy, Analized, I Kiss Girls, We Like To Suck, Private Casting-X, and a bunch of other sites you will find familiar.
So you get a wide variety of porn teen niches.
For a very low price.
Wait for a holiday special, when they offer dirt-cheap memberships. And then play around with the join page, since they often offer different prices for the same membership.
By playing around, I mean, look at the price offered, then start to switch to a different site, and see if they offer you a lower price for the different memberships.
I joined for a lifetime membership for $150, including unlimited streaming and downloads. But the first offer was $300 for the same membership.
I also saw a yearly membership with streaming only for about $60, but they also offer a yearly membership for about $48 that includes streaming and downloads. I'm not talking about different times of the year, but the offers on a single day(normally during holiday specials).
What do you get?
Over 2000 videos.
Over 1500 models, many of which you might recognize if you are into Eastern European teen porn.
Daily updates.
24/7 customer support. (I haven't tried customer support yet this time. Didn't bother using customer support my previous membership, since I never had a problem with the site.)
The site structure is basically easy to use. You can search for the models you like (which is time-consuming, since you have over 800 models), or you can sample videos from different studios (they call porn sites studios), or just browse
You can like/dislike and create playlists.
The content is basically teen-oriented porn, but it covers many different niches.
For a very low price, you get access (unlimited streaming + downloads) to a wide variety of content from many teen porn sites.
Most of the videos offered include 480p and 1080p options.
You can join for a one-month special for around $4, to see what the site has to offer, and then decide whether you want to take a longer-term membership.
I think the site offers a lot of good content for a very low price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Exclusive, niche-y network
+ 5 sites come with a subscription.
+ European models who are kinky and sexy.
+ Downloads are unlimited.
+ Downloads even include 4K
+ It was my second time being a member and both times there’s been a below $10 promo.
Cons:
- I can see how and why some people prefer American-based models to European models. There’s a few noticeable differences.
- Despite 5 different sites, all of it gets repetitive.
Bottom Line:
Puffy Network is an extraordinary, but budget network. The sites you receive are Wet and Puffy, Wet and Pissy, We Like to Suck, Simply Anal and Euro Babe Facials. I will give a brief explanation about my comment about European models. One of the most obvious things you will notice is they don’t talk much. American porn is filled with dialogue, often stupid dialogue, but I do believe that could matter to some people. You won’t get as good of a feel for these models’ personalities as you will an American based site. The models also seem more likely to just be in porn for money than American models seem to be. Those are all just opinions and are opinions, I feel strongly about, or I wouldn’t have shared those opinions. There will be people who may love everything about this site except the European personalities of the models. There are also people who prefer European personalities in porn models.
The network has over 2,500 videos and 2,500 photo sets. You can download as much as you want. There are no limitations. You do get some new updates, but I don’t know if I even noticed. This is a lot of content. I do think it’s better as a “site” than as a network.
The sites each have their own themed “special” part in their scenes. The one site has pissing in every scene. There are pretty models receiving facials on one of the sites. It’s solid, but unspectacular.
The video quality is impressive with some of the scenes even offering 4K downloads with 15,000 bitrate. The picture sets are nothing special, but are a nice touch.
I just find myself questioning if the lack of English causes boredom for the viewer? The scenes are already very similar in setting and niche, but then you add no dialogue, and it just shows how much American porn rules the mainstream. There is a different and distinct feeling to this porn.
I do think this is a worthy network for a month or two month join, but I can’t see using it for any longer than 2 months straight. As it is, it seems like I start getting bored with it by the 3rd week of a membership.
It does a lot right and I think my own subjectivity may be skewering the bottom line of this. I’m not as negative as I may sound about this network. It’s just there’s a feeling of “this is European porn” in every scene. If you like European models and porn you’ll probably love this network. If you don’t like European models or non-dialogue porn, you probably won’t like this network. The models are not quite at the perfection level of them being able to offset the lack of personalities.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Focuses on solo girls peeing.
-Quality site for this niche.
-Rabbits Reviews (a sister site to PU) has discounted memberships to the Wet and Puffy network of:
$9.95 for the first month (recurring at $29.95/month)
$60 for the first year
$199.95 lifetime membership
-Navigation is easy.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-320p through 1080p videos. They advertise 4K is available, but I haven't seen them at this site. Maybe at another site in the network?
-Downloads/streams to PCs and mobile devices.
-Weekly updates.
-Cam shows.
-5 sites are included in your membership:
Wet & Puffy; Wet and Pissy; We Like To Suck; Eurobabe Facials; Simply Anal.
-The videos are good quality: nice sets, good camera work, nicely focused, well lit, good colors on the skin tones and the entire shot, good sound control.
Cons:
-The models range from plain or unattractive to some that are attractive. But the general level of the models' attractiveness is below the standards of most teen sites.
-Login details (username and password) are computer generated.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Pissing is the main focus, almost the only focus. of the site. No b/g, no g/g. So if you're not into pissing, the site would have limited appeal.
Bottom Line:
Stats:
Most videos run about 30 minutes.
Video definition from 320p through 1080p.
There is a low quality and a high quality zip file for each photoset, that is a record of the video.
The site theme is solo women pissing. I think piss smells bad, and it seems like an un-hygenic thing to rub piss on yourself, or piss on a furniture or the floor, or to drink or lick piss. But the models at this site are moaning and groaning like pissing is enough to get them off, without a male or female partner needed.
So if you're into pissing as a fetish (not painful or sadistic pissing, but pleasurable pissing), this site is for you. Because that's what the videos feature: lots of solo girls pissing, and rubbing the piss on their bodies, and drinking it, with lots of noise to show how wonderful the piss is when they rub it on themselves, or when they drink it.
But the girls can bring out a dildo, after they've been playing with their piss, to reach a higher orgasm. I guess the combination of piss and masturbation is the perfect combo for these girls. Because they've been pissing and stopping, pissing and stopping, but they manage to piss even more after masturbating with a dildo,
Watching these videos reminds me of the song, "Cry me a river", except in this case, it's more like "Piss me a river". The amount of piss these girls make is tremendous. I wonder if they use some device that makes water flow from the girls' pussies. That would help with the smell, and make the drinking and rubbing more hygenic, and the clean-up easier.
Because you have to watch a few of these videos to believe how much water/piss is coming out of a girl's pussy during a single 30 minute video.
I take diuretic pills (also called water pills) for health reasons, prescribed by my medical doctor. So I often have to pee every few hours (even at night, which wakes me up when my bladder is full). But I can't pee anywhere near what these girls are peeing.
They are younger than me, don't have my health problems, so I can understand they can pee more.
But not in the quantities of pee that seems to flow in a single 30-minute session. I couldn't pee that much in several days. I mean, it just flows, stop, flows again, stops, flows again, then flows some more, in small and large amounts.
So I'm suspicious that some of the "pee" is really water, coming from some hidden device.
Which might hurt the fantasy.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
The site is heaven for pee fetishists.
Site structure makes for easy navigation.
Videos are professionally shot, excellent camera work, nice settings, excellent lighting and sound control and colors.
Photosets come in a zip file of two definition: regular and high definition.
I wish the models were more attractive. But that's a personal preference. Some PU members might disagree with my preferences, and think the models are very attractive.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The network has almost 2200 scenes and 900 models.
Most updates available in 4K for no extra charge.
Has links to get other discounts.
Excellent quality videos, but poor photosets.
There are no download limits.
I think there are more tags for searching than anybody has anywhere.
Cons:
The models are not always attractive with not much variety in body type or ethnically.
The models don’t talk so it is hard to get to know them.
Bottom Line:
It is a tradition that men join porn sites more than women and the content you commonly find is mostly what men like. While there are many things I liked about this network, it is aimed more at men than women. Let’s just start with the name. When women think about getting puffy, it means uncomfortable and wishing it was over. Here puffy refers to the site Wet and Puffy, where pussy pumps make them bigger and more prominent. I have no interest in that. I watch porn to see women in action that I can identify with and go along with the fantasy of it being me. It is not so much to stare at outsized pussies. Maybe outsized hard cocks might work for me, but they are not to be found on this network. Even then, I want to see them being used, not just to look at.
Besides the pussy pump being something I have never seen before, another is the pussypedia classifications for the three types of pussy. One is Puffy Peach, another Big Taco and the last is Big Cherry. These labels refer to the relative sizes of the inner and outer labia. While interesting, I can’t honestly say I care that much.
The tag system is confusing. If you search using “pissing” you get 315 videos. If you look under “peeing” you get 123. You may well ask how could this be? They have too many tags, a true double edged sword. While having many of them is a great idea and you can use the tags with precision, having too many creates chaos. To compound it all they have an advanced search to further refine your efforts. I saw one video that had yes, it is true, well over 50 tags.
These are the five sites in the network:
Simply Anal - 160 updates and not just anal. Women having anal with both men and women. Not only anal, but oral and vaginal. Cumshots can be anywhere.
Eurobabes Facials - 44 scenes and no longer updating.
We Like to Suck - about 400 videos and not just blowjobs. About 300 videos include ball sucking, for me a big plus.
Wet and Pissy - almost 550 videos. Masturbation with objects, as well as pissing.
Wet and Puffy over 1000 videos. Masturbation with objects.
The women are mostly from Eastern Europe and don’t talk. They look to be about 18 to 30 and some are well known stars, for example Lady Dee and Gina Gerson. I am no expert on famous stars, but these two are on nearly every site from Eastern Europe. For the most part the models are just doing what they are told to do and not how they feel. I found them to be just mechanical and not easy to identify with. I like to see myself as in the scene with them, but that rarely happens here.
The site advertises that all the scenes are exclusive and you get a large enough archive with nearly 2200 video updates and poor quality photo sets. Recently the network has been adding five updates a week, which is not bad at all. Most videos can be downloaded in quality as high as 4K and there is no extra charge for it like you see on some other sites. They have smaller sizes, including ones for cell phones.
There are a few other more minor criticisms. One is that the user name and passwords are randomly generated and make no sense. When you first sign up there are boxes that are already checked to join other sites. I was looking on the opposite side of the page and almost did not see I had to uncheck the boxes. However, if you are interested in other sites, they have seven pages with links for discounts. Right now there is a sale price of $7.95 a month as an early Black Friday special.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Updates added once a week
The site has almost 550 videos and photosets
Uses a great many tags for searching
All the scenes are exclusive
Comes with four other sites
Videos can be downloaded in eight options and the most recent include 4K
Cons:
Some of the tags are confusing
The site layout needs improving. The non-member tour is easier to use than the member's area. It's the same content from the tour but they have it laid out in a way that becomes confusing.
Bottom Line:
When I was living in India, I developed a fetish for pissing. We don’t have the best public hygiene and seeing a man urinating outdoors is not uncommon. For women, this would be extremely taboo and pretty much unimaginable. Although this site has its main concept of seeing women pissing, it is done indoors and as a kind of surrogate for sex. The women see pissing as a sex act in a way. I think it is fair to say that the pee is treasured as if it were a man’s cum and makes these women do things with it that help them reach orgasm. Well, maybe I should say a porn fake orgasm as these women are all acting out a fantasy and do it for a paycheck. These are stars I have seen before on other sites and even on the other four sites within the Puffy Network that is included with your membership.
The women are for the most part, pretty and thin Eastern European models that don’t talk. Instead, their actions speak for them. They play to the camera and seem to be acting out what a director is looking for them to do more than out of any spontaneous passion. That makes me feel a bit left out of the scene as I would have preferred that they were a bit more original and believable. For me the best pissing videos are showing a forbidden act. For the site the women see themselves as putting on a show for men who want to see pissing acts that are a lot more than just a biological relief.
One example of that is when you click on the models list, you get thumbnails of their faces as you would expect, but you also get a picture in picture smaller shot of their pussy with piss coming out. There seems to be a desire for acts that are striking visually and are in their own way a bit extreme. For the most part you get stripping and showing off her body, just like most male focused porn and then a bit of toys, dildos, etc. to get her in the mood or you see her pissing and doing all kinds of things with the piss. She drinks it, pours it over herself, licks it up from the floor, pees in her clothes and then squeezes the piss into her mouth or licking toys covered in piss.
The tags are extensive and many of them are perfect for the niche. Sometimes I felt overwhelmed by how many there are and was confused by the differences between them. Sometimes the tags felt overlapping and maybe even redundant. You can see for yourself as these are just a few and I don’t think this is even close to a complete list of the tags that are piss focused. Clothed pissing, clothing mopping, golden shower, licking up piss, licking toys, peeing, piss drinking, piss play, pissing, pissing during insertion, pissing in glass, pissing in pants, pissing on self, piss spitting, pussy wash, standing pee, sucking on clothing, wet and messy, watersports, wet, wet hair, wet toy, wet panties.
This is a shortened description of one of the better scenes. Keira stands up before she starts pissing into her panties. Her stream trickles through the fabric and her denims, then strips out of them to mop up her pee from the floor using her panties. Squeezing her piss in the panties into her mouth, she climbs up onto the table and fingers her pussy. She gushes all over the table, then leans over, lapping up her pee. Next, she holds a glass vase underneath her and pees right into it before pouring it into her mouth and all over her face, going down her body. She uses her fingers as she brings herself to orgasm.
The videos have as many as eight download options including 4K and there are two for the photo sets, which are not worth bothering with. Updates come once a week and the archive is huge for a specialized fetish site with about 550 videos. Not only are all the scenes exclusive, I can’t think of any pissing site I can compare it to.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining any site in the small network gives you access to 5 sites.
The 5 sites are listed in the Bottom Line section of this review.
-Navigation is basically simple.
-There is a text file that describes the action of the video very well.
-Also, plenty of tags to describe the action of the video. So search is easy and can be very detailed, if you want it to.
-Newer videos have a definition of 320p through 4K. The 4K video file size is around 3.35 GB for a 23 minute runtime video, so the coding seems efficient.
-The content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-The level of attractiveness of the models is poor. Other PU members have written that they find the models to be attractive. I disagree completely. I respect the opinion of these PU members, but find it hard to agree with their opinion.
-I find the quality of the videos and photo sets to be poor. The images are not crystal clear, but either slightly unfocused or with a slight haze to the image. But since the models are not attractive to begin with, I wouldn't mind watching the video with the images in complete darkness, so I wouldn't have to view the models at all. (That is a joke, but also has an element of truth. These models are far below the attractive level of the Teen Mega World models, and comparing the models at Wet and Puffy to the models at the Wow sites is like comparing night and day: the Wow site models are fucking georgeous; the Wet and Puffy models are unappetizing.
-The online mechanism for viewing photo sets is clunky. Slow to load images.
-Pre-checked cross-sale.
Bottom Line:
The 5 sites of this network include:
Wet and Puffy We Like To Suck
Wet and Pissy
Simply Anal
Eurobabe Facials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Membership in any one site gives you access to all 5 sites.
The stats for Wet and Puffy network:
Over 27000 photos. and
Over 480 models.
They advertise that the photos are the best ultra high definition picture sets.
They advertise that the tags, filters and layout of each page makes browsing simple.
The thumbnails that illustrate the models have washed out colors.
Even models that appear young and attractive at competing sites look plain and unattractive at this site, in the photo sets and videos.
You examine a photo in a photo set, and it appears as if the photo was taken with a filter that makes the model appear slightly out of focus.
Each photo set has 2 definition zip files, low and high.
The low definition is 666 x 1000 pixels.
The high definition is 2267 x 3400 pixels.
In the photos, the models are uniformly unattractive. They are plain-looking women. You go to a local mall, you find plenty of good-looking teens or twenty-year-olds. The models at this site are mainly in their twenties or thirties, and they are far less attractive than the normal twenty-thirty-year-old you find at your local mall. One reason is the photos have washed-out colors, so the skin tones of the models are not pleasing. A second reason is the models themselves are below-average in level of physical looks. Plus many of the models have lots of tattoos, which I'm not a fan of.
Even though the site advertises "best ultra high definition picture sets", I look at sets and feel the quality is far below the quality of any photo site, in any technical feature you can think of: these photo sets are shit. Teen Mega World, which is a hardcore teen site, has photo sets that are far superior in technical quality to the photo sets at Wet and Puffy. The the quality of the teen models at Teen Mega World is far superior in attractiveness to the Wet and Puffy models.
The Wet and Puffy models are mainly plain to unattractive. The photos are not worth collecting. They aren't even worth viewing.
Note: some of the live cam girls are really attractive.
Note: my opinion seems to be in the minority.
There are some attractive models at this site, but they are not presented attractively at the site. Delphine and Nika O, two girls who normally look very attractive at other sites, look washed out (in color and skin tones) and blah at this site. How a girl is photographed can make a huge difference in her appearance. Besides which, most of the models at this site are not that attractive to begin with.
Maybe I should have my eyes checked. I look for attractive girls at this site and can't find any. Some of the girls are attractive at other sites, but not at this site. I know that beauty is supposed to be in the eye of the beholder. The average female at any local mall, or even your local grocery store or Walmart, is far more attractive than the models at Wet and Puffy.
Maybe my problem is expectations: I assume that most models are chosen for their looks. But at this site, I think they were chosen for performing hardcore sex. Without bothering to filter for attractiveness.
The photo play mechanism for viewing photos online is clunky. Images are slow to load. The images themselves are poor in color, poor in clarity. You aren't viewing sharply defined images of the model.
The composition of the photo is poor. The sets are inexpensive or cheap and lacking in any imagination.
Overall, the photo sets are a waste of storage space, and not worth viewing.
I was a member of this site before, and wrote a review that highlighted how poor the site was, in terms of the attractiveness of the models, the poor quality of the photo sets. But my memory is poor, and I forgot how unappealing the site was. Which is the reason I rejoined. I was stupid.
Other PU members seem to appreciate the site much more than I do. They cite the attractive models at the site, the ease of navigation, the low membership price. I agree the membership price can be low: PU has the first month's membership for $15, or $60 for a year.
I agree that navigation is simple and effective, that Vendo and Epoch are fine billers.
But I can't agree the models are attractive.
Poor models, poor photography. And that kills the site for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note:
I want to explain that I am being easy in this review because I paid a low membership price.
Some PU members think that membership price should either not be mentioned in a review, or else considered as a minor factor.
I disagree.
The membership price is a major factor for this site, because you are paying a low fee to access over 3000 hardcore videos, over 1100 models. The site is certainly not perfect, but the operators are working to improve the site, as well as giving you a wide range of hardcore niches.
That slant colors this review.
If you don't agree that price can be a major factor in the value of a site, then you should probably ignore the review.
PROS(START OF):
-The main pro is the low membership price.
There is a PU discount for $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $14.95/month.
I believe there are holiday discounts for even lower prices.
-The network is like a tiny Adult Time network: you get access to 3015 hardcore videos and 1136 models.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos come from over 70 different sites, so it's like a sampling of those sites. For a very low price, you should be able to find plenty of videos to watch.
-Most or all of the video content is available in hd quality.
-The site is easy to navigate, and you can search by site, category, tags, model name, video title, etc. They also list the sites offered, plus categories.
-Members can leave comments on scenes.
-You can have a favorites list, which is useful with over 3000 videos to search and choose from.
-You can also make your own personal play list.
-Epoch, Vendo and Segpay are the billers, which are first rate and dependable.
-Can pay with a credit card, paypal, or crypto.
-There is a model listing.
-With over 70 sites contributing, the number of niches offered is large:
teen, MILF, masturbation, handjobs, solo, twosomes, group sex, straight fucking, anal, fisting, lesbian, blow jobs, peeing, spy glasses, cuckolds, stocking fetish, dildos and other toys.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Good update rate. 22 videos added this week.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-A special way to improve your account security. You can choose to enable two-factor authentification. If enabled, you will be emailed a unique code each time you try to login to the site. The code will allow you to enter the members area. Seems like over-kill to me.
CONS(START OF):
-The main con is this network is streaming only. No downloads.
-By default, it shows your user ID if you make a comment. The user ID is your email address. So create a nickname before your make any comments on the videos, or else you are exposing your email address.
-Only some content is dated. So you can't tell what the update rate is.
The public page often tells you how many new videos were added to the network in the current week.
Also, I believe the dating process started recently, so most of the content is not dated.
-Cancelling could be easier. You can submit a ticket asking to cancel. But I think it's easier to cancel through your biller. So save your confirmation emails.
-The content is non-exclusive. If you're into porn, you've probably seen a lot of the content featured at this network.
-Videos often don't list the names of the models in the video.
-Many videos are in a foreign language, with no subtitles. But the dialogue is usually unimportant in this type of hardcore.
-Videos often lack tags, a text description, or a trailer.
Edit: Hit the "Show More" link to bring up the brief text description, tags, model name, etc.
But many videos don't show the model name, even after hitting the "Show More" link.
-Most videos have a choice of 480p and 1080p. Which is OK, but not great.
-I tried joining through Vendo, but was rejected several times. Then I tried to join through Epoch, and was accepted the first try. Vendo had no pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. Epoch did have a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Network stats
Videos: 3012
Video runtime varies: from 20 minutes to about 1 hour.
Models: 1136
Contributing sites: 70+
Photo sets: 295
Number of photos per set: 100+
-This is a streaming-only network.
So there are two main ways to use it:
1. A low-cost intro to over 70 different sites, to see which sites you might want to join.
2. A low-cost source of hardcore videos, from a wide variety of niches, from a wide variety of sites (over 70 different sites have contributed content to this network).
For a low price of $10 or less for the first month, this site is worth joining to see how many videos you want to watch. There are no downloads. But if you like what you find, and there's plenty of content from a wide variety of niches, a low-cost year's membership might make sense. Because there's no way you can sample over 3000 videos in a month or even a few months.
I know that most PU members want downloading privileges to join a site.
But some of the low prices I've seen for a year's membership make this a worthwhile join.
rabbitsreviews lists a first year membership of $48, which seems cheap as dirt.
(PU lists a first year membership of $60. So go with the rabbitsreviews discount.)
Consider this site as a low-rent version of most hardcore porn sites, except that it's not the low-rent that many hardcore sites were around 2000 or earlier: the videos are mainly acceptable or OK, not the high gloss videos at the Wow sites, the X-Art site, the Blacked-Tushy-Vixen sites. It's a trade-off: you're paying a low price, and getting a lower-quality hardcore product, but not the cheap videos made around 2000 with cheap sets, cheap production values, poor lighting.
The site has plenty of ads. You can ignore them, or you might find some of the ads have a low price that's worth considering.
I'm giving the site a score 93.
For a low price, you're getting access to some good content. But it depends on your willingness to scan through a lot of material that won't appeal to your individual tastes.
Edit:
I have downloaded videos from this site. The downloads were done through a shareware download manager, not from the site's function. My mistake. Reducing the site score to 90.
I just started using the download manager, and didn't realize I was using the program to do downloads. Thought I was using the site software, until I realized the download link was popping up for other sites, as well at the Filth Flix site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hot Eastern European models
- Some great POV oral
- Some, but not a lot of sex scenes
- Part of a larger network
- Reputable billers
Cons:
- Small site
- Does not appear to be updating
- POV camerawork is shaky
Bottom Line:
While the title of this site isn’t ambiguous, it’s fair to say that the bulk of the scenes here are facials following a blowjob. Some of the scenes do feature sex though.
I’m not a fan of POV porn, which this is, but I have to admit that this site does it quite well. The models maintain eye contact and otherwise play to the camera in a way that POV scenes can do. It’s the efforts of the models that make this POV really work well. However, as is often an issue with POV scenes, the camera work can be the letdown. Here, the camera is often a bit shaky which detracts from the scene itself. But this is a common issue with POV and should be expected.
The models are a big draw to any site and this one is no exception. I’m not usually a big fan of Eastern European porn though there are some models that I really like. I found the women here to be very attractive even if most of them are largely unknown to me. Many are popular models who have done a lot of scenes for other sites. Models like Gina Gerson and Nesty come to mind. If you are familiar with both of them and like their looks, you will likely appreciate the rest of the models as well as young and petite is the majority here.
Each scene starts with the model standing to introduce herself in English. I like this as I find that a lot of European scenes don’t have any verbal communication between the talent or the talent and the viewer. For me, this interaction adds to the heat of the scene.
What is also less frequent is that there is ball worship in nearly every scene. I had hoped every time the model went a bit lower to do some ball licking that I might get to see one of my favourite porn niches – f-on-m rimming. Unfortunately there is very little of it here. But, admittedly, shooting POV rimming wouldn’t be easy.
Interestingly, even though this is a POV site there does seem to be a second camera used in many of the shoots. This is noticeable because in many of the scenes the cumshot is replayed as captured by that second camera.
One aspect of how these scenes are shot and edited that I particularly liked is that the scene didn’t end immediately after the cumshot. In most cases the model continued to pose with her facial. I really wish more sites would do this rather than go to an immediate cut away.
It’s also fair to say that whoever the male talent is he can usually deliver a prodigious amount of semen. This is definitely another plus for a site that features facials.
The videos have four download options: Full HD1080p, which is 5000 kbps and 25 frames per second, HD 720p, 480p and 320p. There are no 4K videos and many of what you do find is not the sharpest HD either. The downloads were fast and the videos are generally about 30 minutes.
Photos are also available though, in my opinion, they are secondary to the videos. The photos are available as singles or zips and there are two options for the zipped files. They are available at 2850x4300 and 666x1000. The photos are not screenshots and the sets have under 100 photos.
If you’re like me some scenes really stand out. That happened here. My favorite scene starred Czech porn star and hot blue-eyed blonde, Jenny Simmons. She performed oral like she was possessed and also had sex. Her eye contact with the viewer was incredibly hot. Shot POV, it made for a hot scene!
Euro Babe Facials is part of a larger network – Puffy Network. You’ll have access to the full network. There is very little overlap with the sub-sites.
There is a tag system that helps you search for models and scenes throughout the network.
The billers are some of the very most reliable. Those are CCBill, Epoch, Segpay and Vendo. A subscriber can join knowing that their information is secure and cancelling is easy when they want to.
An obvious negative is that the site is no longer updating. There are only 44 videos and photo sets. Another is that the camerawork is not up to the standards of the rest of the network. Many of the videos are shaky, as I noted above.
While this site has some obvious flaws, you get a lot more than this one site when you sign up. All of the sub-sites appear to be still active and posting updates.
There is also a cam site included that has no membership fee and has thousands of models from all over the world. It compares favorably with other cam sites.
At the moment the Network has a discounted price of only $9.95 USD for a month. It has over 2000 videos, 248,000 photos and over 865 models. It’s a great deal.
Apart from the fact that the site is now dormant, there is a lot to recommend it. The site itself has some incredibly hot professional European stars who know how to put on a great performance. While the camerawork lets them down a bit, it isn’t enough of a negative for me to not recommend this site. Add to that the TBP/PU discount and the fact that the site is part of a larger network it becomes very easy for me to recommend a membership here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large site (140+ scenes)
- Updates regularly
- Part of a larger network (Puffy Network)
- All anal
- Beautiful European models (many A-listers)
- 50/50 mix of B/G and G/G
- Multiple resolutions for streaming and download
- 4K available on most downloads
- High production values
- Easy site to use
- Lots of tags to help you sort
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds
- Reputable billers
Cons:
- Not all models speak English
- Watch out for a pre-checked cross-sell when joining
Bottom Line:
As anyone who has read my reviews and comments here for the past 13 years will know, I’m a big fan of anal scenes. Further, if you add beautiful, petite young women into the mix then you can rest assured that I’ll be interested. However, for some reason, Simply Anal never made it onto my radar until recently.
I’ll have to confess that Simply Anal is also a bit different from many of the anal-themed sites that I usually join. In that it’s more couples porn or glamcore. Is this a bad thing? Not at all! I really enjoyed the scenes on this site even if they were softer than I would normally watch.
Because the site focuses more on sensual sex there is a slower pace and every scene features foreplay. While there may be the occasional scene buried in here where it is exclusively anal from beginning to end, all of the scenes that I watched included vaginal sex as well.
Another thing that makes this site a bit different from what I usually subscribe to is that there is an almost 50-50 split between B/G and G/G videos. But, because this site is called Simply Anal, even the girl/girl scenes feature anal play. I rarely collect G/G scenes but I make an exception when there is anal play involved, so I really liked this aspect of the site.
While I don’t collect a lot of European porn there are several models who I do collect scenes with. These would be models such as Alexis Crystal, Gina Gerson and Sylvia Dellai. Overall, however, all of the models have the look that I like – young and petite. The downside for others it may be that there is a lack of diversity: I don’t think I came across any model of colour here.
While this isn’t entirely on point, I did see Ani Black Fox (billed here as Any Black Fox) on a cam site recently and was really struck by her. She has a scene here that I find to be particularly erotic and, for what it’s worth, it’s as if seeing her on a cam site and interacting a bit has created a different level of interest. My exposure to her work before this was on much harder sites such as German Goo Girls and Legal Porno. I really liked seeing her in something quite different.
One of the primary reasons that I don’t download a lot of European porn is because many of the models don’t speak English. I find that dialogue in a scene can really add to it. It gives the viewer more of an insight into the models. Here, that problem does pop up. While many of the big-name European models are fluent in English there are many here who don’t seem to speak it at all. There are entire scenes where the models have no verbal communication whatsoever. (Oddly, this even occurred in Ani Black Fox’s scene even though she is fluent in English.)
Production values are high. Lighting, sound and editing is all top-tier.
There are currently 142 videos here with a new scene being added approximately every two weeks. There is a 50/50 split between B/G and G/G scenes so if you prefer one or the other there is lots to enjoy.
Downloads are available in at least four resolutions: 320p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. Bitrates for all are usually slightly lower than on comparable sites but the videos look great. The added benefit is that file sizes are a bit smaller. Roughly 90% of the scenes also offer a 4K version. Something I found odd in 2021 is that all scenes also offer one WMV file.
Streaming is also available in the same resolutions as above, minus the 4K.
The site is easy to use and it’s easy to find something you like. You can sort scenes by most recent or recommended or you can search by model. The site also uses an extensive list of tags. I have to give full credit to the site for such an extensive list, but I also found it a bit overwhelming because with each scene there could be two or three dozen tags affiliated with it. But, they are unobtrusive so it isn’t too much of an issue.
I don’t normally collect photos but I have to admit that this site is geared to photo collectors almost as much as it is geared to video collectors. Photos are available as singles and zips in two resolutions: HQ 3400x 2200 and LQ 1000x666.
While this review is intended of the specific site, Simply Anal, and this site does stand on its own well, it’s important to note that it is part of the larger Puffy Network. This adds a lot to the value of the membership. Five additional sites are included.
I use a download manager and had no issues doing so here. I found downloads to be consistently fast and stable. I didn’t encounter any limits.
The site bills through reputable billers so you can join with confidence.
The bottom line is that there is a lot to like here and it’s easy to recommend a membership. Whether you like B/G or G/G anal scenes, there are lots of each. Add in the 50% TBP discount and it’s an offer you can’t refuse! It’s a great site that’s part of a great network with some beautiful models at an amazing price. It’s definitely worth checking out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Nearly all solo girl content of some very attractive European models.
- Has some variation in the scenes including speculum and bigger insertions, reminds me a lot of Give Me Pink.
- Very high quality on the video downloads.
- Good download speed (80% of my max)
- Uses Epoch as the biller.
- Downloadable photos in low quality or high quality.
- Updates once per week.
Cons:
- Pre-checked cross sale at sign-up
- Anytime you’re dealing with a solo site you’re going to run into the potential of the scenes being too similar.
Bottom Line:
I would say to anyone that is a fan of Give Me Pink, you should give this site a try as the shooting style and action itself is similar to it.
The main selling point of a solo site is the looks of the models and how believable they are. These are European models so you’re not going to get a lot of dirty talk or feedback from the models to go by and I think that does hurt a little, at least now in 2020, years ago we didn’t care about something like that. The models here are mostly white with a few darker models. The body types are in-between slender and average. I would say they are all attractive.
There are 979 scenes just on this site and you also get access to 4 other sites. The site has a few scenes that are not solo with a second woman helping but those are rare. I think most people that are into solo porn would be just as happy if there weren’t scenes with more than one woman. The solo content they have here does have some teasing in it and that to me, is a major part of solo porn. If the model can’t get you interested or keep you interested you’re probably not going to watch her masturbate either. You’re not going to find any soon to be major solo stars on this site. That’s also one of the frustrating parts about liking solo porn. You could watch 10 scenes and every other one could be considered poor. I think solo porn brings in your own fantasies and because of that what I may like, you may not like.
These scenes are good enough to give a try if you’re into solo porn. They have nice photo sets with usually 100+ photos in each. The models are often clothed at the beginning of the scenes and at least try to tease. The photos can be downloaded as zips. The video download options stand out as well. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p, 320p and a WMV version as well. Each scene also has a trailer if you want to watch a little before downloading the full scene. If you give it a try make sure to make note of this, the photo zip downloads are in with the video downloads. At first, I didn’t think they had any photo downloads, but they do and give you a low and high option.
The site also has a very deep, I’m going to say, too deep of a search engine that gives you hundreds of options to choose from in your search. I tried a few of the more obscure looking options and got 0 results. That’s why I say it’s too deep. Still the site is part of a full network that comes with 4 other sites including some pissing fetish sites. Their quality is plenty good. Their navigation is as well. There’s not a lot to complain about and they also use Epoch as a biller so it’s easy to subscribe and cancel.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very cheap at $9.95 a month
Vendo is a biller I trust
968 videos and part of five site network as well
Stockings and pantyhose in many scenes
Has been updating once a week during pandemic
Works well on my cell phone.
Cons:
For me the models are hit and miss as to their looks
Too much standard masturbation porn aimed at men.
Bottom Line:
Wet and Puffy has a lot to like about it. At $9.95 a month I took a chance as I like to see women masturbating. I swear I am not a lesbian, but I have had offers where I was tempted.
It is a very large site with 968 videos and a very large network is included. When I took the tour before signing up I saw a lot of videos with stockings and pantyhose, so I thought what do I have to lose? The models use all kinds of toys and methods to get off. I saw a lot of dildos and wands. I also saw them using a pussy pump and wondered why would they do that? How would that feel? What I realized is that they do this to make their pussies look bigger and more inviting for men to look at. I did not find pumped pussies to be sexy and I think men would like this type of scene more than I did. I like to see wet pussies shaking with real earth moving orgasms.
The models are Eastern European pros who were mostly very much eye candy. But as I watched more and more videos I realized their looks were hit and miss. Many did nothing for me. They often seemed like they were just going through the motions and lacked enthusiasm. In most scenes I thought they had real orgasms, but they rarely seemed to be having fun. I like masturbation scenes with models losing themselves in the heat of the moment, maybe even to the point of forgetting they are on camera.
To the site’s credit I must add that I saw a fair amount of anal play and even some dp. Since many of the scenes can only be called extreme, there were many that were exciting to watch. There are just so many scenes that I did find quite a few worth keeping. I also discovered Ria Sunn, a blond beauty that I thought was just too pretty to ignore. I am a big fan of hers after seeing her here.
I think 80 is fair score as it is a very large site at a low price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An interesting twist on porn sites for the future.
- Content from 75 non-related sites, I'm going to estimate the average site has 15 videos on here.
- It covers 89 different categories including most niches/categories I can think of.
- A total of 877 models, mix of pros and amateurs.
- There's a big con coming but I believe it's offset by the low price and variety, a full month is $9.95.
- Navigation is excellent for this type of site. You can sort by site, model or category.
- Video player works well.
Cons:
- No downloads. I will go into this into the bottom line and why I'm not making too big of a deal over it.
- While streaming-only is becoming a little more popular these days there are people who don't have fast enough connections to stream without going through a half-dozen buffering moments per scene. I didn't have that problem but it is one of the downsides not often mentioned with stream-only sites.
Bottom Line:
Normally, a stream-only site wouldn't appeal to me. I have joined sites that have stream-only but allow you to upgrade to a download version of the site. This one doesn't allow that but I do think the very low price makes it acceptable.
The big plus here is you're getting content from 75 sites. One of the sites only has 1 scene, one only has 3, the rest have at least 5, while some have over 50 and a few even have over 100. The majority fall in that 10-20 range. It's kind of like getting a trial to 75 sites for $9.95.
I think a site like this could be good for porn. A few sites I consider to be polarizing sites that people either love or hate that have content here: Amateur Allure, Analized, Brutal X, Disgrace That Bitch, Fister Twister, German Castings, Lederhosen Gangbang, Make Him Cuckold, Sell Your GF and VIPissy.
Those, to me, are sites that most people aren't going to blindly join just based on the premise of the sites. It's a situation where a person might watch a few scenes and decide they might like it more than they realized or they might watch a few scenes and realize they hated it even more than they thought they would. This helps with cutting back on unhappy customers, showcasing different niches than people would normally try and it might introduce people to porn they otherwise would ignore. I believe VIPissy falls into that category as much of any of the sites do. It has a niche that is popular but isn't likely going to pull new people away from their other favorite niches to it. Now, they can see what their content is like as it is a regularly high ranking site, even by those not directly into pissing porn.
The other sites to me are not that polarizing in type of content as much as it is that people might not know the site well and won't take a chance on a full membership. Sites like Young Sex Parties, X-Sensual, Spandex Porn, She is Nerdy, Spanish Sluts (with nearly 200 videos on here), Summer Hookups, Julie Skyhigh, I Kiss Girls, a longtime favorite of mine Mano Jobs has 44 scenes here, Lisa Ann, Flexi Dolls and going to mention it here too, Amateur Allure and a large collection from the Puffy Network.
It's like an advertising site for 75 sites you might only know 10 of.
I will say I think they have to keep that price at $9.95, that's not a promo as far as I know, it's the regular price. When I reviewed In the Crack, I even talked about how their $9.95 streaming-only membership was a good option for those that didn't know much about the content. I feel the same way here except it's 75 sites that cover 88 categories.
This is, to me, the type of streaming-only site that I would welcome more of. I think that's the whole problem with a single site or network with similar content being streaming-only. There's not enough diversity in the content like this site has.
Even as long as I've been reviewing sites and as many sites as I have joined, I only knew of about half of these sites. This would really be an ideal place for a newcomer to porn to start. Or for someone like me that believes there's very little unique being produced in today's porn market. They even introduced me to a site called Fuck on Street, which TBP scored low in 2014 but introducing me to it introduced me to the network it's on which I had never heard of called, "Extreme Movie Pass".
I see that as progressive thinking. To get me interested in a niche site which led to me being interested in an entire network. Some of us are content with a site only having 30-40 scenes we download and keep ... if it fits a niche we are really into and that is the strength here. I can't go higher on the score than I am just because I am viewing this site as a nice preview of 75 sites to see if I can find any new sites I'm interested in but the key is the $9.95 price.
I would recommend it especially for newcomers since you're going to see most niches here and maybe you'll find a new fetish. I recommend it for those that say they are bored with the porn they have been watching and want something different.
Very unique concept they have here and I'm giving a good score for the amount of coverage their site is giving to different sites/categories/fetishes and for the value.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Over 950 solo scenes of mostly attractive US and Euro girls pleasuring themselves.
Straightforward site design and navigation, with scenes listed as pages of thumbnails showing title, release date, pussy type and rating. Scenes can be filtered by multiple category tags of which there are many. Search function works well.
Site works well on mobile devices with previous and next scene links in scene detail page.
Scene detail page provide streaming, downloading and viewing photo slideshow, also model name, release date and scene duration. Can rate the scene, leave comments and add scene to favourites. Clicking model name brings up the her info page showing detailed info and her scenes.
Model gallery shows a list of paged thumbnails with alphabetic filtering, or can filter by pussy type. Can also select model name from dropdown list. Model thumbnails also feature pussy close-up.
Cons:
PROS (cont'd)
Videos can be downloaded as 1080p, 720p, 480p and 320p, photosets can be downloaded as ZIP files, either high or low quality.
Good download speeds with no download limits and downloaded videos are good quality with reasonable file size.
Membership discount via PU and other links found with google.
Easy signup and subscription cancellation via Vendo (but see cons).
CONS
Signup page a little confusing - the username and password fields are pre-filled with random username and password, but you can just delete those and choose your own, so long as each are at least six characters long.
Pre-checked cross-sells on sign-up page.
Links to pages are a bit slow - clicking a link results in 5 or so second pause before the page loads, but once loaded the page is responsive.
The filter tags are not alphabetically sorted, making location the tag you want more difficult.
Scene listing thumbnails don't indicate which scenes are favourites.
At 1600x1071, high quality photos aren't.
Bottom Line:
If you're a pussy worshipper then you'll love this site, though but I do think the Pussypedia feature is just a gimmick to distinguish it from other sites. Oddly the scene detail pages don'tmention the pussy classification at all.
It also includes access to other sites in the Puffy Network which is the parent site.
The site is easy to use and functional though I found the tagged categories to be sometimes inaccurate when using them to track down scenes I'd be interested in, so you're probably better off just browsing all the scenes and picking from that. Having said that, I'd rather have the option of selecting scenes by tag than not have.
The Pussypedia classifies a woman's pussy as either Puffy Peach, Big Taco or Juicy Cherry - the detailed descriptions for each are interesting enough but at the end of the day, I'm less focussed on the type of pussy and more focussed on the woman as a whole, hence my opinion that it's a marketing gimmick for the site - I'm sure others will disagree :)
About the scenes:
-scenes are solo, starting off with the girl stripping and playing with herself, using her fingers or a selection of toys. Some scenes feature no toys at all, just the girl using her fingers to stimulate her clit or finger her pussy or asshole.
-there are a few DP scenes in that the girl has something stuck in either hole whilst fingering or thrusting something else into the other hole.
-due to the selection of toys, there's plenty of variety in the all solo scenes, though I did spot at least one scene where the camera man's fingers make an appearance to finger or play with the girl's pussy.
The featured toys/tools range from large to small dildos, large and small suction devices (which for a Puffy Peach distends the pussy quite a bit), some speculum-type inserts that open up the pussy for an interesting look inside whilst at the same time stimulating the labia, to vibrators used to stimulate the clit or inside pussy and clit simultaneously.
-some toys are large and fill her pussy or ass, others are slender/shiny which tend to be used in the ass.
-some scenes feature "chunky" balls on a string that are inserted and swallowed up one-by-one by the pussy, then slowly pulled out using the tiny bit of string dangling outside. Some scenes feature an inflatable dildo.
-usually the scenes end with the girl cumming and sometimes pissing.
-scenes average about 20 minutes long, though some are over 30 minutes and some are as short as 10 minutes. For the lingerie lovers out there, quite a few scenes feature stockings and panty-hose which for me, nearly always adds to the hotness.
-scenes are well produced and good technical quality, with good camera angles and close-ups of the pussy action.
-some scenes feature pissing, which some folk will like but it's not really for me, but having said that, when a girl cums she'll often need to pee so I guess it's all part of the action in some cases.
The photosets are the weakest part of the site, with no proper high-quality/resolution photosets available and the so-called high quality option maxing out at 1600x1071 pixels. The low quality pics are 1000x666. Compared with other sites the photos aren't that well lit but as someone more interested in the scene videos, I'm not too bothered about the photos but I mention them here for those for whom photo quality is important.
The signup page offers a choice of full access (USD 9.95 for 30 days, recurring at USD 29.95), streaming only (USD 9.95 per month recurring) or a PAYG option where you purchase tokens used to buy individual scenes, which seems a crazy option given that the smallest number of tokens cost USD 19.95 - to be honest I didn't notice the latter options when signing up and just went with the default full access option for 9.95, which is great value.
Considering the content and price, I recommend this site overall, particularly as it includes the rest of the Puffy Network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Attractive models and variety of well-shot anal scenes.
Good site design, easy to use, providing good functionality such as scene/model search, works well on mobile devices.
Scene listing displays as tiled/thumbnail or list/details view, allowing you to read the full scene description before viewing.
Paged scene listing is sortable by release date and popularity, model list is sortable by name, model can be selected from drop-down list.
Scene listing can be filtered by model and tag (there are many, such as DP, threesome, stockings etc) and model listing can be filtered by name first letter.
In scene detail you can favourite the scene, rate it, stream/download, view photo slideshow and download pics as ZIP file. Also links to model detail page and has a list of hyperlinked tags applicable to the scene.
Downloadable videos are 4K, 1080, 720, 480 and 320, plus WMV 720.
Pics are downloadable as high or low quality.
Responsive video streaming and DL speeds.
Easy membership cancellation.
Cons:
Site is slow: on clicking a link there's a 5 second wait before the next page loads, though once loaded the page is responsive.
However, clicking the "add to favourites" link in scene detail page is unresponsive during video streaming - you click it and nothing happens, so you click it again and what happens is that the delayed first click favourites the scene, then the delayed second click unfavourites it, so you think that "add to favourite" doesn't work.
Depending on the browser window size, the search box sometimes covers the "add to favourites" link in the scene detail page.
Still on the subject of "favourites", scene listing doesn't show if a scene is a favourite.
Pages contains promo links (can't switch off) despite ticking the "Hide Promotional Popups" box in account details.
My Favourites page very basic, just a long list of titled scene thumbnails, though you can remove a scene from favourites by clicking a "remove" icon.
Scenes circa 2016 and older not available as 4K.
Bottom Line:
As the name suggests, this site's all about anal. And more. It's part of the Puffy Network and membership includes the other network sites.
There are 125 scenes at time of this review and content is updated every two weeks, with a preview of upcoming scenes and their availability date.
I didn't come across any download limit and the site worked fine with the Firefox DownThemAll DL manager, the downloaded scenes are reasonable file sizes.
Pics are downloadable as HQ (3400x2267) and LQ (1000x666) zip files and the HQ photosets are indeed high quality.
Scenes are well produced, are between 15 and 30 minutes long and featuring a variety of scenarios including threesomes, lesbian and DP. Every scene has anal - whether it's a lesbian scene involving toys and strapons, a threesome involving two guys DPing a girl or a guy and girl with strapon DPing a girl (this is particularly hot) - with either a cock and/or toy ending up in the girls ass. Some lesbian scenes also feature DP thanks to a strap-on and a toy, or two toys at once, or a toy and some fingering.
A scene typically starts with the girl's striptease, then sucking cock followed by fucking, though some boy-girl scene also include pussy eating. The fucking sometimes starts with pussy but most scenes are straight to anal for much of the scene before ending in a cumshot or creampie - there are quite a few creampie scenes, though most scenes end in a facial, or cumming on the girl's ass, or on her pussy or boobs.
One thing I did notice is that the tags aren't always accurate, as filtering scenes by strapon showed many scenes that aren't actually tagged with "strapon" and don't feature any strapon, similarly with scenes tagged "creampie" which don't feature any creampie and scenes that are creampie that aren't tagged "creampie", so that area of the site needs improvement, though in fairness it's just an annoyance rather than a major flaw.
The model details page contains quite a bit of model info and allows you to rate and add the model to your favourites, and speaking of models, the standout girls for me here are Lady Dee, Sofi Goldfinger and Dido Angel. Previews of their scenes made me join this site via a discount link.
For some folk, a useful feature of this site is the availability of 1 minute downloadable clips: a scene of length say, between 34 and 35 minutes will have 35 clips available for download, which means you can download one or more of the 480p clips of the hottest parts of your fave scenes on your mobile, and let's face it, a mobile device is more likely to be short on the free space needed to store the full video clip, so this feature will be welcome to those who have to have their porn on the go.
Overall, the site works well and provides the functionality you'd want to find and organise the scenes and models that you want to watch or download, if you like anal then this site won't disappoint.
Yes there aren't that many scenes, but the majority of them are excellent and with the PU discount and the inclusion of the other network sites, it's a recommendation from me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of high quality scenes of hot girls sucking cock, in many cases getting fucked and in some cases even getting creampied!
Clean site design with good functionality for searching models and content and organising what you want to watch.
Can list scenes as thumbnails or as a detail list so you can see the full scene description and tags without needing to click to see the scene page.
Scene listings are paged and are sortable by release date and popularity; model list can be sorted by name and model can be selected from a drop-down list.
Responsive mobile site is fast and easy to use.
Scene listings can be filtered by model and model listing can be filtered by first letter of the model name.
The scene detail page lets you can favourite the scene, rate it, stream/download, view photo slideshow and download pics as ZIP file. There's a list of hyperlinked tags applicable to the scene and the page also links to the model's detail page.
Cons:
PROS (cont'd)
A neat and very useful feature of the scene page are the 'next movie' and 'previous movie' links, allowing you to navigate between scenes in the scenes listing, saving you having to actually go back to the scenes listing to choose another scene. I mention this 'cos not many other sites have this and it's great for mobile device users of the site.
Downloadable videos are 4K, 1080, 720, 480, 320 and WMV 720, photosets are downloadable as high or low quality.
Responsive video streaming, good DL speeds good and works with a DL manager.
Sign-up is straightforward, so is membership cancellation.
CONS
Name of the site implies all oral content but there's lots of sex and even some creampies, so it's a bit misleading.
Some advertising but it can be dismissed with a click until the next time you visit the site.
The the scene and model listings give no indication of whether a scene or model is in your favourites list.
Older content not available as 4K - to be expected I guess.
Bottom Line:
I fully expected this to be a blowjob site so when I saw scenes called "Creampied Cutie", "Creampied Cum Slut" and "Steamy Anal Threesome", I was for a brief moment disappointed and then happy.
There are 330 scenes at the time of this review, with a new scene every two weeks. The home page shows upcoming scenes.
It's part of the Puffy Network of sites which includes lots more content.
Scenes are well produced featuring hot girls, some well known and others not so well known, but they all suck and fuck with enthusiasm. Scenes are up to just over 30 minutes long though most are around 20 minutes and some are as short as 13 minutes long, the shorter scenes being mostly oral. As I've mentioned that many of the scenes feature fucking, with some anal and DP with quite a few scenes ending in a creampie or something other than a facial, so the choice of website name is curious to say the least.
Scenes don't have a storyline and get down to the action pretty quickly, with the girl giving the impression she's enjoying herself whether sucking cock or getting fucked by one or more guys. Some of the pure oral scenes stand out though: the girl seems to wield power over the guy, she being in full control, sucking his cock and ultimately milking his cum into her mouth or onto her face - I thought these scenes were very hot, despite the lack of pussy penetration.
Generally the site works very well, is easy to use and has plenty of great content. I did find the tag navigation to be a bit hit and miss, with scenes tagged as DP not actually having any double penetration for example, but on the whole, the tags are mostly accurate and make locating great scenes quick and easy.
A site who's name implies it's all oral but provides much more with fucking, anal, DP and creampie kinda reminds me of when I was a kid waking up and dreading having to go to school, then realising it's a Saturday and there's no school.
One unique feature of this site is that you can download videos as one minute clips, so if a scene is 14 minutes and 30 seconds long, the scene page will have 15 individual 1 minute clips for you to choose from. The clips aren't full HD so I'm guessing their purpose is for viewing your favourite parts of a scene on your phone. Full marks for an original idea - I'm assuming it's original 'cos I've not seen anything similar elsewhere.
There are great discounts for this site, which is great on it's own, but as part of a network of good quality porn, it's an absolute bargain and comes highly recommended by me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Attractive young Eurobabe pornstars sucking cock, fucking and taking big facials in mostly POV scenes.
Good, usable site design and navigation, with videos and picture sets separately listed as paged lists of scene thumbnails, each showing model name, release date and whether the scene is a favourite.
Model index page links to the model's detailed info and scenes, along with hyperlinked tags.
Scene detail page allows streaming and downloading the video, viewing and downloading picture sets, rating the scene and leaving comments. Includes model name, release date and scene length, as well as whether the scene and model are in your favourites list.
Videos can be downloaded as 1080p, 720p, 480p and 320p and are mostly reasonable download sizes.
Picture sets can be downloaded as high quality 4272x2848 and lower quality 1000x666.
Good download speeds with no download limits, works with DL managers.
There's a user forum for discussion of models and scenes, suggestions and customer support.
Cons:
Sign-up page has prefilled random username and password - it's not obvious but these can be changed to anything longer than 6 characters.
Not a lot of content at 44 scenes, only one scene per model, no updates since July 2019.
Despite the good usability, site functionality is a bit quirky: you can't favourite a scene or model from the detail page, you have to do it from the thumbnail in the scenes or models listing. Also, whilst the scene detail page shows if the scene and model are favourited, the model detail page doesn't - clicking on the favourites icon from model detail page brings you to the login/sign-up page. Finally, only model details have tags, though this isn't really an issue given that each model has just one scene.
Content is all a bit same-y, girl sucks cock, sometimes gets fucked and take a huge facial at the end, but then again the site isn't called what it is for nothing.
Production quality is good rather than great, but I'm nitpicking here really.
Bottom Line:
This site is part of the Puffy Network and includes other sites from it, which is a good thing considering the limited content on offer from this site.
The site itself is well designed and very functional (notwithstanding the quirks I've mentioned in the cons section), allowing scenes to be filtered by model, tag and page number (which is odd but there you go). Scenes can be listed in order of release date, highest rated, most viewed and most commented.
Similarly, models can be listed by most recently added, most popular, highest rated and of course, alphabetical order, and they can be filtered in the same way as scenes. It's odd that scenes can be filtered by tag considering that scenes don't support tags and only models are tagged, but given that each model has one scene, that doesn't really matter.
Scenes are 15 to 30 minutes long and feature eurobabe models, some well-known, others not so well-known but still hot. The action is straightforward - girl strips off and gets down to business, sometimes playing with herself before sucking cock and in some scenes, getting fucked and/or riding the cock. Generally, scenes are mostly POV and feature throat-fucking, rimming and ball-sucking. The action is hot with the girls fucking and sucking cock vigourously until getting a huge cum load on their face - kudos to the stunt cock who's at least consistent. The cumshot is shown from both the side then as POV, so you get the best of both worlds.
One thing I did notice was that the well-known pornstars only suck cock in their scenes, with the less well-known girls fucking or getting fucked - market forces at work I guess?
The production quality is more than good enough for the content which doesn't need to achieve Joymii or X-Art levels of production.
One thing I didn't already mention is the easy cancellation process, which is a click away on your membership/profile page.
There's no advertising on the scene and model pages, but there is a link to special offers to other facial/cumshot sites, though I've usually found better offers by just searching online or checking out PU reviews!
The name of the site does suggest that the scenes are gonna be mostly sucking cock, so the inclusion of some hard fucking is a bonus as far as I'm concerned.
If you love seeing babes getting huge facials then you'll like this site for it's quality of content and usability, plus you can further explore the other networked sites which provide plenty more other content.
I'm scoring the site a little low for it's lack of content, though what little there is is very good so it's a recommendation from me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They are running a current special of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
But the special one year price is $60, which is very low.
-Vendo is the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). So ISP does not keep a record of each member page you visit
-No streaming or download limits that I can find.
-You get confirming emails on signup, with your login details, subscription id, order details (price and duration of membership), credit card used, etc.
-Most videos are available in 320p through 4K definition.
-Videos have a runtime of 20 to 30 minutes.
-Photosets are available in zip files in 2 definitions: low and high.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-User name and password are computer generated, so have to write them down. But they are in the confirming emails, so can copy and paste into login page.
-The site has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, but the thumbnails are usually poor photos of the models: a home photographer could easily take photos that would make the models more attractive.
You look at the thumbnails of the models, and realize that the girls in any mall would look much better than what these models look like. How you photograph a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears.
I look through the thumbnails of the models, and I find some models I'm familiar with, such as Delphine, who is a very attractive blonde model, and at this site (at least, in the thumbnail), she is not attractive. Nika O, another attractive model, looks poor.
If a site does not have attractive female models, I usually have little interest in the site.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Even the models I know can be very attractive, at this site thumbnails, are not attractive.
-The online photoplayer is slow.
-The quality of the photos varies. From poor to OK.
-I've seen many screen caps at competing sites that were far better quality than the photos at this site: two problems with the photos at this site: the models are not made up to be attractive. The second problem is the quality of the photos: they are just poor photos. Even models that I've seen can be very attractive at other sites, at this site, they are not attractive. The colors of the photo are poor. The model looks poor. The photosets are a waste of time.
I look at the photos of Nika O, an attractive teen. I know it's her, because I've seen her at other sites. And I've seen her at other sites with the same name. But at this site, in the photos, she looks like poor. At MetArt, Nubiles, ShowyBeauty, she is an attractive young teen. Sexy. Erotic. An object of desire.
At Wet and Puffy, she is a piece of meat I would not look at twice.
Am I over-reacting? I don't think so.
Porn is fantasy.
But if the image of the model is so unappealing, the value of the porn is damaged.
There was a recent poll at PU that asked: "Do you feel high-quality photos are an important part of a site's content?"
Well, the photos at Wet and Puffy are not high-quality photos. They are low-quality photos, that degrade the value of the models, that degrade the value of the site.
Sites like X-Art, the Wow sites have good to excellent photosets, that display the attractiveness of their models.
The Teen Mega World network has improved the quality of their photos over the years, to the point where the photos can present attractive young teens and contribute to the quality of the network.
The photos at Wet and Puffy are poor photos, that degrade the value of the site.
Even when they do have models that are naturally attractive, those models are presented as un-attractive females.
Holly, another attractive model, has 1 video at Wet And Puffy. An attractive model, pretty face, voluptious body, but the video is hurt by the skin tones of the model. She's just not attractive.
At Wow Girls, where she's listed as Barbie, she looks great. At Wet And Puffy, because of the poor skin tones, she looks blah. Not pretty or attractive.
The lighting and other factors can add or detract from the value of a video, and at Wet And Puffy, the photos and videos are poor. Even when they take a pretty model, she will look poor or unattractive in her photos and videos at Wet And Puffy.
BOTTOM LINE(Start of):
Site theme: The site classifies a woman's pussy into one of three types:
puffy peach, juicy cherry or big taco.
So the site focuses on pussies and toys.
Whatever it takes to get a woman off.
(Except no men are allowed.)
So you get all kinds of masturbation with toys.
-You get access to 6 sites with a membership.
wetandpuffy
weliketosuck
wetandpissy
puffynetwork
simplyanal
eurobabefacials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Porn is fantasy.
One of the main factors I look at is how attractive the models are.
The models at Wet and Puffy are not presented attractively.
That is a major negative factor, for me, at least.
So, in spite of the current special price of $60 for one year, I would not join this site.
That is a personal judgment.
Other PU members have found the site to have value.
Homegirl gave the site a score of 90.
mbaya gave the site a score of 95.
tangub gave the site a score of 84.
It's a large site.
Over 900 videos.
Over 900 photo sets.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
PU has a discount, however there is an even cheaper price available at $9.95 a month on sale.
The site has scenes with two of my favorites, the exotic and almost Asian looking Lady Dee and Latina Apolonia.
Many pretty women.
Many hot scenes.
Cons:
The site gives you a name and password that means nothing and is hard to remember
Two prechecked cross sales
The site says it offers CCBill, but I could not find it.
The women never say anything. How could women be so quiet, especially during sex?
The preview says trailers, but I could not get them to work. It leads you to the page to join up.
There are presently 73 Lesbian scenes, not really a lot.
Bottom Line:
This site has anal scenes for both straight boy girl sex as well as for lesbians. I did not watch any of the boy girl scenes as they did not interest me. As of right now there are 73 lesbian scenes.
These are with women using strapons as well as dildos of all kinds, sizes and shapes. There is lots of ass licking as well with some in most scenes. I have never tried that, but would do giving and receiving with models as hot as these. The women start off with very nice outfits that look to cost a bit more than I spend on clothes. The makeup looks very professional and so do the women. These are not the stereotypical butch lesbians. I know they are just acting lesbo for pay, but they look damn good.
There is some genuine interest in each other and it does not seem overly fake, like on many other sites that focus on showing what men expect lesbian sex to be like.
The models don’t speak at all, which may be because they don’t know English. I would settle for subtitles if they had them. Women who don’t talk? This sounds crazy to me. How could we get it on, if we don’t say a word to establish a connection? No woman I know would be quiet during the sex either.
I was glad to see two of my favorites on the site. I love Apolonia, a gorgeous Latina from Spain and the Asian Czech woman, Lady Dee. The rest were mostly Eastern European women, with looks ranging from hot, to how did they get on this site? A lot are real blondes, not the kind who got their hair color from a bottle they got at the drug store. I like real.
The site is not perfect and it does not have enough scenes to justify a high price. But it is well worth joining as PU has a nice discount and you can get it for less as there is a sale price of $9.95 a month. I would recommend this as a woman who can’t resist a bargain for some pretty good porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Comes with the five site Puffy Network.
Interesting pussy classification system.
Pretty big site, 953 videos, with lots to love about it.
Lots of great looking women
Special price on PU of only $14.95 for a month
I loved Lady Dee, what a woman.
Cons:
I saw mostly white women but this is ok. More variety is better.
Bottom Line:
Just the other day there was a poll that asked “How do you like your pussy?” I answered “wet and juicy”. This site is Wet and Puffy and it also answers the question. It is all about hot girls getting off by masturbating. It gives a new meaning to do it yourself.
It comes with Puffy Network, but the other four sites are not ones I cared about as they are focused on women and men having sex together.
One thing I found to be fun was that they have a great way to search by types of pussy.
These are the three pussy types they have on the site: big taco, juicy cherry and puffy peach. I have never heard of doing this and I think this is very creative and original. I have a pretty good idea of what each of these are. Within these you can do a detail search using hairy, pussy piercing, shaved and trimmed pussy. My first choice is hairy juicy cherry. Yummy.
The models get themselves off by using all kinds of dildos, pussy spreaders, toys inserted both vaginal and anal, anal beads and pussy pumps. The action includes lots of pussy close ups, panty play, and my favorite one, which is opening up those pussy lips and stretching them.
The orgasms look realistic and not fake, unlike many porn sites. This is very much 100% on the hot meter. I think they had a lot of fun making these scenes and I am glad they shared the fun with me and you.
The women are mostly white, and very thin. I loved Apolonia, a Latina from Spain with a Juicy Peach pussy, who had one scene and adored Chloe Lamour, three scenes, who also looks Latina and her pussy is Big Taco. My favorite though was Lady Dee who has a vaguely exotic and very special Asian look. I want to see a lot more of her in lesbian scenes. She has a high level of sexy enthusiasm that I can’t take my eyes off. She had only one scene with her Juicy Cherry pussy that I couldn’t take my eyes off.
The only black models I found were Luna Corazon and Luciana, but they don’t do anything for me.
The site is very friendly to use and anyone can find anything they want without much effort.
They have 953 videos as of today. That is enough to keep me busy for a lot longer than a month, but they are having a deal right now that is a bargain. For only $14.95 you can download all you want for thirty days.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Don't let the title of the site fool you. There is also sex here.
- As of 3/28/20 they have 322 scenes.
- Very high technical quality.
- Very attractive models, I don't know a lot of them but I'm guessing these aren't amateurs.
- Released a new scene on the 3/26/20 and were releasing a new scene each week (see bottom line).
- Download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Very good PU discount
- Vendo is the biller
Cons:
- Should it be a con that the scenes aren't 100% oral? If you're looking for just oral based on the name you might be disappointed.
- Really strange happening when signing up (will explain in bottom line)
- Scenes could be a little longer, some are less than 20 minutes. None of these are major cons.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to start with the strange happening or else I'll forget it. I was signing up for my account and unchecked the pre-checked cross sale, hit submit and there was an error. When I went to sign up it generated a username and password for me. The username was too long for their system to process. How does that happen? I think it was 14 maximum characters and the username it generated for me was more than 14. I didn't see any way to change the username until it rejected the auto-generated one. Just something they might want to look into.
One more part to get out of the way, on their updates, they have a notice up that in coming weeks they are going to be posting compilations, releasing remastered old scenes, releasing scenes from other sites, because of the Coronavirus.
I like this site but I do wonder why part of the scenes end up being sex scenes. Some of the scenes have as much vaginal as oral. They do often switch between in the middle of vaginal back to oral. The site has added value for me since a lot of the vaginal goes into at least a certain level of tease. It adds an erotic feel to the scenes. The camerawork is a major plus here. They do a very good job of focusing on the model's face/mouth/eyes during the oral parts. I remember saying something similar about a blowjob only site. Blowjobs in porn are usually too fast and jackhammer-like. The ones here give you more of a feeling of the model really enjoying giving the blowjob.
There are 322 scenes. Of those 80 have up to 4K video downloads. The other 242 have up to 1080p. They also have 720p, 480p, 320p and even 810p WMV. The scenes also have downloadable photos in high or low resolution. They also offer a trailer for each scene. If they offer anymore they're going to need a longer dropdown box.
This is another site with very extensive tagging features. They even have more fun with their tags than other sites. Three "pussy" types are Plump Peach, Juicy Cherry and the classic Big Taco. They have 10 different tag categories just for the type of model and 7 different tag categories for the action depicted in the scene.
The models are mostly Czech/Russian but thanks to their nationality tag, I can see that they have models from 21 other countries too.
The scenes usually start with some teasing, then some oral (both ways), a little sex finds its way in and usually back to oral to finish. The star of this site is possibly the cameraman or woman. Though lacking much story there is rarely a wasted frame of video and in today's porn world that is a plus. No bouncing cameras, no focus on someone's butt cheek while the action is 6 inches away.
I did laugh about the age filter on models. The most common age is 21 (83) and somehow, they have 0 that are 22, then jump up to 30 that are 23.
You also have access to the Wet and Puffy Network which has four other sites on it. Be sure to join through the Wet and Puffy Network page here on PU, it's only $9.95. The value raises the score a few extra points too. This is very high quality porn at an excellent price.
It's just different enough in their style of filming and niches to keep it from being another mainstream cookie-cutter network. Their staff seems active like with the Coronavirus post which also shows complete transparency on their part to announce how things are going to have to change until we get through this Coronavirus mess. Gave them a point or two for that too.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Vendo, Segpay, Epoch or CCBill.
-Scenes are exclusive. There is a preview trailer for each one.
-Photos are zip downloadable and 2400x3400. At least 100 photos per set.
-Top notch European porn stars. Most are from the Czech Republic.
-No download limits or broken links.
-The site has an easy to follow, logical layout and downloads are fast
-Tag system search engine that works well
-Nice PU discount. If you can live with streaming only there is an even lower price.
-Part of Puffy Network of five sites, 1883 videos. This is the only network that I have ever signed up for a lifetime membership.
Cons:
-Updates twice a month. Growing very slowly.
-The site selects your user name and password
-Updates scroll down endlessly. Works better on a cell phone or tablet than on a pc.
-The models are too perfect. I am kidding, LOL. I have waited for years to say this as a con. If you find perfection boring, don’t join the site.
-Gonzo type action. No premise or story.
-Too few anal creampies. I would have expected some.
Bottom Line:
What they have on this site is a mixture of heterosexual anal as well as lesbian anal. Of the 119 very high quality updates, less than half are hetero and the rest are lesbian. There is some rimming in 81 of the 119 scenes. Nearly all the rimming scenes are lesbian. Most cumshots are in her mouth or on her face. There should be more anal creampies on an anal site.
The site excels in the lesbian scenes much more so than in the heterosexual ones. They seem to be more enthusiastic, go all out and in general project more chemistry. That seems to me to be true of many sites that are Eastern European. Heterosexual porn made there can be extreme as well as demanding physically. Lesbian porn in contrast is seen as preferable, almost a break, so they can rest their exhausted bodies, especially those worn out buttholes. If you have ever seen Eastern European anal scenes, you know what I mean.
As is also common in porn from Eastern Europe, the models never speak a single word. Quite possibly they don’t speak English. The scenes are quiet and we never see any of their personalities. The models show off their bodies and then a partner enters and the sex begins. I see no use of a premise or story, just get right down and go all out. As the models are universally very attractive, they come across well. In my cons I was kidding that they are boringly perfect. I was pleased that there is at some level some chemistry between them. The videos are well produced. This is basic gonzo without the stripper outfits and fits the mold of European gonzo type sites. The models pretty much fit the same mold-thin, young, and in their twenties. Most but not all, are from the Czech Republic. I recognized many as established Euro stars, such as the extremely popular Gina Gerson, another rising superstar the amazingly gorgeous Spaniard Apolonia LaPiedra, Arwen Gold, Antonia Sainz, the exotic looking superstar Lady Dee, KatrinTequila, Angel Piaf, Braziilian Francys Belle, Brittany Bardot, Vinna Reed, Lexi Dona, and Christy Charming. I could say this is a list of proven great stars, but I could also say this is the cream of the crop of current Euro stars.
Updates are twice a month, not really enough to say that it is growing much. I expect anal niche sites to update at least once a week. There is a trailer for each video as well as a photo set of at least 100 at 2400x3400 pixels. The photos are nice quality but did not interest me.
The preview page is nicely done and informative enough. The site uses a well organized tag system for searches. Member pages are logical, uncluttered, have no advertising, and easy to navigate. I had absolutely no downloading problems.
An interesting plus is that if you hit the link that says “channels”, you get sample downloadable videos from 18 Closeup, Amateur Allure, Babes.com, Club Seventeen, DDF, Perfect Gonzo, Stiffia and Yanks. Some of these samples are of very low non HD quality, and some are full HD. The discounts are sometimes lower than the join price through PU or Rabbits.
If you like anal, this site is worth joining. It is enjoyable, in spite of being not terribly innovative or extreme. There are many anal focused sites, but few, maybe even none, that do lesbian anal as well as this one. The bottom line is that this site is worth a join if you are into attractive thin models doing anal sex. The price is a bargain compared to what you get.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through Vendo, Segpay, or CCBill.
--Updates once a week
-The video and photo archives number 942 scenes
-The best video quality is 4K
-Photo quality is 3400x2300. At least 100 photos per set.
-A list 20 something, thin Euro porn stars
-All scenes have great production values
-There are no download limits.
-Easy to follow, logical site layout
Cons:
-The site selects your user name and passwords randomly. I don’t consider this a major con, just an annoying one.
-Updates scroll down endlessly. Works better on a cell phone or tablet than on a pc.
Bottom Line:
Wet and Puffy is a site that focuses on female masturbation scenes. Female friends of mine that like porn, find the videos stimulating and enjoy watching them. Porn producers take note-they want and are looking for a site comparable to this with straight men masturbating. The ones that exist are not interesting as they for gay men.
Speaking as a heterosexual man, I liked the site. The models use dildos of various sizes and types, metal spreaders, toy insertions both vaginal and anal, anal beads and pussy pumps which is very unusual and make the pussy look huge. The only thing I would have liked to have seen are scenes with speculums. The action includes lots of pussy close ups, camel toe panty play, labia stretching, and pissing.
The filters for the site give a pretty good idea of what you will get. These are the categories and how many scenes get these tags.:
Big Taco 186, hairy 17, juicy cherry 169, puffy peach 174, pussy piercing 9, shaved 603, shaved pussy 189, trimmed 188, and trimmed pussy 71. Three pussy types are big taco, juicy cherry and puffy peach. They promote the site as the only pussy classification website on the internet.
Most of the models are thin Eastern European porn stars but a few are from Western Europe or the US. Mostly the models are in their twenties and are most definitely well known professionals and not amateurs. Some I recognized are Antonia Sainz, Chloe Lamour, Angel Wicky, Chrsity Charming, Vinna Reed, Angel Piaf, Francys Belle, Charlotte Sartre, Ria Sun, Victoria Sweet, Gina Gerson, Apolonia, Luna Corazon, Eva Berger, Arwen Gold, Rachelle Richey, Marley Brinx, Lady Dee, Sindy Vega, Eufrat, Lorena, Beata, Abby Cat, Mia Melone, Miela aka Marry Queen, Nikky Thorne, Satin Bloom, Caprise, and Zafira, This is quite a quality lineup.
Updates are once a week and the archive is huge with over 942 scenes. The site layout is easy to follow and the downloads had no broken links or download limits. There is ability to use advanced searching, which is using more than one tag. An example would be American, big taco, blond. Four scenes appear.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bills with Vendo or Segpay. These are reliable billers. They also use Epoch, which is not.
-Tag system for searching
-Archive of 184 videos, about five to ten minutes each
-All videos are in HD, but not 4K
-Links to support on every member’s page
-Option to pay her to make custom videos
Cons:
-Prechecked cross sale
-No cam shows, although mentioned on preview page
-No photos, although mentioned on preview page.
-Archive site and no longer updating
-Standalone site without extras.
Bottom Line:
LexiDona is a 27 year old porn model from the Czech Republic. She has striking features and is that rare combination of being a brunette with bewitching hazel green eyes. With a slender athletic body, she is very feminine, just not full bodied and voluptuous. In her scenes on other sites, I was impressed with the enthusiasm of her performances.
She is one of the most popular Czech porn models and is easily found on many Eastern European pornsites. On this site she is the star along with 18 of her Czech female friends.
Her personal site is no longer updating since February 2019. Additionally, the preview page promises more than you will find inside.
The list of broken promises is that there are no weekly updates, there are no cam shows live or downloadable, and I could not find any photo sets.
I can’t say for sure if it still works, but there is an option to pay her for custom videos. Solo is 20 per minute, anal, boy girl vaginal, lesbian and pissing are 40 per minute. There is a ten minute minimum.
She also sells signed softcore photos at $25 each plus $10 for shipping. Every member’s page has links to her on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram.
So, what exactly do you get on the site? There is an archive of 184 High Definition videos. The action is solo, lesbian, boy/girl and some pissing scenes. There are also a lot of scenes where she does very ordinary things, like getting dressed or brushing her teeth.
Like most single model sites, it is past its prime and may be worth joining if you are a big fan. If I owned the site, I would add it to a network as an extra bonus.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Pros
-Vendo is the biller.
-Links to discounts for 11 sites
-A nice plus is pissycams.
-Archive of 1456 videos, mostly under three minutes each.
-Updates nearly daily. January had 23.
Cons:
-Two prechecked cross sales
-Weak tag system for searching. Not enough tags. There are 26 but they need more to be specific, perhaps an advanced search.
-No bonuses or photosets
Bottom Line:
The site name Got2Pee refers to women with very full bladders peeing urgently, mostly in secluded places. Sometimes it is a scene with random people walking past, or a bus or train passing by.
The urgency is clear in these videos as they pee quite a bit. If I had that much in me, I know I would be ready to burst too. I have to admit that a few times in my life I had to do the dirty deed outdoors. I have never been caught and probably would have been terribly embarrassed. I have never seen a woman peeing outdoors before watching the videos here.
In these videos, the scenes start with a woman in normal, everyday clothes frantically looking for a secluded spot. Sometimes it is an alleyway or in a park or open field area.
I appreciated them pulling down their pants, pulling up a dress or skirt and exposing the goods. Sometimes the better videos had them wearing skirts without panties.
Obviously, the erotic value is subjective. I found seeing them as exhibitionists revealing what they normally did not show the world to be of more interest than the actual peeing. I loved it when they anxiously looked around for anyone watching and then exposed themselves. A few scenes had two women and those were outstanding due to their nervous and playful interactions.
The videos are short at three minutes or less and they are certainly plentiful. The archive has over 1450 videos and the site has near constant updates, about six per week.
The women are young, twentyish Eastern Europeans. They did not all look like models and some had a genuine amateur look to them. The link on the bottom that said see more of this model had links to them both on this site and other sites. However, I don’t think any were big name pornstars.
I saw two negatives. One is the lack of a good search engine. This site is too big to not have one. There are 26 tags but the site needs more to be specific, perhaps an advanced search would be in order.
The other one is this is a site that seriously would be improved by having photos.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The video and photo archives number over 454 scenes
-Updates once a week.
-Photo quality is 3400x2300. Zipdownloadable.
-Many beautiful and professional Euro porn stars
-Part of the five site Puffy Network.
-The scenes are exclusive.
-No download limits.
-Good search engine using relevant tags.
-All updates are at least HD 1080 and 4K became available in 2015.
Cons:
-The network has only about three updates a week over the five sites.
-The site selects your user name and passwords randomly. You get something like an alphabet soup of upper and lower case letters and some numbers.
-The billing processor is Vendo, not one of the big name billers. I have used them in the past with no problems though.
Bottom Line:
The Puffy Network consists of five sites, so you get quite a bit with your membership. Some sites may or may not be to your taste, as I did not care for all of them either. There is Wet and Pissy over 454 videos, Wet and Puffy, which has more than 934 masturbation videos, Eurobabe Facials with 44 videos, We like to Suck with over 312 videos and Simply Anal which has over 115 videos and includes a lot more than anal scenes. Eurobabe Facials has not updated since 2015. Altogether you get more than 1850 scenes.
One of the sites is definitely focused on a fetish, Wet and Pissy.
Most of the models are thin Eastern European porn stars but others are from Western Europe or the US. I saw none that were not shaved. Mostly the models are in their twenties and are most definitely professionals and not amateurs. The models are nearly all very thin and white. I would have liked a bit more variety, but this is par for the course for a European website. Further, as such you get little to no talking in any language.
Some of the better models that I recognized are Christy Charming, Vinna Reed, Angel Wicky,Antonia Sainz, Victoria Pure, Lady Dee, Gina Gerson, Lexi Donna, Silvia Dellai, and Richele Richey. These are all quite attractive as well as top notch performers.
The action includes solo peeing and pee drinking, They pee on the floor, in their pants, on a couch or other furniture, masturbate and pee, they taste their pee, drink it from cups, lick it off table tops, aim the pee straight into their mouths and there is even more variety. They also use pussy pumps to highlight their pussies. The site has excellent video quality and includes attention to details, such as the model's dress, makeup, and has stylish, artistic settings. There is no peeing site on the net that can compare with all these great creative plusses.
The site layout is easy to follow and the downloads had no broken links.
You also can get some videos as samples from other sites, but they are not downloadable. The sites are Club Seventeen, Perfect Gonzo, Amateur Allure, Yanks, Babes, Stiffia, Babes, as well as 18 Close Up.
Additionally there is a link to other sites that offer discounted memberships. They are Nubiles, Team Skeet, POV Bitch, 21st Sextury, MyXXX Pass, Got2Pee, Life Selector, Club Seventeen and PornPros.
I believe this is one of the best peeing sites that you can subscribe to. The quality of the scenes is very high as are the attractiveness and performances of the mostly Eastern European and very professional pornstars.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
