|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » What is the most underrated site? |
| 1-22 of 22 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 11-21-08 10:44am - 5875 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User  Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
What is the most underrated site? I always like to see reviews of smaller sites, rather than yet one more review of a site we all know about. Wittyguy, Drooler, Monahan and the rest of you all seem to know a lot about what's good and what isn't. (Almost descended into cliche and said "what's hot and what's not.") I love those reviews of smaller sites. I also know one or two of you take "hits" as well, in the name of curiosity! You find the occasional rogue site that's absolute rubbish, and then inform the rest of us and save us some money. This is great, and one of the reasons why this site is so good. What I want to ask is what are your favourite small or underrated sites that we should all know about? I know there are some great sites out there, but one or two seem to get ignored. I think Denner mentioned how he loved "Devils Film" and how he considered it totally underrated and unsung. There are a few sites that seem well loved on here, and maybe there's a good reason for this. Maybe the others aren't as good. But when I checked out "Video Box" I was disappointed to a certain extent, but I loved the quality available on "Pink Visual." I do like a site that has very good quality video. I suppose we're all spoilt nowadays with so many affordable good quality sites, so I'm being a little fussy in looking for some obscure ones. I'm from the UK, so I guess I love an underdog. Edited by Staff on Nov 21, 2008, 06:43pm | |
|
||
| 11-21-08 11:34am - 5875 days | #2 | |
|
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 2,158 Registered: Jan 01, '08 Location: Wash |
Hmmm, There is one site CatalinaCruz which comes with a a few other sites, like AustinKincaid.com ( who is seen often on brazzers etc) Comes also with two cool sites Licensetoblow.com and Licensetolick.com These first two sites are among my favorites. Two reasons: Director is Catalina mostly so if you hear talking its her sexxy voice. AustinKincaid, has about the sexiest talk and mannerism I have seen to date. Playful sexxy and no how to do things, things I want done :-) Since 2007 | |
|
||
| 11-21-08 04:27pm - 5875 days | #3 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
x Edited on Apr 19, 2023, 02:10pm | |
|
||
| 11-21-08 04:45pm - 5875 days | #4 | |
|
rome476 (0)
Active User Posts: 78 Registered: Aug 19, '08 |
I agree on the Catalina site that is really a great network and an incredible bargain with the TBP discount at $20. I would also suggest Naughty Allie site that has great swinger/group action with some actual orgies(the only place I've ever found good quality orgies) and with excellent video quality. rome476 | |
|
||
| 11-21-08 05:39pm - 5875 days | #5 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I'm sure I typed "most" not "mosr" for the title. I find this really irritating as I cannot edit it. Can some mod out there please change it? Please!? | |
|
||
| 11-21-08 06:44pm - 5875 days | #6 | |
|
Khan (0)
Suspended  Posts: 1,737 Registered: Jan 05, '07 Location: USA |
This one time, I've corrected it. Former PornUsers Senior Administrator Now at: MyPorn.com "To get your ideas across use small words, big ideas, and short sentences."-John Henry Patterson | |
|
||
| 11-21-08 07:42pm - 5875 days | #7 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Cheers! I always check my spelling, but for some reason missed the spelling on the thread title. | |
|
||
| 11-22-08 04:41am - 5874 days | #8 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I'd say TeenDreams is a good candidate. You get 30 updates per week, pics and vids, softcore and hardcore, and at TBP or Rabbit's it only costs $18 per month. On top of that, the pics are now coming in often at over 2000px and a lot of them look great. I think it deserves better than the 84.5 average score it has now. Sure, it's hardly an all-exclusive site, but for the value, it's as good now as Babelicious, which, even with SexyBabes (an included bonus), doesn't update as much in a week. I also think that 82.6 does not represent the quality and volume of Hegre Art. The pics are usually very clear and they go up to 6000px! What other sites do that? Very few. Errotica does every long once in a while, to past 7000, which is, well, p-l-e-n-ty. And I don't agree with some folks that the girls are all skinny. That's an overgeneralization. And HegreArt is all exclusive. It's one of the best softcore nude photography sites there is. Eight-two point six? No. I do not agree with that! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 11-22-08 07:57am - 5874 days | #9 | |
|
Denner (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,217 Registered: Mar 03, '07 Location: Denmark |
Not supprisingly to most here, I totally agree with the Drooler about TeenDreams. Over the years this site has delivered some of the best soft (and HC) videos (and photosets, by all means) of euro/easterneuro girls/models - even if most of it is not exclusive, but a "joint venture". I'd also say Babes.tv which have some very fine exclusive videos. Next it's FMTeens - if your're a sucker for those eastern euro-teens - soft - the site is too expensive and the updates are not the best, but the content IS - generally. And in the same gender nudolls.com - alas the site lately has had some problems with updates - hope they are still alive and well, because the content is great and here you get some hardcore-videos with some of the models also known from FMTeens. "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle" Edited on Nov 22, 2008, 08:00am | |
|
||
| 11-22-08 09:02am - 5874 days | #10 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I'll toss in that Teen Dreams has lately had some very nice photosets (surprise! ;) of Erin Nicole, Lena Nicole (could they be related? ;), and even some older -- but larger -- pics of my long-term bone-throb Mia Stone. And that's just some of it. I've gone from "Fuckin' WOW!" to "Yeah-Yeah" about TeenDreams over the years, but they have been making improvements that I really appreciate. The downloads aren't always super-swifty, but they're hardly slow enough to get a ticket for holding up traffic on the Information Superhighway. And sometimes the downloads put that pedal to the metal. NUdolls I've been lurking into from time to time, but they haven't updated for over a month as of today. I hope it's just a windup for a big flood of new material. As Paul McCartney once sang, "Those Ukraine girls really knock me out!" I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 11-22-08 09:48am - 5874 days | #11 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Given your two avatars I had a feeling you two would sniff out something! Teen Dreams is a site I have never joined but was considering. NUdolls sounds good too. I prefer hard to soft, but it sounds like they have some of both on those sites. I read Toadsith's review of American Vice. That sounds pretty good. Sadly I don't have many recommendations myself. There is so much out there, but I guess I stick too much to safe sites. On the other hand I don't get ripped off when I take a chance and join a "rogue" site. | |
|
||
| 11-22-08 09:53am - 5874 days | #12 | |
|
Denner (0)
Active User Posts: 1,217 Registered: Mar 03, '07 Location: Denmark |
If you prefer hard to soft NUDolls may not be IT...take a look at preview - and if you like, my review....BUT it's mostly solo-girl softcore... "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle" | |
|
||
| 11-22-08 10:18am - 5874 days | #13 | |
|
Denner (0)
Active User Posts: 1,217 Registered: Mar 03, '07 Location: Denmark |
I'm with you about: "I've gone from "Fuckin' WOW!" to "Yeah-Yeah" about TeenDreams over the years..." Well, got almost the same experience - TeenDreams has provided this user with some of the greatest videos in my "career" as a porn-browser, especially in the early years - only extended by 1byday. I still think it's both fun and somewhat great to re-visit/re-join the site now and then. About NUdolls, I hope they come back - right, no updates since october, the 20th. A shame, because they really seem to have the touch (for easteuro-girl lovers)... "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle" | |
|
||
| 11-22-08 10:26am - 5874 days | #14 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
Okay, I'm starting to drool. Those sites do look good. If the content is soft I like it to be really special and it sounds like it is. | |
|
||
| 11-22-08 10:32am - 5874 days | #15 | |
|
Denner (0)
Active User Posts: 1,217 Registered: Mar 03, '07 Location: Denmark |
Yes, well - if you like soft - TOO. Take a look at the rather fine previews at NUDolls - you'll get a pretty good idea...the site got preview of every video, so... "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle" | |
|
||
| 11-22-08 10:38am - 5874 days | #16 | |
|
rome476 (0)
Active User Posts: 78 Registered: Aug 19, '08 |
Can anyone give an estimate of % HC/Soft on the videos on TEENDREAMS, especially on the newer ones? rome476 | |
|
||
| 11-22-08 10:43am - 5874 days | #17 | |
|
rome476 (0)
Active User Posts: 78 Registered: Aug 19, '08 |
I should add I am only interested in bg HC, NOT all girl HC. rome476 | |
|
||
| 11-22-08 10:55am - 5874 days | #18 | |
|
Denner (0)
Active User Posts: 1,217 Registered: Mar 03, '07 Location: Denmark |
Don't know the precise deal here, but the guess is 30% bg hc, 50 solo and 20 lez - with some alteration. But, rome - take a good look at the preview under "Members Area Tour" - and you'll get the idea...BTW: Teendreams previews have always been fair to the user... "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle" Edited on Nov 22, 2008, 10:59am | |
|
||
| 11-22-08 07:44pm - 5874 days | #19 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I go along with Wittyguy when he says, "One man's pain is another man's pleasure in terms of content." The same idea as "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." If you look at a smaller site, that idea applies even more. With a big site, you can have lots of content and features that might appeal to a broad range of people. With a smaller site, that's not as easy to do, and you are probably going to have a smaller audience for that site. Seems like you are looking for the thrill/excitement of personal discovery. Nothing wrong with that. But a smaller site would be a niche category, which would limit its appeal, no matter how excellent some people might think it to be. Like an art house film. That's a niche category. The film might be great or technically wonderful or artistic or whatever, but the appeal is probably limited. Not 100% true all the time, but that's the basic idea. The great mega-sites are the ones we should all know about, because those are the sites that have the broadest appeal, and that we should probably join (great content and a reasonable price and good site structure so we can download or enjoy the content). I'm not saying there are not truly great or appealing smaller sites, but those sites would not appeal to everyone. They would appeal to fans of that content. I've seen some paysites get a 90+ score, that I would not want to watch for free. The content would be a real turnoff for me. But for fans of that niche, those sites are hot and exciting and pleasurable. No disrespect intended, but I've also read reviews of how hot and good looking the models on some sites are, and when I check those sites out, I realize again that "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." One guy was raving about a model that I would rate a 50 on a scale of 50-100. Actually, I would rate her lower than 50 if there was a lower rating. My favorite softcore site is Metart. You get: -massive amount of Euro teen/young models, some of the prettiest models on the web. -massive amount of high quality photosets, shot in glamor style -large number of contributing photographers -a low annual price of $99. -around 12-14 hours of free live webcams per day (different models put on a 1- or 2-hour show) -4 new photosets per day, on average. Photosets are 100+ pics, on average. So the content keeps growing. If you like videos, Metart is a bore. They have videos of some truly gorgeous girls, naked, and it's a waste of time to download or watch most of these videos. I don't understand how they do it. In a photoset of some gorgeous girl, she can appear sexy, erotic, appealing, wonderful, and a whole bunch more. Then you watch a Metart video of that same girl, and the thrill is gone. Completely. The music is distracting, the special effects editing is amateurish, and it's such a complete waste of an opportunity to spend some video time with a lovely young model. Chiara A. is the only Metart model I've seen that had some watchable videos. I am not currently a member, but I will rejoin it in the future. I almost feel like a shill because I keep recommending the site again and again. Drooler has much more porn background than I do. I belonged to TeenDreams late 2006 early 2007, so maybe my experiences have little current relevance. And you can skip this section if you want. Teendreams is a supersite like Metart. -huge number of models, some very attractive -large number of vids -softcore and hardcore photosets If you are into teen/young women pics, then almost none of the photosets I saw at TeenDreams in early 2007 had the high quality of Metart. A girl will look gorgeous at Metart, and merely attractive or just OK at TeenDreams. Presentation can make a huge difference in the appeal of a model's picture. At Metart, they go for a glam approach, like the Playboy magazine of the 1970s-1980s, although even more glam than Playboy actually used back then. Sorry, I'm going into more detail than I should. Some of the models at Teendreams could be really beautiful, but the photographers don't bother to show them that way. Instead, the models are more like slices of white bread, digestible but not truly mouth-watering or yummy. Take a tour of the models at Teendreams, enlarging the sample pics of the models. Then take a tour of the models at Metart, enlarging the sample cover shot of the models (use the Metart updates page for an easy page to see a large number of different models). The more recent Teendreams pictures are much better quality than the older photosets from 2007 and before. There is a large amount of 2007 and earlier photosets where the quality is just OK, certainly not great like Metart of the same period. But from what I can see (as a non-subscriber to Teendreams for 1+ year), even the recent photosets of Teendreams don't match the quality of Metart. The quality of HegreArt is as good as Metart for photosets. Both sites (HegreArt and Metart) are softcore Euro teen that focus on photosets. But Metart has a massive amount of models and photosets, while HegreArt's content is far more limited in number of models and number of photosets. Both sites have some great-looking women, so they are both worth joining to see their wares. But Metart content is massive compared to HegreArt. And Metart is cheaper as well, for a monthly or an annual subscription. But if you prefer hardcore to softcore, then skip Metart and HegreArt, because they are both soft only. My experience of hardcore is very limited. If you want hardcore suggestions, I have none. Edited on Nov 22, 2008, 07:49pm | |
|
||
| 11-28-08 06:08pm - 5868 days | #20 | |
|
sitsat (0)
Active User Posts: 4 Registered: Nov 28, '08 |
Okay, bearing in mind that one man's pain is another man's pleasure in terms of content, I'm gonna mention just one porn niche that is seldom covered at all (I have many many niches, btw :p), and this is WAM (wet and messy porn). I should mention that I only like this niche when it's lesbians or solo girls getting absolutely covered in cream, oil, syrup, or whatever else... (no guys allowed!) Anyway, there are very few WAM sites out there, and most of them are of incredibly low quality - featuring unattractive girls doing basic, silly things that I feel would be more suitable for a clown than a pornstar. However, I believe this one site, Messyfun, is absolutely leagues above anything else I've seen, yet it is rarely covered on review sites (and even this site only scored it as 77.2 :O). Admittedly, the site is a little old and doesn't really get updated much nowadays (I think one of the main directors passed away, and the site never recovered), but the quality of the videos still exceeds anything else I've ever seen in this niche by a long, long way. There are very hot women in some of these vids getting absolutely drenched from head to toe in liquid chocolate and having erotic sex that would rival Sapphic Erotica. Yum! Anyway, it's such a shame that the site hasn't really improved much in the last 5 years or so, and the videos are of quite poor quality by modern standards, but it is still the best site for this niche by far (and I've searched long and hard...). No other sites appear to have any imagination whatsoever. Thus I feel it deserves a much higher rating. Edited on Nov 28, 2008, 06:49pm | |
|
||
| 11-29-08 02:07pm - 5867 days | #21 | |
|
shooterbo (0)
Active User  Posts: 185 Registered: Apr 25, '07 |
PornFidelity........hands down! | |
|
||
| 11-30-08 09:21am - 5866 days | #22 | |
|
TheRizzo (0)
Active User Posts: 44 Registered: Jun 11, '08 |
Teen dreams definitely gets underrated in my book as well. I've always enjoyed their site whenever I've been a member. | |
|
||
| 1-22 of 22 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
