Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-CCBill is the payment processor: trusted name, easy to join and/or cancel, and CCBill website has the details of your membership.
-Get an email confirmation on signup. Email states the price and length of membership, plus the billing agent, plus the account number. But the username and password items are left blank. So write down the username and password when joining, or you will have to contact the website or CCBill for those details.
-Nubiles-porn is a network with access to many different sites.
The main sites in the network are listed in the first reply below.
-The nubiles.net site, by itself, is worth the price of membership.
Because nubiles.net has a massive catalog of teen models.
And the nubiles.net site, by itself, has a daily update rate of videos and photosets.
-The search engine searches the entire network, not just the site you are logged in to.
-Navigation is easy. You can easily switch from photoset to video and back again.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The photos in the photosets appear to be real photos. Excellent quality. You look at some of these fine-looking models, and you either get horny, or you're dead inside.
For some reason, I appreciate some of the photosets at Nubiles-porn more than the sets at MetArt. MetArt has been a disappointment with some of the recent photosets, for me. At MetArt, they put the models into contorted positions to showcase the model's pussy or ass, and it just seems like an uncomfortable experience. Let the girl stand up or lay down in a normal position, and show the girl as a person, instead of an ass or pussy.
The photos at nubiles.net are simpler, in composition, and they shoot the girl in natural positions, without the contortions that MetArt favors.
-You can live-stream the photosets in large, medium or small definition.
-The online live-stream photoplay mechanism is fast and easy to use.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are basically minor.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
This is one of the best networks for hardcore teens. The catalog of teens is huge at Nubiles.net.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Entering the member's area, the first page you see is ads for other sites.
-And you get more ads on every member page. I've seen worse sites, where the ads overwhelm the members content, but since you paid for a membership to access the sites, they should respect you enough to not bombard paying members to grab more cash.
-The model page at Nubiles-porn only lists the model's content at some of the network sites: it does not include the model's content at nubiles.net, which is a mistake, because the nubiles.net content for a model is probably the major part of her network content. So you have to switch to the nubiles.net site to search for the model's name, to see her content at that site.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
There are some outstanding bargains in the porn world.
I consider nubiles-porn one of them.
Mainly because of the inclusion of nubiles.net, which has a massive catalog of young, fresh teens, and also updates on a daily basis with at least one video and photoset.
I also enjoy the quality of the videos and photosets at nubiles.net, and some of the videos and photosets at the other sites in the network.
The quality of the videos and photosets is excellent: and the composition is simpler and more natural than some glamcore sites, and they also include basic costumes (not expensive, but natural clothes) that adds to the effectiveness of the photos.
-Some of the plots of the videos are interesting.
"My Sister Wives What It Takes - S1:E10"
Bunny Colby's husband Charles Dera has just taken a new sister wife, Danni Rivers. Unfortunately, when Danni arrives home with her new hubby they both quickly realize that she has no idea what she's doing in the bedroom. Danni is timid and unsure when Charles hikes up her wedding dress and pushes her panties aside to eat her out. Then Charles whips out his dick and sticks in it, but he can tell Dani isn't having a great time. Finally Charles calls Bunny in to help her new sister wife out.
What impresses me about the video is how Bunny Colby(aka Nadya Nabakova), a fine looking woman, is willing to help the new wife learn the finer points of sex with their mutual husband.
Bunny Colby, an under-appreciated star of the porn world. I keep finding these girls (or women, Bunny Colby is around 26) and their attractiveness amazes me.
It keeps me interested in porn.
Overview: It's been a while since I was a member of nubiles-porn, and I forgot how clean and good the network is. Especially the nubiles.net site, which is the crown jewel of the network. Navigation is basically easy, once you learn about the drop-down menu that allows you to switch between sites.
Although the PU/TBP has a discounted price of $19.98 for the first month, I recommend waiting for a holiday special, where the discounts are even more.
I joined for a year at $84/recurring, which is an exceptional value.
Because of:
-the massive amount of high quality videos and photosets.
-the massive catalog of young, fresh teens.
-easy network navigation.
-low membership price, especially during holiday discounts.
I'm giving the nubiles-porn network a score of 95.
See the reply section for a listing of the sites you get access to with a Nubiles-Porn membership.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-XXX Shades is part of the LetsDoeIt network. The site and network feature attractive European models in glamcore settings.
-As part of the LetsDoeIt network, you get access to over 40 different sites. The sites are mainly glamcore, and the models are not just attractive, but are presented with special care to appear like movie stars.
-You stream and/or download the videos in a variety of definitions: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Login and member pages are https. So the pages are secure from hacking.
-There is a hot link in each video that lets you skip the intro of the video (which is advertising for the site).
-You have a model index, a network site index, and a search function.
The model index has nice-sized thumbnails for each model.
-The videos at the site and network are exclusive. Except that you can find many of them on tube sites, so the idea of exclusive no longer means what it used to mean.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale. Standard for porn sites, unfortunately.
-Each video comes with a tiny photoset (6 to 15 photos per set). The models deserve a full photoset of at least 50 to 100 photos per set.
-No zip file for the photo sets.
-But since the photosets are so tiny, they are hardly worth collecting. Except as a visual reminder of what the videos are like.
-It's a small site (only 146 videos currently), so you can manually examine the entire site.
Bottom Line:
The videos are a mix of glamcore in a variety of niches: blowjobs, lesbian, boy-girl, etc.
The site title refers to the novels and films in the 50 Shades of Grey series.
So the site videos feature erotic romantic videos.
The production values are high, and the models are uniformly attractive to gorgeous.
The videos feature boy-girl, girl-girl, threesomes. The 50 Shades of Grey series featured a slightly harder BDSM flavor than the videos at XXX Shades site: the models (male and female) wear nice costumes or underwear, but there is very little BDSM in the videos: the action is more heartcore, where the male tries to pleasure the female with sex, instead of inflicting pain to arouse her. So there's lots of kissing, stroking, cunnilingus, blowjob, vaginal fucking.
There is one video titled "50 Shades Of Submission", which is based on the 50 Shades of Grey series, where the model, Arya Fae, plays a submissive who is mouth-fucked, spanked, choked, fucked strongly, which is the closest the site comes to the 50 Shades of Grey movies.
The video titled "Freaky Threeway" is a hoot.
It features a man, a cute girlfriend, and a sex doll.
The man bugs his girlfriend that he wants a threeway sex, but the girlfriend is jealous and doesn't want to share. So then she comes up with the idea of giving her boyfriend three-way sex, but with a blonde sex doll, instead of a live person.
The boyfriend seems overjoyed, and a bit slow, because he's banging away on the sex doll, saying how great it is, until he tries to put his dick in the sex doll's mouth, and the doll's mouth won't open.
That's when he realizes it's a sex doll, not a real person.
The girlfriend has a laugh, and explains that's the only way he will have a three-way with her involved.
The man slowly accepts the sex doll as a real partner, he fucks the live girl and the sex doll, and everyone ends happy.
The girlfriend is really cute, I'm not sure why the guy isn't satisfied just with her, but variety is the spice of life, and if it takes a sex doll to make everyone happy, go for it.
But, personally, I would focus more on the girlfriend, Andreina De Luxe, who is not just fine-looking, and sexy as hell, but smart and sassy as well.
Currently the site has 146 videos.
Videos have a runtime of about 20 to 35 minutes.
There is a matching photoset for each video, but the photosets are tiny: anywhere from 6 to 15 photos per video. The photos are either excellent screencaps (made from an excellent software program that converts a video to a photoset), or actual photos.
Since the models range from attractive to gorgeous, I don't know why the site (and network) posts such tiny photosets: the models deserve a full-featured photoset, because the models are lovely, and compare to the models at any fine photo site such as MetArt, MPL Studios, or Femjoy.
Since the network and site feature glamcore hardcore videos, this would be a chance for the network to satisfy a need for glamcore hardcore photosets. Sites like SexArt and The Life Erotic feature glamcore videos and photosets, but in my opinion, the models at the LetsDoeIt network are presented more attractively, and the hardcore action is hotter.
So I fail to understand why the network only offers such tiny photosets.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
My favorite site on the network is The White Boxxx, because the mix of models ranges from attractive to lovely.
The models at XXX Shades can be very attractive, but some of The White Boxxx videos are some of the best-looking glamcore videos on the internet.
And since you get full access to the LetsDoeIt network with a sub to any of the sites in the network, the real value of the network is in the 90s.
What I'm saying is: the exact value of a score for a site, or a network, is a matter of opinion.
What counts is whether a site or network's contents appeals to your tastes.
And the videos at the LetsDoeIt network are some of the best glamcore videos on the internet.
Impressive review.
Covers the details and site overview.
If there was a prize for best review of the month (which was discussed, but nothing came of it), I'd nominate this review for the reward.
Excellent review.
I think Adult Time is one of the best bargains in internet porn.
I got a free add-on to Adult Time when I joined 21 Sextury late last year.
At the time, the Adult Time network was still in beta testing.
They finished beta testing in January 2019.
So membership in Adult Time was being given out on a random basis, when joining sites that were included in the Adullt Time network.
Now, when you go to the public pages for 21 Sextury, they explicitly state that you get Adult Time membership when you join 21 Sextury.
The same holds true for the public pages for Devils Film: they state you get access to Adult Time when you join Devils Film.
Not all sites in the Adult Time network have public pages that state you also get the Adult Time access as a free add-on.
My guess is that they are slowly changing the public pages of the sites included in Adult Time to show that Adult Time access is included.
Which is a good thing, because Adult Time is the crown jewel, for any membership in a single site, or a network site, that is part of the Adult Time network.
"The models are some of the very best looking Euro pornstars ever to do a porn scene."
You should take a look at The White Boxxx, part of the LetsDoeIt network (used to be called PornDoePremium network).
At The White Boxxx, they take care to make most of the models look like movie stars: I mean, the models are fucking gorgeous, far more so than when they appear at other sites.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the LetsDoeIt network, which gives you access to over 40 sites.
-Site login and member pages are secure (https).
-Good to excellent production values for the videos.
-Videos are supposedly set in a French university. So the models speak French, with subtititles. Giving a foreign flavor to the videos. Maybe this is supposed to add an element of class to the videos (pun--class, because the setting is supposed to be a French university).
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in different definitions: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-There's a hot link in each video where you can "skip intro" to bypass the network advert that starts each video.
Cons:
-Small site. Only 36 videos.
-Archive site. Last update was around October 2018.
However, network access to LetsDoeIt gives you over 40 sites, with almost 3,000 premium hardcore videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Sometimes have to pass through a pop-up cross-sale for another site to enter the members area.
-No zip file for the photosets. But the photosets are small, maybe 10-15 photos per photoset. And since the girls are mainly not that attractive, there's no reason to collect these photosets anyway.
Bottom Line:
Site features horny young co-eds (late teens, early twenties) in steamy action.
So if you're into girls in school uniforms (going back to your college years), the site might be worth a cursory glance. Except the average model is not that attractive.
Site is one of the poorer offerings in the LetsDoeIt network:
-It's a small, archive site that stopped updating in 2018.
-Only has 36 videos.
-The quality of the models is below average for the network: many of the network sites feature attractive to very attractive models, but the models at this site are not.
My recommendation would be to delete the site from the LetsDoeIt network, since it drags down the value of the network. The network mainly features attractive to very attractive models, and this site is mainly a waste of network space.
So why give the site a score of 75?
Because you get network access with membership in any site in the network, and the network has some very nice sites, especially The White Boxxx site, where they do an outstanding job of presenting attractive models at their loveliest in hardcore glamcore porn.
Lena Rief, Melena Maria Rya, Liya Silver, Kaisa Nord, Emma Hix, Tiffany Tatum, Kenna James, Stacy Cruz, Cayla Lyons, Frida Stark are just some of the lovely models appearing at the LetsDoeIt network. Photographed with equisite care, these girls can appear to be poetry in motion.
My recommendation would be to delete Porno Acadamie from the LetsDoeIt network, since it drags down the quality of the network.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Let's Doe It network. Network used to be called PornDoePremium.
The network features attractive women from around the world, mainly from Europe.
-Although many of the models are attractive, at this network they are presented with extaordinary care to make them even more attractive, with some of them beyond gorgeous or beautiful. View some of the videos at The White Boxxx to see what I mean: these girls could be entrants in the Miss World or Miss Universe pageants. Sites like Blacked, Tushy and Vixen choose attractive models and make them look good, but if the same model appears at The White Box, she looks even better. If you enjoy gorgeous women in hardcore porn, The White Box is one of the premier sites for glamcore porn.
-Secure login and member pages (https).
-Easy login if you have cookies enabled. Don't have to re-enter username and password each time you enter the site.
-Download videos in your choice of 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Can stream videos in your choice of 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Can also stream videos online in different speeds of 1/4 through 2x normal speed.
(Not sure how useful the different streaming speeds are for viewing: but if you want to study the video in slow motion, or fast motion, you can.)
-There is a trailer for each video.
-There is a zip file for each photoset of each video.
CONS(START OF):
-PU does not have a discounted price. Regular price is $29.95/month.
But holiday specials throughout the year can drop the price to $14.95 for the first month.
-Pre-checked cross-sale. Standard for porn sites.
-Search engine is best used for finding the content of a model.
-Zip of the photoshoot downloads with default name of photoshooting_number.zip. So you have to re-name each zip file to know who the model is, date of posting, title of set.
-Bitches Abroad is a small site (100 videos + photosets). So it's best to manually search through the thumbnails of the videos.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
You can explore further by playing the trailers of the videos that might be of interest.
-The photosets are tiny. Each one is from 10 to 15 photos. I have no idea why the photosets are so tiny, because these are very attractive models, and the quality of each photo is good. I can't tell if the photos are excellent screencaps or actual photos; if screencaps, they are using excellent software to make screencaps from the video. The models are generally attractive to really lovely, and they deserve a normal-sized photoset for collecting.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is young women who are travelling in foreign countries. Since they are young and sexy, there are also looking to enjoy themselves with a handsome stud they encounter. Actually, the stud doesn't have to be that handsome, because these women are in the mood for sex, and if the guy can get it up, the girls are willing. So not a lot of romance here, but the girls are attractive, and the guys are more than happy to fill their sexual desires.
There is a slight element of freshness, because these are European models, and although the plot or story might be slight, the models can be attractive to lovely.
-The White Boxxx is my favorite site in the network, but you have access to about 43 different sites, most of which have mainly European models.
Then entire network has about 2,833 HD videos, which is far more than you can watch in a single month.
The sites cover the normal niches of boy-girl, boy-2 girls, 2 girls, more than 2 girls, whatever.
The network is basically glamcore, and highlight how attractive these models are.
Bitches Abroad currently has 100 videos.
Bitches Abroad is a site with many attractive models. The videos are professionally photographed, with good lighting, camera-work, sound control, etc. The photosets are disappointing, because they are tiny (10 to 15 photos per photoset).
So Bitches Abroad is an OK site, but access to the entire Let'sDoeIt network raises the score to 88.
Except that The White Box is one of the premier glamcore sites on the internet, because of how it presents the models at their best: the models at The White Box could be contestants in any beauty contest, they are that fine-looking.
@Selena,
My login problem was fixed.
Thanks for the help.
I appreciate your fast response, and think that MetArt customer service is one of the best services available.
Very nice review.
I personally think Pure Taboo is the best site in the Adult Time network, because I really enjoy the videos, which can be dark in tone and lighting (maybe a little too dark in lighting).
REVIEW(CONTINUES):
Analyzing the Chloe Cherry-James Deen video: James Deen gives his usual performance of treating the model rough: he forces her to gag on his cock deep in her throat, smear her dripping saliva over her face, shove his fingers into her mouth to dominate and show her who's the boss, choking her, grabbing her hair and pulling, etc.
Chloe is a cute girl, and she seems to go along willingly with her abuse.
So the video features Deen's style of dominance and sadism, while the model submits to his rough treatment.
I would categorize Deen as a slightly softer version of Pierre Woodman, who seems to enjoy forcing women beyond their normal limits to submit to his rough treatment.
In some videos, I've seen Woodman forcing the model to drink his piss, which, along with his slaps, forcible anal intercourse which often seems like rape, and other rough treatment, just adds to Woodman's enjoyment. But models put up with it, and even smile and kiss Woodman at the end of most of his videos.
So I have some trouble watching James Deen or Pierre Woodman perform in a video.
There are too many stories about James Deen abusing porn performers.
And Pierre Woodman built his reputation forcing women to have rough sex. Sometimes against their will, which might or might not be scripted.
But both performers seem to get off treating the women they work with as pieces of meat to be degraded and/or treated roughly, in a domineering fashion.
Their attitude seems to be: I'm big, tough, and will fuck these women harshly, and the women will enjoy it and worship me.
I remember one video where the woman tells Woodman she doesn't want to be filmed, so he tells her he is stopping the video, and he shuts off a light, but continues to film her anyway.
So, Woodman can tell you one thing, and do the opposite. Which is common in real life.
But it drains my enjoyment of any scene with James Deen or Pierre Woodman because I believe they enjoy degrading women: on the other hand, I do enjoy sites like Pure Taboo, where there is a twisted pleasure in abusing women, but that seems more scripted, and I believe the sex is more consensual, so that's just me, where I don't believe the models are being treated harshly in real life.
Fantasy BSDM is fine, but when it moves into real life, the boundaries blur, and I have a problem watching or enjoying it.
The New Sensations network does not have a lot of BDSM videos, but I guess they add a few to give some variety to the storylines.
My preference is more in the heartcore line, where the performers are trying to please each other, hopefully with some affection or tenderness and lots of kissing.
At the same time, the Pure Taboo site at Adult Time is one of my favorite sites in the network, because of the element of tension in some of the videos, as well as the offbeat, twisted stories and the cinematic-style of the videos which is first class.
Giving the site a score or 85. Good site, but network access raises the score.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the network sites.
-The New Sensations network is having a holiday sale: $60/year, which is a great price for a quality network.
-The network has over 20 sites, covering a wide variety of niches.
-This is a quality network. The sites are well laid out, easy to navigate, easy to switch between sites. The content quality is good to excellent.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Network has 7,000+ videos.
-Network has 2,000+ porn stars, many of them attractive to beautiful.
-Network features videos with
-Network has multiple weekly updates.
-Most of the videos have streaming options at 720p or 1080p at different bit rates.
-Most of the videos have download options at 720p or 1080p at different bit rates.
-Login and member pages are https.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Search function could be better. If you are just looking for a model, the search is fine. But if you want specific types of porn, the search is poor.
-The videos adds plot to make the meaningful, but the porn can be too vanilla for some tastes.
Bottom Line:
Site theme is teens just fresh out of high school. So the models are supposed to be around 18 or 19, though they are often in their 20s.
The female models are mainly cute or attractive.
The behind the scenes videos at the site can provide a glimpse into the personality of the models. Although the models are putting on their showbiz/porn actor face, they can come across as real people instead of plastic porn actors.
So there's a freshness to their appearance, versus the often-times stupid scripted parts they play in most porn scenes.
Chloe Cherry, a popular porn model has appeared at many porn sites, under different names
: Chloe, Chloecherry, Chloe Cherry, Chloe Couture, Robin.
She appears at the New Sensations network under the name of Chloe Cherry.
The video, "Chloe Sends An Urgent Text To Big Brother", posted 03/21/2018, features Chloe and James Deen. James Deen plays her step brother, who, like all loving brothers throughout the world, takes care of his cute sister by letting her give him a blow job and
You can choose to stream in 720p or 1080p, with bit rates ranging from 1500 kbps to 12000 kbps.
The choice I make is based on my personal situation:
Since I'm watching on an older PC laptop, the Lenovo Thinkpad E420:
14" monitor
Streaming at higher definition than 720p does not improve the clarity of the visuals.
Streaming at higher bit rates does not improve the clarity of the visuals.
Although I have a 200 Mbps connection with Specrum, I watch on a WiFi connection, so my speeds average about 13 to 20 Mbps.
This means I select the lowest definition and lowest bitrate available when streaming, and also for downloading. The low streaming choices are to prevent the video from stuttering during play.
On a downloaded file, I could chose a higher definition, and a higher bitrate, which should not affect stuttering playback, but higher definition and higher bitrate would increase file size significantly, and my hard drive space is limited, and I don't want to keep buying newer hard drives to store these files.
Also, watching the files on my older laptop, does not increase the clarity of the visuals or improve the sound, so larger files with increased definition and bitrate are wasted on my computer setup.
The same holds true when selecting file size for photosets: I can't tell the difference, visually, from a low, medium or high definition photoset at MetArt or other fine photo sites, on my older laptop computer, so saving a high definition photoset of a favorite models is basically wasted space on my hard drive.
Even when I switch to a desktop computer with a 27" monitor, I still can't tell a visual difference between a high definition photoset and a low definition photoset from MetArt.
I assume that is because of the program I am using to display each photo.
If I blew up the photo (expanded the view), then the differences between low and high definition would be noticeable. But I almost never view or study each photo in such detail: I either look at a photo by itself, on in a slide show, where the definition (low, medium, high) does not seem to matter on a monitor that is 27" or smaller.
I assume the lack of difference is partly due to my PC equipment, and partly due to poor eyesight on my part: You need very large monitors and good eyesight to appreciate the value of higher definition displays, and faster bitrate videos.
And high (or at least medium-) grade speakers on the audio side.
I also believe that a lot of the supposed value in higher grade equipment is salesmanship.
An inexpensive laptop or desktop can deliver a good experience in watching porn (videos and photosets).
But if you have the money, then, it can be worthwhile to spend some of that extra cash to invest in higher grade equipment, to enjoy a better experience watching the videos and photosets.
It just depends on your personal situation.
Actually, I just read an article on the internet that stated speed requirements for different tasks:
-1 Mbps if you use the internet for general web browsing, social media connection, and streaming compressed music such as MP3 audio and emailing.
-2 Mbps is good for streaming SD quality video and lossless music,
-3 Mbps is good for standard quality videos
-5 Mbps is good for streaming high-definition videos.
-10 Mbps internet connection is good for full HD video and audio streaming
If those statements are true, when I get a WiFi connection that is 10 to 20 Mbps, that should be plenty fast for streaming videos.
However, my Wifi connection can sometimes drop to less than 1 Mbps, even though my Spectrum connection is supposed to be rated at 200 Mbps (that would be the hardwired connection, with everything operating at peak efficiency).
And there are many other factors involved.
For example, I often have to restart my PC laptop, because the browser pages fail to load new pages. I get the message: Unable to connect.
I'm currently a member of 5 different sites in the MetArt network.
There's supposed to be a way of switching between sites with a drop-down menu.
Currently, if I try to switch to a different site, instead of switching, I get a webpage stating:
Update Your Account Details
Three easy steps to simplify your login process.
In the past, when I've updated my login details (by creating a new username and password), I've usually been locked out of the network, until I email customer service and ask for a new username and password.
Which takes a couple of days, sometimes.
So, currently, I can't use the simple drop-down menu to switch sites.
Irritating.
To make things easier, they mess up my account access.
As I get older, I wish they didn't force these changes on me, which make using the sites more difficult.
Also, not only can't I use the dropdown menu to switch sites, but I can't enter the sites directly (using username and password), because I get the same run-around of "Update Your Account Details".
Also, I should add that the update process is faulty:
When I click on the "continue" hot link, nothing happens: I do not advance to the next step in the update process.
So I am locked out of the MetArt sites. MetArt, you used to be a first-class network.
But there are problems with your network, off and on.
Some of them are created by you.
Excellent warning.
I've never heard of Aeron Pay, but if I see it listed anywhere, I hope to remember your warning and stay away.
PU and TBP should look into this, and issue a warning that the PU/TBP sites are not doing business with any of the sites using Aeron Pay.
And the PU and TBP sites need to change their practice of just delisting a company without giving a warning.
They can make it simple, such as "PU and TBP no longer do business with these sites", as a hint/reminder that the sites are doing something wrong.
Because if PU and TBP just delist a site, without any warning or explanation, some other members might fall into the trap.
Note: if you don't see the prices I listed, use a Google search for discounted membership to Evil Angel.
There are discounts available: it just depends on how you find them, and what prices are shown.
I would guess that on holiday specials, the discounted price might go as low as $63/year. But that would take some searching to find.
If you really enjoy the site and plan on staying longer, a 1-year membership for $89.45 would be a cheaper way to go.
Or you can wait for a holiday (all kinds of holidays throughout the year) and find a special discounted membership for a month or a year.
I used the PU link to the Evil Angel site today, hit the join page, and see:
$9.95 for 1 month, single payment, for streaming and downloading.
$67.50 for 3 months, single payment, for streaming and downloading.
$89.45 for 12 months, single payment, for streaming and downloading.
There might be holiday specials that would be even lower, but you have to search them out, and it's hit or miss if you find one.
But $89.45 for 1 year would save you money on your current plan, I'm thinking.
I noticed you won second place in the weekly raffle.
You should get an emailed coupon that is $50 you can spend at Amazon.
If you don't get the coupon by Friday or Saturday, post a short note at the Porn Users Forum ยป Raffle Winners thread that you didn't get your coupon, and Freddie (PU staff member) should send it to your current email address.
Computers can be mysterious beasts.
For me, anyway.
Can you use a different computer with the same internet connection, to see if the erratic download speeds are repeated?
If you get better results from a different computer, using the same internet connection, that would seem to point to some software/hardware blockage in the computer you normally use.
Excellent review, as usual.
I agree that Adult Time is one of the best deals for online porn, because of the massive amount of content, most of which is excellent quality, and the low membership price, especially during holiday discounts.
I also like all the specific details you gave on the Fantasy Massage network.
In my mind, I haven't decided how to view what used to be the older networks like Fantasy Massage or the Devils Film network: since they, and other fine networks, are now included in the Adult Time network, should these older networks be considered networks any longer, or just sites (or channels) in the Adult Time network?
For marketing purposes, or better yet, from membership purposes, you can join Fantasy Massage or Devils Film directly, or you can join the Adult Time network directly, and whichever way you join, you still get the same access to the Adult Time network.
But I also think, from the PU viewpoint, these old sites/networks still exist, even if the membership you join is basically through the Adult Time network, since those old network have been folded into the Adult Time network.
OK.
I'm rambling.
Good review.
Gives a clear view of the Fantasy Massage network.
And explains that Adult Time can be considered a bonus in the Fantasy Massage network.
Or better still, that Adult Time is the main value, and that Fantasy Massage is a small part of that value.
I'm sorry the site was disappointing for you, but glad you're able to explore new sites that might be worthwhile joins.
So you took one for the home team, which is always a good thing
(always better when it's someone else who spends their money on a disappointing site, most people agree).
Sites like Blacked, Tushy and Vixen are valuable when they have enough content to be worth joining, because of the excellent visuals, lovely models.
But the thrill seems to wear off after a while.
Maybe it's part of human nature to want fresh content, and the Mad Cheddar sites just seem to lose their appeal after a short while.
Or maybe I'm just getting older, and most porn is not as astounding or potent as it used to be.
Adult Time impresses me because of the massive amount of content (over 50,000 videos, in a wide variety of niches), and the quality at many of the sites is excellent.
That, combined with a low price (I love holiday discounts) makes a winning combination.
But the best site in the network, for me, is the Pure Taboo site, which I enjoy because some of the videos are like short porn movies from the 1970s, with a dirty plot and some lovely models.
I've done extensive background checks on suspicious PU members.
rearadmiral and Shen (the supervillain better known as brainiac, the green-skinned creature with computer cables coming out of his head, who sold his soul to the Darkside for help in writing PU reviews), and MrBison, the newest entry at PU for writing suspiciously outstanding reviews, are all characters I've sent files on to the FBI (proud investigators of Brett Kavanaugh, Trump's drinking buddy on the US Supreme Court.
There's a reason why the PU site and community has been hit with demonized gremlins.
And the PU staff is aware of this.
My unbiased recommendation for the Memorial holiday sale is Adult Time, which I've seen advertised for $7.50/month, although there might be even better prices around.H
Has the PU staff done any thinking on the award for best review of the month yet?
In past reviews, I was thoroughly impressed with Shen and MrBison, both relative newbies at PU who have submitted outstanding site reviews.
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
-The massive improvement in the site navigation, quality of the content (money spent on nice-looking sets, photograph and video equipment to film the content in excellent lighting and professional technical standards).
-The attitude of the models: they are there to explore their sexuality: so the sex is hardcore, but without cruelty: teenage girls getting their rocks off, by themselves (masturbation), with one or more other girls (lesbian), one girl and one or more guys, whatever. These girls are up for anything, and I wish I had a few of them in my home.
I would die happy, because I couldn't possibly keep up with these sex-crazed teens.
Or maybe I should admit that these attractive teens have a healthy appetite for sex that far exceeds my body's capacity.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is not a pro. But joining directly through the Ex GF Box site charges $29.95 for the first month.
If you join through the Teen Mega World site, you are charged $14.95 for the first month, with a PU discount. And access to the Ex GF Box site is included.
-This is not a pro. But it's very important: If you join through any of the member sites of Teen Mega World, your search results might be limited to the site you joined through.
Even when you switch to another site in the network that you have access to, your search results migt still limited to the site you joined through.
The search engine when you join through one of the member sites seems to give random results: sometimes it will search for a model's content only at the site you joined through; other times, it will search for a model's content at the entire network.
The best solution to the limited search is to join through the Teen Mega World site directly.
PROS(CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION):
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
The search, when you join through the main Teen Mega World site, covers the entire network. Which makes the search far easier, and you can also access the entire network contents more easily: if you join through one of the member sites, it can be a nightmare trying to search the network for a model's content.
-Starting on the pros:
-Ex GF Box is part of the Teen Mega World network.
The Teen Mega World network is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
Membership in any one of the Teen Mega World sites gives you access to all the sites in the network (but the search engine when you join through one of the member sites might only return content from the site you joined through. So, join through the Teen Mega World site directly, and not through one of the member sites.)
Benefits of the TMW network:
-Daily updates.
-High res images.
-Some sites have video resolutions from 360p through 2160p.
-Over 30 sites covering different teen niches.
-Over 5,000 videos.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Over 2,000 models. Most of them attractive to very attractive.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
CONS(START OF):
-The Ex GF Box is probably the poorest site in the Teen Mega World network.
-If you join through the Ex GF Box site directly, you are charged a higher price ($29.95/ month recurring) than if you join through the Teen Mega World site ($14.95/month recurring). Both joins give you access to the entire Teen Mega World network content. So save money and join through the Teen Mega World site.
-Also, as I already mentioned, joining through the Teen Mega World site directly, means your search engine covers the entire network. If you join through one of the Teen Mega World network sites, your search is might be limited to the site you joined through: which makes search for a model's content at the network a nightmare.
-The Ex GF Box is an archive site. Last update to the site was in 2012.
-Most member sites offer a choice in streaming or downloading definitions ranging from about 360p through 2160p. But a few sites, including the Ex GF Box site, only offer a very limited or no choice of streaming or downloading choices.
The Ex GF Box site offers the videos at 720p definition, for downloading. There is no streaming option
-There are broken links for accessing many of the photosets for some videos (or else, there seems to be a photoset for many videos, but there is no link for downloading a zip file of the supposed photoset (I don't know if a photoset actually exists, and they forg to put a hot link for downloading, or they were going to post a photoset with a hot link, and never got around to posting the photoset and hot link on the server.)
-The most recent videos were posted back in 2012, so the quality of the videos and photosets are poor, compared to the improved quality of the videos and photosets posted in the last few years.
-The videos and photosets from 2012 and earlier feature cheap sets, cheap technical quality (poor lighting, lower-definition videos and photos).
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The Ex GF Box site is a member site in the Teen Mega World network (TMW).
It's one of the poorest sites in the network.
There are many reasons it's a poor site:
-It's an archive site. The last update was in 2012.
-The quality of the videos and photosets is poor. The content was produced back when the network was producing cheap, teen videos and photosets. The costumes are cheap street clothes. The sets are low-rent apartment rooms, with cheap furniture. The videos and photos are poor quality: almost no money was spent trying to make the models look attractive, or trying to use a plot to make the sex more interesting: this is just straight hard-core fuck-and-suck.
Little effort was put into making the site contents better quality, or to upgrade the site navigation.
Most videos have a single definition option for downloading (7200).
Most videos can not be streamed online (You need to download the file and watch off-line).
Many videos have no accompanying photoset.
When you do find an accompanying photoset to a video, there is no zip file, and you have to manually download the individual photos. Little effort is made to present the models attractively, even if the models are cute. Since the photos are poor quality and the costumes are cheap street clothes, the photosets are not worth collecting.
Note: the TMW network, and the member sites, have an unusual structure:
There is an https version of the member sites.
And the is a non-secure version of the member sites (the login and member pages are not https).
This is the only network I've seen with both a secure and non-secure network.
It makes no sense to me.
They should delete the non-secure network and member pages, and only offer the secure network.
I'm giving the site a score of 70.
And that is generous.
Navigation problems, poor quality content, lack of zip files, lack of streaming choices, lack of photosets, etc.
The main positive is that membership in any one of the member sites of TMW gives you accesss to the entire TMW network: there are no premium sites that they charge you extra for.
The TMW network is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
Along with the Diesel Access network (they dropped the Diesel Access network name, and now, apparently, have no official name for the three sites that used to be the Diesel Access network: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), even though under the current marketing system if you join any one of the 3 sites you get immediate access to all 3 sites.
So I'm giving Ex GF Box a score of 70.
But on a practical basis, since membership in any one of the TMW sites gives you access to the entire network, I think the entire network deserves a score in the 90s.
That is due to:
-The catalog of over 2,000 teen models, most of them attractive to very attractive.
-The wide range of niches covered.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW:
The Best Porn reviewers sometimes get facts wrong.
Or miss things.
I depend on the PU reviews much more.
PU reviews can be excellent, or not so good.
I agree that a simple alphabetical search of models is usually the best approach.
But with Mega-sites like Femjoy, that takes a lot of time and effort.
I'm getting old, and no longer have the patience to search mega-site model listings.
There is a work-around to your problem.
Go to the URL
http://old.femjoy.com/index/models#/?layout=list&category=top-voted&shaved=1
This is one of the public pages of Femjoy (not the member's area).
This page loads a model index with apparently the full femjoy model listing in alphabetical order.
Some models are missing a thumbnail to show you what the model looks like.
You can search by the model's name, under her letter
Click on a model's name, it brings up a nice-sized thumbnail of the model.
Most of the models have thumbnails for at least some of their sets.
So then you have to log in to the site, to search for her sets (photo + video), that you want to access.
Hope this helps.
Happy clicking. Because you will need patience and clicks to scroll through the pages.
LOL.
AT&T screwed me on charges to my account.
Before and during the signup process with AT&T, the ATT customer rep told me that AT&T would waive the $99 installation fee.
That same salesperson also told me that AT&T no longer has contracts (in response to customer desires).
However, when I cancelled my AT&T accounts, I found that I could not depend on what the AT&T rep told me when I signed up.
AT&T told me I would have to pay a penalty of $125 for early cancellation.
I told them I was told by the AT&T salesperson that AT&T no longer had contracts.
I spoke to several AT&T reps, and they all told me I would have to pay the $125 penalty, and that either I was confused, or did not properly understand the salesperson when I signed. (AT&T does not have a contract for cell phone service, but does have a contract for the internet service.)
Also, I was charged $99 for installation of internet service, even though the salesperson I signed up with told me the fee would be waived.
One AT&T rep later told me the salesperson made a mistake about the $99 installation fee waiver.
A different AT&T rep did not say the initial rep did not make a mistake, but said they were definitely charging me for the $99 install fee.
Sorry for the details on how I got screwed by AT&T.
But I'm pointing out that you can't depend on what customer service says, or what a salesperson says, even from a company as big as AT&T.
At the AT&T signup, I asked for copies of what I agreed to, the sales person talked to a manager, and she said AT&T does not give out copies of what I signed for.
I was signing on an electronic device, that accepted my signature, but did not give me a copy of what I signed for.
And the salesperson said the office would keep a record of what I signed for, and that it would show the $99 install fee would be waived.
Except when I cancelled my AT&T contract, the salesperson I spoke with said the copies of what I signed for were no longer at the office I signed at.
So it was my word of what I was told, versus AT&T policy, and AT&T can't take my word over AT&T policy.
So I now think AT&T has the morals of a used car salesman.
End of rant.
But useful in knowing that you can't take the verbal word of a sales clerk or a sales person.
It has to be in writing.
And you need to get a copy.
And if you don't get a copy, you are signing at your own risk.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
