Ferro Network (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Attractive models both young and not so young.
Huge amount of exclusive content across a large number of sub-sites.
Some of the content is quite unique, for example, the girls fuck guys strapon site.
Some very hot content with frequent updates to overall network.
Good variety of niches (lovers of stockings & pantyhose are well-served) but generally the niches are pantyhose/nylons, shemale, strap-on, matures, old men, lesbian. anal and gay.
Video content can be streamed or downloaded.
Downloaded video content is 1080p HD, 720p or 480p with reasonable file sizes.
Straightforward downloading of videos which works with download managers.
Photo sets can be browsed or downloaded.
Downloaded photos are 1500 x 1000 pixel photos downloadable as ZIP files.
Good download speeds.
Straightforward site design and navigation - can navigate and search by model and site.
Scenes can be rated 1 to 5 stars.
Uses CCBill so trustworthy and easy to manage your account. |
| Cons: |
Member sign-in is via random character username and password.
Extremely expensive unless you get a discounted membership offer.
Although updates are frequent, some of the latest updates are 640x480 videos so clearly were not shot recently, though couldn't tell if content is being recycled.
Basic streaming & performance not great when navigating through the clip using the slider (just make sure you're not downloading content from the site whilst streaming).
Suspect quite of few of the cumshots are fake.
Video files are all WMV rather than MP4 which suggests old content.
Some of the scene descriptions and model names don't match the actual scene. Some scenes have no description at all.
The download filename doesn't include any model names, so you have to add that yourself if desired when downloading.
No favourites facility for scenes nor models.
Production quality is variable across the network, some great camera work but some scenes not so great. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network is something I had my eye on for a long time and was always curious from the clips I'd seem on tube sites, but the very high cost put me off until I searched for a discount and found a link for $19.95/month membership!
Pretty sure that all the performers are Russian - only three of them I've seen in other sites outside Ferro network.
A lot of the content you won't see on other general porn sites - the sheer range of content on offer on Ferro is something I've not seen anywhere else.
The content covers every combination within a genre, for example, the nylons and pantyhose sub-sites cover guys fucking girls in stockings, guys fucking girls in pantyhose, guys anal-fucking girls in pantyhose, guys wearing pantyhose fucking girls in pantyhose, group sex fucking girl in pantyhose, lesbian pantyhose sex, shemales in pantyhose fucking guys and girls, guys fucking girls both wearing pantyhose masks - you get the picture.
There's a lot of condom use in scenes but I'd say that most of the content is bareback.
Where condoms are used the cumshot is sometimes into the condom, which is sometimes left inside the pussy or ass, sometimes taken off and the cum poured onto the girl or into the girl's mouth or face, otherwise the condom is pulled off and he cums in her face, mouth or on her ass or body.
Quite a lot of the bareback scenes end with a creampie in the pussy or ass, and in some scenes, the girl gets dressed with the cum dripping into her undies and pantyhose.
Some scenes end with the guy cumming inside the girl's pantyhose/stockings, after which she sometimes gets dressed wearing a long skirt to hide the cum stains, and leaves.
The production quality isn't as polished as some other well-known sites, but most of the action is hot and the girls (young and old) are sexy and slutty in a demure kinda way which adds to the appeal.
Speaking of production quality, some of the scenes are very amateurish, you can see both the guy and girl looking to the director as to what comes next, but these sorts of scene are few.
Generally the unpolished production quality lends itself well to the hotness of the scenes, there are some great camera angles but in some scenes the camera hardly moves position so you don't see much close-up.
Some scenes end without a cumshot, just the guy and girl making orgasm noises then the scene ends, or sometimes the scene will cut to a wad of cum in the girl's pussy or ass, which suggests the cum has been faked.
As mentioned in the cons, the scene description doesn't always match the reality, e.g. a blowjob-only scene described as the guy "slamming his hard cock into her tight pussy" or the guy "shoots his load inside her" yet actually cums on her back.
Scenes with condom often involve it being left inside the pussy or removed and dumped on the floor or table for the lady to do something with. Also in some scenes the guy or girl gets dressed/walks off when done, leaving the other. All a bit odd but very Russian I guess.
Photosets are separate and not of the video scene.
Some of the scene descriptions are hilarious: "he couldn't stop slamming that sweet pussy until his testicles vibrated and ejected a fat juicy load into her ravaged nylon pussy" when in fact the scene ends with him cumming on her ass.
As mentioned, there's a wide range of content including lesbian, shemale and gay, with shemales fucking shemales, shemales fucking girls and shemales fucking guys. There's also strapon sex with girls fucking girls and also fucking guys, mature sex with young guys fucking older ladies, old guys fucking young ladies, older lady on young lady lesbian action, I could go on but I'm limited by available space!
There does seem to be an unnecessarily large number of sites in this network, for example the mature genre is served by, amongst others, the sites BOYSLOVEMATURES, STUNNINGMATURES, ACTIONMATURES and GUYSFORMATURES but I'm hard pressed to say how each site is different.
You may need a membership of a number of months for the sheer amount of content, but if you must absolutely have HD content, then there's not much of that here, the majority of the content being 640x480p.
One thing I noticed was a scene I found on a tube site with the Ferro site name on the watermark couldn't be found anywhere on Ferro network - don't know if there are other such "orphan" scenes?
For the full membership fee of around $85, it'd be hard for me to highly recommend Ferro network, but if all of the range of content on offer appeals to you (I didn't bother with the gay content and only a few shemale scenes interested me), then it's just about reasonable value and after a month the price drops with each successive month.
However, for the discounted membership fee that I got, I highly recommend this site - it's not the most slick or polished but the range of content and the hotness of much of the content make it a recommendation from me.
I'm happy to pass on the discount link I used if you email me via PU. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
