Fresh Outta High School (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the New Sensations network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the network sites.
-The New Sensations network is having a holiday sale: $60/year, which is a great price for a quality network.
-The network has over 20 sites, covering a wide variety of niches.
-This is a quality network. The sites are well laid out, easy to navigate, easy to switch between sites. The content quality is good to excellent.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Network has 7,000+ videos.
-Network has 2,000+ porn stars, many of them attractive to beautiful.
-Network features videos with
-Network has multiple weekly updates.
-Most of the videos have streaming options at 720p or 1080p at different bit rates.
-Most of the videos have download options at 720p or 1080p at different bit rates.
-Login and member pages are https. |
| Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Search function could be better. If you are just looking for a model, the search is fine. But if you want specific types of porn, the search is poor.
-The videos adds plot to make the meaningful, but the porn can be too vanilla for some tastes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site theme is teens just fresh out of high school. So the models are supposed to be around 18 or 19, though they are often in their 20s.
The female models are mainly cute or attractive.
The behind the scenes videos at the site can provide a glimpse into the personality of the models. Although the models are putting on their showbiz/porn actor face, they can come across as real people instead of plastic porn actors.
So there's a freshness to their appearance, versus the often-times stupid scripted parts they play in most porn scenes.
Chloe Cherry, a popular porn model has appeared at many porn sites, under different names
: Chloe, Chloecherry, Chloe Cherry, Chloe Couture, Robin.
She appears at the New Sensations network under the name of Chloe Cherry.
The video, "Chloe Sends An Urgent Text To Big Brother", posted 03/21/2018, features Chloe and James Deen.
James Deen plays her step brother, who, like all loving brothers throughout the world, takes care of his cute sister by letting her give him a blow job and
You can choose to stream in 720p or 1080p, with bit rates ranging from 1500 kbps to 12000 kbps.
The choice I make is based on my personal situation:
Since I'm watching on an older PC laptop, the Lenovo Thinkpad E420:
14" monitor
Streaming at higher definition than 720p does not improve the clarity of the visuals.
Streaming at higher bit rates does not improve the clarity of the visuals.
Although I have a 200 Mbps connection with Specrum, I watch on a WiFi connection, so my speeds average about 13 to 20 Mbps.
This means I select the lowest definition and lowest bitrate available when streaming, and also for downloading. The low streaming choices are to prevent the video from stuttering during play.
On a downloaded file, I could chose a higher definition, and a higher bitrate, which should not affect stuttering playback, but higher definition and higher bitrate would increase file size significantly, and my hard drive space is limited, and I don't want to keep buying newer hard drives to store these files.
Also, watching the files on my older laptop, does not increase the clarity of the visuals or improve the sound, so larger files with increased definition and bitrate are wasted on my computer setup.
The same holds true when selecting file size for photosets: I can't tell the difference, visually, from a low, medium or high definition photoset at MetArt or other fine photo sites, on my older laptop computer, so saving a high definition photoset of a favorite models is basically wasted space on my hard drive.
Even when I switch to a desktop computer with a 27" monitor, I still can't tell a visual difference between a high definition photoset and a low definition photoset from MetArt.
I assume that is because of the program I am using to display each photo.
If I blew up the photo (expanded the view), then the differences between low and high definition would be noticeable. But I almost never view or study each photo in such detail: I either look at a photo by itself, on in a slide show, where the definition (low, medium, high) does not seem to matter on a monitor that is 27" or smaller.
I assume the lack of difference is partly due to my PC equipment, and partly due to poor eyesight on my part: You need very large monitors and good eyesight to appreciate the value of higher definition displays, and faster bitrate videos.
And high (or at least medium-) grade speakers on the audio side.
I also believe that a lot of the supposed value in higher grade equipment is salesmanship.
An inexpensive laptop or desktop can deliver a good experience in watching porn (videos and photosets).
But if you have the money, then, it can be worthwhile to spend some of that extra cash to invest in higher grade equipment, to enjoy a better experience watching the videos and photosets.
It just depends on your personal situation.
Actually, I just read an article on the internet that stated speed requirements for different tasks:
-1 Mbps if you use the internet for general web browsing, social media connection, and streaming compressed music such as MP3 audio and emailing.
-2 Mbps is good for streaming SD quality video and lossless music,
-3 Mbps is good for standard quality videos
-5 Mbps is good for streaming high-definition videos.
-10 Mbps internet connection is good for full HD video and audio streaming
If those statements are true, when I get a WiFi connection that is 10 to 20 Mbps, that should be plenty fast for streaming videos.
However, my Wifi connection can sometimes drop to less than 1 Mbps, even though my Spectrum connection is supposed to be rated at 200 Mbps (that would be the hardwired connection, with everything operating at peak efficiency).
And there are many other factors involved.
For example, I often have to restart my PC laptop, because the browser pages fail to load new pages. I get the message: Unable to connect.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
