|
|||||
|
Porn Users Forum » Is Pot Actually Legal or Do Porn-stars Just Think So? |
1-20 of 20 Posts | Page 1 |
Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
12-18-10 06:51am - 5080 days | Original Post - #1 | |
PinkPanther (0)
Active User Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
Is Pot Actually Legal or Do Porn-stars Just Think So? There have been porn babes that have been pretty out-front about their affection for pot - Jenna Haze's daily mentions of "420 time" and "meeting with Miss Mary", for instance. Then there are the web cam babes that think nothing of taking hits from a bong during their shows. I just stumbled across Gigi Rivera's site and her home page has a new level of brazen-ness: http://tour.gigiriveraxxx.com/ Check out the pic in the lower right - and the promo for her site: http://www.yourdailygirls.com/galleries/gigi_rivera_2/ saying: "Gigi Rivera is a naughty latina teen who loves to fuck and smoke weed." So have I missed something and pot is actually legal or do porn babes just think it is? Maybe it's a Cali thing. I've been in clubs in Cali where the DJ's were smoking pot at the DJ station and patrons were going into the beer-supply area to smoke - in a non-smoking club - and the only concern of the staff was that they don't get in the way of their beer runs. Edited by Staff on Dec 18, 2010, 12:16pm (Khan: Removed affiliate code from link provided) | |
|
12-18-10 06:56am - 5080 days | #2 | |
jberryl69 (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,000 Registered: Nov 27, '10 Location: neverland |
Hope they don't bogart the joints. If it ain't grits, it must be a Yankee. If you're going to lay her head over the pool table and fuck her throat, get your fucking hand off her throat! | |
|
12-18-10 07:03am - 5080 days | #3 | |
PinkPanther (0)
Active User Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
Oh, and Khan, I noticed that her site is not yet listed by TheBestPorn.com - good time to list it, since her first ALS Scan scenes just got posted this week, which might inspire more interest in her - she's an awesome little cutie! | |
|
12-18-10 11:28am - 5080 days | #4 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
Based on what Lexi belle as written then I'd say that she needs it almost daily. Now Gigi has taken it to an all new level or maybe the person who pitched it to her said that might make her site edgier. In any case I wouldn't bother with this site because it's not worth joining for any amount. as far as I can tell from the one page previw. This is your typical pornstar site with little to no pornstar involvement of any kind and no updates. The stuff you see on the site have been there for a month. She's super cute and reminds me of Little Lupe. I hope that she does more porn but forgets the porn site idea. I know that she has quite a few videos on the porn pros network. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
12-18-10 04:12pm - 5080 days | #5 | |
PinkPanther (0)
Active User Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
5 scenes - 3 under her name and 2 with her best porn friend, Teagan Summers, one of the cutest new blondes in porn | |
|
12-18-10 05:01pm - 5080 days | #6 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Hey, I thought all you Californians knew about legal pot, or are you just losing your short term memory? From everything I've heard and read in the news, yes, it's all but legal, watered down to "medicinal" status, which means you buy it from a "clinic" or "dispensary"--fancy talk for marijuana store, sort of like "coffee shop" in Amsterdam--instead of some guy on the street. Seriously, I doubt most of these prescriptioners have any medical reason beyond "it silences the voices in my head that keep asking me to buy more pot." Even Time magazine did a cover story on pot in America, so you know it's getting big if it can show up on their radar. So, apparently you find a doctor, he writes a prescription, you fill it out in one of the many clinics (supposedly in the hundreds in California), and you buy your medicine. I doubt any insurance company covers this, but who knows what the future holds! I think your Gov. recently legalized possession (without a prescription) up to an ounce as punishable only as a misdemeanor--so the law sounds like it's growing up, if only at a snail's pace. I don't smoke or partake in it myself, but I also don't think it should be illegal. Honestly I find the whole medicinal argument approach bullshit too. Why can't we just have things for recreation--what the fuck ever happened to that "pursuit of happiness" or was that just a typo written by some 18th C hippie? Let people have their plants and their relaxation, it's probably safer than half the shit we load up on the grocery store, or any the legal science experiments the pharmaceutical companies have convinced us to buy. I mean when's the last time there was salmonella outbreak in "medicinal" marijuana? But back to your original question...Gigi, or any other actress probably has a prescription. If they can show up with proper ID at shoots, and get monthly blood tests, then I'm betting they're responsible enough to to get a prescription. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Dec 21, 2010, 11:59am | |
|
12-18-10 05:07pm - 5080 days | #7 | |
slutty (0)
Active User Posts: 475 Registered: Mar 02, '09 Location: Pennsylvania |
To be fair, one can smoke things other than weed out of a glass pipe - which is the only reason they are still legal for sale in many states. While I've never known anyone that smoked tobacco out of their pipe unless mixed with "additives", it is theoretically possible. People have been pretty brazzen with marijuana for quite some time, several rap videos from the 90's included not-so-subtle imagery involving marijuana use. I remember seeing an episode of Cribs in college (10 years ago or so) where Snoop showed off his "hang out room" which was clearly intended for hot-boxing. While attempts to legalize marijuana were recently struck down, the narrowing of the margins - plus the fact that medical marijuana is now legal in many state, I believe show that the public generally accepts that marijuana is not a big-deal drug (not to mention the drug's use in many movies and TV shows, including That 70's Show which is humorously played on the Family Channel now). I can't see how anyone could ever be arrested for filming themselves doing drugs and releasing it, as how could it ever be proven that they were actually drugs? I also seem to remember seeing a Taylor Rain video some time ago where it appeared as though there were lines of coke on the hotel bedside table. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars. Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited. | |
|
12-19-10 08:36am - 5079 days | #8 | |
Khan (0)
Suspended Posts: 1,737 Registered: Jan 05, '07 Location: USA |
As an aside ... Her site has now been added. You may enter your remarks at: https://www.pornusers.com/review/gigiriveraxxx/ We'll look forward to seeing your review. Former PornUsers Senior Administrator Now at: MyPorn.com "To get your ideas across use small words, big ideas, and short sentences."-John Henry Patterson | |
|
12-19-10 08:47am - 5079 days | #9 | |
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,158 Registered: Jan 01, '08 Location: Wash |
I will have to check it out too Since 2007 | |
|
12-19-10 11:44am - 5079 days | #10 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I hope they never legalise pot. I know that you could get thousands of people claiming that they used it and it was no worse than drinking alcohol but alcohol has killed plenty of people over the years. Most of them because a person thougth they could get behind the wheel of a car and nothing bad would happen. You legalise pot and someone will smoke a couple of joints and think he can get behind the wheel of car and we know where that will lead. Not to mention that there was an extensive study done this year on the use of pot at a young age and in most cases the person who was a regular user faired worse in test. Now the question is what is a regular user. I don't know but if my neighbor is any example of what smoking pot for many years will do to you then count me out. I'm all for it, if they want to decriminalise it. You get caught with a certain quantity then that's fine. That's should alleviate the overcrowded prisons. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
12-19-10 07:32pm - 5079 days | #11 | ||
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
And yet alcohol is perfectly legal and practically celebrated as the rite of passage into "adulthood" in America. Sorry, but with the way the laws currently deal with alcohol as compared to marijuana it's just hypocrisy disguised as "protecting" the public. Until the laws are the same, or more balanced towards outlawing alcohol (since it's more dangerous), then I call bullshit. (Edit: If it's not clear, I'm calling bullshit on the laws currently in place, not your argument.) But you do make some good points, including...
I don't know what you mean by "faired worse" but I've never heard of anyone smoking weed to improve their performance at anything except maybe to watch cartoons and eat junk food (which I can already do quite well drug-free). But I think this is the major hurdle to full legalization or at least decriminalization--the stereotype of the dumb, dopey pothead isn't exactly totally erased with many in the legalization crowd. The science is pretty much on their side, as marijuana is no worse than any legal drug already available (though smoking can almost certainly cause cancer, as smoking any organic matter can), but, frankly, it's kind of easy to look at some of these proud spokespeople and just feel like telling them to grow up and get a real job. And while it helps to inspire some great works of music, literature, art (and some hot porn stars apparently), I'd still rather not have a surgeon or airline pilot wander off the job to giggle and search for some Doritos. Still, decriminalization would be a huge relief for state and federal budgets all over the U.S. as an enormous amount of resources are wasted on stopping, arresting, and locking up people who simply didn't have the "medicinal" argument available. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | ||
|
12-19-10 11:27pm - 5078 days | #12 | |
slutty (0)
Active User Posts: 475 Registered: Mar 02, '09 Location: Pennsylvania |
I'm not sure what the definition of regular user is, but I've known many that use marijuana quite often, and are quite intelligent productive members of society. I'm sure a study on regular alcohol or even tobacco use would show similar results. I think the argument that marijuana shouldn't be legalized is fundamentally flawed if the basis is safety. Most of the so called "pot heads" I have known never left the house when using, let alone drove a car. Has their been an increase in marijuana-related car crashes in California since they enacted their clearly abused medical marijuana law? If this is the basis for legalizing a mind-altering substance alcohol and tobacco poise far greater risks to public health than marijuana. There are tons of doctors addicted to alcohol and painkillers, yet these substances are legal... If someone wanted to smoke weed so bad they would do so before performing a surgery, I'm guessing they would do it, legal or not. Someone stupid enough to get baked out of their mind and do something that requires them to be sober likely wouldn't care about the legal status of the drug. People do understand how readily available this drug is, right? If the government wants to fine people and let them off with no prison time, fine. But throwing guys like Willy Nelson in jail is both cost ineffective, and in my opinion stupid. Not to mention the fact that legalizing would surely eliminate much of the violence and crime associated with growing and selling the drug illegally. I guess what makes me laugh so much about the so called war on drugs is the advertisements almost always focus on marijuana, like this is the big problem drug? Ask any doctor and they will surely tell you they have never treated a pot user, however ask them about meth users and you will get a much different story. Marijuana is surely less dangerous that alcohol or tobacco, is not chemically addictive, and yet this is the drug we fight against? Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars. Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited. Edited on Dec 19, 2010, 11:33pm | |
|
12-20-10 12:13am - 5078 days | #13 | |
Thedebilman666 (0)
Suspended Posts: 144 Registered: Dec 08, '10 Location: NYC |
I've been smokin' almost daily since I was 16 (I'm now 35) and all my brain cells are intact, I'm a productive member of society, go to work everyday, pay my bills, vote, have plenty of cash in the bank, have good credit, own a house, live just like any other Joe. I smoke 'cause I like it, plain and simple, no medicinal need, what a crock of shit that all is anyways, making up medical excuses to "legally" get high. I've smoked with all kinds of people from all walks of life, doctors, lawyers, cops, teachers, the sweet old lady, professional athletes, hell, even a priest wearing his collar - on a Sunday no less. I bet everyone on this board knows at least 20 closet potheads and you'd all shit your pants if you ever learned the truth , ...Especially if you're from the deceitful land of the free where double standards are a way of life. 6 pack bitches, deal with it Edited on Dec 21, 2010, 09:48pm | |
|
12-20-10 09:17am - 5078 days | #14 | |
PinkPanther (0)
Active User Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
I don't drink much alcohol - 1 or 2 alcoholic beverages a year - gave up on pot when I left college. Neither one did much great for me. I'm a cheap date, get fucked up easily so I doubt that I ever drove all that well after imbiding either substance and wouldn't recommend it to anybody else. Even if I'm not driving, I don't find either one all that fun, so why bother with them. But marijuana's not worse for the human body than tobacco or alcohol and I don't think that the law should be constructed to say, "Well, we're letting you fuck yourselves up with these other things, so we're not going to let you fuck yourself up with this." Not to mention all the deadly food out there - if eaten in excess. So I believe that marijuana should be legal. It's just used at this point as a way to mess with people and a way for the government to get away with seizing a lot of property - people have lost their cars, houses, boats - all of which gives the government the incentive to mess with people unnecessarily - and that's a bad way to construct a legal system. | |
|
12-20-10 08:22pm - 5077 days | #15 | |
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
My argument isn't that alcohol or cigarette are better than pot but we can't put the genie back in his bottle on the prior two. Alcohol prohibition was tried in the past and we all know where that went. I know that in Canada the Government is trying a kind of Cigarette prohibition. It hasn't stopped people from smoking but I do belive that it is reducing the amount of people from starting. Seeing as it's usually children and young adults that start smoking and we know what can happen from smoking cigarettes then that's agood thing. Smoking pot is worse than cigarettes in so far as most smoke it in a joint and there is no filter to absorb part of the toxins and particulite so your lungs absorb more of these things than in cigarettes. The good thing is that most people don't smoke a pack of joints a day. I don't think you will see any statistics about accidents and pot smoking because I don't think the police test for that substance like they do for alcohol. I do believe that pot is a gateway to harder drugs. Not for every person that has smoked it or will smoke it but it is still a gateway. I don't have any numbers but let's say for argument sake that 10% of the people who smoke pot try a harder drug like cocaine. If 100,000 people smoke pot each year than 10,000 of those will try cocaine and how many of those will find it easy to quit cocaine once they've enjoyed the great feeling it brought them. I've always looked at mind altering drugs, and I consider alcohol to be one of those, this way. If you have to have it every day then you have a problem. If you think that you don't need it every day but still take it every day then you have a bigger problem because now you've created an illusion that you are in control and you just enjoy the taste. The size of the problem is probably different from person to person but we're still talking about someone who is in trouble. The reason why is that the amount required to satisfy your need is bound to get bigger as your body gets used to the level. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
12-20-10 09:25pm - 5077 days | #16 | ||
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Oh no, not the gateway argument...I guess you really are against pot. Well, don't forget correlation is not causation. Some studies support the gateway theory, while others refute it. I think the problem is that if you're dead set against pot than you're going to look toward the studies that say it's a gateway drug, and if you're for it (or at least its legalization) than you're going to cite ones that say it's not. Sounds like shaky reasoning either way, at least for now. Plus how do you know those 10,000 of the original 100,000 weren't going to try cocaine anyway?
Would you consider caffeine a mind altering drug? If so, then a lot of people have a problem, except that beverage makers pump caffeine into fucking everything now (caffeinated beer--what the fuck?!) so we're led to believe that it's okay to be wired 24/7. Starbucks, energy drinks, soda, turbocharged beer--we've all been turned into jumpy, wiry lab rats with elevated heart rates and short attention spans. In my opinion it's always dangerous to try to control the mind-altering substances because in essence you're saying people should not have responsibility over their own thoughts...but I've never said that I have mainstream opinions so you can interpret that one however you see fit. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Dec 21, 2010, 08:28am | ||
|
12-20-10 11:38pm - 5077 days | #17 | |
slutty (0)
Active User Posts: 475 Registered: Mar 02, '09 Location: Pennsylvania |
Sorry for arguing with you here pat, just wanted to point out that I am pretty sure most localities test for most drugs and alcohol in blood after accidents involving fatalities, so this data is probably available although I didn't feel like looking. i also agree with turboshaft about the gateway drug thing, i know many that have used pot, including myself, and never done anything stronger (well, a few of them did mushrooms). i believe statistics may show it as a gateway drug simply because it is probably the most readily available. i'm sure a similar study with alcohol could easily conclude that alcohol is also a "gateway drug". also, as I understand it the filter doesn't necessarily help prevent illness, as most that smoke filter cigarettes breath the smoke in deaper than unfilters. i remember reading a study a while ago that showed how when filters were less common cancers of the mouth and trachea were more common than cancers of the lung because people were absorbing the nicotine through their upper GI tract rather than through their lungs (similarly to how those that smoke cigars do). now that filters are more common and smokers are inhaling the smoke deaper, lung cancers have become more common. i'm sure it may have happened, but i highly doubt there have been many cases of cancer from marijuana alone, as most marijuana smokers take in far less than the equivalent of a pack a day or whatever from tobacco - although i seem to recall reading that those that smoke both nicotine and marijuana are more likely to develop lung disease for some reason. Bunny Lebowski: I'll suck your cock for a thousand dollars. Brandt: Ah hahahahaha! Wonderful woman. We're all, we're all very fond of her. Very free-spirited. | |
|
12-21-10 08:31am - 5077 days | #18 | |
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Shrooms are stronger?! I thought they were essentially just food poisoning compared to the "strength" of other drugs--albeit one hell of a case of food poisoning! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
12-21-10 09:06am - 5077 days | #19 | |
Denner (0)
Active User Posts: 1,217 Registered: Mar 03, '07 Location: Denmark |
Legalize pot - hashish, the sooner, the better... That means stop criminalizing ordinary people who feel like smokin' a joint, a chillum or what ever now and then... That old cannabis is in my opinion more healthy - or at least not more damaging than alcohol........ I'm close to 60 - been smoking hashish - almost daily - from the age of 18 till 40 something - still got my education, a good job in the media - stopped smoking (almost) daily since then, but a joint/a smoke now and then....why not? And like Albert Einstein declared: "We only use 20% of our brain..." - and then Cheech and Chong added: "So why not blow the rest of it away......."? Bottomline: Who are chose "civil servants" and politicians who go down hard on the average or good citizen who buys a little pot for the weekend? And why is that illegal? It's pathetic... BTW: Did a lot of other funny stuff (you name it) in the hippie years, but NEVER stuck a needle in my arm... "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle" Edited on Dec 21, 2010, 09:11am | |
|
12-21-10 10:13am - 5077 days | #20 | |
jberryl69 (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,000 Registered: Nov 27, '10 Location: neverland |
Psilocybin mushrooms are fungi that contain the psychoactive compounds psilocybin and psilocin. They grow quite readily in cow paddies in the South. There are approximately 190 species of psilocybin mushrooms and most of them fall in the genus Psilocybe. Psilocybin mushrooms are non-addictive and rarely abused. They do create short-term increases in tolerance of users, thus making it difficult to abuse them because the more often they are taken within a short period of time, the weaker the resultant effects are. The mind-altering effects of psilocybin-containing mushrooms typically last anywhere from 3 to 8 hours depending on dosage, preparation method, and personal metabolism. However, the effects can seem to last much longer due to psilocybin's ability to alter time perception. Interestingly enough, you can buy spores and grow your own. Shrooms are psychotropic which is a chemical substance that crosses the blood-brain barrier and acts primarily upon the central nervous system where it affects brain function, resulting in changes in perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, and behavior. Other types of psychotropic drugs which are considered hallucinogens are LSD, Mescaline (from the peyote cactus), Salvia divinorum & catnip (for cats silly). If it ain't grits, it must be a Yankee. If you're going to lay her head over the pool table and fuck her throat, get your fucking hand off her throat! | |
|
1-20 of 20 Posts | Page 1 |
Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|