Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » Reviews of OnlyFans sites - Anybody seen them?
1-25 of 25 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

08-22-18  05:47pm - 2220 days Original Post - #1
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Reviews of OnlyFans sites - Anybody seen them?

With almost every working porn star creating their own OnlyFans sites - and with the sites themselves being positively opaque to non-members - no information beyond the number of videos, number of photos and the price - it seems like there's a real need for reviews of these sites - how often are they updated, how long are the videos, do the photo #'s refer to individual photos or photo sets, what is the quality of the material, etc.


Anybody seen any such thing? I haven't.

08-26-18  10:03am - 2216 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
While I don't disagree that it would be nice if there were reviews of those sites/pages. The fact is that it's not really necessary for the below reasons.

1-You can't view any of the content? That by far is the most obvious way to know that it's content that is almost guaranteed to be a disappointment.

2-The performers almost never talk about what they have shot for their Only Fans "OF" pages and that is another great way of knowing that whatever it is. It's not good.

3-Most new performers(if you can really call them that) have an "OF" page and they aren't necessarily just charging the basic 10$ but significantly more. Best example is Hannah hays who barely made a blip in the industry and she charges 25$ for her "OF" page. 22 photos and 7 videos is all you get for that 25$.

4-This one is basically philosophical. If it looks too good to be true then it probably is. If the content was out of this world then the people who own "OF" and the performers themselves would be screaming at the top of their lungs about all the amazing stuff you can get for your money.

I tend to spend significantly more time on another forum and this very subject came up recently and the general consensus from people that have joined a few "OF" pages is that the vast majority of them will be a huge disappointment Long live the Brown Coats.

08-26-18  01:03pm - 2216 days #3
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I think a problem for anyone writing a review of an OF site would be that unlike a more commercial site the updates can be sporadic.

I have to admit only having limited experience with OF since the only one I ever joined was Jynx Maze's site. It didn't update all that often and most of the videos were low quality.

08-26-18  04:56pm - 2216 days #4
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


I tend to spend significantly more time on another forum and this very subject came up recently and the general consensus from people that have joined a few "OF" pages is that the vast majority of them will be a huge disappointment


@pat362,
Would you post the forum URL?
I'd like to browse that forum, as a possible source of new porn sites that might be worth joining, or just for interesting facts/ideas about porn.

Thanks in advance.

08-26-18  05:11pm - 2216 days #5
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


While I don't disagree that it would be nice if there were reviews of those sites/pages. The fact is that it's not really necessary for the below reasons.

1-You can't view any of the content? That by far is the most obvious way to know that it's content that is almost guaranteed to be a disappointment.

2-The performers almost never talk about what they have shot for their Only Fans "OF" pages and that is another great way of knowing that whatever it is. It's not good.

3-Most new performers(if you can really call them that) have an "OF" page and they aren't necessarily just charging the basic 10$ but significantly more. Best example is Hannah hays who barely made a blip in the industry and she charges 25$ for her "OF" page. 22 photos and 7 videos is all you get for that 25$.

4-This one is basically philosophical. If it looks too good to be true then it probably is. If the content was out of this world then the people who own "OF" and the performers themselves would be screaming at the top of their lungs about all the amazing stuff you can get for your money.

I tend to spend significantly more time on another forum and this very subject came up recently and the general consensus from people that have joined a few "OF" pages is that the vast majority of them will be a huge disappointment


All of the above is a good reason for me why reviews would be helpful.

As you say, the prices being charged for these sites are premium prices, averaging about $25 for a month.

There are many of these sites that are sporadically updated, or barely updated at all.

This sounds to me like the reason porn site review sites became popular in the first place. We currently live in the era of bargain prices for porn sites - most with plenty of content can be accessed for $9.95-$19.95 for a month if you know where to look for discounts, including of course TBP. But back in the day, porn sites such as Pix-and-Video and 1-By-Day were charging $25.95 for a month with no network, no bonus sites included and it was very helpful to see reviews to know which sites were and were not worth joining before throwing in that kind of money.

There may be some jewels among the OnlyFans sites. If so, I'd be interested in knowing about them as a result of reviews.

08-26-18  05:31pm - 2216 days #6
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


As you say, the prices being charged for these sites are premium prices, averaging about $25 for a month.

...it was very helpful to see reviews to know which sites were and were not worth joining before throwing in that kind of money.

There may be some jewels among the OnlyFans sites. If so, I'd be interested in knowing about them as a result of reviews.


The basic problem is that most of those sites are not worth joining.
So why would a non-professional reviewer join a bunch of sites not worth joining?
You would be wasting your money.
(I'm speaking in general terms, because I've never joined this type of site.)

There are plenty of mainstream porn sites that are worth joining.

I think you're slightly bored by what you know is available, and want something special.
(Like most of us, I believe. Just my opinion, of course.)

08-26-18  06:52pm - 2216 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


@pat362,
Would you post the forum URL?
I'd like to browse that forum, as a possible source of new porn sites that might be worth joining, or just for interesting facts/ideas about porn.

Thanks in advance.

This is the link for the thread about "OF"
https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/onlyfansc.../3414753#post3414753 Long live the Brown Coats.

08-26-18  07:40pm - 2216 days #8
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by pat362:


This is the link for the thread about "OF"
https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/onlyfansc.../3414753#post3414753


@pat362,
Thanks for the fast response.
Some of the posts at the site have value.
Yours included.
Edited on Aug 26, 2018, 07:48pm

08-27-18  10:57pm - 2215 days #9
exotics4me (0)
Active User



Posts: 664
Registered: Jan 12, '07
Location: USA
This topic can be listed as proof that if you move from California to the east coast, you end up working way too much! I had to look up the Only Fans on Google. With my current job, I have a Twitter but it's university-affiliated, so no porn on it.

I would be interested in these type of sites. I used to join solo model sites that I knew weren't going to be worth what I paid but at least I got a new group of content featuring the model. I think the best example was Lana Lopez's solo site. It received terrible scores and I could see why. Most of the picture sets were from other sites and the ones that weren't were candid/clothed. But I kept digging around on the site and found a webcam archive that had 89 webcam videos (near an hour each) of Lana talking, stripping and masturbating.

Does anyone remember the old Yahoo fansites that some porn stars had? Would have been mid to late 90s, early 2000s. It looks like these Only Fans pages are like those. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk

08-29-18  09:09pm - 2213 days #10
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


This topic can be listed as proof that if you move from California to the east coast, you end up working way too much! I had to look up the Only Fans on Google. With my current job, I have a Twitter but it's university-affiliated, so no porn on it.

I would be interested in these type of sites. I used to join solo model sites that I knew weren't going to be worth what I paid but at least I got a new group of content featuring the model. I think the best example was Lana Lopez's solo site. It received terrible scores and I could see why. Most of the picture sets were from other sites and the ones that weren't were candid/clothed. But I kept digging around on the site and found a webcam archive that had 89 webcam videos (near an hour each) of Lana talking, stripping and masturbating.

Does anyone remember the old Yahoo fansites that some porn stars had? Would have been mid to late 90s, early 2000s. It looks like these Only Fans pages are like those.


I don't remember porn stars having their own Yahoo fansites. I remember there being a huge number of Yahoo porn fansites and porn fan groups - some of them general, and some of them focused on specific porn stars or companies - and some of of the people who ran them would reach out to the porn stars or companies so that they could claim to be the "official" porn fan group of that porn star or company. There were all kind of weird rivalries and feuds between people who spent a lot of time and energy running these groups.

But the stash of webcam vids that you describe above is exactly the kind of hidden jewel that I bet you would find on some of these Only Fans sites, while others would probably not have much of value.

08-30-18  08:04am - 2212 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


I would be interested in these type of sites. I used to join solo model sites that I knew weren't going to be worth what I paid.


Well if that is your goal than I feel confident in saying that you will regret at least 99% or all your purchases because the general consensus is that most videos are not sexual in nature and under 5 minutes. The photos are more than likely worse because they won't even include nudity.

I would be fine if "OF" was a means for active performers to make ends meet due to lack of filming but since almost every performer with barely a couple of videos under her belt has an "OF" page then that isn't why they exist. This is another way to screw with paying fans. Long live the Brown Coats.

09-10-18  09:59am - 2201 days #12
MrMaxxx (0)
Active User



Posts: 44
Registered: Sep 10, '18
Location: Canada
I've definitely seen some OnlyFans accounts that I was tentative to join in the past (because who knows if it's worth it, if they post enough, etc.). But usually if I look up the person in question on Tumblr, I can find the pics and videos uploaded there! I always check Tumblr before making the decision, but a site where it reviews it and tells you if it's worth it would be super convenient.

09-10-18  05:48pm - 2201 days #13
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I would recommend that you first check if the performer has a Many Vids account before dishing out any cash on her Only fans page. The cost of MV is significantly higher than the cost of an OF page but at least you will know what you are getting for your money.

I will repeat what I have said previously. If the content was as amazing as they seem to imply then those performers would be talking about it on Social Media to attract as many new members as possible. The fact that most of them don't even give an inkling of what you will get for your money is all you need to know that it will be disappointing. Long live the Brown Coats.

09-11-18  02:47am - 2201 days #14
exotics4me (0)
Active User



Posts: 664
Registered: Jan 12, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


I don't remember porn stars having their own Yahoo fansites. I remember there being a huge number of Yahoo porn fansites and porn fan groups - some of them general, and some of them focused on specific porn stars or companies - and some of of the people who ran them would reach out to the porn stars or companies so that they could claim to be the "official" porn fan group of that porn star or company. There were all kind of weird rivalries and feuds between people who spent a lot of time and energy running these groups.

But the stash of webcam vids that you describe above is exactly the kind of hidden jewel that I bet you would find on some of these Only Fans sites, while others would probably not have much of value.


One of the Yahoo ones I do remember was Cherie Roberts aka Kitana Jade. I just mostly remember being able to chat with her and she would take pictures in whatever pose you wanted. I think she's into photography now, though. I still have all of those Lana Lopez webcam videos. I think sometimes the regular list of 1,400 models to choose from becomes redundant. There's also always that "one man's trash, is another man's treasure" feeling with some of it. Oh and another one that just came to mind, Satine Phoenix, and she too, like Cherie Roberts has moved on to photography and I think art. I don't think Satine's was as old as Cherie's, pretty sure Satine's had a twitter on it and she would tweet when she posted something new. I always enjoyed her work away from multi-model sites, she seemed to like having more creative input. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk

09-11-18  02:50am - 2201 days #15
exotics4me (0)
Active User



Posts: 664
Registered: Jan 12, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


Well if that is your goal than I feel confident in saying that you will regret at least 99% or all your purchases because the general consensus is that most videos are not sexual in nature and under 5 minutes. The photos are more than likely worse because they won't even include nudity.

I would be fine if "OF" was a means for active performers to make ends meet due to lack of filming but since almost every performer with barely a couple of videos under her belt has an "OF" page then that isn't why they exist. This is another way to screw with paying fans.


The biggest problem for me would be finding a model I know, who is still active! I have been meaning to look some of these OF pages up but life keeps getting in the way. Do you know if the OF sites are ran by the models? My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk

09-12-18  05:46pm - 2199 days #16
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by exotics4me:


The biggest problem for me would be finding a model I know, who is still active! I have been meaning to look some of these OF pages up but life keeps getting in the way. Do you know if the OF sites are ran by the models?


So far as I know, the answer is "Yes". Of course, I'm just guessing since I'm not behind the scenes, but it seems that the same person/people that are handling the particular porn performer's Twitter account is handling their Only Fans site.

10-13-18  12:39pm - 2168 days #17
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
So Morgan Lee hasn't been very active in porn lately, she turned her attention to fitness modeling and music. But she announced on her Twitter that she was back to doing stuff for her Only Fans page - and at $9.95, I figured it was worth it to check it out. My conclusion: Only Fans pages are basically for fans that want to give porn babes money for not much in return. Morgan Lee's Only Fans page refers to 80 videos. The videos that I have checked out so far - and I haven't checked out all 80 are shot with cell phones. So in that sense they are exclusive to the Only Fans page, but they are not high quality, high def videos. Some of them are very short tease videos. Some of them are scenes split up among several shorter videos, the longest of which I've seen was about 3:30 so a 10 minute scene might be chopped up into 4 or 5 shorter videos. So 80 videos listed in a porn star's Only Fans page probably going to be 20 or less "scenes" plus short tease cell phone videos of less than 1 minute - the sort that you would see posted to a porn star's Twitter or Instagram. The same thing goes for the pics that the Only Fans page lists. If the Only Fans page lists 14 photos, that doesn't mean 14 photo "sets", that means 14 photos, and the photos are again similar to what would be posted to Twitter or Instagram. You'll also receive offers via email to "unlock" other videos. While Morgan's Only Fans page was $9.95 for a month, the offers that I have received so far include an offer to unlock a video of less than 3 minutes for $15 and an offer to unlock a video of less than 1 minute for $4. Plus you can tip additional.

So if you want exclusive cell phone type videos of a particular porn star, subscribing to their Only Fans site might be worth it to you - just be aware of what you'll be getting for the price. Are the videos downloadable? No, but there are probably video-capture apps that are available to download anything that streams. Are the photos downloadable? No, but like Instagram photos, you can use a snipping tool to download them easily.

There are probably sites that have lots more material of whatever porn star that you're interested in than their Only Fans site. Cherry Pimps, for instance, has dozens of Morgan Lee scenes, some of which are hour-long cam shows along with photo sets of dozens of photos. And I've seen Cherry Pimps's memberships at $9.95 for 1 month for the entire site - and all of that material is high-quality, high-def and easily downloadable.

10-17-18  06:09am - 2165 days #18
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I believe that some performers have better "OF" pages than most other performers but since you have absolutely no idea which one does then you will spend a lot of money to find out and while 9.95$ is often the standard join cost. It is by no means the price for all pages because I have seen some as high as 25% and not for super popular established performers but newbies with less than a year in the porn industry. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-08-20  01:02pm - 1595 days #19
Lomez (0)
Active User

Posts: 2
Registered: May 05, '20
Hi folks. I'm new here and joined specifically to see if there were reviews for performers' active OnlyFans pages. I couldn't find another website that offered them in my Googling. I have one I can share to kick it off but wasn't sure if I should make a dedicated thread for that topic or do it in this thread which could serve as sort of an all-encompassing OF review thread.

Given the explosion of the platform due to the pandemic and the overall changes in the industry and how performers earn income I think OF reviews are timely and very much needed to help consumers make wise buying decisions.

05-12-20  11:50am - 1591 days #20
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I've checked a few of the OF pages when there have been big sales. Here are my conclusions:

1) You NEVER know what you're going to get.

2) You NEVER know what you're going to be charged, or for how long

3) if you are going to join an OF site, I recommend that you a) only have enough money in your OF account to pay for that 1st join and b) immediately take your method of payment (debit card, etc) off of your account so that OF has no way of charging you again without your express permission.

There are performers, such as Bonnie Rotten that promise on Twitter stuff that is not on their OF page at all, the pics on her OF account are tamer than anything she posts on Twitter & Instagram and it's all about "tip me $$ if you want more"

There are performers, such as Riley Reid that have entire scenes on their OF page and will also do live streams.

The thing you have to watch out for is that performers will offer an initial sale join price and you never know what the price will be raised to when the sale is over, nor do you often know what period the sale price is for so if you leave a method of payment for OF to bill, you can find yourself billed at a time that you did not expect and for a dollar amount that you did not expect and there is nothing provided by OF to explain this stuff.

05-17-20  10:26am - 1586 days #21
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^One of the things that has become very popular among many OF models is them significantly dropping their join price and in some cases making it free but that is just a ruse to get more people to join their OF page and then spend the rest of their membership getting bombarded with offers for tips or paying for premium content. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-17-20  05:27pm - 1586 days #22
Lomez (0)
Active User

Posts: 2
Registered: May 05, '20
If you can take advantage of a "flash sale" -- i.e. performer offers one month for $5.00 for the next 3 days only -- it could be a great value. Obviously you'll want to be following the performer on Twitter so you know for sure she offers thee content on her OF you want.

And, most important, make sure that auto-renew box isn't ticked in your account settings.

05-18-20  07:09am - 1585 days #23
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by Lomez:


If you can take advantage of a "flash sale" -- i.e. performer offers one month for $5.00 for the next 3 days only -- it could be a great value. Obviously you'll want to be following the performer on Twitter so you know for sure she offers thee content on her OF you want.

And, most important, make sure that auto-renew box isn't ticked in your account settings.


you can't tell from Twitter what a performer actually offers on OF. Bonnie Rotten promises stuff on Twitter, and then the reality is that her Twitter & Instagram posts are hotter than anything that she has on her OF page without tipping her additional money. the problem with the "flash sales" is that in the world of OF, you really don't know that 30 days is going to be 30 days - sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't, which is why I say, "Only put as much money on your OF account that you want to spend, then take the method of payment off your OF account so that you cannot be recharged without your express permission."

05-18-20  12:36pm - 1585 days #24
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I will go one even better. The entire OF system can only work if the models are as nebulous as possible about the content they offer in their OF account. The sheer number of videos that some models supposedly have on their OF page are so numerous that you know most(I say all) are seconds long and not remotely sexual in nature.

The models that have great content on their OF page that can be gotten with just the join price can probably be counted on one hand and you may not need all five fingers to do that.

PU members are for the most part porn fans with varying degrees of experience accumulated over many years of surfing for porn and most of us know that if a site is not upfront about the content available then it's probably because it's not worth it. I apply the same logic to OF content and I feel comfortable avoiding it like the plague because I know I will regret the 25$, 15$, 10$ or even 5$ dollars I spent on a piece of crap because I like the model and i hoped she would do the stuff she hasn't done anywhere else because she can make more money with an OF account. Long live the Brown Coats.

05-19-20  02:24am - 1585 days #25
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
"The models that have great content on their OF page that can be gotten with just the join price can probably be counted on one hand and you may not need all five fingers to do that."

I don't know how many OF sites you've been a member of, but I've tried 6 - Amia Miley had some decent content & updated at a decent rate, Morgan Lee had very short vids & wasn't updating much, Andi Land updates a lot, does some nice long vids & exclusive photo sets, occasionally tries an OF live broadcast, definitely tries to make her OF site something that has value for the original join price. I would say the same for Riley Reid - she does some very cool "watch the sunrise with Riley" vids where she does some fun tease, she puts some long scenes up from her ReidMyLips site, she puts exclusive photos up, she tries occasional OF live broadcasts, she definitely tries to make her OF site have value at the original join price.

Michelle Maylene was a free join, Bonnie Rotten was a very inexpensive join. Both gave pretty much nothing for the original join price, it was all about "tip more so we can have some fun".

So 2 grade F, 2 grade A- (the basic platform is not one that I like, really), 1 grade B-, 1 grade C

1-25 of 25 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.