|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » Is it just me .... |
| 1-18 of 18 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 01-17-14 01:24pm - 3954 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Is it just me .... ... but I find that most models in my formerly favorite softcore sites (Anilos, All Over 30, ATK Aunt Judy, ATK Natural & Hairy)are not as beautiful as they used to be? Am I jaded, a natural born whiner, or is there something to my observation? | |
|
||
| 01-17-14 02:50pm - 3954 days | #2 | |
|
FibiLove Co (0)
Suspended Webmaster Posts: 7 Registered: Jul 01, '11 Location: Jamaica |
You have gotten used to that level of beauty, there is nothing special about them anymore. Seems like you are starting to acquire more exquisite tastes. I deleted a tonne of pics I had because the girls just don't look as good as I once thought they did. | |
|
||
| 01-17-14 03:00pm - 3954 days | #3 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I think you hit the nail right on the head, FL, because I did the same thing: "What did I ever see in HER? Delete!" and that particular model was slumbering in a folder called "Favorites!"  | |
|
||
| 01-17-14 05:59pm - 3954 days | #4 | |
|
graymane (0)
Suspended  Posts: 1,411 Registered: Feb 20, '10 Location: Virginia |
I donno, mess ..... it might not be "what did I ever see in her" ......but what you did see just wasn't improved upon or creatively going anywhere. There are a select few porn models out there I've been following for years, and because they're surrounded by the best visual and idea-centric communication, that something that stoked the fires then and still haven't wavered .... Indeed, they still surpass the ordinary; she and her coaches reach and man the vehicle that just keeps us coming back. Although this doesn't jive with what I just said ... but let me give you An example of another bend on this subject of model-longevity: Even though I detest the abnormal, grinding, wretched obsession Aria Giovanni has with fondling her damned tits, what else she has and maintains, and how she uses it, still brings me right up out of my chair. Anyway, I'm steppin' off my soapbox, for now. | |
|
||
| 01-18-14 06:06am - 3953 days | #5 | |
|
Capn (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,740 Registered: Sep 05, '09 Location: Near the Beer! |
I think it is more a case of you pick what you consider to be 'best' at the time. Further down the road, your perceptions may have changed & / or the current crop of models may be more or less appealing than an earlier favourite. Personally, I like variety. If I get jaded with any particular model, I just look at a totally different model type & I find that keeps my outlook balanced & less critical. Cap'n.  Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU AwardHilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award ( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/ Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder! | |
|
||
| 01-18-14 06:28am - 3953 days | #6 | |
|
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 2,158 Registered: Jan 01, '08 Location: Wash |
I tend to move around and then go bad, like Jenna was once and so was Madison Ivy. I move around then a year later maybe come back and its like new again. Since 2007 | |
|
||
| 01-18-14 09:29am - 3953 days | #7 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I'm going to throw this one in because I haven't seen it mentioned by anyone else. Is it possible that part of the problem is that technology now makes a very beautiful women less so because what was hidden behind a lower resolution image is now completely revealed in HD. After all these women may be above the norm look wise but they are still human being and therefore prone to the same skin blemishes we all suffer from. It used to be that a model or actress could hide their imperfections behind a filter lens or the use of makeup but today's camera sees what past cameras did not. This problem is compounded by the harsh reality that many studios no longer use makeup artist. Badly applied makeup or no makeup at all is bound to affect what a model looks like. There is a reason why the word artist is used when talking about professionals who apply makeup. I know many studios think that they can photoshop the pictures after the fact and it's true that they can but the finish product is no longer the picture of a real person but is instead a computer generated facsimile where it's obvious we aren't looking at a real person anymore. I'd like to add that it's quite possible that the current crop of models are not as impressive as the ones that came before them and that's why so many of us enjoy these new women but keep going back to past ones. Long live the Brown Coats. Edited on Jan 18, 2014, 05:45pm | |
|
||
| 01-18-14 10:47am - 3953 days | #8 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User  Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
I think there could be a great deal of truth in this. When you look at some actresses the way they are photographed makes them look stunning, but send in a paparazzi photographer and they can look very plain or even unattractive. I used to know someone who was attractive, but put her in front of a camera with some makeup and she looked out of this world sensational. Some are simply more photogenic than others. There are some stunning girls out there who would look great in front of a camera, but there is a limited number of attractive girls willing to do porn. Beauty may be in the eye of the beholder, but some without doubt are more attractive than others. Often that makeup is needed, and porn models do seem to wear very quickly. HD spec may turn out to be a double edged sword for the porn industry. | |
|
||
| 01-18-14 05:55pm - 3953 days | #9 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
^I don't need my porn performers to be drop dead gorgeous. A girl next door/plain Jane is more than adequate because I need more than looks to sexually stimulate me. What I do not want to see are bad cases of facial blemishes or the now ever present pimples on the girls ass or around her genitals. There are so many scene start great but become unwatchable once the camera zooms to the below the waist region. A good makeup artist could fix that but since the producers want to shoot the scenes for the least amount of money than that basically means that I have even less porn available for purchase. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 01-18-14 06:37pm - 3953 days | #10 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
We may be out of touch with porn users here on Porn Users. Most porn fans may want their girls to be drop dead gorgeous. Personally I prefer a natural look with some curves but either young/skinny/thin or BBW seem to be the options available. There is a certain porn uniform look. In fact the porn look is a uniform, as much as an army uniform. It states what you are and what you do. Agreed about once the camera drops below the waist. I have seen one or two cruel comments on forums run by porn sites. One or two stunning girls even appear to have genital warts, and some have bad blemishes, spots, warts etc. You have hit a nail on the head, HD reveals the brutal truth and all the imperfections in not too flattering detail. With lower resolution good makeup artists aren't needed as much, but what is the point of HD if it turns out to be a turn off rather than turn on, because it shows too much of the truth? I guess porn is going to become even more realistic, with more emphasis on what we keep calling "abuse" here on PU. No time to focus on the beauty of the female, no time to focus on any imperfections, just watch as she gets bashed, mauled, and slimed. That's probably too negative, but it maybe one part of the future of porn. | |
|
||
| 01-19-14 05:44am - 3952 days | #11 | |
|
elephant (0)
Active User  Posts: 583 Registered: Jan 11, '07 |
Yeah I'm very much into the natural look, I just don't go for glam girls with makeup at all anymore, just does nothing for me. Its quite annoying cause loads of sites think this is the way to go and over do models to the point of I just think, arghhh you look so much better without that stuff all over your face. Certain models you like and then you can see them on other sites and you are like, woh, is this the same girl as they can look totally different. But yeah tastes, mine certainly do but one thing I will always hate and to be honest really cannot believe the amount of American girls who look so unbelievably gorgeous and they go and ruin it by having these hideous tattoos, well for me they ruin it, I know some people must like them, I really don't get what is good about them at all an never will. But it does effect it if I favorite a girl, very few tat honeys on my list. Oh and another thing I don't quite understand with American girls, is having a big booty and how women with huge butts are more favored. I have to say, its not my thing at all. "Women are like tricks by sleight of hand, Which, to admire, we should not understand." WILLIAM CONGREVE | |
|
||
| 01-19-14 10:40am - 3952 days | #12 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Tattoos don't bother me half as much as those so-called "enhanced" breasts. You see them mostly in American models and I despise them. Any set or video that features enhanced automatically will get a one out of five or even ten from me, no matter how pretty the face or rest of the figure may be.  | |
|
||
| 01-21-14 07:34pm - 3950 days | #13 | |
|
Micha (0)
Active User Posts: 321 Registered: Jul 04, '10 Location: san jose ca |
On many TGB sites there is a category for ugly women, I think if one were to spend some time there, they might develop a renewed appreciation for beauty. Beauty, is I've heard, in the mind of the beholder. Truth be told,most of the women appearing on those sites are not ugly. A face that is often deemed by others to be ugly, I find as interesting and depicting what I would call character and a sense of fun. Wandering in the shops and malls, I often see women that I do not think are attractive, who seem not to have a shortage of attractive male suitors in attendance. Go figure. Often, tooling that cyber place, seeking women in various stages of undress, my eye is often caught by faces, bodies and personae that are not runway model material but rather pretty, smart and fun, depicting what I consider to be a great sense of life. They look healthy. That is what I find attractive. unless life also gives you water and sugar, your lemonade is gonna suck. Edited on Jan 22, 2014, 12:53am | |
|
||
| 01-23-14 05:41pm - 3948 days | #14 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I agree, partly because I have a few tattoos myself (but not implants  ) and I'm not one for imbibing in the whole tattoos-are-ugly trope, and also because I know plenty of real, non-porn women who have tattoos but not all the other body mods seen in porn.I was reminded of my distaste the other day when I was looking at the photos on Lisa Ann's Twitter feed--ugh! Over sculpted/"toned" jawline and arms complemented by cartoonishly oversized breasts that look like they're almost as much for laughs as they are for lust. Most of her friends in the photos looked the same. They sport Grand Canyon cleavage engineered into dresses which look to be made out of spandex and Kevlar, lest those mammoth mammaries spill out and collapse into a black hole. And they look so hourglass-shaped that you think you're viewing a photo that was skewed in Photoshop or at one of those funhouse mirrors. Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of the pear-shaped, bottom-heavy female (though I'll let it slide for the more Rubenesque with pee fetishes), but transmogrifying yourself into a real life RealDoll is not attractive to me--it's fucking scary!  Just my angry  , but maybe I need to stop complaining and go join AbbyWinters for awhile.  "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-23-14 05:52pm - 3948 days | #15 | |
|
biker (0)
Active User  Posts: 632 Registered: May 03, '08 Location: milwaukee, wi |
I don't mind large breasts, but the implants are so unnatural. I have stated it before, it looks like two bowling balls stuck in there. I like soft curves, not hard ones that implants produce. Warning Will Robinson | |
|
||
| 01-24-14 12:19pm - 3947 days | #16 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
You spoke right out of my heart, Micha. Couldn't have put it better myself.  | |
|
||
| 01-24-14 12:24pm - 3947 days | #17 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Yep, that's my problem, biker: the bowling ball look!  Yet there are guys who drool at the thought of enhanceds, and give them to their wives/girlfriends/mistresses/lovers as a present and those poor, misguided, insecure women end up believing that they really improved their looks, based on the theory that bigger is better. Wish more women would look into this forum now and then to get a more balanced view as to what is beautiful and what is grotesque.  | |
|
||
| 01-24-14 12:28pm - 3947 days | #18 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Keep on contributing your 2 cents, turbo, you done good! | |
|
||
| 1-18 of 18 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
