|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » 100 |
| 1-7 of 7 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 09-25-16 11:14am - 3010 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
Denner (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,217 Registered: Mar 03, '07 Location: Denmark |
100 Jeeez, I remember old times here - to get a 100 score - pratically never. Now I see one of those 100 - takes a look and??? For this site: http://www.lelulove.com/ Never thought inflation could go this far...  "I don't drink anymore - I freeze it, and eat it like a popcicle" | |
|
||
| 09-25-16 12:40pm - 3010 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I've never given a site a score of 100. But I have given MetArt a score of 99 (my highest score so far) because I think MetArt is the best softcore site on the internet, in spite of any flaws (and it does have flaws). MetArt was the first site I reviewed for PU, and at the time I gave it a score in the high 90s. Then on my second review I gave it a score in the higher 90s. Then I finally gave it a score of 99. But several other PU members have given MetArt a score in the 90s. And mbaya gave MetArt a score of 99 on his last review of MetArt. So I think that PU is loosening up, and gone are the days when a score near 100 is regarded as suspicious or unreasonable. It's a matter of attitude. 100 is perfect, and no site is perfect. But most newbies don't realize that. And probably don't care. But a score of 100 is still something that only a newbie will give, as far as I know. Or something that is very rare for regular PU member to give out. I took a look at lelulove, and it's not my kind of site. But we have all kinds of tastes. So maybe you found a person who absolutely loves that site--in spite of it's faults. If you read marcdc1's review, he states the site is not perfect, but it's his favorite porn site on the internet. And it's the only site he's ever been a long-term member for years. marcdc1 is not a newbie. He has a score of 186, which means he has close to 100 approved reviews. His review of lelulove is worth reading. It's not a puff piece. He gives reasons why he loves the site. So if he loves it, he feels it deserves a 100 score. That's his opinion. I can accept that. And inflation is part of life. Every year you go to the grocery store, the prices of most items keep rising. I remember when you could buy a loaf of bread for $0.35 back in the 1970s. Now the same loaf of bread costs over $4.00 (not the same exact loaf of bread, because I ate the one I bought in the 1970s, but a similar loaf of bread).   Edited on Sep 25, 2016, 12:49pm | |
|
||
| 09-25-16 01:00pm - 3010 days | #3 | |
|
mbaya (0)
Suspended  Posts: 891 Registered: Jul 07, '08 Location: new jersey |
I think a well written, logical coherent review can make a case for a high score. I still think that 100 is too perfect to be deserved though. I think the reason why so many PUers are against high scores is that they are written by newbies with A) no sense of perspective as they have not joined many sites and B) are not well presented cases that are persuasive. Why would anyone be impressed with a review that sounds like a shill, even when they are not? | |
|
||
| 09-25-16 06:09pm - 3010 days | #4 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
If an established member of PU decides to give a site a perfect score and has data to corroborate that score than although I don't agree with a perfect score. I can accept that for that reviewer the site has to have that score. I am significantly less forgiving to any new member who gives a perfect score or a very high score. I'm Even less forgiving if they do not have any actual data to show why they gave their score or if their score is significantly higher than a TBP review with data. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 09-26-16 12:24am - 3009 days | #5 | |
|
exotics4me (0)
Active User  Posts: 664 Registered: Jan 12, '07 Location: USA |
I've honestly tried my best to give a site a 100. I just keep running into that one little problem with the site that won't let me type the 100 in. I still think FTV Girls has the most potential for reaching the 100 from me, but then again, the problem, splitting videos into parts, most likely won't ever change. I still can say I would give FTV Girls a 100 if they posted full scene video option. Then ALS Scan, Nubiles and DDF Network come really close. My first time I jacked off, I thought I'd invented it. I looked down at my sloppy handful of junk and thought, This is going to make me rich. - Chuck Palahniuk | |
|
||
| 09-26-16 09:44am - 3009 days | #6 | |
|
merc77 (0)
Disabled User Posts: 291 Registered: Apr 17, '16 |
A site has to work hard to get 80-90 from me. I look at quality of videos, frequency of downloads as the main part of the grade. Cost, ease of access and other factors make the rest of the grade and few sites out there would be perfect which is what 100 tells me. "Dogs think people are Gods. Cats don't as they know better." - Kedi (2016) Dogs have masters; Cats have staff. | |
|
||
| 10-03-16 01:44pm - 3002 days | #7 | |
|
rearadmiral (0)
Active User Posts: 1,453 Registered: Jul 16, '07 Location: NB/Canada |
I agree with the thoughts in this thread. I'll be skeptical about a score of 100 but if the review is well reasoned and works to justify the score than I can live with it. But... I suspect that a 100 score has an element of subjectivity in it too. I try, and I'd like to think that I sometimes succeed, to step away from the kind of porn on a site I'm reviewing. I'd like to think that I could review a site featuring porn that I genuinely dislike and yet still score it high if the production values were good and the site did a lot of things right. But I suspect that's exactly what the staff reviewers here and other review sites have to do. | |
|
||
| 1-7 of 7 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
