|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » I'm Ready For My Closeup Mr. DeMille |
| 1-18 of 18 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 04-29-08 11:23am - 6081 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
jd1961 (0)
Active User  Posts: 296 Registered: Jun 07, '07 |
I'm Ready For My Closeup Mr. DeMille Something that has bothered me about porn for many years is the body part closeup. I've seen photo sets where I have counted a dozen straight body part closeup photos, which is continued a few photos later. I've seen videos where the camera will zoom in as close as possible for a minute or so, zoom back for a few seconds, then zoom right back in. As far as I'm concerned, this may interest someone who doesn't know what a girl looks like naked, but I find it to be infantile. Someone here made a comment about this, and the webmaster wrote back sounding very surprised, as if he thought that's what people really wanted to see. Is that what you really want to see? | |
|
||
| 04-29-08 01:15pm - 6081 days | #2 | |
|
JBDICK (0)
Active User  Posts: 160 Registered: Apr 04, '08 Location: Wales, UK |
Hi jd1961... the 3 sexiest things about a Pornstar should be her eyes, her lips (the ones on her face, surprise...surprise) and her voice...obviously you cannot have all of that and the rest of her is only upto muppet standards... so the rest are essential, but like a jigsaw puzzle of a beautiful scene, one piece cannot portray the beauty without the other pieces, except for the 3 I mention above which in themselves can convey a message. I could splat an apricot on my kitchen floor, dribble some syrup on it, take a close up of it, and post it on some website somewhere and I'll guarantee you someone will see it and get a boner...which reinforces jd1961 statement... Having said all that...I do like some closeups if I do know the model...I think it remains sexy if you still have her face or associated parts of the body in the shot. Nothing sexier than using some girls camel toe as the sights for lining up her face. Sort of on this topic...why do girls get undressed within seconds of the start of the scene...do they not realise that we want to see them teasing us before we get into the clinical trials... There is a fantastic scene where Taylor Rain is wearing her pumped up Pornstar heels, stockings and tiny panties, she opens the door and we have the pleasure of seeing her walk through the house until she finally arrives at a pool table and gets shafted and drafted at both ends...now that scene's sexiest moment is not the point where someone is trying to turn her apricot inside out, its the walk, her knowing sexiness doing it and staring at the camera as she walks past...and of course the point where she lets the boys cover her face like a glazed doughnut... Beautiful Girls Covered in Pearls and No Oysters in Sight | |
|
||
| 04-29-08 01:36pm - 6081 days | #3 | |
|
The Clyde (0)
Active User  Posts: 31 Registered: Jun 21, '07 Location: Michigan |
I rather like the close up shots.... I would rather have a mixture of close and glamour shots in a photoset. In videos are like it down and dirty with closeups and lots of action. I could really care less about the "art" Funny thing about it... I don't condemn those who like the artsy shots, it really doesn't bother me. I simply choose to download sets that do appeal to me. Kinky | Inky | Pinky | Stinky <><><> Give em to me Hotter than Fire <><><> | |
|
||
| 04-29-08 03:32pm - 6081 days | #4 | |
|
littlejoe (0)
Active User Posts: 49 Registered: Jan 25, '07 Location: earth |
i like closeups where the girl is lying on her back and u can see her face in the background while doing a closeup (ftv does this a lot!). but i too prefer to see the whole model in videos. closeups are great, just not the focus of the video | |
|
||
| 04-29-08 06:29pm - 6080 days | #5 | |
|
jd1961 (0)
Active User Posts: 296 Registered: Jun 07, '07 |
That's not a closeup. A closeup is when the body part fills the whole frame. | |
|
||
| 04-29-08 07:42pm - 6080 days | #6 | |
|
littlejoe (0)
Active User Posts: 49 Registered: Jan 25, '07 Location: earth |
no, actually it is | |
|
||
| 04-29-08 09:09pm - 6080 days | #7 | ||
|
Toadsith (0)
Active User  Posts: 936 Registered: Dec 07, '07 Location: USA |
I think what littlejoe is referring to is the style of close up where the camera will be a few inches away from the model's crotch, with said crotch in focus, but you can see the model's face peering down at the camera. Generally the model will be out of focus as the aperture has to be pretty wide open for easy to make out details when exploring the crotch area. Unless they decide to light the scene with arc welders. As the A-Team taught me: You can conquer the world as long as you have an abundant supply of welding equipment. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!" Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo | ||
|
|||
| 04-29-08 11:35pm - 6080 days | #8 | |
|
malikstarks (0)
Active User Posts: 108 Registered: Nov 19, '07 Location: Florida |
Agree 100%, even I myself have a strong leg and foot fetish, but hate (foot fetish) sites that focus obsessively on feet and leg closeups. Nonetheless I have to surmise that this is what most guys like otherwise it probably wouldn't be as popular as it is. There are sites that have very few closeups, most notably (from my experience), nude arty sites like Met-Art and Abby Winters, also Allover40 comes to mind. (This just covers pics though) | |
|
||
| 04-30-08 02:32am - 6080 days | #9 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
A few closeups of the girl's face, eyes, breasts, and ass (especially) are nice, though there also have to be more complete shots as well. I hate it when there's a lovely shot of the girl's ass all evenly flat (but still round!) on a bed but no shots at the same angle, top of head (no cropping!) to upper thighs. I think the people who put out photosets like that are idiots. My computer monitor knows this better than anyone. The "In Tight" (which at least used to be a feature at DigitalDesire), "Bodyscape" (which still shows up at MPL Studios), and such are mostly a friggin' waste of time and money. I suppose it's life imitating art (?). But, as I've said before: Fuck art! I mean FUCK ... ART! We want porn! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-30-08 04:11am - 6080 days | #10 | |
|
littlejoe (0)
Active User Posts: 49 Registered: Jan 25, '07 Location: earth |
thx for clearing that up. i didnt do a good job 1st time around | |
|
||
| 04-30-08 04:26am - 6080 days | #11 | |
|
jd1961 (0)
Active User Posts: 296 Registered: Jun 07, '07 |
http://img209.imagevenue.com/img.php?ima...ol_043_123_428lo.jpg | |
|
||
| 04-30-08 09:58am - 6080 days | #12 | |
|
shooterbo (0)
Active User  Posts: 185 Registered: Apr 25, '07 |
Yep..... | |
|
||
| 04-30-08 12:03pm - 6080 days | #13 | |
|
JBDICK (0)
Active User Posts: 160 Registered: Apr 04, '08 Location: Wales, UK |
that's an apricot... confirms another theory I have that you can use a girls apricot to identify her like crime and fingerprints...they are all unique... Beautiful Girls Covered in Pearls and No Oysters in Sight | |
|
||
| 04-30-08 07:40pm - 6079 days | #14 | |
|
Toadsith (0)
Active User Posts: 936 Registered: Dec 07, '07 Location: USA |
I hadn't replied directly to the question this thread posed, so here goes. In the realm of photos, yes - I am a fan of close-ups. As has been pointed out, the unmentionables are unique to each model, and are quite beautiful in their own right. However, I do not want a photo set without some diversity - there's more to a model than just her crotch. I like ATK, Abby Winters, MET Art (or Met Art as Porn Users spells despite it being an abbreviation not a name), Simon Scans and so on - as they focus on the full body of the model just as much, or in many cases more than the crotch. Though I do feel like I haven't gotten my money's worth if I don't get a few good solid peeks down there - so I like close-ups, but I don't want that to be the whole show. As for video - I'm less of a fan of that style. I want to see the model's face much of the time as I like to pretend that she is getting off as much as she acts like she is. I can't get that feeling from watching a some throbbing holes. Sure, no questions about the bees and birds from that type of camera work, but it isn't exactly interesting either. I'm actually rather fond of the extreme sites I recently signed up with - Facial Abuse and its sister sites, as they focus on the models face quite a bit. In their case they want the model to look ashamed and upset, but still, they have the right idea in mind for the camera work. It's gritty but their heart's in the right place, lol So, to wrap this up, I like close-ups and I don't want them to go away, but I think they should be used sparingly, sort of like an exclamation point: very useful when needed, but it gets boring if you end every sentence with it. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!" Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo Edited on May 02, 2008, 09:05am (Toadsith: Grammar fix.) | |
|
||
| 05-02-08 04:10am - 6078 days | #15 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User  Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I like close-ups, particularly from underneath. As I may or may not have mentioned, I have this slight femdom kink and in my hyper-active imagination the women (yes, plural) are always overhead, ready to take a seat, or simply to torture by proximity, or to do other unlady-like things. While I like close-ups I don't care for too many in the same set or TOO close up. I mean, I don't necessarily need to see her kidneys. And now for some reason I'm thinking of that can of apricots in the fridge... You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-02-08 07:11pm - 6077 days | #16 | |
|
jd1961 (0)
Active User Posts: 296 Registered: Jun 07, '07 |
Those old Most Erotic Teens sets aren't so easy to come by anymore. | |
|
||
| 05-03-08 01:24pm - 6077 days | #17 | |
|
Toadsith (0)
Active User Posts: 936 Registered: Dec 07, '07 Location: USA |
To be honest, much like the new Abby Winters setup, I'm very confused about why MET Art break apart and spawned its kin. It seems very complex, they have this suite of sites that they keep asking me to join. (I'm still on the mailing list, after all these years. Guess I just like looking at the pretty pictures.) MET Art, Errotica Archives, MET Models - the content looks to all be very similar and they recommend joining all three at once. So why not just make it one site? I must say though, even when I was a member, was many years ago now, the Most Erotic Teen stuff was already slowly being removed. Classified as not large enough images I guess. I do enjoy the large images, but I like when sites have history and I think they shouldn't be ashamed by their past. Oh well, I guess not everyone shares that opinion. "I'm not a number, I'm a free man!" Second Grand Order Poobah in the Loyal Order of the Water Buffalo | |
|
||
| 05-07-08 05:01pm - 6072 days | #18 | |
|
JBDICK (0)
Active User Posts: 160 Registered: Apr 04, '08 Location: Wales, UK |
just to refresh this thread with an example of a good closeup with peripheral context...i.e. the models face... http://www.imagefap.com/image.php?id=121...id=916356&page=6 Beautiful Girls Covered in Pearls and No Oysters in Sight | |
|
||
| 1-18 of 18 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
