|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » Areola reduction surgery?!?! |
| 1-9 of 9 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 05-04-12 01:58am - 4615 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User  Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Areola reduction surgery?!?! It's bad enough that: 1)trendy magazines and gay fashion designers have convinced women that being 89 pounds is sexually attractive to the average male, and that 2) being 89 pounds; and it being the case that an unwieldly percentage of that weight comes from ridiculous silicone breast implants which make these women look like scarred, starving mannequins or bizarre, animated Barbie dolls - - - No, this outrage isn't enough. Now we have somehow gotten it into the heads of women that having large, or puffy areolas is somehow a dire negative when it comes to the matter of appearing attractive to men. I can't possibly describe how appalled I am at the idea that some poor woman, with beautiful, large, dark, or puffy areolas, is at this very moment wondering why she was so cursed, and is checking her bank account to see if she can afford having her breasts mutilated by some money-grubbing, unscrupulous physician, in order to have more "attractive, youthful-looking" breasts. The world is truly upside down. It's gone from drastically insane to catastrophically insane. I know there are those of you out there who actually prefer small areolas to large ones. But would you want your wife, or your lover, who happened to have large or thicker areolas, to be surgically altered? Do you think that would make her breasts more appealing to you? If so, please explain it to me so I can understand. Because to me, it seems monstrous and obscene. I DO understand that in some cases, a cosmetic, surgical modification would be helpful. I am not ranting against women with various deformities who are seeking help. I am in full support of those women. What I am addressing are the great numbers of women who have naturally large, thick areolas who may be vulnerable to the nonsensical idea that they are beset with a physical attribute which is in some way inferior and unattractive. Ugh....Long live large areolas! Ladies, they are beautiful! Don't give in to the nonsense. http://www.jromano.com/BreastEnhancement...AreolaReduction.html Look at the comments to the next link here: http://www.makemeheal.com/answers/viewMB...qid=3648&eid=202 doctors, or make-believe doctors, soliciting photos from women concerned about their breasts. At least there is one doc with the ethical wherewithal to tell the questioner that her areloas are perfectly fine, but these guys are clearly in the minority. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on May 04, 2012, 02:13am | |
|
||
| 05-04-12 04:29am - 4615 days | #2 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
This is even more disgusting. Scroll all the way down to see the mutilation and butchery being done on these women. http://www.poustiplasticsurgery.com/case...cone-gel-implants-3/ You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-04-12 04:37am - 4615 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
A news article from yesterday, states Vogue magazine, will no longer feature models that are less than 16, or appear too thin. ............... ............... Vogue bans too-skinny models from its pages Associated Press By SAMANTHA CRITCHELL 12 hrs ago NEW YORK (AP) Vogue magazine, perhaps the world's top arbiter of style, is making a statement about its own models: Too young and too thin is no longer in. The 19 editors of Vogue magazines around the world made a pact to project the image of healthy models, according to a Conde Nast International announcement Thursday. They agreed to "not knowingly work with models under the age of 16 or who appear to have an eating disorder," and said they will ask casting directors to check IDs at photo shoots and fashion shows and for ad campaigns. The move is an important one for the fashion world, said former model Sara Ziff, who was discovered at 14 and has since founded The Model Alliance, dedicated to improving the working conditions of models and persuading the industry to take better care of its young. "Most editions of Vogue regularly hire models who are minors, so for Vogue to commit to no longer using models under the age of 16 marks an evolution in the industry," she said. "We hope other magazines and fashion brands will follow Vogue's impressive lead." American, French, Chinese and British editions of the fashion glossies are among those that will start following the new guidelines with their June issues; the Japanese edition will begin with its July book. "Vogue believes that good health is beautiful. Vogue Editors around the world want the magazines to reflect their commitment to the health of the models who appear on the pages and the well-being of their readers," said Conde Nast International Chairman Jonathan Newhouse in a statement. Models' health and especially their weight has been a lightning rod the past few years, especially after the death of two models from apparent complications from eating disorders in 2006-07, but the focus, until now, has been on runway fashion shows. The Council of Fashion Designers of America adopted a voluntary initiative in 2007, which emphasizes age minimums and healthy working environments during New York Fashion Week, and London Fashion Week designers sign a contract with the British Fashion Council to use models who are at least 16. The primary fashion organizations in Italy and Spain banned catwalk models who fall below a certain Body Mass Index level, and earlier this year, Israel's government passed an anti-skinny-model law. Still, there is persistent criticism that the fashion world creates a largely unattainable and unhealthy standard that particularly affects impressionable young girls. "We know that there is an impact for young girls and boys, by the way of what is put in front of them in terms of media," said Elissa J. Brown, professor of psychology at St. John University and founder of The Partners Program, a specialized therapy program for children and adolescents. A change in what they see on the pages of prestigious fashion magazines could change the image of what they would strive for, she said. It wouldn't hurt for parents to take a look at healthier looking models, too, she added. "I'm a mother and I hear other mothers talk about the parts of their bodies they don't like in front of their daughters instead of talking about health. If the message becomes about health, it could have a tremendous impact." The Vogue guidelines are largely similar to the CFDA's no surprise since U.S. editor-in-chief Anna Wintour was instrumental in crafting them. "CFDA is pleased to see all the Vogue magazines unite in support of model health," CFDA CEO Steven Kolb said. "This increased level of support makes the message of 'Health is Beauty' even stronger." Conde Nast, in its announcement, recognized that fashion models serve as role models for "many women," and the publisher wants to ensure that the models in its pages "are well cared for and educated in ways that will encourage and help them to take care of themselves, addressing as many of the pressing issues relating to ill-health in the industry as can realistically be tackled." Ziff said the age restriction is important for other reasons, too. "The use of underaged models is linked to financial exploitation, eating disorders, interrupted schooling, and contributes to models' overall lack of empowerment in the workplace," she said. "We simply believe that 14 is too young to be working in this very grown-up industry, and we're glad that Condι Nast International is making this commitment. In addition to agreeing not to knowingly work with models under 16 or with eating disorders, the Vogue pact says the magazines will help "structure mentoring programs" for younger models and raise awareness of the problem of model health. The magazines said they would encourage healthy working conditions backstage and encourage designers "to consider the consequences of unrealistically small sample sizes of their clothing, which limits the range of women who can be photographed in their clothes, and encourages the use of extremely thin models." Conde Nast publishes other magazines, including Glamour and Allure, but a spokeswoman said there are no current plans for these guidelines to be adopted across the company. Runway model Coco Rocha applauded the changes. "I've long been a vocal supporter of setting reasonable standards in the modeling industry," she said in an email. "Not every model appears in Vogue, but every model and every magazine looks up to them as the standard (bearer). I can only imagine this will be a solid step in a direction that will benefit models for generations to come. " ___ Online: http://www.condenast.com http://www.vogue.com/ | |
|
||
| 05-04-12 07:00am - 4615 days | #4 | |
|
PinkPanther (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
Yeah, that areola reduction thing is bad news. Karla Lopez aka Karla Spice got that and it caused her enhanced boobs to look like franken-tits with scarring all around the areola. I doubt they had any sensitivity for her after that surgery. | |
|
||
| 05-04-12 07:59am - 4615 days | #5 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Oh my God, that poor girl. She's absolutely gorgeous! Why in the world would she get it into her head that she needed her areolas reduced??? Reduced! Large areolas look fucking wonderful, especially on Latina women. My ex wife had large ones and DAMMMMMMMMN do I miss them. What the hell is going on? Are there guys out there who think tiny, boy-nipples are sexy on a woman? What the hell? If there are any PU members out there who think tiny boy-nipples are sexy on women, will you please have the nads to post here in this thread, so I can try to get inside your mind and help you out of your delerium? Sorry, but this is hugely upsetting to me. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-04-12 08:01am - 4615 days | #6 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Thanks for that article, lk2fireone. That is very good news. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-04-12 09:23am - 4615 days | #7 | |
|
Monahan (0)
Active User  Posts: 348 Registered: Jan 17, '07 Location: SF Valley, CA |
Wow! What a total shame. In the "before" photo the babe has a rack that totally turns me on. All natural, perfect nips and large areolae. Butchery is the right term. | |
|
||
| 05-04-12 08:48pm - 4614 days | #8 | |
|
PinkPanther (0)
Active User Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
I quite like women with tiny nipples, but I was no advocate of Karla surgically fucking with hers. I doubt that you would find many guys that like tiny-nipple babes that like the look when accomplished through surgery. I don't know who goes out and convinces women with long pussy lips that they should get them clipped or women with large areolas that they should get them fucked with - it's pretty fucking weird. | |
|
||
| 05-09-12 11:02pm - 4609 days | #9 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I appreciate your attitude towards this, PinkPanther. It's fine having a certain taste. After all, I don't suppose we really have any control over what pushes our buttons and what turns us off. You have a good and moral view of things. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 1-9 of 9 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
