|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
anyonebutme (0)
|
| 201-250 of 294 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Page 5 | 6 | Next Page > |
| 05-27-10 11:09pm - 5323 days | #4 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User  Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
always liked 1By-Day & InFocusGirls Suburban Amateurs has some good stuff too | |
|
||
| 05-26-10 07:02pm - 5324 days | #33 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Mr. President, we must not allow a sperm and egg gap! | |
|
||
| 05-25-10 03:18pm - 5325 days | #20 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
I've always considered that to be the "politically correct" objection to the act. As we can no longer even acknowledge biblical sins out in the open any more, the message needed to be tweaked just a bit for the sins the atheists happen to agree with too. | |
|
||
| 05-25-10 03:11pm - 5325 days | #17 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Carrots don't consent to being eaten either. And then there is the problem of treehuggers and all the non-consensual groping  | |
|
||
| 05-25-10 02:04pm - 5325 days | #10 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Considering the act is illegal in most if not all civilized countries, let alone filming and distributing it... | |
|
||
| 05-25-10 12:33am - 5326 days | #25 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
anyways, this is what's so great about hi-res photography, you get the best of both worlds! Zoom in for the gynecological views, zoom out for full-body enjoyment | |
|
||
| 05-24-10 10:44pm - 5326 days | #24 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Well I guess I just assume that if it is termed gynecologic closeups, it would be a close-up shot that does not have a cock in sight. I mean, how many cocks is one going to see in a gynecologist's office?  | |
|
||
| 05-24-10 08:34pm - 5326 days | #19 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
I don't particularly like the idea of subscriptions in the first place! I'd rather buy on a per-scene basis, but I understand it's not feasible for sites to do things that way either. I do not like paying for content when I haven't a clue what it is even going to be. That being said, I do have two long-term subscriptions currently  one of which you'd all think I was insane for buying  if I said what it is | |
|
||
| 05-24-10 08:27am - 5326 days | #3 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Same with just about everything else in porn, lots of pervs want to watch the close shots. On the grander scale, there are far worse things some pornographers choose to focus on than closeup pussy shots | |
|
||
| 05-23-10 03:13am - 5328 days | #11 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
It does make a difference in the side discussion of the overall health of the industry. Plus that this site shutting down is not depriving us access to any content. But to the discussion of long term subscriptions, no there isn't much difference between the two. | |
|
||
| 05-22-10 10:47pm - 5328 days | #9 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
This is fine and all, but lets not forget that American Vice is not a producer, just a reseller. To PinkPanther's comment on Europe's issues, actually they may be helped out here with the dollar becoming stronger against the euro. | |
|
||
| 05-14-10 01:05pm - 5336 days | #13 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
It does makes it more difficult to pull up images of dozens of random ugly guys banging one's daughter from a quick google image search if she used a common name like Alice or something. There is a certain reality to this work that is conveniently easy to dismiss from over here on this side of the internet. | |
|
||
| 05-13-10 11:09pm - 5337 days | #8 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Websites can use whatever name they want. Like one example is Eufrat's video on the website givemepink.com. She is listed under the name Janette, then immediately as the scene begins the cameraman asks "What is your name?" "Eufrat". It's just the way it is. Don't look in to it any further than webmasters are free to name them whatever they choose. Once the girl does up work for someone else, it's the pornographer who owns the works and full rights to make money off it any way he can - the girl just gets a one-time payment up front. At that point, it is entirely the site owner's decision what name to put up that he wants to to sell his work. | |
|
||
| 05-13-10 08:19pm - 5337 days | #6 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Some girls don't want hordes of perverts following them around the internet. Some girls don't want celebrity status from being the biggest slut in town. | |
|
||
| 05-12-10 10:56pm - 5338 days | #16 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
As someone who watches only all-girl scenes, I can't recall the last time I watched a facial  | |
|
||
| 05-12-10 10:53pm - 5338 days | #4 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
She definitely did up a few scenes with her boyfriend for her site tawneestone.com , but I don't think they exist on the site anymore. There were boy/girl scenes of a number of the other lightspeed girls that were later taken off too. | |
|
||
| 05-08-10 07:12pm - 5342 days | #3 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
So you don't like girls mouthing toys, nor monster cocks, girls talking while performing, and no facials. got it  | |
|
||
| 05-06-10 11:07am - 5344 days | #21 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
jerkoffinstructors.com Jana Cova also has a ton of dirty talking dvds over on the video catalog pages of playtimevideo.com , along with similar scenes of many of the hot Czech & American girls. The exact kind of things you're talking about in the first post. | |
|
||
| 05-06-10 01:17am - 5345 days | #5 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Bandwidth is a finite resource. There is no way to get around this limitation. What would you prefer them to do? Edited on May 06, 2010, 01:22am | |
|
||
| 05-05-10 07:14pm - 5345 days | #10 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Actually it's a studied phenomenon in human behavior  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Paradox_of_Choice | |
|
||
| 05-05-10 07:11pm - 5345 days | #3 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
These guys are pornographers, not tech geeks. Many of them, believe it or not, actually do try their best - but the money just is not there for many of them to have insanely fast servers on insanely fast connections with a highly trained dedicated support staff on-duty 24/7. | |
|
||
| 05-05-10 05:35pm - 5345 days | #8 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
There are certainly many various pros and cons to the artsy soft nude sites, much more than ever could be discussed in a single post. I don't think anyone will disagree that they are the easiest and cheapest to create content for. On top of that, this really can be a side hobby of someone for some extra cash, the site does not need to be a big money maker. A photographer can create a month's worth of updates in 3 days. Then I really think this is going to be the defining point in porn moving forward - ask yourself this question, who is going to pay for porn knowing it can be had for free by a simple google search? I believe those who like artsy soft nudes is high up on that list. The biggest con for these sites is the limited variety of girls. Go from one site to the next near all the girls on the first site are also found on the second. Due to the economics, you rarely if ever find exclusive girls on a small-time photography site, to make someone want to join it for more than the photographer's style. How often will you find on a smaller site a girl who is not also found on Met-Art? Actually I would like to mention just for the sake of mentioning, I much prefer the soft nude sites that update 2 or 3 times a week, over a site like Met-Art that updates 28 times a week! Sounds strange, but something is just more satisfying about a site with limited viewing choices. I find myself lost in a daze trying to navigate the mega sites... Edited on May 05, 2010, 05:53pm | |
|
||
| 05-05-10 02:15pm - 5345 days | #2 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
They come and go. I like them, but they usually have a year or two then go under. Then more come up and give it a try. Been like this for the past decade. I imagine their ultimate goal is to be picked up as a contributing photographer to Met-Art or FemJoy, I think that is where the real money is. | |
|
||
| 05-03-10 12:14pm - 5347 days | #9 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
I got to be physically at the AEE show & AVN awards back in January some photos by a quick google search: http://www.avn.com/galleries/3964/61977/ | |
|
||
| 05-03-10 09:48am - 5347 days | #7 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Faye is not that bad looking. The girl I like to follow around the 'net went skinnier than that, has been up & down & up & down in weight for the past 3 years now. I don't like it, but yeah, Faye not all that bad. | |
|
||
| 05-01-10 09:53am - 5349 days | #8 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Ah man, I find that to be one of the best parts of solo vids! If for nothing else than the sheer absurdity factor  Still, it depends on the girl. Some do it very well, some do it very lamely. But then again, that's the whole crapshoot that is porn, no matter what the genre. Sometimes you get an amazing scene, sometimes not. | |
|
||
| 04-30-10 04:18pm - 5350 days | #7 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Sometimes you hit good timing for a deal, and sometimes you don't. It all evens out in the end. Couple months ago I picked up a year subscription to sapphic-erotica for a $100 special, where current subscribers still only had 6 months for $100. And, if I wanted too, I could have passed on that deal, and in a year subscribe for 1 month @ $20 and downloaded all the updates. Life just becomes more enjoyable when one stops worrying about squeezing every penny of value out of something. I'm not being loyal to them, and they are not being loyal to me. Although it is hella fun when the site *does* respond and is loyal to me  | |
|
||
| 04-30-10 11:08am - 5350 days | #3 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
I suppose I just look at it as, if the work the guy puts out is good, like it would have to be to have a long term membership, then he deserves the money I give him. Life is too short to be fiercely protective of an amount like $10. | |
|
||
| 04-29-10 01:57pm - 5351 days | #172 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
not finding the site cumfortune.com in here | |
|
||
| 04-16-10 05:05pm - 5364 days | #6 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Videos, especially Hollywood film based movies, are supposed to look grainy. Maybe with a good crisp display you are just now seeing video as they actually are? | |
|
||
| 04-14-10 02:30pm - 5366 days | #2 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Watermark is in the video clip http://www.teasersvod.com/tour/models/20...tober/Eden_Adams.php | |
|
||
| 04-12-10 07:10pm - 5368 days | #19 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Yep, they still develop the browser. | |
|
||
| 04-11-10 06:33pm - 5369 days | #16 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
No one else uses the Sea Monkey browser? I'm not a hopey-changey kind of guy, I use Sea Monkey because it still holds the same interface & menus that go back all the way to Netscape 4  | |
|
||
| 03-26-10 03:21pm - 5385 days | #13 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
But there are many regulars who take their duties far too seriously around here, in my opinion. I read some of the reviews and comments and I'm in shock. Porn is to be enjoyed. I have to wonder if some here when joining a new site specifically look for something to piss them off, just to come back here and blow it way out of proportion! These are pornographers. They don't have MBA degrees. They don't have PR staffs. They are not tech geeks. Yet some regulars around here demand they be perfect. And I mean, I read the comments, and just want to shout out "Damn, take a step back and look at this! you are pissed off over what is a very trivial issue" What is the purpose around here? So onlookers can read and see how pissed off everyone is at every website? Remember, onlookers are not just looking for site to site comparisons, they are also looking for reviews with the added alternative of tube sites, torrents, rapidshare, usenet, etc. Whatever... I give up, you guys can have your little club. | |
|
||
| 03-22-10 07:33pm - 5389 days | #4 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Everyone has their opinion on what label to give them. Is it "porn"? Is it something else? I keep it simple. My definition of porn is this - if the images are being sold for the primary purpose of masturbation, then it is porn. If not, then it is something else. Then take NYPD Blue, the nudity used in that show I'm sure was not added in for others to masturbate to, hence it's not porn. Couple other movie references off the top of my head: A Clockwork Orange = not porn Monty Python's The Meaning of Life = not porn. Edited on Mar 22, 2010, 07:37pm | |
|
||
| 03-22-10 12:50pm - 5389 days | #165 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
There was a new site sybian1.com that I saw opened up this past week | |
|
||
| 03-22-10 01:55am - 5390 days | #6 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Teendreams buys lots of material from general content producers. Sometimes they bought exclusive rights to a set, sometimes not. But due to the downturn in porn economics, content producers turned around and opened up everything they had to everyone, not honoring the exclusive agreement they had with certain sites. In other words, Teendreams is not trying to piss you off. | |
|
||
| 03-15-10 11:33pm - 5396 days | #29 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
That's not why. Watch enough softcore girls, you'll understand that the moment she starts working with guys on camera, marks the beginning of the end of her career, and you can often watch her life take a turn for the worse. It's not quite as fun as one may fantasize. | |
|
||
| 03-15-10 01:24pm - 5396 days | #27 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Heh I have two fav models, one has a tatoo, just checked her Femjoy sets, there's not a photo that even would display the tatoo, photoshopped or not! It's there in the video though. I know other sites Sapphic Erotica and In Focus Girls photoshops out all tattoos. | |
|
||
| 03-14-10 03:55am - 5398 days | #3 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Wow! You haven't figured out yet that Professional Wrestling is *fake*? News flash, wrestlers are not being hurt, they are not being killed. And boxing is just about dead as a sport. Better to go with something more popular, like football. Oh, wait, government *is* taking actions against the violence in that sport too. There are huge differences between how a porn performer is created, and how a boxer or MMA fighter is trained. Even going at it from the opposite angle, compare someone who is beat up, versus someone who was raped, you going to tell us you don't see the difference in the psychological impact those have on the victims? But let's just get down to the real test - pornwatcher, and anyone else here too, would you want your own daughter entering the porn industry? Or how would you feel if your son trained to be a fighter? Yea, there is a difference. | |
|
||
| 03-13-10 04:04pm - 5398 days | #16 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Don't knock it 'till you've tried it ;) | |
|
||
| 03-13-10 12:47pm - 5398 days | #2 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Q: Is bi-sexuality a requirement for enjoying eastern european porn? A: No Watch only what you want, ignore what you don't. Eastern European porn is also home to the best girl-only porn in the world | |
|
||
| 03-11-10 08:39pm - 5400 days | #37 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
...and porn has childless 22-year old milfs If you want to get in to the dictionary definition of "soft-core" it simply means "sexually arousing depictions that are not fully explicit" or "Being less explicit than hard-core material in depicting or describing sexual activity". One can easily make the case that depicting penetration with a toy instead of a guy with a cock, fits "soft-core pornography". Don't ever get hung up on labels. | |
|
||
| 03-07-10 07:06pm - 5404 days | #20 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Microsoft's built-in zip file support in Windows does *not* open .rar files renamed to .zip And winrar does not automatically convert zip files to rar files. This program is just able to open files using either compression/formatting technique. | |
|
||
| 03-05-10 09:07pm - 5406 days | #15 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Compression artifacts in jpegs usually are best seen running the lengths of edges in the image and making large areas of a solid color fuzzy. Artifacts in mpeg videos usually take the shape of a block usually around the edges in the image. Here is an image from even a Blu-ray with compression artifacts (copy & paste the link) http://www.pics-hosting.com/files/yafqp1o08knzm3l4jnoq.png Edited on Mar 05, 2010, 09:12pm | |
|
||
| 03-05-10 09:04pm - 5406 days | #14 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
This is due to other factors, pick your favorite out of these possibilities: (1) when upgraded to a better monitor, better clarity, revealing flaws in the source image that the previous monitor did not show (2) since bandwidth is faster & cheaper, sites are putting out higher quality photos than ever before, after getting used to today's quality, yesterday's doesn't look as hot as it used to (3) you're memory is fading. There is sufficient tolerance built into digital file storage that you are not experiencing actual degradation of the file. | |
|
||
| 02-28-10 05:56pm - 5411 days | #28 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
I have my own anal porn theory. Years ago vaginal sex was the porn industry, what everyone did. Very little anal, very little softcore. Then along came the internet. Opened up the adult industry to a new breed of porn viewers, the softcore fans, ones who may never have stepped into an adult store in their lives if it were not for internet porn. Two types of girls in porn, those capable of great passionate amazing vaginal sex scenes, and those who are not. Those who are, figured out they can make a good enough career doing soft girl-only or solo-only porn. That left the vaginal sex porn to the less desire-able girls, and for the adult industry to compensate to this, had to move to anal sex with these girls for the viewing audience to get excited. (I'm not referring to the current roster of girls in porn, they are *very* desire-able, and innocent of what occurred years prior) And thus the divide in porn, lots of soft porn, lots of anal sex, but not a whole lot in-between. I mean, talk to those who buy lots of anal porn, they are all the same, they cry out that vaginal porn is BORING... It's either boring because of the physical act, or of the performance of the girl. What's the difference between vaginal sex and anal sex? One inch. So I doubt it's the physical act that bores them... Or I'm just an idiot - I can't ever deny that =Þ | |
|
||
| 02-28-10 05:30pm - 5411 days | #24 | ||
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
That's what makes it great!
Ever chew on a pen? I don't expect these girls to play with toys in their mouths when the camera is not around. Just like I don't expect them to ever have two cocks up their asses when the camera is not around. It's just porn. And while I fully concede that I am an idiot, I will continue assuming that playing with the toys in their mouths is not doing any harm physically or emotionally. What else is there to object to? Seriously, though, no problems with a girl putting a strap-on made of a mysterious concoction of chemicals in her vagina, but the mouth is off limits? Edited on Feb 28, 2010, 05:36pm | ||
|
|||
| 02-27-10 06:12pm - 5412 days | #12 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
^^^ Apologies, that particular response was directed towards the topic question, and Capn, the thread creator. | |
|
||
| 02-27-10 05:51pm - 5412 days | #10 | |
|
anyonebutme (0)
Active User Posts: 294 Registered: Aug 23, '09 |
Not every site needs to cater to everyone's desires. How about karupspc for example (only because I have a subscription currently with them), in the most recent 20 photosets, 3 are b/g sets, 1 is a g/g set without toys, 2 are solo with toys, 14 are solo without toys! | |
|
||
| 201-250 of 294 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Page 5 | 6 | Next Page > |
|
