| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
My Free Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
That's not quite true. The top models do a lot to earn the money they take in, it's just not always evident to a viewer exactly why a given tip was sent. Every tip is sent for a reason, and a reason why it went to one person and not another.
But I do agree it's damn difficult for a new girl to start into it.
|
12-22-16 08:46am
|
Reply
2
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
Often it's the artistic image the person creating the content wants the final video to look like, crispness, lighting, etc. Bandwidth is also actually quite an expense for sites to provide. And personally, I don't like sites that give only the options of either crappy SD or super-ultra-large-file-size-HD that has only very marginal at best improvement over HD videos half the filesize.
I'd rather have 20 good quality 720p videos saved off from a site than have just 3 super-mega-high-quality HD videos taking up the same hard drive space.
|
01-31-16 11:53am
|
Reply
3
|
Dorcel Club
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Site is fine. Some scenes are good video quality. Other scenes are poor video quality. Don't expect much accompanying photos. And the model index occasionally has videos incorrectly marked with which models are in the scenes.
No problems signing up or canceling, no shady unsuspecting upsells while browsing the site.
|
01-31-16 11:39am
|
Reply
4
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
Roberto281's Comment
Site consistently downloads at 15mbps for me.
|
01-01-16 11:50pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
I can't recall ever coming close to 300gb in any month, honestly I'd be surprised if I've hit that limit in any 5-month period.
|
12-19-15 09:34pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Not an easy question to answer. The best are solo, no toy videos. But it's not that common for a porn model to really excel at that content. So might go with solo w/ toys, or soft lez because the quantity of good material is much greater.
|
11-15-14 08:31pm
|
Reply
7
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Last time I checked, you have the option to not sign up. Is this no longer the case? Either the material is worth $50 to you, in which case you'll buy, or it is not worth $50 and you will pass.
|
08-25-14 06:36pm
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
The option "She turned into a MILF" is interesting, as the acronym itself literally says she's someone you still highly desire. "She aged" is probably the more correct option, but that just sounds mean and insulting to say.
I voted for "she moved into hard from soft". I'm completely backwards in my likes compared to the typical internet porn surfer.
|
02-12-14 11:55am
|
Reply
9
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Parsnip's Comment
I have cut way back on porn purchases, enjoyment in the material is way down, largely due to all the anal, but it's just a part of the problem - a site has to cater to the people who spend the money. If I don't spend my money while all the anal fans do, they get to dictate what scenes are created in the future.
|
12-26-13 10:22pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As someone who's full time job is computer services for businesses and individuals, believe me, a computer tech has seen it all and does not seek out saved material to judge the owner. Your porn is nothing special.
|
07-19-13 12:02am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only when the video shows scars or other signs of abuse does it become a turn-off.
|
04-16-13 06:24am
|
Reply
12
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcie's Comment
I feel a little bad for mentioning here, I checked out this website a couple weeks back and there is no update schedule, and the updates that do come in sporadically are often ones that were previously published on the site in years past. A very large percentage (more than half) of the pics and videos that were once available on the site are no longer available. Several of the listed videos, click on them and the video files do not exist on the server. Of the videos present, they are lesser quality than was available previously, and many encoded in the wrong aspect ratio.
|
12-02-12 05:11pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Other.
I inquire to what the director became sick from.
|
11-27-12 07:33pm
|
Reply
14
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
There are other ways that malware can screw things up.
For example, DDF has a bar at the top with interactions with google plus, facebook, & twitter, it is possible to have malware on your own computer that is redirecting DNS lookups on those popular domains to alternate sites.
Part of my daily job is cleaning viruses off computers, no anti-virus software is perfect. I clean up nasty virus that get on computers that are running Norton Anti-Virus, McAfee, Microsoft Security Essentials, Kaspersky, NOD32, Avast, AVG, the list goes on.
No anti-virus software is perfect, especially when it comes to rootkits which can be very nasty and very evasive. Rootkits often cause very strange things to happen while browsing the web.
In other words, be cautious browsing the web, but also make sure to inspect your own computer thoroughly when anything shows up.
And often double-check your Adobe flash & reader software, and java software, are updated to the current versions. Java especially has been where I've seen most recent malware get in.
|
10-28-12 07:00pm
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
No, seriously, if someone scores a site a 90, while stating in the review that at the time of the review there were, say for example, 40 scenes available - why would ANYONE have a problem with that review? Someone please give me a reason for why you would have a problem with such a review.
If you have reason to believe the review was a false or fake review, then by all means go after it. But you cannot challenge a review because the other person values different things than you do.
And if one of you sees someone score a new site higher than you believe it should be scored, then you subscribe to the website yourself and write your own competing review.
Every single website began as a new site, and all the top sites grew because there were people willing to give them a chance early on.
And full disclosure, the one thing that does irk me, are those who believe a website subscription entitles them to uninterrupted 24/7 full speed data streaming. Though I haven't ranted on that in a long while. If this were the widespread attitude of porn subscribers, simply put there would be little to no porn produced anymore. Ask any porn website operator how he really feels about users who use their bandwidth to the maximum.
|
02-12-12 10:47pm
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
And as a follow-up, in particular to the third option - once you review a site, unless that site removes content, why would you ever change your score, change your review?
All reviews are based on the content that is available at the time of subscribing.
As the site grows, or doesn't grow, in the future, the content that was the entire basis of the review still exists in full for every successive subscriber.
"Live" sites, sites that focus on cam shows, model interactions, chats, etc., where the value of the content is dependent on interaction on the other end, then yes these sites would have their value changed over time. But the traditional sites which post static photoset and video updates?
|
02-12-12 09:54pm
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
Does no one else recognize the inherent problem with the question? Scores are subjective opinions, and unique to the individual. No one should dictate what another person values in a site.
I don't view sites as a "did I get a month full of entertainment" as one here says, I view it as "did I get $xx.xx worth of entertainment" and new, small sites absolutely can deliver.
Some people value quantity more than others. If you do, then pay attention to reviews that value quantity. If not, then pay attention to reviews that value quality.
|
02-12-12 09:44pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I see pregnant porn anything, and for some strange reason, I wonder what will be for that child growing up when everyone around finds out he/she was in a porno.
I think that sums up my feelings on this subject very clearly.
|
01-06-12 09:28pm
|
Reply
19
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
You mean, the part at the end of the scene where she is given the choice to say she enjoyed the scene or not receive her paycheck?
|
01-06-12 09:24pm
|
Reply
20
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I don't know the details of the cam shows.
The forum I believe is open to anyone with any ATK subscription.
The actual content is just glammed up. In Premium she may start with an evening dress, where in Galleria she is starting with a t-shirt and jean shorts.
|
12-29-11 11:31pm
|
Reply
21
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Not sure what you mean by "quite a fe periphery bells, whistles & add-ons."
It's exactly like ATK Galleria, made for a glamour look, instead of the amateur look.
|
12-29-11 11:42am
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If the site has something I want, why would I choose not to join the site?
No matter what the website is, whether it is still updating or not, I join based on the material that is currently on the site, not the material that will be added to the site.
|
12-23-11 07:10pm
|
Reply
23
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
Their oldest stuff is 1090px on the long side. Their newest stuff is 1600px.
Then they have some "big sized" sets that are either 3000px or 4000px but they are more random than anything else, not even close to their complete collection, and only include a sampling of images from a given set.
Assume you're getting 1600px on their new material.
|
12-11-11 05:02pm
|
Reply
24
|
Joy Bear
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
All you have to do is subscribe to the website and write your own review.
It's as simple as that.
Seriously, what is the point of your comment?
|
12-08-11 08:31am
|
Reply
25
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
For a site with as much traffic as videoz, they are making use of cloud computing, having their site spread amongst many data centers. Most services don't advertise prices, Amazon's cloud services do:
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/
Do the math with their numbers. And question if other services are going to give cheaper or more expensive rates to porn sites? All you have proven is that Action Jav has other subscribers who are not maxing out the bandwidth 24/7 for the full month.
|
11-20-11 10:31pm
|
