Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: graymane (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1411)  |   Threads Started (119)

1151-1200 of 1412 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 23 Page 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next Page >

11-13-10  12:11pm - 5153 days #5
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Maybe one of those pay-for-time sites could work for you. Just pay up front for so many minutes of viewing and/or downloading. No hassle with renewals or the usual crap one gets from the kind of sites you've described.

11-08-10  01:32am - 5159 days #4
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by justme:


Porn will always be around. And what you're describing are just methods of getting a product from point A to point B. Each successive one more efficient than the last.

Now with the internet, an image originating in, say, Europe, within a few seconds time can be in every home in the world. That is pretty damn efficient. Whether the device on the consumer end is a computer web browser, an iphone, a tivo-like device, etc., the internet will be the method of delivery.

So...

Are you saying the internet will not be used, or the current website subscription model will not be used...

The only wildcard is how many people will be willing to pay how much for porn going forward. If the answer is "enough" then internet porn will be here for a very long time. If the answer is "not enough" then there will not be a successor.


Yours and lkfireaway's comments have extraordinary merit.
I think what I should've conveyed more strongly was not so much "the Internet" per se, but with more emphasis on the "transmission" of sight and sound.
I believe ikfireaway is right on track with this "virtual reality" concept. Sight configuration and feel, as well as other enhancements are the rule here. I don't know how they're going to do it, or when, or if at all, but a litmus test of major advancments in electronics simply has to be in the works to improve on what we already have. Of course we aren't privy to that, we just wake up one morning and read in the paper where there's a spectacular development in visual electronics that's going to re-shape the entertainment media.

11-07-10  09:35pm - 5159 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


Porn is big business (Even bigger than Harry Potter,I'd say)
But seriously, beyond conventional thinking, Porns' seductive power and influence is incalculable; so much so even our Government gives it plenty space.
But Internet Porn isn't. It's still in its infancy and flushed with good tidings. But ultimately even it will be riding off into the sunset to join it's predecessors.

The Predecessors as I know it:
First there was the dirty-picture "French cards," circulating about the workplaces and school yards.
Then there were the Vintage films, some of which is still alive in the business.
"Adult films" wherein theaters featuring soft-core emerged, after which quickly succumbing to the hard stuff as the latter 19th century was closing.
VCR recorders out-drew them by giving porn lovers the privacy of watching what they wanted at home.
Adult book stores then cashed in, crashing the party with in-home cassett rentals for the VCRs.
Broadcast Television, a family oriented vehicle obligated to tamed fare, had to wait in the wings until allowed to open strictly enforced pay-for-view porn channels.
Dreams finally came true for porn aficionados with the explosive expansion of the computer giving birth to the internet. It was inevitable this consummate medium would lovingly embrace porn, as we know it today.
But, as absurd as one announcing Rome would fall in its declining days of power ....so it did, passing the torch to a waiting successor.
All this simply says -- maybe sooner than later -- something's coming along and shift "internet Porn" to the back burner...not turn it off, mind you, just leave it on low heat to simmer.

Technology, being what it is today, any thoughts of what could possibly supercede or technically trump Internet Porn? Should our worthy Webmasters have other irons on the fire? Edited on Nov 08, 2010, 12:37am

11-07-10  05:16pm - 5159 days #20
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I did a little searching and according to this article (from 2 years ago, by the way) it is/was being done through the Bunny Ranch in Nevada, so California law probably doesn't apply.


Affirmative, Turbo....Your search is indeed absolutely correct.
However, Since I found the information you're referring to irrelevant and of no use to the point I was making...
namely: A resurgence of media attention recently coming out of California about the case, and my point expressly having to do with the practice possibly taking root and growing into actually auctioning virginity.

11-04-10  11:39am - 5162 days #30
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Well, I voted for my choices. Twas sorta like participating in that parlor game wherein guests get to choose just one of an assortment of beautifully wrapped packages from a neat pile. At a designated time all are opened to see what they have inside the wrappings. Most packages contain little worth , while one or two others are holding keys to unlock great opportunities for themselves as well as the others.
Sadly, there are times the one or two packages that possess the goodies are simply over-looked or not choosen at all...... hence the spirit of "what could have been" never materlializes.

The aforementioned will be preceived by some as an exaggerated example to heighten my point......and they would be right. Edited on Nov 04, 2010, 06:43pm

11-01-10  03:32am - 5166 days #13
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
DUPLICATED....THIS COPY OF POST TERMINATED. Edited on Nov 23, 2010, 02:24pm

10-29-10  10:12pm - 5168 days #10
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Khan:


You can try posting the link to the PAGE the video is on. They *might* allow that. It's not unuasual for sites to block hot-linking straight to videos.


I realllly appreciate the added effort, Chief. but you've gone way-way beyond the call to help me on this thing.
Which all goes to prove we've (Porn Users) got the finest operating staff on this planet..and the stand-alone-majestically talented master administer to ever serve in this genre.
Now, you keep on trying to make this work, and I'm going to step up embarrassing you with compliments.

10-29-10  09:51pm - 5168 days #9
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Debi Diamond has a new DVD company making fem-dom vids - women dominating guys, including with strap-ons.

It's a niche with some popularity these days - along with other kookie stuff like she-males.

I haven't seen Erica Campbell's vid that you described. I was never the biggest fan of hers. Jenna Haze did a masturbation tease vid where she was being really bitchy - showing herself and stripping out of a tiny bikini, saying all this stuff about "you love this don't you, you have your cock out, you can't even help from cumming at the site of my boobs" etc. I really like Jenna - and it's all true, so I actually found it to be one of the hottest vids she'd done for her site - as did a number of other guys there, which shocked Jenna. She just did it as a throw-away little vid with no preparation and figured it would draw no particular attention at all.


Yup....not as rank as what I've discribed, but similar kind of stuff. But I'm still trying to figure out how come some guys like gettin' a verbal thrashing. Edited on Nov 01, 2010, 01:25am

10-29-10  09:09pm - 5168 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Humor, and comedians, come in many varieties.
Insulting the audience (or some group) has long been a staple in humor.
Don Rickles made a career in that.
So I don't think a woman making fun of men is really original.

I clicked on your link, it brought up a page where there was a 30-second clip of a 20-something, long-haired blonde, who took off her clothes and felt herself. No audio track.

Didn't bother searching beyond that.

If you don't enjoy the insulting female porn performer, just ignore her and watch something else. It doesn't make sense to let her bother you. And if there are people who do like watching her, that's their business.



It's easier for me to say, than for you to follow that advice, because I haven't even seen her. But if I did see her perform, I would almost certainly turn away and watch something else after a few minutes or less.

There's plenty in life that can be irritating. I try to ignore the things as much as possible. Easier said than done, of course, but why get angry about crap you can't control?


Thank you very much, IKfireaway.....That is a brilliant offering of psychoanalysis......just send my bill in care of this site.

10-29-10  08:59pm - 5168 days #5
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Khan:


Well, I tried to make the link clickable but it looks like that site doesn't allow hotlinking. I even tried putting the full url into an empty browser but it always refirects me to one of the site's main pages.


I fear you'll need to describe which video you had in mind (where it can be found) if you want the other users to be able to see what you mean.


I'm throwing in the towel, chief...I spent all day trying to get this thing right...did everything I was instructed to do. The hard part was getting in a single video... as it was, the whole page kept popping up.
Only message I guess I got across is proof of how technically challenged I am.

Many Thanks for all your patience, Chief.

10-29-10  07:54pm - 5168 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


It's bad enough that one is sitting at his computer and being insulted and humiliated...but to pay good money to have it done? Nuh-uh! Don't make a lot of sense to me.

I was hoping to add a video link of my case in point, in order to present a more graphic portrayal....but after a laborous unsuccessful effort on my part and bringing in the site administer to help get it posted without success, I temporarily aborted the thread. However, inasmuch as the video clip won't cooperate, I'll text some of it instead:

(The girl is talking while in the process of doing a striptease)
"you like what you see, you stinking slob?" "I don't know why I'm wasting my time getting you off, you filthy scumbag, because you sure ain't worth it."
"Okay, you miserable, pathetic, poor excuse of a man, I'll open up with a little bit of my time ..but under only one condition: that is you give me money; lots of money." "You'll provide me transportation shopping for anything I want, and not a whimper about the costs...because I'm the best who'll ever give you the time of day and you should open your half-ass mind and realize it.
Another thing, you sorry, cheesy lowlife, I'll be riding in style. Nothing less than a deluxe equiped limousine.
And when I'm ready to go home, don't be expecting anything ...not even a thank you or goodbye..because I wouldn't lower myself to give you that gratification."

She goes on and on putting you down ...highlighting the fact you're a disgusting pervert who's a worthless loser.

I rest my case.
Edited on Nov 01, 2010, 03:09am Edited by Staff on Oct 29, 2010, 08:24pm (Khan: tried to make link clickable)

10-29-10  06:05am - 5169 days #9
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Denner.....You might take this as a cautionary measure before you download any of the latter (Hotfile) scenes.
I curiously attempted one and my firewall lit up like a 4th July Fireworks display. I don't recall the name of the (medium risk) malware it dumped on me but I had to initiate a simple removal proceedure to get rid of it.
I ain't saying all of'm are packing malware, or even if my firewall might've misfired on this one.....jus' saying you might wanna check it out.

10-27-10  04:12pm - 5170 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


I think she's a way for you to advertise Little Asian GFs!

Not surprisingly, Goldfish, you're as right as rain.
I just visited the site, and it seems I was so welcomed there they just didn't want me to leave. When I did finally tear away, I was greeted by an unending array of after-burner pop-ups hawking similar fare.
Edited on Oct 27, 2010, 04:15pm

10-27-10  08:28am - 5170 days #4
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


It's probably her sugar daddy's crib, or the home of the nonexistent "boyfriend" used as that day's set.


Keen observation, turbo. And I applaude avidwatcher in his search, because this petite little stunner looks almost too good to be real......without seemingly even trying she simply exudes eye-popping sex appeal and (can't stress this too strongly) demonstrates the epitome of innocence.

10-26-10  09:54pm - 5171 days #2
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
From the looks of the house in the background and the furniture inside, she's anything but poor.
Maybe she simply owns the site watermarked on the pic......That would explain everything.

10-24-10  08:51pm - 5173 days #14
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Technology has come a long way, seemingly getting to the point wherein nothing almost is impossible.

With that in mind, I guess What I'm going to say will probably ilicit a blast of laughter that'll roll you out of your chair.

Here goes:....Just kick the human male porn star's ass out of the business completely, and bring on animated virtual partners for the ladies. You gotta admit they got those electronically generated forms lookin' uncannily realistic.

I'll take that any day over the sight of a condom. Edited on Oct 26, 2010, 06:26pm

10-24-10  04:48pm - 5173 days #10
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by pat362:


I don't think the police and firemen analogy works because both of those groups use protection in their job. police officer wear bullet proof vest and firemen wear fire resistant material.


I think if one could compare an accurate obituary percentages of police, fireman, and porn stars. I doubt your theory would stand up.
Firemen protection and police vests still leave vulnerable areas that's much too easy to exploit -- and are, for too many times.

10-24-10  12:51pm - 5173 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


To me, porn is about women. A guy has as much status in a porn scene as the couch, bed or pheasant farm where the scene is filmed. For me, the scene is all about her: her expressions and reactions. Her orgasm. The guy is furniture. Do your job, do it well and shut the fuck up. Your orgasms is necessary as hardcore, but only for her (positive) reaction to it.



I quite agree with all the above....but particularly the part about the guy "shuttin' the fuck up." That alone speaks volumes.
I might add also that we can do without the male's peculier need to grab, squeeze, pinch and slapping the face, tits and cheeks of the woman's ass... What the hell is that all about?

10-24-10  01:04am - 5174 days #14
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:


Sorry, Graymane, I did get the drift and think the whole concept would not help any illusion but simply look silly. I honestly can't imagine a scenario where a solo girl could successfully pretend that "her brains are being fucked out."

But, as we say so often, "different strokes for different folks" so this is not meant in a confrontational way. It just wouldn't work for me.


With all due respect, messmer, might I suggest you examine some of the web's Hypnosis sites, wherein this thing you "can't imagine" is the one and only primary theme. While I have to say I had issues with one of the sites (see review) What you're saying "looks silly" is making those sites a fortune....I guess there's a lotta wisdom in the 'ol adage: "one man's trash is another man's treasure."

10-23-10  04:23pm - 5174 days #8
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by markfx:


Why should I care if any industrial workers risk their health and well being? All I care about is that the product meets my needs. And, be sure, that target is constantly moving, so workers should accept even more dangers as they have voluntarily chosen their avocation. If they don't like the risks, they can become CEO's,lawyers, doctors, or hedge fund managers.


Of course that rant is dripping in sarcasm, but that sentiment is prevalent for the arrogant consumer.


Welcome to the real world, markfx. May I throw in a little sarcasm, too?
Lets also do away with the Police and Firemen, cuz we know they risk life and limb every day...certainly no guess work there.
Maybe I should sue Ungle Sam for drafting and sending me into that raging jungle war in Vietnam -- where my life-expectancy was in the single digits.
If one compares those dangers with the small chance of even a reckless porn star will contract HIV...well, it doesn't take a Mathematician to take that on.
In your stated sarcasm, I believe you left out the fact that a method exists in the porn business called "exams" ..which, if followed properly, would almost assure protection against the disease.

I ain't buying the "dripping sarcasm rant" ....

10-23-10  01:33am - 5175 days #2
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Not a big deal, but I seem to be seeing the use of a lot more condoms lately in European porn. Are they becoming more safety conscious, or what?

I think it's a step forward. If the actors are safer, that's a good thing. And the condoms are not really that visible anyway. You only see them in some of the shots. If you're aren't looking, you hardly realize they are being used. And they are removed at the end for the money shot, anyway.


Your optimism is commendable, lk2fireone. I only wish I could agree with you.
I'd argue that most porn users, like me, see condoms as a major turn-off and don't want to see them being used at all -- despite the safty factor.
And although that may appear callous, the importantance of a performer's job is to satisfy the needs of those who pay to benefit from their services.
Until the porn business gets serious about finding a solution to this problem ie., methodology concealing and/or convincing the viewer somehow condoms aren't being used, then controversy will rage on.

10-22-10  09:51pm - 5175 days #3
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


I think this is more hype than reality. This sounds more like something to be invented by the people who want to promote a return to family values. Has it happened in reality? Maybe, but it isn't common and isn't ever to likely be.


Hype?...Invented?....If this is true then the groundswell of media coverage on the story coming out of Sacramento is going to produce a lotta eggs destined for their faces.

My statement: "soon we'll likely be getting pop-ups promoting virgins in your town" is obviously tongue-in-cheek and wasn't meant to be construed as gospel.

10-22-10  08:22pm - 5175 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


For those like myself who don't know, a whirlwind of media coverage is swirling around a Sacramento State graduate who is auctioning off her virginity. She's using the pseudonym Natalie Dylan for safety reasons, and has announced the decision on the Howard Stern radio show. Got no date, but Bids are already flowing in reaching as high as $275,000.
She said she got the idea from a news story on the Internet about a Peruvian girl who attempted a similar cash out. The girl received an offer for $1.5 million from a Canadian man, but I think she changed her mind.
She said "Once you get past the moral issue, all this is is a girl trying to get through school."
Think about it, soon we'll likely be getting pop-ups promoting virgins in your town.

10-22-10  05:11pm - 5175 days #8
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Email me the GPS co-ordinates and I'm on my way!


Better bring a truck. Apart from that, If you'll pay the postage, they're yours....at least what's left that hasn't been stolen.

10-22-10  03:54pm - 5175 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Breaking the commandment to refrain from stealing, I "borrowed," on extended "loan," a stack of Penthouse from a cousin when I was in my early teens. That would be the early 1980s.


I might mention, I have a collection of Playboy Mags dating back to the '60s. They're all in my attic...
Anybody interested? Opps! 'jus kiddin', Kahn

10-22-10  03:00pm - 5175 days #10
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Count me in on that too. Maybe I'm getting old, but I just don't see the point. Make it real sex or an old-fashioned wank. None of this make believe crap.

Yeah, I know what you mean. Brings to mind how I feel about some guy doing rough sex on his partner, and for his finally does a dry anal number in her ass. Makes no sense. Edited on Oct 22, 2010, 06:47pm

10-22-10  02:47pm - 5175 days #8
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
For those who possibly missed the message I was trying to put across, Allow me to attempt to be more specific:

I couldn't give a rat's ass whether This live Japanese performance ever again sees the light of day...here or elsewhere.
If one would read what I said more carefully, one would note that it's THE ACT OF A PORN PERFORMER TO USE THE INVISIBLE PARTNER CONCEPT RATHER THAN GOUGING THE FLESH OUT OF HER VAGINA....she goes through the same masturbatory motions but purposely gives us the illusion her brains are being fucked out....ideally by one of us perverts who are watching the action.

10-22-10  01:55pm - 5175 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:


Sorry, Graymane. I agree with Wittyguy on this one.


Agree on what?

10-21-10  07:59am - 5176 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


Air Sex is a performance activity invented in Japan; clothed men and women simulate sexual activity with an invisible partner, often in an exaggerated manner, set to music, and in a competition before an audience.
Now why didn't we think of that? How about it Web-masters, can we have something on that order?...(without the clothes and audience of course).
This is exactly what we need to create a niche that give these progressively eroding, lazy, robotic, masturbation acts a kick in the ass.
It would also steal the thunder from those expensive, use-limited, phony hypnotist sites which already uses this kind of act.

For savvy guys out there who're tired of performers inordinately licking and sucking on inanimate plastic objects...just going through the same motions....and guys who vicariously want to place themselves in the position of that "invisible man"......well, this Bud's for you.

10-21-10  01:19am - 5177 days #16
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by mistresskent:


Winona Ryder (Spelling)

Angelina Jolie

Pat Butcher from Eastenders (UK program)

The entire cast of Friends in a gang bang, pheobe spitroasted!.

7 of 9 from star trek

Halle Berry

Eliza Dusku

(One for the ladies) John Travolta


I think you have something there, femme fatale the UK Doll.

But I think I'd died and went to heaven just seeing Angelina Jolie doing blow-jobs.

10-21-10  12:38am - 5177 days #56
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by mistresskent:


Why thank you young man.. compliment greatfully recieved

X


Well thank you too, Ms. Better-built. "young-man" is also a term "greatfully received".
But you need to be advised that you was but a twinkle in the eye of your lucky parents, during which I was already engaged in and flirting with porn.

10-21-10  12:17am - 5177 days #2
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
I remember when Penthouse first hit the newsstands. They went on to give Playboy a good run for the money. Guccione also dropped Hefner a few notches on the Babe-conquering scoreboard.
It's sad he ultimately lost his magazine empire and later developed some grave financal woes. He was a brilliant Publisher. Edited on Oct 21, 2010, 03:53pm

10-20-10  11:49pm - 5177 days #17
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Khan:

I had some health issues (thanks to the many hazardous materials I'd been exposed to ... that the gov't refused to take credit for) that made working from home an attractive option.




Really sorry about the health issues. I can well relate to the hazard thing, having worked in an asbestos environment and living in an area surrounded with shipyards and hosting one of the largest Navel Bases in the world.
As a result, with a smorgasbord of potential lawsuits just waiting to be plucked, Lawyers have sprouted about the area like fertle Kudzu.

It might interest you to know, a little more than a decade ago when I bought my first computer, I had, and used Compuserve as my ISP...unfortunately for more years than I care to remember. That was a time when the word "freeze-up" became a staple of my vocabulary. Edited on Oct 20, 2010, 11:58pm Edited by Staff on Oct 21, 2010, 04:25am (Khan: fixed quoteback)

10-19-10  10:40am - 5178 days #9
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Monahan:


Khan,

I really think you should reconsider. The evolution of porn from "The Immoral Mr. Teas" to the sophistication of the industry today would seem to be a reasonably good, broad based theme that would interest a wide range of people.

And from your unique position where you actually engage with us Porn Users and also with the web element, I, for one, would think you could really write a successful book on the subject.


My sentiments exactly. Considering the debth of involvment he's had in this business, and with his refreshingly unique style of writing, I think his book would be smashing accomplishment.

10-18-10  09:10pm - 5179 days #4
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by turboshaft:




I guess that means you're not running for office anytime soon either.


I already suggested to him he run in his State , turbo.
He vetoed that too.
Humility......WHAT A GUY!

10-18-10  04:04pm - 5179 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


Sir....It occurred to me that with your experience and knowledge about this stuff, have you ever thought of writing a book? Somebody ought to. Edited on Oct 18, 2010, 06:38pm

10-17-10  05:51pm - 5180 days #18
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:


It's a wonderful diverse world. Glad you agree re. panties and luxurious lingerie. We may not be on the same wave length when it comes to garter belts (nothing frames that bush better)


Perhaps a good reason us geezers are so fond of panties is because in our day that was all we had to fantasize about.
I never knew what a pussy looked like until I was in High School -- and only then thanks to some French picture-cards circulating amongst my football team-mates.

Being awarded flashes of Cheerleader's panties, who on the sidelines were practicing their routines the same time we were on the field, (as well as some lucky up-skirt eye-candy that inadvertently came my way from other sources) provided me with many days of "hands-on" fantasy.

This was pre-Hefner/Playboy times..and the word "porn" had yet to make it in the pages of Webster.

10-17-10  04:04pm - 5180 days #13
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Khan:


I've never had call or desire to burn DVD's to date but this thread reminded me that one of my computers came with Roxio installed. Anyone have any experience with that DVD burner?


I have the whole bundle of Roxio...came with my Dell software. But I still can't get it to cooperate with my TV.
Also went on the Divx website, where they claim to have an AVI program that'll transport data to play on TV/DVD players. But I passed because I have a Divx bundle --which, although superb, is too doggone erratic and tempermental.

10-17-10  01:52pm - 5180 days #12
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Drooler:

During the Bush years, the Republican-lead Congress decimated the Clinton-era surplus and proceeded to create the largest deficit we've ever had. Now they're blaming Obama for it.


Forgive me for diverting from the discussion (subject), but I just have to seize the moment and echo Drooler's above sentiments. The essences of this statement needs to be kept alive and never sleep. Edited by Staff on Oct 17, 2010, 02:44pm (Khan: fixed quoteback)

10-17-10  01:18pm - 5180 days #15
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by RustyJ:


We are exactly the opposite in this sense then! I hate it when all sexy clothes are removed right away


Correction......I didn't say I wanted them all "removed right away." They can take all the time they want to, as long as the stockings ultimatly come off and her bare legs are given equal time, and ideally the benefit of the finale.
I love a good striptease as much as the next guy, although I do prefer it being done without repetitious over-kill -- that is to say get on with it and not take forever removing her bra.
Messmer might be interested to learn also that many of us older guys vigoriously share his delight for sexy panties and luxurious lingerie. I persoanlly deem panties a crowning front-runner......but echoing Ed2009's welcomed entry about suspender belts.....and may I also throw in the dark stockings and those ugly clip-ons, I couldn't agree more.

10-16-10  03:46pm - 5181 days #5
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Unfortunately, I was never able to create that level of writing. My ideas come across more in the form of scrambled eggs, hopefully edible, but not especially tasty.


You're selling yourself woefully short, fireone. Contrarily, I find your stuff right on the heels of the superlatives you've granted to those you've just espoused to. I would also say that about the other active members who contribute to the forum. I never cease to be amazed at the abundance of writing talent I see from this bunch.

Oh yes...And to you Goldfish....great thread you got going here. I'll be following it with interest.

10-16-10  02:56pm - 5181 days #10
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


I enjoy stockings, hosiery and any sexy clothing in general as long as it comes off.


That's it!....Thank you Mr. Goldfish. You have said in a few words what I've attempted to convey in a multitude.
"AS LONG AS THEY COME OFF".........That works for me.

10-16-10  02:45pm - 5181 days #9
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by RustyJ:


I hate pantyhose everywhere

Stockings, especially with garter belts are entirely different thing however


Okay, guys...let me be a little more specfic about the "stocking" thing. Mainly, my greater beef here is with pantyhose, thigh-highs and fishnet types...but I can understand the garter-belt combination being a stand-out amongst those who've spoke out for stockings -- And it's only fair to add that the small portion of thigh you are preveleged to see beneath the straps and other garter gadgets, does present a mysterious level of erotic appeal.

I, however, (and legions more out there) get nothing from any leg-wear....esp. if worn during sex scenes.

10-15-10  07:53pm - 5182 days #59
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Mark me down as one who loathes viewing a condom being worn during a sex scene.
Note, if you will, I said "VIEWING A CONDOM."
If the industry would get smart and persue an effort to develope a way the condom wouldn't be recognized, then maybe they'd make some progress with solving this problem.
Condoms sliding all the way on without showing the "lip" at the base would be a start. Of course, another give-away to be addressed is the usual gloss reflected from the use of lighting.
Close-ups would have to undergo major change, but that would be cheerfully welcomed because many of those brain-dead camera-men who have a fixation on excessive micro-taping would have to go back to school.
Makeup and prosthetic wizardry should by now have advanced to a stage of producing an appearance where one simply cannot tell if the subject is, indeed, actually wearing a condom. It can be done.

10-15-10  06:45pm - 5182 days #3
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Word for word, I had the same dilemma you're inquiring about. Tried everything you described, verbatim.
Results?....the same you had.
Solution:??? throw in the towel.
So, thanks to your helpful and timely thread, Sir Denner, perhaps we'll both learn something useful.

10-15-10  04:01pm - 5182 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


Pardon me, if you will, if I'm awakening a subject that's already been hashed-over enough, or desired by many to just let lie.
But this thing to me is such a grinding annoyance that I'm going to throw it out there again --- if but for nothing else than a hoped-for upgraded appraisal.
It's probably no secret my take on hosiery-in-porn is a sure way of mortally wounding a pic or video clip; and to bring on a chick with her beautiful legs ladened with thigh-high fabric is likened to spray-painting a bouquet of fresh roses.
I can't figure out it's appeal.

Here's a suggestion: If we gotta have'm, why not compromise and give equal time to performers having'm on and peeling'm off. Another layman's outside suggestion (if un-tapped) is the industry might give some thought to promoting the sale of all used porn-hosery for the panty-sniffers out there.
I'd like to say most porn-viewers prefer bare-legs...and that this strain of leg-wear is on the wane.....but that's obviously wishful-thinking.
Any well-wishers? Rebuttals?

10-12-10  08:46pm - 5185 days #333
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Eli Wallach appears in Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps, which opens today. He is also in another movie, The Ghost Writer, which opened this year.

The guy is 94. He's been married for 62 years to Anne Jackson (the actress).


I've ceased being a movie buff a long time ago....just seems to happen to a lot of guys my age.
However, Perusing this thread for the first time, I've picked up on some pretty nifty stuff....I mean, like, shucks! I don't get this much up-to-date news even on the major news and entertainment TV channels.
And you, 1k2fireone, they could use you at CNN.

But what actually spurred me to pen this post was your opening up the subject of Eli Wallach. This master showman is far and away one of my favorite actors of all time. The man has talent to burn. Why I haven't seen him playing in leading roles is beyond me.....unless he choose to do character parts.
It doesn't surprise me that he is so highly sought-after for parts....the damed man simply lights up the screen. And, more importantly, he makes his counterparts look better than they actually are.

10-11-10  11:55pm - 5186 days #3
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
In the movie Havoc, there's a brief full-bodied slow-motion scene in which Anne's wearing only a revealing bra and frilly, sexy, pink panties....... a la messmer style.
And those legs!!!!! pant-pant.

10-11-10  11:19pm - 5186 days #13
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
You're smart to go with your instinct, lk2fireone. Dispite my favorable comment, I have a gut feeling you're gonna be glad you did.

10-11-10  11:07pm - 5186 days #19
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


At the time, back in the 1950s, I believe the test pattern/station logo for channel 5, where I grew up, was an Indian chief.

Did you have a similar experience? Of ever watching the test pattern on your TV when you were much younger?


Ohhhhh yeah! but we didn't have the luxury of the "Indian Chief." Our's was just a hodgepodge of crazy symbols that didn't make any sense at all. And guess what? Back then I had to actually get up off my ass and turn the doggone television off and on...as well as operating the channel knob on it to get the three lone stations available at the time. And the manual antenna???? I won't even go into that.
And our kids are complaining......go figure.

1151-1200 of 1412 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 23 Page 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.