Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: graymane (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1411)  |   Threads Started (119)

1301-1350 of 1412 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 26 Page 27 28 29 Next Page >

06-21-10  11:45pm - 5298 days #18
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:


I agree, Pat. Kindness in a woman is highly prized by me as well, as is gentleness.


Well, if'n we're gonna go to the "heart" of the matter....I guess, in an attempt to revive any sense of dignity from a previous post, I must confess I'm in whole-hearted agreement with the "kindness" thing. Kindness is good. One of my X-wives had an abundance of kindness. In fact, her kindness was so overwhelming that I fantasized I'd died and married an angel. Moreover, So overwhelming was her kindness, never letting my cup run dry, she still found it necessary to go out and fill others.
Atlanta Georgia, where we lived, ultimately became too small to spread all the kindness she had to offer, so she wished me farewell, loaded her car and headed for Taxas...a much bigger place, and one which can absorb a lot of kindness.
She gave and left her mark in the great City of Atlanta, and even today if you bring up her name in any local pub or the popular night spots, you'll likely get a testamontal from somebody having been "touched" by her kindness. Edited on Jun 22, 2010, 02:30pm

06-21-10  10:34pm - 5298 days #16
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:


That or deadly silence, except for the inexplicable gasps of the models who weren't even touching anything at that particular point!



You suppose they're on something we don't know about? Edited on Jun 22, 2010, 01:47pm Edited by Staff on Jun 22, 2010, 05:48am (Khan: fixed quoteback)

06-21-10  04:16pm - 5298 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:



When reading some of the reviews I get the impression that many of our members dislike hearing music in a video. As a matter of fact, some even list it as a negative.

Instead they were giving off those fake moans and heavy breathing before they even touched themselves, not exactly a turn on.

There's also the fact that in too many of the solo scenes you can hear the photographer's equipment as he adjusts it etc. etc. It would be nice to see those noises covered up through some low background music.

Rant over!


Well, esteemed fellow member, you, of course, already know my views on the fake moaning an' groaning farce-a-mania......and now that you've brought up a new wrinkle --namely the Keystone Cops behind the action working the equipment and giving directions -- from which I'll add my
There's a dire need for these guys to have overseers overseering the overseers. Can you imagine, seated in a local theater, watching an intimantly poignant love scene between two of your favorite popular stars when...(rumble, screech, crackle -- among other distracting noises) appear out of nowhere. Then watch the patrons heading for the ticket booth demanding back their money.
I know these porn sets ain't Hollywood....but we're paying good money and they're takin' it...And for that we deserve a decent return.
About the music:..no complaints here...it even adds character to the scene. But don't expect music to cover up the apparantly oblivious insensitivities of the noise-makers behind the cameras. Edited on Jun 21, 2010, 04:21pm

06-20-10  11:38pm - 5299 days #11
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Is there a universal type of woman that most guys would be attracted to?
Preferabley one who puts-out...wouldn't hurt if she's also drop-dead-gorgeous...
I especially like the kind who convincingly and repeatedly yell "STOP" "DON'T DO THAT" "QUIT, IM NOT THAT KIND OF GIRL" "MOVE YOUR HAND"....... whilist her panties is dripping so profusely I'm having to enlist the use of a towel. Then we have more protesting, as she spreads and lowers herself into a horizontal position...lifting her ass and sayin' goodbye to that pesky cotton lunchen cover.
She may not be universal, but makin' you work for it somehow puts that elusive, extra pazzaz in the ride.
At my age, I've gone the gamut on femme fatales variety. intellectual to feather-brain; The gimme's to the givers; the hard-sells to the easies. In the end (forgive the pun) pussy lies at the seat (damned those puns) of man's "UNIVERSAL" inate pursuits. And If she's got one that works good, I'm afraid that takes precedence over anything else.

I know, RearAdmiral, I've wandered way off the question in question, but it was all I could contribute Edited on Jun 21, 2010, 06:26pm

06-20-10  03:57pm - 5299 days #7
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


Don't get me wrong, graymane - bed scenes are good, too. But so is watching her get herself off while hanging from a chandelier.


Not to mention possibly being recognized and awarded adulation from the International Porn Award Ceremonies.

Funny stuff,RB.....Speakin' of The IPAC, they could use somebody with your comedic talent to help livin' up the festivities.

06-20-10  03:32pm - 5299 days #5
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Son-of'a-gun....who'da thunk it? I could'a sworn I'd get broad laughable support on this ludicrous ensemble of Odd-ball wierd-a-mania.
And did I see something about "the bed being boring?"....Well damned! silly me, It must be those happy-pills I'm currently takin' for pain that's disabled the grey-matter's logic side of its lobe.....cuz any fool would know a bed is disigned only for sleeping...God forbid some adventurous women would use it to bounce around pleasuring herself.
Thanks for the input fellows...you're what this wondiful forum is all about. If everybody only agreed, it simply wouldn't work. Edited on Jun 20, 2010, 03:37pm

06-19-10  07:53pm - 5300 days #18
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Why is it a guy can go "streaking" (pecker-a-flopping)across a football field during a game halftime, with a stadium full of onlookers, and he gets wild applause, after which he's usured out of the facility by authorities.... WHEREAS, a guy is sitting in a dark, remote side-section of a movie theater, silently and inconspiciously stroking his man-hood (completely covered by a garment) And along comes the theater mgr. followed by a pair of policeman, who then arrest the poor guy and cart him off to the slammer. If that wasn't enough, can you imagine this otherwise law-abiding citizen then having to stand before a judge and answer to this asinine, frivilous pile of dog-shit law, in the presence of strangers -- and worse, perhaps the humiliation of a family member?
Meanwhile, the newspaper the next day has the streaker hailed a celebrity.

Damned...go figure!

06-18-10  06:02pm - 5301 days #7
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Capn:





Thanks, Capn...for the nice "jesture".... you don't do so bad yourself...lov' your posts. An' how bout that Drooler, huh...can we get a thumbs-up on the professor, too?
Ain't inferring a mutual admiration society here...but these guys rock!

06-18-10  05:33pm - 5301 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Well, it's because they have something in common with toy train sets. Both are intended for children, but it's the fathers who wind up playing with them.


Another innovative euphemism from the pro.....

You wouldn't be into channeling would you, Drooler?
Like With erudites on the level of Mark Twain, maybe?

06-17-10  03:33am - 5303 days #10
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Yariana:


Though I am not a man, I just have to comment on this "Fake Boob" debate. Being a female with very large, all natural breasts, I was quite offended by a remark from a male friend. He is attracted to woman with fake breasts because he believes them to be more sensual, more in touch with their sensuality. He says woman with real boobs are lazy about their appearance and boring in bed. I have since read similiar comments from men about woman with real boobs. This is so not true! Unbelievable.


You say this man is a friend? For one to make such stinging remarks to a woman, esp. a friend, appears to me that he might have some self-image or security issues. although, believe it or not, there are men who are insensitive and don't know it; They just haven't been taught any values.

Men are also like this who consciously..or perhaps subconsciously, fear, or could actually hate women who are successful, beautiful and/or have other laudable attributes. They believe That make them unattainable, and their defense to bring you down is by lashing out. I'm not into psychoanalysis, but that's my read as a layman.
You're rightly bothered, and many in your position would hold a grudge.....how you handle it will speak volumes.

As for fake breast VS au naturel...I've sampled'em both and the real-thing wins hands-down.....or should I say "hands-on." Edited on Jun 17, 2010, 03:46pm

06-17-10  02:22am - 5303 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


Ever notice almost every female appearance in a clip usually begins with her hands all over her tits. She lifts them, rolls them around, massages them, squeezes them together, licks them.....and sometimes after or midway through her act, she has her male partner squeeze his penis between them and he proceeds to hump away as if her jugs was a hot, juicy vagina --- which amazes me why they're having such a bloody hot time. I mean, it's not like a hand-job or the like.
Examples abound with tit-fever , but a favorite of mine is Aria Giovanni's solo videos, most of which, sadly, are consummed with her ruinous love affair with her own pair of generous knockers. The woman can't keep her hands off'm. We have to agonize through so much pre-boob-spotlighting, whether it's smiling solos chewing up reel after reel of boob-a-mania celluloid, before finally giving us the good stuff; Or the introduction of a male-female f..k scene, before which we're having the girl parade around, ad nauseam, showboating her mammary attributes. followed by (but usually preceeding) her male counterpart, who grabs a hand-full of ass, squeezing, a'slappin' shaking, summing up before advancing boob-ward wherein he samples the whole mammary terrain with envious lip service and dexterity, while his viewing audience stew in their juices awaiting "the good stuff."

Now I love a luscious, "natural" pair of shapely jugs, peaked with puffy (swollen) nipples as much as the next fellow..
but unless they're actually leaping off the screen and burying my head within it's enter-softness.....then just spare me the longevity of showboating tits 'an ass and give me just enough to wet my appetite... and move on to the good stuff.

06-15-10  03:22pm - 5304 days #8
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by nostromo:


Men of true substance don't jerk off.


What about nocturnal emissions? Is there an absence of "true substance" in that, too?

06-15-10  02:36pm - 5304 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
You might do yourself a favor and give this gal her walkin' papers right now and count your blessings.
Otherwise, you could end up married to this gal, thereby inheriting her "friends" along with the package. Edited on Jun 15, 2010, 05:49pm

06-14-10  03:05pm - 5305 days #23
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by turboshaft:



Obviously there's a big difference the right to die and the right to a boner (for starters, one stops your heart the other speeds it up)


Gee, turbo, I don't know which deserves the louder applaude: whether it be the wisdom of your "big difference " argument.
Or the philosophical humor in "(for starters, one stops your heart the other speeds it up)."

I suppose I should've approached the subject with more logic and familiarity, but the contrast between these two personalities being served the same kind of being-made-an- example-of justice, just opened the door for me to sound off about something close to my heart.
I did get something out of it. Learning Dr. Kevorkian was finally out of the slammer.

06-13-10  11:30pm - 5306 days #21
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


I'm not sure if what you mean is sarcasm, but if not, I'm in full agreement with you. My own death is one of the last things I can have control over. If I ever get a daignosis of terminal whatever I'll take matters into my own hands. The sad thing is that any choice I can make is limited due to right-wing fundies. The choices are difficult for me and messy for those left behind. I'd far rather if there was a Dr. Kevorkian willing to make it more simple and humane.

Fuck I hate fundamentalists...

M


I don't know if it was "sarcasm" or not, so I'll expand my thoughts comparing the two cases and it might be clearer.
All I know about Max Hardcore is from what I've observed here in this forum, and from that nothing remotely good. And, in fact a societal menace.
Making a random comparison about another case being delt the same kind of justice except being the antithesis of all Max represents -- namely, a genuine caring man who shows boundless compassion for those suffering -- is what prompted my post. Both men, being polar opposites, with the only thing in common being persecuted and made an example by our justice system.
Max can rot. But if there ever was a man who should've never been labled a criminal it would be, hands-down, this planet's angel of mercy Doctor Kevorkian.

06-13-10  06:21pm - 5306 days #23
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Compliments are always welcome, as long as they are honest and sincere.


Actually, fireone, the "compliments" ARE a bit of an exaggeration. And although it looks it, I hope you and those viewing won't think there was any sarcasm meant. Well, maybe there was but not in a mean, derogatory sense.

I suppose it was the way I took your last post, it having suggested a somewhat abrasive overtone, an' all, that contributed to my eratic response.
Anyway, if there's a hatchet somewhere here at all, consider it buried

06-12-10  07:19pm - 5307 days #7
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Khan:


Not sure I'm following what you're asking here. If you're asking can you add a bookmark in your browser to an internal page of the site, then the answer is ... sure thing! If you mean something else, perhaps if you're more specific with the question I'll get it and try to give a better answer.

Glad you found the old thread helpful.



Well, I'm not all that puter savvy about all you said.
Of course you know that pretty well by now.
But yes, my guess is it'll go in my favorites , on my Explorer page with my Google search engine. It pops right in and when its needed, the page pops right out. Just a simple left click.

06-12-10  07:01pm - 5307 days #21
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


.

And graymane1777, the thread author, wants the female to be fully exposed to his view, without her moving around too much (into different positions) so he can enjoy the buildup to his climax.
Like I said in my first post on this thread, I was not clear on the subject of this thread. But I had plenty of company.

If it walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck..
A generous rousing round of appalude for a brilliant phsychoanalytic masterpiece, Mr ikefire
You should be soaring the heavens,...you've broke the code and exposed all the elements of this here-to-fore impenetrable lockbox that has alluded everybody. I'm impressed. There's a dire need for your kind of exceptional talent, ikefire, especially in our most sensitive areas of Secret Service intelligence...although you might have come up short about me getting off...at 77yrs. the only thing I might get off anymore is a puff of dust.

06-12-10  04:26pm - 5307 days #5
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


Every time I see your name pop up anound here Chief....Superlatives light up and parade by my mind's eye one by one. The one that stands out at the moment is "omnipresent."

Thanks for poppin'up. your link looks like ticket I'm after.


WOW! WOW! WOW! Is that a Hunk'a hunk'a hunk'a Abrev's, or what? went in expectin' paperback and found Oxford International gold. Impressive...GWOS it surpassed expectation.

by the way, Chief.... is book-marking the page or favorites a no-no?

******GWOS goes without saying Edited on Jun 12, 2010, 04:29pm

06-12-10  03:36pm - 5307 days #4
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Khan:


If it helps, there is an old thread that contains a lot of the common acronyms. See:
the Official ABRACADABRA Thread

Hope that helps.


Every time I see your name pop up anound here Chief....Superlatives light up and parade by my mind's eye one by one. The one that stands out at the moment is "omnipresent."

Thanks for poppin'up. your link looks like ticket I'm after.

06-12-10  01:11pm - 5307 days #13
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Why don't they let out Dr. Kevorkian?...he's done a hell've lot more for humanity......Law enforcment..go figure Edited on Jun 12, 2010, 01:36pm

06-12-10  12:59pm - 5307 days #19
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:


I finally got it, graymane, after very carefully reading your original post again, plus your latest response: you are not talking about masturbation at all!

That's what had me confused because I automatically associate "solo" with masturbation while you were thinking of the model and your fantasy of having sex with her .. two totally different concepts and I can see where you would want nothing to come between you and the model, not even hands because they would indeed get in the way. Proper communication can be so hard at times. (coin dropping)




HALLELUJA

06-12-10  12:50pm - 5307 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


It drives me crazy. I'm reading a post and just when I'm about to understand what's being said, the writer throws in a few three-letter-shortcuts that blows everything. Common terms used often like pov, milf, gonzo, and a number of others still elude me. The worst are like BLW, SFL, etc.,
The problem I've had is failing to find a glossary of all this confusion. Do they think we are mind-readers?
After wrestling with this for way too long, I'm gonna just lay it in the lap of the helpful people here in PU's forum.

06-12-10  12:05pm - 5307 days #17
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by messmer:


Graymane, it's just hard for me to visualize a model going through the motions without actually using at least her fingers near her pussy. Unless clit massage is okay with you as long as her pussy is not obscured! Otherwise it simply conjures up, in my mind, a horizontal bump and grind and not masturbation. And all the previous remarks are meant in fun!


Ditto, messmer; not surprisingly, expressed like the true gentleman that you are...and that also goes for our mutual confrere turboshaft. The initial sting of evolking a few laughs at my expense have long worn off.... so, my fellow member, the next beer is on me.
A rather repetitive phrase my daughter uses during the too infrequent phone calls and zero visits she allots me is: "Dad, why are you being so defensive?" I deny it is and always say she's reading too much into my natural inclination to raise my voice. So it is with the frivol skirmishes here in the forum. big bark, little bite.
Now, about the hands-off-the-pussy... it's classic "different strokes for different folks". you want the fingers, I want'm out of the way..you're focused on the feeling she's getting , I'm focused on my feeling.
I look at the subject having sex with me, therefore I want her to "playlike" I'm on top of her. Lookie, I'm not the Lone Ranger in this fetish...I got lots of company.

06-12-10  03:10am - 5308 days #15
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
I was trying to puzzle out how a woman could masturbate without "getting her hands anywhere near her pussy,"
so many different ways of doing it and I missed out on all of them!
This may be more for sports fans, but couldn't she superglue a vibrator to the end of a baseball bat

Talk to you some other time, turboshaft, I am busy experimenting with pillows at the moment!

[QUOTE=messmer]



And here I was thinkin' this little 'ole thread was just about to skid into a dead-end, when along comes two of PU's most visible heavy-hitters.. adding star-quality with some bowled-over knee-slappin' humor and keen wit that'll do any project proud, thus diverting demise and softly laying it right back on track. Gee, guys.. I'm jus' all choaked up. what can I say?

Meanwhile, I'm going back and try once again to explain a post that was yanked completely out of context .. hence the fodder for all the comic fanfare.
To wit:
My quote: I don't give a rat's ass anyway about "masturation" per se. [b]It's her motion that does it for me. Note: its the motion.
My quote: "If I had anything to do with it, her hands wouldn't be anywhere near her pussy." it's part and parcel of my (what do'ya call it, nitch?)
What this says is: IM ONLY INTERESTED IN HER BODY MOTIONS, And I don't want her pussy obscured in any way. In other words, she goes through the motions , sans the hand, toys or anything else covering her complete frontal view. Inasmuch as she's feigning her act anyway, it matters not.
If you look at the very beginning of this thread, discribing an playing out an erotic solo scene... then that says it all. Edited on Jun 12, 2010, 03:47am

06-10-10  07:48pm - 5309 days #9
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


You'd have to weed through hundreds of fingering and toying scenes, but IFeelMyself has maybe a dozen scenes where girls are grinding away at pillows, furniture and even a stuffed animal. No fingers - no toys.


Thanks, RB.....always a privilege getting your input.

06-10-10  03:54pm - 5309 days #7
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I'm not really sure what the point of your post is. But my answer is hopefully related to what you are talking about.



With all due respect, guys.....I simply don't know how to make my "point" any clearer....(if clearer is the right word).
From what I can gather, maybe because the word "masturbation" was absent in the post introduction, it confused everybody, I dunno.
Assuming that was the fly in the ointment, I should perhaps confess that I don't give a rat's ass anyway about "masturation" per se. It's her motion that does it for me. If I had anything to do with it, her hands wouldn't be anywhere near her pussy. And we can also scratch the stupid toys. Weird? Call it what you will, it's part and parcel of my (what do'ya call it, nitch?) Oh, and by the way, I'd be eternally grateful to anybody out there who can put me on to a site that caters to this kind of taste. More specifically, think in terms there's an invisable man on top of this model, screwing her royally out of her mind. But please, although this site has just what I'm discribing here, "hypnogirls" is OUT. .... Been there done that

06-10-10  12:32pm - 5309 days #4
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:



I'm not really sure what the point of your post is. But my answer is hopefully related to what you are talking about.

Then again, I tend to ramble a lot myself.

Ok, the short answer to my point is simply this: If you're gonna do solo, stick to one position. Don't give us missionary, then doggie, squatting, rolling over and over...eh, well, you get the picture.
Most of the top sites have some of the most beautiful models out there, and a portion of the site's content is solo. But what frosts me is that their solo acts "suck."
And I can't empathize "suck" too strongly. I've dwelled on this before, but I'll bend off the subject a bit because its worth rehashing: I don't want to waste my time watching this airhead "suck" on her fingers, dipping them in and out of her cunt.. what's the point? And while I'm on a roll lets include the insidious practice of her licking and overtime-massaging her freaky tits.

Eh, Speaking of "tending to ramble".......

06-10-10  10:03am - 5309 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


She's flat on her back, writhing, bumping and grinding; her face grimacing with orgasmic delight... culminating in a crescendo of multiple viginal sensations that brings her midriff right up off the floor. NOW, THAT'S HOW I LIKE MY SOLOS!
Unfortunately, that's not necessarily how it usually goes.
Count on midway through..usually sooner, her performance will be interupted time after time bouncing around into varying positions. This breaks the continuity of the scene, therefore, frankly,....fucking up the whole clip.
I know you gotta please everybody, and different guys prefer particular positions, and there are those who're completely satisfied with the status quo ..but we could use a system that better allows one to choose the position that suits him. Alas, I figure things are so fixated now that they ain't about to change.
Thankfully, a few (but too few) sites have the business sense to give us the jist of what I'm advocating...I feel myself being among the best.
Wanna toss your two-cents worth in? ... I'd value your thoughts.

06-09-10  10:44pm - 5310 days #19
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


So if this is a staged performance, where the model and Woodman or whoever is doing the interview and sex have rehearsed what is shown on video, it is a very convincing performance that appears spontaneous and natural and real. I really doubt these girls are such accomplished actresses that they could give the performances they are giving.


.
I'm going to give you the benifit of the doubt, fireone, because I'm convinced I can't shake your conviction.
I will sum up my arguement though by saying anything is possible if one has the power Pierre has over his domain and his girls......These girls are acting, acting is an art designed to portray another character. If they can fool the viewer then they've accomplished their task.

The two scenes you requested are as noted:
private casting 13....Christina
Private casting 44....Anetta Keys Edited by Staff on Jun 10, 2010, 06:10am (Khan: fixed quoteback)

06-09-10  07:19pm - 5310 days #14
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Khan:


... but I'm sure I must have been mistaken.



I'm "sure" you must be right,Chief. Unwittingly "mistaken" it is." Could'ya please chalk this up to Newbie ignorance?


06-09-10  05:40pm - 5310 days #12
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:



Point 2: I believe I know the model you are referring to, that appears in 2 different casting videos. I did not get the impression that the girl was being disguised in any way. It's obviously the same girl in both instances, as far as I can tell.


I have both copies of the girl in question, and it's clear to me they did indeed pass her off as a different girl, even going so far as to bringing her on first as a brunette and later as a blond. Interviews and the usual step by step routine Pierre runs through with new girls were followed in the same manner individually in both scenes, and, for all practical purposes, treated as two different girls.
To me that kinda smacks of passing them off as different participants. I have the videos..they're yours for the asking Edited on Jun 09, 2010, 05:44pm

06-09-10  02:05pm - 5310 days #9
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


The closest thing to reality porn I've seen are the casting videos by Pierre Woodman. That guy is amazing in his ability to persuade young girls to perform sex on camera.
I'd admit I am sometime amazed by how many new/first time girls agree to work with one lucky guy, but on the other hand I seriously doubt he's giving them Monopoly money.

I know the deck's stacked against me, here...but I've seen enough of this aging, French Lothario to say he's the perfect example of what I'm talking about. This guy's gotta be among the best at his craft, because he's got even savvy PU aficionados believing it's spontaneous and in real-time.
I'm gonna take the liberty to quote our esteemed and valued member RagingBuddhist: "if you're not cynical, you're not paying attention." These gals are interrogated and read the do's and dont's way before they're actually preforming....and all the "persuading" going on during this mesmerizing seduction all goes with Pierre's phenomenal act. I'm going to site one example and then I'm outta here: One has to look real hard, but of the few hot young girls I've seen him interview, the hottest one I noticed was brought on again disguised and made up to look like a new participant. SO, assuming I'm right about all this...may I then appeal to the au courant among us to check this out.
And to my illustrious fellow PinkPanther, with The Lord of the Rings thing, a little more, if you please, about "getting my money back."

06-09-10  11:17am - 5310 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Uh, Graymane - it's a fantasy - it's not an insult to your intelligence. It's a fantasy.



Ok, guys...please give me a break, and for Heaven sake credit for not being so naive as to think this stuff isn't "fantasy." (STAGED)
I know my writing sometimes sorta runs off the page, and, admittedly undecipherable, but try again to grasp from my post that WE KNOW IT'S FANTASY BUT THEY APPARANTLY DON'T KNOW THAT WE KNOW...AND, IN FACT, THINK WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH SENSE TO KNOW IT.
Example: "Hey Stud, ain't that a chick I see yonder?" Stud: "Well damned, Dick, I believe it is." I'll jus' drive on over to her sos you can do your stuff."
Chick: (walking alone in a remote area wearing a skirt up to the cheeks of her ass...oblivious to a van approaching with two guys ogling her)
Stud: "Well Hi honey-Bunch, me an' my partner here would be much obliged if'n you'd hop in our littl' 'ol van here and let us make you a movie star."
Chick: "Well, gee, fellows, I don't usually do this sort of thing, But OK...what'da I have to do?"

I won't belabor my point......I rest my case.

06-08-10  09:30pm - 5311 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


Two guys are driving merrily along -- camera and paraphernalia in tow -- searching for young, attractive, and innocent girls with which to bring back to their comfortable pad and film themselves fucking her brains out. Then there's the other trolling pussy-seekers who want all the action right away in their vehicle...so once the target is sweet-talked into their van, the girls are fast-talked into piling in the back for their filming debute. What puzzles me is the ease with which these guys get the girls off the ground and into their pussy-wagon. And I'm not convinced they have so much to offer it'll entice a girl to throw caution to the wind and hop right into a van with complete strangers. I've never had that kind of luck..nor anybody else I know.
All this would come together if the scenario was staged -- which I'm completely convinced is the case. But the project's intent is unquestionably done to make us believe otherwise... spontaneous and real-time. I figure the place and time the action starts is prearranged, and the guys simply let the girls ad-lib through the whole setup. Good acting isn't easy, and any attempt at it by most porn'ers stick out like a ball-an'-chain.
Don't you get kind of tired of these porn peddlers taking pot-shots at our intelligence like this? I'd suppose if we were Eskimos they'd be selling us snowballs.

06-08-10  06:19pm - 5311 days #11
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
All the serious stuff I recall is pretty much covered here, Denner; but if you like Westerns and want a little diversion, might I suggest some excellent Western comedies: There's the much acclaimed "Cat Ballow"...starring Lee Marvin and an all-star cast. The venerable Mal Brook's "Blazing Saddles" was an all-time hit. But the one I like best, although it never made waves like the others, was "Evil Roy Slade." starring John Astin (the character Gomez in TV's Addams Family) I don't find too many things anymore to actually make me laugh out loud, but this flim had me doubled over .

06-07-10  04:29pm - 5312 days #2
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by graymane1777:


Masturbate with both hands.


This thread obviously is going over like a lead balloon.
Well, you win some...you lose some. I thought it was hilarious.
Hell...What'da I know?

06-06-10  04:09pm - 5313 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


Masturbate with both hands.

06-05-10  03:40pm - 5314 days #8
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
I just don't think we are as monogamous a species as some would like us believe.
[QUOTE=turboshaft]

BINGO! It's not rocket science that men are perhaps chemically altered to crave variety when it comes to sex...hence the cheating and roving eye.
It always used to amaze me seeing entertainers, high-profile men, or just lucky guys in general, cheat, or simply walk away from drop-dead-gorgeous wives and girlfriends. That was then.....
I later married a beauty twenty years my junior, a sexual olympian and in my mind would grace the pages of Playboy or any other glamor Mag.
She left for greener pastures, leaving me with vividly priceless memories to sip on until this day.
An' you know what? Even during our two years of martial bliss, she still had to share me with my porn.

06-05-10  10:29am - 5314 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


This may be true and prevents at least some from cheating but I wouldn't say it's very healthy. I would argue that reality is best suited for "your own ultimate sexual encounter" rather than porn, which should be for your own ultimate sexual fantasy.


As always,turboshaft, your differing argument continues to pack logic and practical good sense.
If we were lawyers opposing each other in a court of law, I think I'd be a little nervious.
(Quote)> "prevents at least some from cheating but I wouldn't say it's very healthy."
Would you then say "cheating" is healthy?
While I may back up and agree with you that conventional thinking dictates "reality" is better than "fantasy" -- I stick to my guns that in the mind of most avid porn aficionados the "ultimate sexual encounter" is indeed their porn. And the fact porn keeps them at home speak volumes about it's validity and the condition of it's health.
Many I'm talking about here are regular Joes; and many are professionals; and almost all married --- commonly to trophy wives.

06-04-10  09:53pm - 5315 days #3
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
It's my judgement, a surprising number of avid porn-watchers cheat less, if at all. The simple fact is: their real-time mistress is porn itself...pure and simple.
Think about it. The arduous make-or-break babe chase for that elusive lay is replaced by the relaxed comfort of vicariously wallowing in your own ultimate sexual encounter right there emanating from your darling computer.
Imaginative success beats a hunt failure.

But hey.....in the case of a sure thing> testosterone rules.

06-04-10  08:53pm - 5315 days #18
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
If it's rated R or anything short of XXX, and the film goes as far as cable is allowed to play sex on American select channels, then I have it recorded. This goes back 20 years. Like the site "Mr Skin", All the hot scenes are extracted and put on VHS cassette. I have so many, in fact, Although they're labeled I'd be hard-pressed finding any particular movie from which to view any given scene. Every once and a while I'll grab a tape from the batch and run it on my out-dated VHS video player. It's a welcome breather (pun intended) from the hard stuff I'm immersed in coming through my computer.

06-04-10  07:59pm - 5315 days #16
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by mbaya:


HI BGR,
I love Liv Tyler and want to know more about Stealing Beauty. How explicit does it get? In the description on Amazon it only mentions topless.


I have all the hot scenes of this movie -- the best of which take place near the end of this movie: Liv and her male companion are reclined under a tree, facing skyward and talking; she invites the shy boy to kiss her, and as the scene progresses he's awkwardly fondling her ultimatly culminating in a highly erotic sex scene. What's so exceptional here is the powerfully charged flashes of Liv's panties -- which includes a generous view of what else is under her skirt.
The shocked look on Liv's face after she feels the force and warmth of the boys semen, is priceless.

06-04-10  05:02pm - 5315 days #9
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by GCode:


I don't know where you have been, but your statement about WWII women may be right. However, I am from the USA and women these days revolve around sex. At least the women I have met from when I was the ages of 16-27 (present day), so like 1998 to 2010 in the age ranges of 15-35. I've actually have had women laugh in my face and break up/not want to see me again because I wanted to wait it out with sex. Maybe I'm not understanding the post exactly as I'm writing this. I'm talking about women from the 90's to present day, but weren't women from the late 60's and 70's considered pretty open minded and aggressive when it came to having sex? I mean the hippie age was known for 'free love' and sexual stimulation. I dunno, have u seen how women dress these days? I'd say they are pretty sexually assertive


I wasn't implying that U.S. women weren't assertive... on the contarary, indeed they are...just not as much so as our European neighbors. My point: (according to my post) is that it was before, and later during my years as a youth -- early 40's on throughout the 50's, when mores relaxed as the 70's an' 80's sexual Revolution approached (from whence you're alluding to) that I'm talking about. Let me give you an example: during my High School years (1950-1954) if a girl allowed a boy to have sex with her, Her reputation immediately became toast. She'd subsequently be ostracized by classmates and left out any and all school activities. She was, in effect, an anathema. Even post school-years dating (1954-1960) was predominately limited to only light petting. If a guy were to succeed in getting as far as his hand in a gal's panties, he was hailed as a real "Ladies' Man". Gettin' laid crowned you as a consumate lover... an' one to be reckoned with. How time does change.

06-03-10  06:30pm - 5316 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


Do you suppose one day some porn-maker might've had this brain-storm and just had to rush right out to the studios and present it? And do you further think his excitement at coming up with this ground-breaking idea was so overwhelming that he felt it needed to get started and presented immediately into mainstream porn.
Wow! it don't get no better than this....
The piece de resistance: lets have the ladies do their solos on top of furniture, on kitchen and pool tables, on washing machines, desks, workbenches...golly, the oddly dumb places they can do their stuff is endless.
And it's so original.......OK, but is it practical? realistic? believable? ....is it anything that one can preceive as making even a nanogram of sense?
(she) Hey, you guys, ain't this dildo-action I'm doing over my double sink just bringing you right up out of your chair.
Hey! I've just got a brainstorm myself: how about solos done stretched out on the BED????

06-03-10  05:31pm - 5316 days #68
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by purduerachel:


I would really like to see the study that discusses that problem, kkman... thats really interesting!



Most search engines will get you in the ballpark...but google is the all-knowing granddaddy of them all. It's a simple matter of typing what you want into the field.
Example: "study on surveys" or just "surveys" or anything else specific to your needs. Single entries are more effective.

06-03-10  02:03pm - 5316 days Original Post - #1
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia


Women haven't as yet become as aggresive sexually, as portrayed in our porn movies and vids... but who knows? maybe they'll one day get there.

During world War Two, the fondest memories of GI's coming home from liberated countries in The Europien theather involved their exerperience with the women there. Unlike the courtships our troops were used to with the girls back home --- strait-laced, prudish, morally and rigorously strict and genetically embedded with a puritanical belief that going all the way with boys would bring on catastrophic consequenses -- our GI's found polar-opposite with the girls over there.
German, French, Dutch, and even The pepper-hot-blooded Italian babes showed a far more open attitude in the ways of sexual endeavors than our gals -- and its fair to say from that resulted many relationships and marriages.
U.S. women have come a long way since then, but is, and will continue to be in catch-up mode when it comes the assertive European babes.
Maybe some of PU's European members have had experience with gals on both sides of the pond, and would like to comment on their view.

For those that are confused about the first part of the the subject..."You have to hand it to the American women" The empthisis is on "hand it" I hope you get the jest of the quote. Edited on Jun 03, 2010, 05:12pm

05-31-10  08:07pm - 5319 days #15
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by pat362:


The problem is that you can't be sure that one girl won't lie about another girls numbers and vice versa. The only way to know for sure is to get the people that produce porn to give numbers but that won't happen because they don't want one girl to know how much they paid another girl.
.


the address below (if I have it right) is where I got my information. The page looked pretty legit to me. I've no doubt you'll be quite impressed with what you see. Trust me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornographic_actor

05-31-10  03:34pm - 5319 days #26
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


I'm not bothered by condoms because I really don't care all that much about the look of the cock unless it's excessively disgusting. Whether the cock is wearing a little raincoat or one of those sweaters that people put on their dachsunds doesn't really bother me.


Funny stuff, Panther. Perhaps some humor will help stir this thread up a bit ... probably needs it.
Now, lemme see if I can be a little more specific:
To me, it's not how a cock looks, moves, spits cum, or whatever. But I've been around the block enough in my many years to keenly decern the difference between how it feels with and without a condom when my member is at work inside a pussy....and the difference is monumental.
As with all good pics. or video scenes of a guy humping this incredibley sexy babe, the closest I'm gonna get to the action is vicariously immersing myself into the role. But if he's wearing a wrapper....well, I rest my case.

05-30-10  11:44pm - 5320 days #24
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
Originally Posted by Yariana:


We use condoms in our video shoots because we work with a lot of "First Timers" who are very nervous about doing their first video. It helps put them at ease knowing the chance of contracting an STD is minimized.

Our members understand this and have stated they would rather have the girls be safe and really enjoy themselves rather than brave the entire shoot with a fear of STD's. Our male talent cup the condom in their hand as they pull out. It slides off in their hand, unseen by the viewer, prior to doing the popshot. I have never had any complaints about the use of condoms.


It's rather extraordinary you have such a rapport with your members. Most all the web sites to which I've been a member, they couldn't care less about any opinion I might have about anything. It appears, under the circomstances, you're managing your site well and on the way to bigger and better. With all due respect, however, as tempting as you've discribed it, I'd have to pass on ever being a member soley on the basis condoms are visible. This can be remedid, were it that important, by some simple and creative camera work. But Let me be brutely frank: many, many guys out there feel as I do about these visable sheathings... they slice erotic impact and compromise the essence of a hot scene. It's akin to taking a shower wearing your raincoat.
,

1301-1350 of 1412 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 7 12 17 26 Page 27 28 29 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.