|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
WeeWillyWinky (0)
|
| 1-50 of 243 Posts | Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next Page > |
| 11-01-15 08:06pm - 3300 days | #8 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User  Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
In the Crack You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 11-01-15 08:03pm - 3300 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I see that I got some kind of award for most active user in October, with 0 (count 'em) Zero points! Lol. https://www.pornusers.com/users_monthly.html Some kind of glitch? Or is it my early Christmas present for being a good chum? You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 10-02-15 03:52am - 3331 days | #16 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Zishy looks like it will probably be my next join, if I choose another. Still mining from my current site. The site looks refreshing. Let the imagination do it's thing. Pretty models, a general sense of tease and the occasional flash - right up my alley. YAY! (and the peasants rejoiced..)  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-25-15 10:38pm - 3337 days | #3 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I know it's been a while, but this is important, and I'd like to bump it, if that's ok. I suppose a mod can undo my bump if I've made a mis-step. This is still, to my knowledge, the most civilized discussion forum on the Internet. And I've been ALL over. Quite extraordinary that one should find the most civility and rationality on a porn site. "Crazy, crazy world...crazy crazy times..." R.E.M. "Fireplace", great song! You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-25-15 10:15pm - 3337 days | #11 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Had a wee look at the site(s) you mentioned, but alas, none of it looks like I'd be interested or turned on by that content. It looks like Sodom and Gomorrah to me. ? That's not what I associate with clothed female, nude male porn. To me, true CFNM would have to incorporate certain essential elements: Clothed females! As in, the clothes stay on. Downblouse and upskirts would enhance the viewer's pleasure, but it shouldn't be the focus, or get out of hand. Nude males: they could be undressed slowly, or whatever, but should wind up either nude or half-naked. Women should be in charge, with no waffling or deviation from that. ie: No uppity men getting their testosterone in an uproar. Subservience and subjugation to the will and wishes of the female(s) should be adhered to religiously. There should be ejaculation. The classic elements of drama need to be followed, and no drama is complete without a climax. If the male orgasm is to be 'ruined', or non-existent, this should be explained in the text accompanying the video, so potential consumers will know what they are buying. **Note: CFNM doesn't, or shouldn't, have to be based on degradation of the male. Women could be in charge, as in have complete say in what happens during the scene, but the female(s) could express affection, adulation, even awe and amazement, which would require some suspension of disbelief, but could work very well. As long as the content isn't strongly steered into the unsavory and immoral, ie: making the females look like underage girls. That to me is a mistake, and can't possibly be a net positive in the long run, no matter how patently it's explained that the performers are of legal age and that the scenario is strictly in the realm of fantasy. On Literotica, and other fiction sites, an author CANNOT write about underaged participants. It is illegal, even to write fiction - meaning fiction that has the express intent of being for the purpose of titillation, NOT literary fiction, as in serious novels - which includes underaged characters engaging in sex, consensual or not. This is as it should be, IMHO. Short version: Nabokov can write Lolita and get away with it, because it's a work of serious fiction, and especially because it has a moral underpinning: the main character gets his come uppance. But, if one goes to Literotica and tries to post a story, intended as erotica, about an underage female with an adult male - it won't get posted, because, as far as I know, it's illegal in most countries to do so - and for good reason. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 25, 2015, 10:32pm | |
|
||
| 09-25-15 06:09pm - 3337 days | #14 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I'd be interested in that as well. I know lots of men, and guys here, even women, like that kind of content. The Porn Fidelity clip just showed aggressive sex - I'm not against aggressive sex with consenting partners at all. I know all about passion during sex, and had some scratch marks myself, when all was said and done. What I find especially intriguing is how and why people can enjoy content that is markedly violent: like Max Hardcore for instance. I saw a scene with him where the girl was impaled on his willy, and he stuck his fingers down her throat, made her vomit, and rubbed the vomit into her face. I had to stop watching at that point, and my guts were seething. I felt nothing but contempt for Max Hardcore for a good long while. I did not and do not understand what could make a man do that to a woman - even if the woman WANTS that! I just don't get it, and maybe a thread on that very thing can help me to grok it. Though even if I understand it, there's no way I would want to consume that kind of stuff, or fill the pockets of the people who make that kind of entertainment. I have a friend on Facebook who's an ex porn performer. She has some really ugly tales of ugly men in the business who essentially exploit young women, get them addicted to opiates, heroin, or other highly addictive drugs, use them up, and discard them like trash. It happens all the time in the industry. How in the hell can anyone determine, just by being a consumer of porn, which producers are good and fairly ethical, and who are the bastards. And how can you tell about the female performers? How do you know they are really "into it", as these unsavory, greedy producers would have you think? I download clips on In the Crack and have to stop watching them after a while, because in some scenes you can just see the contempt in the models' faces. I won't name names, but in some of the early clips especially, there are at least two models whose faces are full of disgust and even contempt, which they can barely disguise. I understand that they have consented to be videotaped and to be objectified, that they are being paid well. But it doesn't help when it comes to trying to enjoy material when the subject is someone who is obviously only doing it for the money, and was perhaps compelled to doing whatever she could to make ends meet. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 25, 2015, 06:13pm | |
|
||
| 09-25-15 03:26am - 3338 days | #3 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Big leap there, from angry husband to he's "not safe or to be trusted." With all the information I have thus far, from the article linked to, and this thread - I don't know enough to be certain of which party involved was trustworthy or not. X commits murder-suicide in situation A, does NOT mean Y will do the same in situation B. It means bad shit could happen. That's all it means. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-24-15 10:06pm - 3338 days | #11 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Tragic. WTF??? Who the hell is convincing women that men find those kind of faces attractive? A young lady I worked with, who recently moved to a better job in another city, posted a new pic on Facebook. I swear her lips look ridiculous. She gets comments from male friends about her "duck face", but she laughs it off. She looks HIDEOUS! Can't someone, a significant other, a best friend, a mom or dad, somebody, just tell these women point blank: "You looked beautiful the way you were! Now you look funny! Please stop doing this to yourself!"  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-24-15 09:54pm - 3338 days | #10 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Shame, aint it? What about when you see a beautiful woman and the tats are all over her chest? Immediate zeppelin shrinkage for me. By the way, I like your Congreve quote. I'm sure you know he's the author of one of the most misquoted AND mis-attributed lines ever? Musick has Charms to sooth a savage Breast Ask the average yokel and he'll say that's from Shakespeare. I thought it was Shakespeare for most of my days (rekkin cuz I'm the avrij yokil refird two). Actually, I grew up with Bugs Bunny's version: "Music hath charms to soothe the savage beast." Which is the usual misquote, still misquoted to this day, despite data overload. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 24, 2015, 09:58pm | |
|
||
| 09-24-15 09:44pm - 3338 days | #6 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
It doesn't have to be fast. Strong, rhythmic sweeps can do the trick also. BUT - yes, hard and fast works. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-24-15 09:37pm - 3338 days | #5 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
To describe this graphically, I could make my ex cum quite quickly with a simple method. She would lie on her side, and I would use my fingers on the inside, upwards, towards her pubis, and rub my fingers back and forth across that fleshy wall there. Or, she would lie on her belly. I put fingers in, knuckles upward - toward the ceiling - and rub downward, side to side. IF she was already in the mood and responsive, this could make her, in the words of Jack Nicholson in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, "light up like a pinball machine." My ex had a tiny clitoris, in fact, in the early years of our marriage, I discovered that she didn't even know what it was, what it was called. She was born in Mexico, and by her own account, most of the men she knew anything about, with respect to sexuality, were of the "two pumps, a tickle and a squirt" variety (Stephen King quote): ie They didn't give a hoot in hell about whether the woman got off or not. A female of close relation, when in conversation of sexual matters, was completely ignorant of the fact that a woman could have an orgasm. My ex said, "She just looked at me with her eyes wide open, her mouth open, like, 'what the hell are you talking about?' " With my ex, I could go all day, in the words of the immortal Frank Zappa, applying "rotation to her sugar plum", without so much as a hum or a sigh. But on the INSIDE - BINGO! How wonderful it was when we discovered this! OH to be married again! I was a lucky man, and I threw it all away because I'm an idiot. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-24-15 09:01pm - 3338 days | #12 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
No thanks! I have zero interest in watching that kind of stuff. It gives me the same feeling as watching giraffes fight (check it out on Youtube!), or watching scenes of gang violence. It does NOT give me any titillation or sexual excitement to see that kind of aggressive content. It does the opposite. It makes my skin crawl, literally. Please bear in mind, I'm not being judgmental of YOU, the participants in, or consumers of, this kind of content. I am only judging the CONTENT. There's a big difference! I know we all have different triggers and different hot buttons, and that what causes sexual excitement is probably not something we have any real control over. We can control our consumption of material that feeds those urges, and we can control our behavior, but I think - I believe - we are stuck with our biological, physiological make-up, and with whatever happened in our formative years to make certain things more sexually stimulating than other things. Hey look, I get turned on by CFNM material, and I have a wicked cuckold fetish***, as well as a wicked fetish for seeing women in their underwear - and the more ordinary the underwear, the hotter it makes me. I can understand that to you this probably seems absurd. What the EFF can be sexy about a middle-aged woman in a pair of fullcut Hanes Her Way white cotton panties, with a tank top, and just being her ordinary, boring domestic self? Why do I like symbols, pictures, ideas, of the domestic female, the earthy, maternal, sitcom soccer-mom type? Most likely, while I call myself a feminist, there's a deeper part of my reptilian brain that is obviously turned-on by the woman-as-nurterer, the stay-at-home housewife who looks after the kids and doesn't aspire to a career or a different life. We are what we are, we like what we like. So there's no way in hell you're gonna get me interested in that kind of porn.  *** Note I say "wicked". My cuckold fetish is what destroyed my marriage. I had a beautiful - and I do mean beautiful! - wife, and over the course of probably the first two years of our marriage, I slowly and with full intent made her aware of the fact that my greatest turn on was the idea of her going to bed with another man. She was very against the idea at first, but after I explained the psychology of it, the whole alpha male, beta male thing (I'm a beta), she began to warm up to the idea. She eventually began to date a young man she worked with, a very good looking young man who wanted her badly. I wanted him to have her. He did. After fantasy became reality, a few weeks went by and I called him on the phone and threatened him, and after that my wife began to hate me - as I deserved to be hated, naturally - and my marriage was, for all intents and purposes, over, though for the sake of our two kids we stretched it out to ten years. I'm incapable of a healthy, normal relationship with a woman, because I'm an idiot. You're more fortunate than I, I imagine. God bless ya!  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 24, 2015, 09:18pm | |
|
||
| 09-23-15 08:57pm - 3339 days | #10 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I took one brief look at the sample vid on Porn Fidelity, - which I think features this Ryan guy - and I have to thank you for reminding me why I can't stand hardcore porn. WTF is right. The snippets of the sex scenes looked as erotic and stimulating to me as two dogs fucking. Absolutely nothing there. And I know that this isn't even hardcore "hardcore". This is warm-fuzzy cuddling compared to what some people like to watch. WTF?  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-23-15 08:34pm - 3339 days | #2 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
My ex-wife had a definite discharge when she climaxed. There was a particular odor to it, and it didn't feel like urine. If she climaxed in the missionary position, this discharge would end up on her mons veneris, and on me, and if it was a powerful orgasm it would be quite a lot. If it was a really big O there was usually quite a mess underneath us as well. Orally, I never saw her actually squirt, but during climax there would be that discharge. Depending on the magnitude of her orgasm - sometimes she had little ones, and sometimes really powerful ones that would go on and on - it would be quite messy, and it was NOT urine. To repeat, though: I never saw her actually squirt, not even during her most powerful orgasm. I've looked high and low for videos of genuine female ejaculation. In The Crack features a few. I've seen those gusher videos, and they always make me laugh more than anything else. Although it can be entertaining and a turn on in a fantasy sense, just as videos with ridiculously fake male ejaculation can be a turn on if they are done well, and if you are willing to do that "suspension of disbelief." My first lover - and I've only slept with two women, both long term relationships - had occasional big O's with a very small amount of discharge, but nothing actually squirted. I guess there might be women out there who literally squirt in copious amounts. How awesome! It's a very interesting subject. I've seen some Japanese videos where the women were manually brought to climax and the discharge and physical reaction of the performers were very similar to my ex wife's. My ex-wife was most easily brought to the big O manually. If she was in a certain mood, it could happen within twenty or thirty seconds, and happen over and over. But, unfortunately for me, she was very rarely in this kind of a mood. I sure wish I could understand women!  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-23-15 08:10pm - 3339 days | #8 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Ugh! Tattoos! I live in a resort town, what has been called the Fort Lauderdale of the 21st century, and during spring break we get flooded with college kids who roam about the shopping centers in thongs and flipflops - sandals that used to be called thongs when I was a kid. If I were asked to make an estimate of the percentage of women with at least one tattoo between the ages of 18 and 23, my guess would be over 50%. 23% seems very low to me, but that may be because of where I am. I'd say more women have tats than men, and more of them, at least here in Havasu. While I think small, discreet tats in various areas can be cute, like the traditional "tramp-stamp" on the lower back, by and large I find them extremely unattractive. I've seen strikingly beautiful girls and women who look like walking comic books, and some of the ink jobs are obviously cheaply done, and look like someone took a sharpy and scratched on them while they were passed out. I've seen text on arms and legs, sloppy monochromatic scribbling that looks like graffiti rather than "body-art". Yuck is all I can think most of the time. A lot of these otherwise beautiful women look nothing short of hideous. And it's not just the tats: it's the piercings, the fake tans and leathery skin, the terrible, shoddy make-up jobs, the ridiculous obsession with thick lips. Yuck! I wouldn't touch some of these grotesque women with a ten foot pole. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-22-15 07:35pm - 3340 days | #10 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Good post, good points.   You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-22-15 07:19pm - 3340 days | #9 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
If I were an owner of a company that produced electronic content, such as ITC, for example, I *might* consider bumping up the monthly sub price — which has remained pretty much the same even though what they are offering has markedly increased in quality and quantity in a relatively short period of time: I'm seeing a dramatic change even from say 2010 until now — but that would be on principle only, and not profit-motivated. Since I have only very modest means now and don't run a business, I honestly don't know what I'd do in their situation. I'm not a greedy person, in fact quite the contrary, so most likely I'd say "shove" my principles and leave the sub price at what it is. In 2001 they were shooting in modest looking locations, and the models were usually attractive but often quite plain, even unattractive, at least by my admittedly finicky standards. But now, it's almost surreal. The 2015 scenes are set in places where I'd probably not even want to enter because they look so pristine, as well as opulent and ornate. And, the models are all stunners now, from tip to toe. They look unreal sometimes as well, like some kind of alien super human life form!  It seems apparent that ITC is making tons of money, so there's really no reason to raise the sub price. So, I guess I have to retract my "*might* consider bumping up the monthly sub price" I guess I'm old fashioned, but it bothers me that talented artists should be in the situation they're in now. I don't think they should be mega millionaires, but I think they should do well, because I know how hard it is, what effort it takes, to write lyrics and music, to compose songs, to record them, and to go through the whole process. I was in a band that recorded our own music for several years, and I've recorded much of my own music. It's NOT easy. In fact, making music is a great deal more difficult than the joe-job I currently do. It takes weeks, if not months, of work, to produce 40 minutes of music. And that goes double and triple - and so on - for artists that create complex music, played on real instruments. What I mean is that "intellectual property" is something that should be taken seriously, and I think there's a trend towards poo-pooing that whole concept which is unfair and just plain wrong for the artists among us - and it's especially wrong for those artists who are head and shoulders above the rest. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 22, 2015, 07:24pm | |
|
||
| 09-22-15 06:32pm - 3340 days | #8 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
You're right, lk2fireone. The other avatar was done by an artist back at the inception of the forum when the artist agreed to make a unique avatar to personal specifications. I'm less an individual now than I was, I must say - more a member of what I might call a collective consciousness. Not that I don't celebrate individuality. I do, very ardently. In fact, I think what humanity has figured out, with the development of civilization, socialization, and progress, is that the best way to coexist as social animals is to exalt the individual. It sounds contradictory, but it's the only thing that works. The concept of individual rights, and the negative of that right, is what keeps us together. IMHO.  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-20-15 10:36pm - 3342 days | #4 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
What could be discussed is the problem of video and music being reproducible without much more initial effort, time, or resources. What I mean is: it takes a certain amount of wheat, work, processing, packaging, shipping, and marketing, to make every single loaf of bread; but once an electronic video or music file is created, it requires much less further work and/or material to reproduce that product indefinitely. Someone much smarter than me, and/or someone who knows more about economics, production, and how the market works, could 'splain this better. By the way, my new avatar is Coco Chanel, my new hero. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 20, 2015, 10:55pm | |
|
||
| 09-20-15 10:04pm - 3342 days | #3 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Swift, Beyonce, Bieber, all beautiful, glamorous, which no doubt has a lot to do with why they are so popular. When I talk about musical artists, I mean people with a great gift, or talent, for music who produce something of merit as art. Not to suggest that those three above are NOT talented or gifted artists, only to point out that, like Elvis Presley, just to use one example from the past, the fact that they have personal beauty and magnetism probably accounts for their fame and popularity more than the fact that they produce and perform music. This could be argued, I suppose. I realize that musical tastes are subjective, but we can observe that some artists have an advantage when it comes to their potential for achieving celebrity, and that that advantage often has very little to do with the medium they use to rise to celebrity. When you say, "Value, ethical standards, something for nothing, are all concepts that might have little to do with the real world.", you seem to be agreeing with what I'm talking about. You're right: the world is upside-down, and the concepts of value and ethical standards are disappearing. That's my point. **Edited in: alright, I shouldn't say disappearing, that's hysterical and alarmist. What I mean is they are changing in a manner that I don't think is good. They've been on the decline for a long time, but the Internet has exacerbated that decline, IMHO. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 20, 2015, 10:43pm | |
|
||
| 09-19-15 09:39pm - 3343 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
When I was twenty, in 1984, and when I wanted porn, I had to go into a convenient store and slink into the back where they had the naughty magazines, the really good ones where you couldn't even see the cover photo, only the title of the mag. I'd basically go into these places at night, in the wee hours, when there was hardly anyone around, because I felt like a creep as I nervously fumbled through those deliciously tempting mags in search of Cheri, Club, or one of my faves, the British Mayfair.  When I'd selected two or three, I'd of course pick up a few other things, like a can of Coke I didn't want or a bag of chips I didn't want. If I was lucky, it was some old guy at the register. If I was unlucky, it'd be that lady that looked like Alice from the Brady Bunch, and the ordeal would be all the more embarrassing. I'd plunk down my items, you know, the things I really came in for: the Coke and the bag of chips, and then the magazines. If I remember correctly, it was anywhere from 7 to 10 dollars per magazine; or it could have been less. My memory fails me. When I got home with the magazines, I remember that exciting feeling of having new porn to look at. What a feeling! But, inevitably, after plunking down that much money, I'd be lucky if there was a dozen or so pictures in each mag that would actually do something for me. The rest would be the usual cliched poses, the same old same old. I didn't buy porn flicks until I came out West in 1989. To buy some X rated movies on video cassette I had to drive about ten miles to the edge of town to a small shop next to a tattoo parlor. The guy at the counter had a gun at his hip. This is Arizona, mind you. Usually the place would be empty, but sometimes there would be one or two gents shuffling about, and occasionally a woman. Here's where I really spent a good portion of my paycheck. These movies went for upwards of 30 dollars. OR - a better way, I'd send away for adult entertainment. I spent over a hundred clams on three of the then famous Buttman flicks. Since I'm more of a panty/tease/softcore guy, I'd send away for panty oriented videos, and these went for anywhere from 20 to 30 dollars, and they were usually pretty terrible. You were lucky to get a few good scenes out of the 30 or 60 minute videos. By and large, sending away for porn was mostly a waste of money. I always felt very guilty, and very stupid, winding up with a sub-par product and having paid far too much for it. But now, I can go to In The Crack, do a few clicks, and download a 30 minute video that is right up my alley, and is of the utmost quality, and the download takes about thirty seconds. Now that's just ONE clip, among thousands that are available there. Just a short time ago, that single 30 minute video, if sold separately as a DVD, would have gone for anywhere between 20 and 30 dollars. So, I consider ITC's monthly subscription charge of 35 clams to be a steal, quite literally! And it is! With my high speed connection and my super-duper Apevia gaming computer (which is sitting next to me and is WAY smarter than I am), I could probably download their entire catalog in a few days. Or less. I don't even know, because I can't imagine even wanting to download that much material that fast. The reason I wanted to start a thread on this is because I've seen people discussing prices of various websites, and it looks to me that the subscription prices have remained pretty much the same, even while the content on offer on these sites has increased, in quality and quantity, in remarkable fashion. I would not think it strange or wrong in any way if a lot of the premier sites started to bump up their sub prices, due to the fact that the quality of their content has increased, but I have a feeling that this would cause a lot of people to boycott those sites or simply not join them. Segue into non-porn areas - "skip a little brother"... There are many great musical artists and bands nowadays that simply cannot make a living recording and touring because people are reluctant to PAY for the products these artists create. People would rather just go to Youtube and listen to the whole album for free, or download it from some other site. It seems to me that if you like an artist's music, and that music has a definite positive value in your life, that you would want to compensate that artist by paying for the opportunity to consume what they have produced. We have no problem with the simple trader principle in daily life. If we want a loaf of bread, we pay for it; if we want new batteries for our flashlight, we pay for them; if we want a professional to cut our hair in a certain way, we have no problem paying for that service, etc, etc. But when it comes to something like music, for some reason a lot of people have qualms about paying for it, even though they consider it a good thing, a benefit to them, and a thing of value: of even greater and longer lasting value than a haircut. Just as one concrete example: There's a great Doom Metal band called Solitude Aeturnus. They have many thousands of fans around the world, and by most accounts they have achieved at least a moderate level of critical acclaim as well as popularity among fans of Doom Metal. Sad thing is, while their last full length CD, Alone, released in 2006, is arguably one of the best albums ever recorded in its genre, the band has not recorded another album since, even though, according to Wikipedia, and according to the main founders, the band is still extant. This is one of the best bands in its genre, and every member of the band has a day job, because they haven't sold enough CDs to be able to produce music for a living. My theory, with respect to SA's lack of success, is that many people have a warped sense of value. There are probably thousands of fans of Solitude Aeturnus who haven't been to a show - which is understandable since they don't tour extensively - and haven't purchased a single SA track on iTunes or Amazon, or wherever, because they think that paying for music is something only a "chump" does. That was a term used by someone I argued with at some forum, at some time in the past. "Yer a chump if ya pay fer music!" was the essence of his argument. Bottom line is this: I think, if you value something, you should WANT to pay for that value. Only a chump - without a moral compass, with no ethical standards, and with no concept of value, wants to sit back and get something for nothing. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 20, 2015, 01:34am | |
|
||
| 09-17-15 08:42pm - 3345 days | #9 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Hey gpl: Question here: I can't help but wonder how CFNM could be very titillating to a gay man, since there are women doing the naughty stuff to the "poor unfortunate victim." (LOL!) I would think that having a bunch of women around would detract from the experience for you, rather than add to it, just as it would seriously damage (in fact eradicate completely) my interest and enjoyment by seeing a bunch of clothed men doing naughty stuff to another man. ?? You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-17-15 08:38pm - 3345 days | #8 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Thanks, mbaya, any and all help in this is good. You could possibly have cut my search (and usually destroy) efforts down to a bare minimum. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-17-15 06:41pm - 3345 days | #6 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
This genre is probably the one that pushes my hot buttons more than anything else, I guess because I can put myself into the position of the male, and the idea of several women discussing my willy and making me ejaculate for their personal pleasure is extremely exciting. How can it NOT be? Personally, while I proudly call myself a feminist and despise any degradation of women, I wouldn't mind being treated as a sex object by a group of attractive women, or by one woman. In fact, I'd LOVE it! Bring it on! That being said, if I were Mr. Handsome, and if I were in a situation where I were being objectified and degraded by one woman or a group of women, for REAL, and especially over a certain length of time, I imagine I would begin to hate it and despise the woman or women that were doing that to me. Bottom line: it's a great fantasy, but I have found so little of the videos I've seen to really work for me. The women seem fake, their words scripted, and the worst part, these guys are jaded, most likely far too accustomed to being objectified and pleasured in such a way, and this causes them to appear utterly bored. Here's an idea for a videographer or site owner: Select men who HAVE NOT undergone this kind of treatment, and get the female participants to be as honest and less "fake" or "scripted" as possible. This would make for dynamite content, for the most part. If I weren't a hermit, not to mention a struggling Christian, I would happily volunteer myself for such an experiment! LOL! But if this were to actually occur, I would decline. Besides that, I haven't been with a woman in ten years, so the scene featuring me and my poor neglected willy would be a very short scene indeed.  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-08-15 10:16pm - 3354 days | #18 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Well, Pyrenees, I guess I just don't understand things. I basically departed from Porn Users for the most part because of my being drawn to God over the course of 2010 and 2011. I destroyed over 500 gigs of porn I had collected over the years, and tried like hell to focus my mind on more positive things, like my music, my poetry, my writing - novels and short stories - as well as participation in various discussion forums, mainly centered around interests in philosophy, theology, cosmology, literature, art, etc. If you read my reviews or gather a bit of info about me, you can see I was never really into hardcore porn. What I mean is, YES, I LOVE seeing beautiful young ladies and women in intimate ways, via photography and video, and watching men and women bump uglies was interesting and "helpful"  to me, as it is to most normal males I guess, during various stages of my life; but the older I got, the less interesting and helpful it became, until I got to the point where it bored me to tears. Literally. I mean, seeing an episode of Three's Company nowadays, with those two beauties cavorting about, is far more titillating to me than watching even the most bonzo hardcore porn. I find it either: horribly violent and aggressive, misogynistic, repulsive, disgusting, silly, downright hilarious, and/or - as boring as watching water boil.Most of my reviews, if memory serves, were of model sites, or softcore picture/video sites based on the simple pleasure of seeing a good looking woman in her undies - still a MAJOR hot button for me, something I will never shake and do not want to shake, as a matter of fact - or naked as a jaybird, doing stuff like just walking around, bathing, rubbing lotion on her lovely parts, or whatever. What I mean by my first sentence: "I guess I just don't understand things", is that I don't understand how a person can enjoy seeing a woman being humiliated. That you're a person of faith is not really relevant, and while I agree with you that there is an ultimate Authority out there (God), I agree with the others that quoting the Bible isn't going to do much good when it comes to addressing how to deal with people who stoop to such evil as to have sex with a child. I mean, look at Genesis, right off the bat we have Lot's daughters getting him smashed and having sex with him. We have problems right from the get go. There is great wisdom in the Bible, and there is also much superstition, gruesome ritual— animals' blood being splattered and dabbed here and there, on places and people in the tabernacle [I think, if memory serves], what to do with what dead animal body parts, sacrificial slaughter and burning: a nasty, bloody, sticky mess —and ancient proscriptions and prescriptions which to our modern minds are repellent, and rightfully so. After all, how many Christians, or Jews, do you know who would take one of their rebellious kids and stone them to death? None? That's what I thought. And so on, and so on. When we get to the New Testament, we have Jesus, a benevolent, and in my opinion divinely guided and disciplined man, who tried to sort everything out and get people to shape up and quit acting like idiots: to LOVE one another unconditionally, to tolerate one another, to stop mocking and berating people, to be thoughtful of the poor, to ANYONE who is suffering, be they high or low; to speak honestly of people and to STOP putting words into other people's mouths, which is the cause of confusion and hatred worldwide, to STOP bearing false witness, to tell the truth, to be aware of OUR OWN shortcomings and failures, our own imperfection, and to remember them before we set out to blame and judge others. Unfortunately, the game of telephone was on, and what we have of Christ's teaching is presented to us in a giant ultrafiltered multi-linguistic and multi-interpretational tangle, the work of 2,000 years of commentary and addle-brained religiosity. But I am getting off the track. What I meant to say at the outset is that I don't know what gets your rocks off, and you don't know what gets mine off. It seems plain that we humans have fetishes for everything and anything, our sexual urges are complicated and confused by constant sharing of experience and mutual analysis, and the better we try to be, the worse we become, because we're all in the soup together and we're all corrupt, which only means - we're all human, and NORMAL. The best we can do is what Christ and Paul recommended: render to Caesar what is Caesar's, and render to God what belongs to God. Let's keep working at our civil laws and political policies, let's love one another and hope and pray, and let's DEFINITELY remove individuals who do evil things to others from society - by due process and according to the law, in the best way we can. This Jared person. I'm astonished, appalled, and stunned that someone with that much money, that much reward in life, would stoop to appeasing such a revolting sexual urge! I'm stunned that ANYONE would do it - but him! On top of the world - worth 15 million just because you lost weight eating at SUBWAY - and you debase yourself, your family, and cause unspeakable harm to children, just to scratch a physical itch in the pants and a sickening dream in the head? Yes, he has a hard road ahead of him where he's going. If God can forgive him, then so be it, but I'm just a man, and a father, and I don't have the capacity to forgive him, nor do I feel that it's my right to forgive someone for doing such a thing. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 02-14-15 09:08pm - 3560 days | #4 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Thanks for the replies, fellas. As for Obamacare, I've heard only bad news. graymane, thanks for the kind words! You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 01-24-15 11:13pm - 3581 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Hey fellow fellers (and ladies), It's me, your friendly neighborhood drive-by poster, WWW. As I've said, I don't want to abandon this forum since (as I've also said) I find it to be one of the most civil on the Net, but my activity will be scant, and there will be moments of busy-ness interspersed with great yawning gaps of absence. Not that any of you should care, since the forum is going on swimmingly, as I see. Just dropping in and keeping y'all up to date. That's the good news. Now for the bad news: Looks like I've got Peyronie’s disease. It aint no picnic. I was born with some problem with my winky that my parents never satisfactorily explained to me, a problem which required surgical intervention. At any rate, my unit, though with a pretty wicked left hook, was serviceable from my devirginization and all through my ten year marriage. When I went on the net to compare winkies, I was quite relieved and actually overjoyed to see that my curve was not abnormal at all, and that, in fact, a rod-straight pecker is actually in the minority. Size-wise, I was dead average at exactly 6 inches. But that's beside the point. The point is, I had no complaints from the scant number of ladies I bedded with. (Or is that, with whom I have bedded? One must NEVER! end a sentence with a preposition...or...a preposition is not something you want to end a sentence with... (skip a little brother.... [Python humor]...) Anyway, since my separation in 2005 and subsequent divorce two years later, intimacy with the fair sex has been absolutely nill, save for a one night stand that didn't stand, if you get my deflated drift. A few years ago, I began to notice a tissuey hardening (not the enjoyable kind) in my sadly neglected johnthomas, at the top. Over time, this hard tissue grew, so that it now takes up almost the entire width and length of poor little willy, down the top. This makes any erections slightly painful, and makes even more embarrassing the already embarrassing task of the infrequently-necessitated self-servicing (pipe-cleaning). To describe how drastic this is, you should know that Mr. Happy nearly makes a right angle when titillated and doing his best impression of a zeppelin. What's even more humiliating is the shrinkage. I don't think that my trouser trout would extend even to four inches, if I could straighten it, which I can't. Now, there is simply no way I can woo a woman with this relatively new malady afflicting me. I was already shy and not exactly a ladies' man, as some of you may remember, but now the situation is almost hopeless. I can't seek medical help because I have no insurance - which is a big no-no here in Rome....I mean Merica, have precious little money, and already owe many thousands of dollars to two hospitals in two states. My love life was pretty much a disaster but now my secret, private love life is equally plagued, so I don't take the pony out of the shed unless I'm in dire need, which, frankly, hardly ever occurs. I guess I should be thankful for that. But, there are times when my libido comes full bore and the need for feminine contact is poingantly alive in my noggin...and in other places. The horrible irony is, since I've lost a great deal of weight, shave my head, and whatnot, I am told that I'm better looking now - at fifty - than I was when I was twenty! Not that that makes me terribly handsome, but I have noticed more attention and compliments from women. ACH!! Oh well, I have my two strapping young sons who are on the cusp of manhood, and I have gained a decent amount of attention as a poet - not fame-wise but by widely published poets around the world with whom I associate online - and healthwise: except for the tricky-dick, I feel like a spring lamb. I'm doctor free, take zero medications, and despite a gamut of tests in recent years there are no major health issues with me, save for ulcers which caused me to spend 4 miserable days in a hospital in Vegas. Horrible! I have not shared this info with any other forum, or anyone else except my brother, who's also my room-mate. I just wonder if there are any of you guys out there with a similar debilitation? If so, please share. Misery loves company!  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Jan 24, 2015, 11:20pm | |
|
||
| 08-16-14 02:38pm - 3742 days | #13 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Really? I always assumed the opposite. But you might be right? You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 08-16-14 12:24am - 3743 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
http://fourhourworkweek.com/2014/07/30/n...oze-no-masturbating/ You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 08-16-14 12:22am - 3743 days | #11 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I know, I've been terribly lax in participating here! I've finally remembered to bookmark this site, and it's right there on my bookmark bar, so I can't miss it or let myself forget it. The best thing about Khan is that, as anyone intelligent and rational will notice, is that he doesn't ask for nor need praise of any kind. This is a common trait among highly refined individuals. We all have ego, and ego is not a bad thing. But an ego that is not made subordinate to Reason, that just runs wild, unchecked, unreined, unmoderated: that's what results in all the loudmouths on the Net and in real life who can do little but sling mud, cast aspersions, revel in ad-homs, and draw attention to their own silly selves. We could start a "Accolades for Khan" thread, but that would be for our own pleasure, not so much for Khan, who doesn't need it. I'll be around. Still fapping, but fapping far less, as my T drops and drops to ridiculous lows. Does anyone else around my age - 50yrs - have major hair loss on their bodies? I have legs as smooth as a young girl's, and my booty? If I were to wind up in prison, let me tell you, I'd be very popular! Five-seven, 140lbs, and smooth as a baby seal! Let's just hope and pray that WWW doesn't go to prison...  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 08-13-14 01:28pm - 3745 days | #8 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Like Zappa said, this may very well be a one-shot deal, but who really knows for sure? Maybe the notion of reincarnation has some merit after all and isn't just a lot of mystical hooey or 'woo'? The more I read about the so-called Intelligent Universe theories, which are not by any means new, only more in the public eye nowadays, the more compelling such theories become. What does that have to do with reincarnation you might wonder? Lots, I would imagine. Note: I'm not sold on I.D. or any speculative theory regarding cosmology, collective consciousness, Plato/Lactantius/Pascal/Spinoza/Hegel/Jung/Hagelin/Penrose-Hameroff, etc, but I find the subject fascinating, more and more so. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Aug 13, 2014, 01:46pm | |
|
||
| 08-13-14 01:17pm - 3745 days | #7 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
A true gentleman: great comedian, actor, performer in general. His skill at improv was nearly unmatched. His performance in Dead Poet's Society alone would secure him a place in my heart. I think the real, the serious Robin Williams was evident in that film more than in certain others. He was knowledgable and wickedly intelligent, as well as a humanitarian and all around high-quality human being. I remember he was on the Tonight Show when Johnny was still at the helm, and Johnny just let Mr. Williams take over the entire show. Good on Johnny as well as Williams. He has a daughter who is absolutely gorgeous. I feel for her the most. Not because she's beautiful, of course, but because she has to live the rest of her days without that wonderful father. God bless him, and I hope he's making God laugh at this very moment. **Note to everyone: Good to see this site is still flourishing! One of the most civil and pleasant discussion forums on the net is reason alone to keep this site in my memory and in my heart, even though I rarely visit. I'm currently getting all my eye-candy (pretty much hate "porn", since it seems to be leaning more and more toward knuckle-dragging aggression and misogyny) from free sites, since I'm in a rut financially. If things improve, I'd love to sub somewhere and write another review. Peace and Love to all! ***Edited in: Khan, you may very well be the best moderator on the Net. I spend a lot of time on two discussion fora: one a site for poetry, the other a freethought/rationalism BB, and it seems that at both places, which are highly trafficked and well-known, the concept of moderatorship is toast. Threads go on and on, off-topic, with ad-homs and ridiculous behavior all around, and the so-called moderators don't do a thing! Why have a moderated forum with moderators if you aren't going to moderate??? I'm not just kissing your booty, as I have no reason to. Just speaking the truth. You rock! You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Aug 13, 2014, 01:24pm | |
|
||
| 06-12-14 05:47am - 3808 days | #6 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Absolutely. Hi all!  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-29-13 07:50pm - 4186 days | #5 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Thanks all. Yeah, I'll be hanging around for a bit. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-29-13 05:49pm - 4186 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Hello gentlemen (and gentleladies), Just wanted to drop in and touch base with you fine people here. I know I haven't been active in quite some time. Basically, I've had exceptionally low "T", and there are long stretches where the thought of sex (for me, that means: looking at porn) not only fails to interest but actually irritates me. I dumped all my naughty stuff, which amassed to upwards of 800 gigs - which I imagine is a piddly amount nowadays - and turned my mind to more "spiritual" avenues. Reading a lot about transhumanism, collective consciousness, quantum field theory, and the sometimes uncanny parallels between the ideas of a few modern theoretical physicists and ancient religious texts. I've also been busy with my poetry and my music. That being said, while I type this I have a window open full of vintage photos of gals in their unmentionables. Oh how I wish I had my teens and twenties in those years, prior to this wretched era of thongs and tattoos! Cheers!  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on May 29, 2013, 05:55pm | |
|
||
| 05-09-12 11:02pm - 4571 days | #9 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I appreciate your attitude towards this, PinkPanther. It's fine having a certain taste. After all, I don't suppose we really have any control over what pushes our buttons and what turns us off. You have a good and moral view of things. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-04-12 08:01am - 4577 days | #6 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Thanks for that article, lk2fireone. That is very good news. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-04-12 07:59am - 4577 days | #5 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Oh my God, that poor girl. She's absolutely gorgeous! Why in the world would she get it into her head that she needed her areolas reduced??? Reduced! Large areolas look fucking wonderful, especially on Latina women. My ex wife had large ones and DAMMMMMMMMN do I miss them. What the hell is going on? Are there guys out there who think tiny, boy-nipples are sexy on a woman? What the hell? If there are any PU members out there who think tiny boy-nipples are sexy on women, will you please have the nads to post here in this thread, so I can try to get inside your mind and help you out of your delerium? Sorry, but this is hugely upsetting to me. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-04-12 04:29am - 4577 days | #2 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
This is even more disgusting. Scroll all the way down to see the mutilation and butchery being done on these women. http://www.poustiplasticsurgery.com/case...cone-gel-implants-3/ You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-04-12 01:58am - 4577 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
It's bad enough that: 1)trendy magazines and gay fashion designers have convinced women that being 89 pounds is sexually attractive to the average male, and that 2) being 89 pounds; and it being the case that an unwieldly percentage of that weight comes from ridiculous silicone breast implants which make these women look like scarred, starving mannequins or bizarre, animated Barbie dolls - - - No, this outrage isn't enough. Now we have somehow gotten it into the heads of women that having large, or puffy areolas is somehow a dire negative when it comes to the matter of appearing attractive to men. I can't possibly describe how appalled I am at the idea that some poor woman, with beautiful, large, dark, or puffy areolas, is at this very moment wondering why she was so cursed, and is checking her bank account to see if she can afford having her breasts mutilated by some money-grubbing, unscrupulous physician, in order to have more "attractive, youthful-looking" breasts. The world is truly upside down. It's gone from drastically insane to catastrophically insane. I know there are those of you out there who actually prefer small areolas to large ones. But would you want your wife, or your lover, who happened to have large or thicker areolas, to be surgically altered? Do you think that would make her breasts more appealing to you? If so, please explain it to me so I can understand. Because to me, it seems monstrous and obscene. I DO understand that in some cases, a cosmetic, surgical modification would be helpful. I am not ranting against women with various deformities who are seeking help. I am in full support of those women. What I am addressing are the great numbers of women who have naturally large, thick areolas who may be vulnerable to the nonsensical idea that they are beset with a physical attribute which is in some way inferior and unattractive. Ugh....Long live large areolas! Ladies, they are beautiful! Don't give in to the nonsense. http://www.jromano.com/BreastEnhancement...AreolaReduction.html Look at the comments to the next link here: http://www.makemeheal.com/answers/viewMB...qid=3648&eid=202 doctors, or make-believe doctors, soliciting photos from women concerned about their breasts. At least there is one doc with the ethical wherewithal to tell the questioner that her areloas are perfectly fine, but these guys are clearly in the minority. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on May 04, 2012, 02:13am | |
|
||
| 01-12-12 06:54pm - 4689 days | #14 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
As a picture collector, and not terribly interested anymore in adult video, I'd have to say that the proliferation of property theft all across the internet has reached obscene levels, and I DO NOT blame the producers of said property for trying to protect it, or for taking any action necessary in an effort to do so. As my profile here will show anyone, I've paid quite a lot of money for my enjoyment of adult entertainment. I've been a multi-month subscriber to some five or six sites, and have joined countless others. I've joined FAR more sites than I've mentioned or written reviews about here. I'm a free-market advocate and a defender of capitalism, and I do not mind paying for a product that I value; in fact, I expect, and even prefer to pay for it. All that being said, I know I've no doubt downloaded and saved a great deal of photographs from various sites which I have not paid for. This causes my conscience to kick in from time to time and I end up dumping all my stuff. I try to stick to TGPs and various blog sites owned by the producers of content, who authorize and encourage the viewing and downloading of free samples, but due to the amplitude of material out there, and the number of TGPs, blogs, and other traffic-generating sites, I essentially realized that I could collect photos until my fingers calloused over and still not have scratched the surface of what is available - for free, and legally free, as well as what has been uploaded illegally. But, the situation is completely out of hand now. I recently began surfing Tumblr sites, and on that site alone there must be millions and millions of photographs, uploaded by users as a means of sharing, without profiting from them, but without the permission of their owners. If I were the owner of a website that produced primarily photo content, like Met-Art for instance, it would obviously irk me to no end to know that virtually my entire catalog had been uploaded by users who had no hand in making the product whatsoever, and no right to "share" it with others. The inevitable happens, though, and many Tumblr blogs are little more than TGPs and traffic generating machines, run by the owners and/or producers of content. You end up going from one blog to the other like a ping-pong ball, until you wind up with a swarm of ads, pop-ups, and goodness knows what else. And Tumblr is only one site. There are God-knows how many more. Flickr (which has a gigantic underbelly of porn, both amateur and pirated, only marginally policed due to the amplitude of content), Webshots, Photobucket, etc. If you venture into the land of foreign sites, it becomes even more ridiculous. In Japan, I doubt if there is a single producer of adult photographic content who hasn't had their entire catalog uploaded to the various blogs and file-hosting sites. And let's not even mention the proliferation of Use-net and newsgroups archive sites, whose owners are magically free of all responsibility in regard to what their paying customers will be able to view and download. Granted, file-hosting and tube sites are often a great means of advertising for the big companies, and especially the smaller ones, but it seems to me that the people who are making millions off of the recklessly "shared" property of others, such as the owners of YouTube, Flickr, and Tumblr, just to name a few, ought to arrive at a point when their conscience begins to kick in. Ask yourself why the individual who uploads copyrighted material to Youtube, and makes not a single penny from it, should be criminally liable, while the owners of the site where the material was uploaded, who are profiting from any and all traffic generated by said material, should get off scot-free? What is the rationale behind that? ie: As it currently stands, the individual who is sharing material and not making a penny, is the one guilty of property theft and/or copyright infringement; but the owners of the site where that material is uploaded, are making a profit, and yet are not guilty of property theft or copyright infringement. That is upside down and bass-ackwards, if you ask me. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Jan 12, 2012, 07:03pm | |
|
||
| 09-15-11 12:35am - 4809 days | #47 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Thanks, graymane, that's about the kindest thing I've heard anyone say about me, and it's especially nice because I'm not even dead yet! As far as my feelings about God and spirituality: while I most certainly feel a profound sense of awe, gratitude, and Love for this Presence I am aware of Whom I am calling God, I must stress the fact that I am not particularly aligned with any branch of faith. While I do warm to the Judeo-Christian tradition (as in my thoughts of God tend to go in accord with the classical conception of a personal, intelligent, Creator, but without most of the anthropomorphic trappings the human mind has attached to Him/Her), that may have been (read: probably) geographically determined and not so much a choice. Had my tiny little brain been spawned in India, China, Japan, or Iraq, I would most likely have developed quite a different POV. That being said, I am more aligned to Baruch Spinoza's theological system than to any strictly Judeo-Christian system, which means that in my heart of hearts (mind of minds) I worship Reason and Rationality, and that I believe that a certain disciplined code of morality and ethical conduct is conducive to man's happiness, without the fear of hell or the hope of heaven. I DO NOT believe for one fragment of an iota of one single second that the Architect of the Cosmos would consign any living, feeling creature to an eternity of torment; in fact, I believe the concept of eternal damnation is THE most corrupt, repugnant, and thoroughly unGod-like idea ever to have been hatched and cultivated in a human mind. I say this from my heart(mind), and from my Love of God, and I am instantly suspicious of any person who could reconcile in their minds a Loving Creator with the traditional concept of Hell. And alas! the Earth is swarming with such people, it is choked with them! I have spoken with kind, gentle, decent people, people who would sooner shoo a moth out of a room than step on it, who are somehow able to believe in and worship a perfect, loving, merciful, forgiving, fatherly God, Whom, they also believe, is planning to torture millions & millions of human souls in fiery flames for all of eternity. How this can happen I do not know. I think it is a very sad state of affairs and speaks many negative volumes about the true moral character of my fellow species. And, I will be around PU indefinitely. In fact I am thinking of subscribing to a single paysite again, something that tickles my fancy but won't make my skin crawl. I am keen on Cap'n's recommendation of Only Tease. I subbed there a long time ago when they were partnered with Suburban Amateurs, and I remember a model named Fluer (sp?) whom I very much wish to gaze upon again!!! But I may go with Panty Amateur because I like their videos so much and I kinda wish I hadn't dumped them along with everything else. And, just to add: any of you guys heard of a pair of sister sites that cater to upskirt and downblouse videos, called Downblouse Loving, and Panty Loving? Those are fun sites for people who like the softer, but up close and personal approach to adult video. I put a comment up at Downblouse Loving but no-one commented. Ah, well. WWW You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 15, 2011, 12:48am | |
|
||
| 09-10-11 06:23pm - 4813 days | #44 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Re: "as for whatever it is you do....", the answer is, next to nothing, physically. I know that sounds insane! I spend most of my time reading nowadays, or writing, when the mood hits me, but I still do at least a little picture collecting before I go into my blogs, discussion forums, the eBooks I have virtual markers in, the scads of PDF docs I've yet to look at... I know it seems like two wildly disparate activities: girl-watching and reading/studying/writing; but I've learned to synthesize my two most favorite pastimes in a way that makes me happy. While I do not pursue women at all, because I am socially inept and awkward, and for a variety of other reasons I won't go into (some of which are physical maladies and problems), I am nonetheless blown away by their beauty and charm, and rather than simply try and forget about women and sex, which is impossible for me, I hunt and gather pics and vids of them in all of their wonderous glory. Up until only a few months ago, said pics and vids were of the adult variety: not gonzo hardcore, which I find completely, skin-crawlingly disgusting, but mostly soft to midcore stuff. In a spring-cleaning type frenzy that was part spiritual-conversion (libertarian atheist to quasi-Spinozist Judeo-Catholic theist[ don't ask, it's quite silly I realize]), part post-divorce depression, part middle-aged wistfulness, I dumped all of the content I collected from 2001-2010ish, which consisted of many stacks of CDs and a 500 GB external hard-drive, so that I could have a tabula rasa (clean slate) and try to figure myself out and start anew. Try as I did, however, I couldn't stop myself from beginning a new collection, and I quickly built up a big stockpile of zipfiles and videos from a few of the sites I most recently reviewed here. Some 300 GB worth, stored on my local C drive. Well, I went through another dark, dark, gloomy tunnel of despair and came out alive on the other side yet again (Thank You, God  ), and yet again I dumped everything I had collected of a pornographic nature.Now, we are just about up to the present time. I still collect pictures of beautiful females (not much video, however), but the pictures are non-nude. I made a very simple black &* white rule for myself: no nudity. This would keep me from slipping from respectful admiration to objectification and various realms of graphic nastiness which I want to steer clear of because it brings about a feeling of displeasure rather than pleasure: of dis-ease rather than ease, to be more precise. I'm not suggesting that photographed nudity somehow equates with the objectification or denigration of women: Not at all! Quite the contrary! A nude female form (or male form) is sublimely beautiful and should never be regarded as anything less. You may quote me on that. What I mean is, for me, because I know myself and I know my habits, and I know how A leads to B and B leads to D and D leads to F, in my tiny little brain, the non-nude rule works for me because it is self-imposed and because I know that once I break that rule, even just once, I'll be right back at In The Crack having a gnat's-eye view of the southern parts of a northbound girl, and when I am doing that I don't really understand or like myself very much. What good can come from my having such a pathologically intimate knowledge of the pleated and puckered and wonderously tucked-in design of a beautiful woman's exhaust pipe? Not much, it seems to me, except to drive me mad with unquenchable longing! to be so close, and yet so far! (it's not the exhaust pipe I want, by the way, it's that magically mysterious and deliciously pinkish flower of yumminess right next to it...I just wanted to give an impression of magnification and detail...  )Does this make any sense to you guys? I know I'm a posterboy for neurotic disorder, but this is just how it is. I'm stable now in that I can still hunt and gather visions of prey I will never bite into, and this affords an outlet for my sexual energy as well as satisfying the hardwired proclivities I have as a semi-normal hetero male, and it doesn't totally conflict with or contradict my intellectual and spiritual needs at the moment, which are, at this point in my life, much stronger than my ancient, reptilian, masculine obsessions and preoccupations..... I know what you're thinking..."Call a doctor...make an appointment, dude!" And you are quite right. I am a little mixed up. But believe it or not, for the past two or three months I've been as happy as a lark!(< cliche #21,389) Really! I'd love to have you guys over for some Wild Turkey, straight & neat (are straight and neat the same thing? I forget...), and good conversation. I really would. If this is what madness is, then that's just fine with me. I will be around this forum for quite some time yet, at least until Khan, in his disciplined civility and calm wisdom, tosses me out on my panty-clad noggin! that's all for now. * I vote we should use the ampersand more, it will save scads of space in our children's digital-text saturated future world.... You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 10, 2011, 06:44pm | |
|
||
) for different folks! I guess I'll keep on spoiling my appetite for a while until I learn better. And for some reason you make it sound like looking at women in bikinis and lingerie is somehow way dirtier than us PU'ers watching hardcore porn... 
| 09-05-11 02:10am - 4819 days | #30 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
aw hell, I had to get my 200th! You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 09-05-11 02:09am - 4819 days | #29 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Hey there Mez, it's been a while since we shared some chin music! I can relate, and how, to your get up and go having got up and went, because I go through the same thing, as you may remember me talking about. Now, I am only a mere strap of a laddie to you, at 47, but my sex drive took a nose dive (yes, this post will be chock-full of puns, cliches, figures of speech, and rhymes, so buckle-up!) a few years ago and I thought I had lost it for good. I even told people at work that I was celibate. Actually I am sort-of celibate since I haven't been to the Promised Land in nigh on six years now. However, I sometimes have amazing spikes along with the usual flatline, when my entire mental and physical apparatus is humming at high-frequency and I entertain the most lewd and lascivious thoughts one could possibly imagine. As it happens, however, I still, in these horny-as-a-flock-of-unicorn periods, have little to no desire to spank the monkey whilst viewing pictures or videos of shapely young nubile naiads and dryads flittering about in their unmentionables. Why that is, I do not know. However, when the moment is really at critical mass, when the levee is violently close to breaking, as it were, all I have to do is tap or touch at a certain particular area roundabout the naughty bits and I can achieve and sustain a very strong sensation the likes of which I never enjoyed between the ages of 13 and 40 (sorry for the graphic info there fellas). The sensations I can have now are a whole order of magnitude better than in the wankiest days of yore! And I am not talking about orgasm...I mean the preamble, the long climb up the prickly mountain.... As far as the big O is concerned, I hardly ever get there anymore, because the climb is so arduous. Maybe 2 to 3 times a month, if that. I've had dry spells that lasted several months. But when they do arrive, Lordy, it's like nothing I ever experienced before. I don't know why this should be. In fact, it seems like it should be the opposite. But I kid you not. When I do have the itch, it is magnified and intense, and I feel energetic, creative, happy, and I find that I can channel that energy into my writing. I've been writing more in the past two years than I ever did in my life, and I attribute that to this amazing, albeit sporadic and often absent, new, radical sexual energy. The problem is, it is hard to have a relationship with a woman because most of the time I do not give a tinker's damn about sex or my willy. I couldn't care less. And as we know, the lady-folk are a randy lot, and there's no way I could keep up. I tried to have something with a very attractive co-worker a few years my junior, but it was a disaster. We tried to kindle a romance for several months but eventually agreed just to remain friends. Carry on, Mez, and please give my best regards to the Mrs. I wish you well. ** If anyone is wondering why I'm hardly ever here anymore, well, I've given up porn for good. I find it spoils rather than whets my appetite. I take far more pleasure in looking at lovely women in bikinis and lingerie than in porn. But, I will pop in every so often because this is such a decent and civilized discussion board. Maybe the most decent and civilized board I have yet to be involved with. Thanks all of you and I'll catch you later. WWW. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Sep 05, 2011, 02:34am | |
|
||
| 07-11-11 01:54am - 4875 days | #9 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Yes, very good reviews! Nice to see you here. This is one of the most civilized boards you will find in all of Internetdom. Welcome! You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 07-01-11 01:02am - 4885 days | #29 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I read that story. I think it was Venus On a Half-Shell. The famous fifteenth century French author Francois Rabelais, in his book Gargantua and Pentagruel, writes a lot about farting and pooping, and seems to really dwell on scatalogical stuff. I was in tears once reading some of it aloud to my family. It's hilarious. James Joyce, in his Ulysses, has his character Molly Bloom (a paragon of feminine allure) referencing her own flatulence in the closing monologue, and I believe the poet Ezra Pound made mention of Joyce's fondness for the scatalogical. I saw an interview with Johnny Depp where he mentions his unusual interest in flatulence. And hey, if you're a woman and you're with Johnny Depp, you'll probably go ahead and crack one off for him, right?  Right?  ..alright, maybe not...  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 06-25-11 08:36pm - 4890 days | #12 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Lorna Morgan said thanks to me! um...Lorna Morgan said thanks to me? Really? Wow! really?  Wow.  I'm flabbergasted. I'm gabberflasted. Oh joy! Oh happy, happy day! Thank you Lorna, for being such a gracious and beautiful lady, and for allowing me the honor of beholding you, even from so great a distance.  Best wishes and regards to you and yours. WWW  You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-26-11 02:08pm - 4920 days | #5 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Thanks, graymane. I know I haven't posted or reviewed of late, but I check in frequently. I have several sites I want to do reviews on, which I must get around to soon. Thanks, Khan. I wonder why I didn't get solicited by that parent network? I might have taken the bait. For anyone interested, Lorna Morgan is one of the most honest, down-to-earth, good-humored models you will EVER encounter on the net. Her site has a forum in which she posts, and she responds to users by name, and seems really involved. I believe it's actually her because in one of her videos she mentions her forum. I might do a review of her site, which doesn't nearly live up to or do justice to the magnitude of this model in the video category. The photo content is nice. Nonetheless, Lorna is one in a million and worth every penny. I'd pay ten times the amount to behold such a marvelous natural wonder of the world! Pax! WWW edit: Khan, is this parent network listed here? You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 05-25-11 01:51am - 4922 days | #2 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
Never mind, I clicked on a few bogus links first, not looking carefully enough. Found it. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 1-50 of 243 Posts | Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next Page > |
|
