Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!

Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Goldfish (0) Filtering Options Select Option Keyword Search      Find within...   All Thread Title Messages View Options All Posts (265)  |   Threads Started (18)

151-200 of 265 Posts

< Previous Page

1

2

3

Page 4

5

6

Next Page >

04-05-10  07:56pm - 5375 days	#57
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by Vanessa: Wow - what a read! There is so much to comment on and I don't even know where to begin. I do have to say, I agree a lot with many of TheSquirrel's observations. However, I also come from the same perspective as Spencer (of course). For myself, I know I could do a better job at describing the quality and effort put into a sites' content, at times. And when I blatantly see it, I do! But I'm sure there are some aspects that I miss, or don't touch on enough, and maybe even others that I give too much credit to. I am certainly not perfect, and my tastes are ultimately personal. After seeing so many sites, so much porn, I tend to enjoy a little more kink and typically prefer hardcore scenes more than soft. It's not easy to be a well-rounded reviewer, yet try for expertise at different niches. I prefer the hardcore stuff myself most of the time but I don't get how you placed Only Cuties right in the middle of the top 10 sites. I took a look in '08 and the technical aspects were great but the actual content I didn't really find inspiring. Are the more recent updates that much better? Sorry, I digress.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-05-10  07:40pm - 5375 days	#56
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by Spencer: I wanted to touch a little on the subjective scoring and info on the content scenes themselves. I can only speak for myself, but how fun or interesting the content is always comes into play in a review. At minimum, I always try to describe what type of content they offer (nude? non-nude? hardcore, softcore?), if the models are hotter (or uglier) than usual, or anything else interesting. However, if you look at the number of sites reviewed per week, there are quite a few of them. In any given week or month, there are very few unique or original sites or scenes to comment on. It's difficult to get excited about a site that offers the same type of content as 90% of the other sites we look at. As I said, I do my best, but more often than not, there's just not a lot to say. The other 10% always get special consideration and info give, within reason of course. From there, it's tough to even know what to comment on really. One guy might get turned off by fake boobs, while another doesn't mind them. The same goes for MILFs, Latina girls, Russian girls, girls who don't talk, girls who talk too much, camera men who ask too many questions, cumshots in the wrong place, etc. There are way too many personal tastes to comment on all of them. On top of that, so many people's interests are opposite of each other. I have a friend who loves to see cum all over a girl's face and in her mouth, and another friend who never wants to see it at all, period. Which side should I write about? Usually, the scenes are so middle of the road that nothing really gets mentioned either way. I guess I just wanted to let you know that it's always on my mind at least, even if there's not a lot to talk about at times. I think it would be GREAT to have a more formal rating/critique of the type of women on a site. I realize it is subjective but I'm sure I'm not alone in being interested in the type of women you'll see once you join a site.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-04-10  07:34pm - 5376 days	#73
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by larss: From what I can make out Hybrid can be a play on the words High Bred. Also, I have seen a stable in a couple of her scenes where plaque with the word "Hybrid" on it can be seen on the wall. This may refer to the name of a horse, or possibly to the fact that it is a stable for Hybrids rather that thoroughbreds. Just speculation - maybe the lady herself would like to offer more exact details. Good speculation. I figured she wasn't having sex in a Toyota.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-04-10  07:30pm - 5376 days	#12
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by Drooler: Also, there are sometimes pics in which the subject is too small in the shot. I get that sometimes at FemJoy. Damned if I'll ever get why they make the model the size of house cat in some photos... LOL. Good analogy!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-03-10  01:07pm - 5377 days	#71
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Why "Miss Hybrid"? Any significance to the name?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-02-10  09:08pm - 5378 days	#30
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	The site Teen Sex Mania would probably fit your #2. There is some lead in to the scenes that seems fairly realistic and natural.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-02-10  08:41pm - 5378 days	#34
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	I've had many of the same thoughts about American porn in the past. I do think there is a glimmer of hope for the American porn industry. Little Mutt, for example, is almost the polar opposite of what jd describes in the original post. Much of the video revolves around pleasing the woman and female orgasms. I recently joined a newer site called Fucked Hard 18. It's a guy in a California studio massaging and having sex with women. Many of the vids have the money shot at the end but there is plenty of camera time focused on the woman enjoying the massage and the sex. Maybe the age of the grunting gorilla is coming to an end. LOL.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-14-10  08:03pm - 5397 days	#25
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	I agree with a lot of the body augmentation reason already mentioned. One action that I don't think has been mentioned yet is when a favorite porn star tries to go mainstream (but usually only ends up on her own dead end individual model site). If she was hardcore, she goes softcore and if she was softcore she goes ultra-softcore. A couple examples I can think of are Sophie Moone and another Euro girl named Nella (aka. Jackie on Sapphic Erotica).
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

02-01-10  07:39pm - 5438 days	#33
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Some good selections so far. Here's my contribution: Adrina http://www.nubiles.net/adrina.html?coupon=817224
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-12-09  06:13pm - 5611 days	#2
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	I'm with you on the setup. I started watching porn on VHS tapes back in the early 90's. Part of what would get me aroused is the build up of sexual tension between the porn stars. I don't see the need for the feature films where you need to fast-forward through half the movie but a bit of effort would be nice.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-14-09  09:20pm - 5640 days	#46
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by monty2222: I'm in much the same vain as the two above posters, aggression towards the women (choking, slapping, spitting) and especially the blowjobs where it's forced down the girl's throat is a big nono in my book too. Another thing that turns me off is pierced (especially male) genitals, I can almost feel the pain of it getting caught in something. :-( That's the two things I'll try to 'screen' a scene for before I download then if it has too talkative guys it can result in a quick deletion, in some scenes it might work (notably if the scene had a setup), but often it's just BS or him monotonously (and loudly!) groaning 'oh yeah' every five second. And finally too long close-ups on the guy wincing or having to stare at his asshole because the camera wants to show penetration at all costs can also send the scene to the trash can. I'm not a fan of the aggressive stuff either. For example, Sasha Grey is one of the hottest porn stars out there (IMO) but I hardly keep any of her scenes because they are way too hardcore with the spitting, slapping and gagging.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-29-09  07:30pm - 5655 days	#29
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by GCode: Well my main point was the fact that TBP reviewers tend to seek out and value their porn in the form of artsy style photography. It just seem that these are higher ranked rather than sites that may be putting out not only higher resolution videos with quality clarity but also good camera work with maybe true photo sets that are accompyning these videos at a average to above average photos when it comes to camera work, lighting, and resolution. 2 sites that I know of that do this and are in the top 27 in the 90's at TBP are In Focus Girls and Onlycuties. I was not saying that these photography sites do not deserve to be ranked so high but it just appears that the sites geared more towards having quality photo sets rather than extremely good videos are ranked in the 90's. I've had the same thoughts myself. My only conclusion is the reviewers prefer this niche to others. In a perfect world you'd think the highest reviews would be a bit more evenly distributed amongst sites that have varying focus. At least when you do get down to the best vid sites TBP does have quality reviews to help you get a sense of what the sites are all about.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-29-09  07:08pm - 5655 days	Original Post - #1
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Have you ever considered how your tastes in porn models has changed over time? Recently I've found I've taken a liking to models that have decent size breasts with a little bounce in them. Nothing huge, good size Cs that look natural, or are natural, usually on a fit body. (Still not into the water balloons.) In the past I've focused on other traits: Tall, athletic models, models that have a dressed-down look, cheerleaders, small breasts, the latex look and I even had a thing for models with long black hair at one point. I don't know why my tastes change really. Maybe one particular model catches my imagination and then I look for her elsewhere? In any case it keeps things interesting.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-24-09  03:39am - 5661 days	#16
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	The last good rental I watched was Gran Torino. If you enjoy watching those TV series on DVD I highly recommend the first season of TrueBlood if you haven't seen it.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

06-16-09  07:29pm - 5668 days	#2
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	I'll throw my vote in for Teen Dreams.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

05-01-09  03:39pm - 5714 days	#10
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by Wittyguy: Here's a question that I have never fully figured out. It seems that women (can't say I've ever heard a normal guy take this position) are almost always the ones who frown upon the porn thing as though it is akin to cheating. Apparently, it's OK to fantasize without the visuals but how does taking it one step further become such a dastardly vice? There's been much discussion in the forum about addiction and I'm not talking about some guy who spends all his time watching porn. That'd be a relationship killer there and it's a sign of other problems. I'm also not referring to the Bible thumping moralism that some use to demonize porn. However, if someone sometimes joins a porn site or watches porn dvds once in a while and their S.O. isn't a Jesus Jumper why is that such a big deal? Superficially, I suppose women could take the position of feeling inadequate to the porn stars but, hey, the guy is still chosing to be with you and he's not shagging porn stars. Is it really just the crushing of romantic notions that "she's the only one for him" when in reality everyone fantasizes, just not so visibly as with porn. I can understand not being interested in porn and I can understand someone being addicted to porn. I guess I don't understand the "No Porn" stance when there aren't any underlying moral reasons to do so. Assuming there is no moral component I'd tend to agree. I'm sure most men don't like shopping but it doesn't bother them when their wives/girlfriend go shopping to the point of considering it a "dastardly vice". (With some exceptions!) I don't consider the inadequacy vice legitimate. If the SO doesn't enjoy the porn you can always keep it to the PC monitor in the bedroom and not keep DVDs laying around when not in use. If it STILL bother's her I'd say it's more her problem than the guy's problem. Women usually win out in the argument to rid porn from the house because even if the inadequacy argument doesn't fly they can throw the sex addiction and moral arguments at you.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-26-09  07:31pm - 5719 days	#2
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	I'm sure organizing content locally is a challenge for many of us. Right now I've been organizing the files with a simple directory structure using site names. Then I use the Media Player library to add searchable/sortable meta data. The only problem with my method is the man-hours I need to put in to add the meta data. If a porn site doesn't label the files with the model name then I rename the file as I'm downloading. I always download into a "new" content folder and when I have some time to kill I move vids into the Media Player library folders and start adding meta data. I think the only way to get around the meta data issues was if sites added it themselves in a standard format. That would be GREAT but I don't see it happening any time soon.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-21-09  03:55pm - 5724 days	#4
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Love the jeans!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-19-09  09:56pm - 5726 days	Original Post - #1
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	In the past I'd usually throw my box of VHS tapes or DVDs in the back of the closet when I met a new girlfriend. They'd get a little less use and I'd buy fewer of them but I'd never get rid of them. I never felt the need to show them to my girlfriend either. In the last few years I've discovered and become a fan of Internet porn. Not only do I enjoy the porn but I enjoy organizing my video files, searching the review sites for new stuff and being a member of the PU community. So, it's become more of a hobby these days than just a means to an end. Right now I'm single but I sometimes consider how I'd handle my porn hobby with the next woman who enters my life. How do all you attached/married guys (or gals) handle the porn hobby with your significant others?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-19-09  09:22pm - 5726 days	#15
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by Jeffrey99: I will agree that in network sites (Brazzers, BangBros, RealityKings) I don't review every site in the network. I normally only give my pros and cons on the network's main site and the network as a whole. However for solo sites, I normally try to review every one. Even if the site has alot of reviews, I kinda feel like nobody looking to join a site can have too much info. I do the same thing with networks though I sometimes will review a child site if there is something about it that stands out.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-19-09  09:18pm - 5726 days	#20
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by Khan: You won't be allowed to main these to US customers. Unless I'm mistaken (and I'm pretty sure I'm not) used underwear is considered a bio-hazard by the US postal service. That one got a laugh out of me. LOL.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-18-09  07:31pm - 5727 days	#2
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Say it isn't so! LOL. Have you tried Little Mutt? I love their massage videos. It was a nice surprise last time I joined the site.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-18-09  03:59pm - 5727 days	#38
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by Toadsith: Haha, oh no - not the movie question again - Wittyguy was mocking me about my tardiness with posting my favorite movies list in that other thread, I have been working on it here and there and it is well over 50 movies and still going. It sort of like asking me my favorite color - can I answer all of them? I'll just go with my latest favorite movie: OSS 117: Le Caire nid d'espions As for TV show, that one, oddly, is actually quite easy: Top Gear (current format) Top Gear is a great show!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-09-09  03:53am - 5737 days	#3
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Only Cuties and Sapphic Erotica have gone to 1280 x 720 resolution/4Mbps in the last year or so. According to Wikipedia 15 Mbps is HDTV quality & 36Mbps is HD DVD quality so it may not technically be HD to some but it is the closest I've seen to true HD on an Internet porn site. Regardless of the the technical definitions these two sites have had consistently high quality video since they came online.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-08-09  08:04pm - 5737 days	#17
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	I mentioned this in another thread. I have an HP PC with a good video card and a terabyte of disk space. I also have a Sony 46" LCD that works great with the PC. I've tried the DVI to HDMI connection but the picture kept going out so I switched back to the analog cable and it works fine. I set the PC resolution to 1280 x 1080 and it looks great. It's a home theater PC so it comes with a remote but my wireless keyboard and mouse work from the coffee table so I use those. If I'm watching HD video I've downloaded from a porn site it looks just as good if not better than some of my HD cable channels. I also watch streaming video of TV shows I missed on occasion. It's not HD but the quality is good enough.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-08-09  07:49pm - 5737 days	#9
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Don't like it, especially if it's an interview. I don't watch that stuff on mainstream movies either.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-08-09  07:40pm - 5737 days	#28
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by Bei M: He everyone, I want of share you that how are finding and buying a discount adult DVD. Most of all, you can easily and surely find and buy a discount adult DVD just by being patient and determined enough. Like always, you can never succeed to find what you are looking for if you would not have the right and appropriate drive to do so. These are times when even small discounts and price markdowns in any merchandise can be considered significant. If you are into buying and collecting different adult movie titles, for sure, a discount on adult DVD would be most welcomed. Finding and buying a discount adult DVD can certainly be a tedious and exhilarating experience. We can be patient and determined to find physical DVDs or we can click a couple links and get a better deal downloading porn almost instantly. LOL.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-09  03:44pm - 5738 days	#11
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Regardless of the government squashing the screening I think this is good for the porn industry and the people who consume porn. It gives more legitimacy to porn when it's in the news and being talked about openly. I don't want to see porn at every corner store but it shouldn't be a shameful secret either.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-07-09  03:23pm - 5738 days	#10
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by Toadsith: I must say I've never been a huge fan of "dirty talk" with the exception of scenes with a strong S&M element - and scenes with the Euro models doing it can really backfire unless you let the girls talk in their native tongue. I think my qualms about dirty talk or sex talk or whatever is that so many performers do it badly. To be done right it requires the talker to have a certain level of intelligence that sadly isn't always there. I often find the long surviving male performers can do it just fine, but many of the females just say the same inane phrase again and again or simply ask stupid rhetorical that make you wish her mouth was full. There are notable exceptions, like Lily Thai. Her dialogue is wildly creative, sexy and hilarious. I'm with you on the dirty talk. It can be worse than no talk at all if done badly. There are some women out there that do know how to be sexy. Penny Flame and Jenni Lee come to mind.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-05-09  08:23pm - 5740 days	Original Post - #1
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	I was just reading through Messmer's post titled "Fake Breasts!" and it started me thinking about other assumptions the porn world has made about what their consumers enjoy. What would you like to see more of in porn that is not a current popular trend? What do you see too much of in porn? My personal thoughts on the subject... Not enough: - Models with short hair. - Natural breasts, though we're seeing more of this (nod to Messmer) - Some attempt to build the sexual tension. It doesn't have to be Gone with the Wind but a little build up wouldn't hurt. - Realistic sexual enjoyment from the female in sex scenes. (Little Mutt and HerSweetHand does a good job with this.) - Dirty talk (or any talk from some of those Euro girls.) Too much: - Facials/cum shots. - Silly, over the top stripper/porn star clothes & make-up. - Plastic surgery. Some of the older, MILF models don't even look human. - Robotic sex chanting that's obviously fake.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-04-09  01:10pm - 5741 days	#13
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by TheSquirrel: I rarely join for more than a month and have never joined one of those special offers for one, two, or three days. One month gives me time to download all that I want from a site. I do actually watch everything I download...eventually. This means I only join a site occasionally, and I am very selective. Then it takes me weeks to watch what I have downloaded. I strongly suspect most of you don't get to see half of what you download, except maybe on fast forward. For the most part I find porn instantly disposable. Download it, watch it, then delete it. I do periodically delete out movies I'm bored of or are of low quality but I wouldn't say porn is instantly disposable. I have favorites I watch frequently and some that I don't watch for a while and then rediscover and become new favorites.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-04-09  06:35am - 5742 days	#10
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	I follow the "grab and return" strategy. For many sites one month is all I need to see their content and move on. For sites like Videobox there is enough new content to stay multiple months but I still like to change it up and try another site the next month.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-03-09  04:34pm - 5742 days	#31
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Natural breasts all the way! In the 90's I got used to seeing fake breasts so often in those movies from the big studios out in CA (which was all I had seen at the time) that I could tolerate it. After discovering Internet porn I've found I much prefer proportional, natural breasts on the porn models. I'm similar to pat362 in that I prefer small to medium breasts but even larger breasts can be desirable as long as they're natural. With the popularity of the amateur porn I'm surprised those CA studios still have so many enhanced girls on their rosters.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

04-01-09  08:12pm - 5744 days	#25
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by Riffy: I've never tried that... party cuz my TV is coal powered. Nah seriously I may look into this. Cheers. I have a newer Sony LCD. My computer has a video card with DVI so I could use a DVI to HDMI cable for a digital picture but I've found that problematic. The TV also has a regular analog port for a monitor cable. It's not digital but the high quality movies look just as good as any HD cable channel to me.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-31-09  08:51pm - 5745 days	#18
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by Riffy: The Windows DVD Maker that comes bundled with Vista is fine with WMV files (and makes a good image too depending on the original of course) but doesn't like MPEG at all. It converts the WMV to a VOB anyways but mine does not like those MPEGs. With newer TVs it's easy to just plug the PC or laptop right into the back like it's a large monitor. I do it on occasion.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-31-09  02:22pm - 5745 days	#6
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by james4096: I have never bought a porn DVD or VHS. I never wanted to have that kind of physical evidence(I don't mean that in a criminal way). VHS seemed too expensive for me back in the day. My best friend would shell used to $75 for a top porn video. Of course I spend much more than that on internet porn, but I get a lot more. These days there is so much out here on the internet that it makes even less sense to buy an actual dvd. I guess you can't get the very latest videos in DVD quality unless you do download them on VOD and that can cost just as much, but I'm still catching up on videos from 2004. Back in the day I had VHS tapes or DVDs but I never amassed a large collection for similar reasons (i.e. evidence to be found.) After browsing the DVD site I was looking at before I created this post I wasn't sold on going back to the discs. I'll sacrifice a few clips of Tera Patrick or Jesse Jane for the dozens of movies you can get on the Internet for similar cost.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-31-09  04:09am - 5746 days	Original Post - #1
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	I've been buying/viewing strictly online porn for years now. Joining one porn site is instant access to anywhere from dozens to thousands of pics and videos for only $20-$30. Recently I was looking for more Jana Cova content. I only have a few low quality vids in my local library so I popped over to adultdvdempire.com to check out her filmography and it got me thinking -- what's the draw to porn DVDs these days? DVDs still cost between $15-$30 a piece for only a fraction of the content you receive when you join a Web site. I suppose the quality (in general) of the video might be better on DVDs and there may be some girls (like Jana Cova) that are difficult to find on the Internet -- but that doesn't seem to be enough to keep the DVD industry in business. Is there anyone on PU who still regularly buys/rents DVDs? Are there any pros of using DVDs over Internet downloads that I've missed?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-23-09  07:59pm - 5753 days	#19
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by GCode: I just wanted to mention I'm very surprised no one has put a STAR TREK film in this list, considering that huge thread going on :) Or, maybe the films stink compared to the series?? WELL!!!??? :) -GCode I enjoyed the Star Trek movies but they miss the cut for my favorites list. If I had to pick a favorite from all the Trek movies I'd go with Undiscovered Country.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-23-09  03:25pm - 5753 days	#15
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Fun post. Here's my list: War Movie: I whole-heartedly agree with Wittyguy on "Apocalypse Now" and "Patton". I'll throw in "Glory" and "Braveheart". Comedy: I enjoy a lot of the dumb, physical humor like "Tommy Boy" and "Happy Gilmore". On the flip side "Swingers" is also a favorite. Western: "Young Guns", "Unforgiven" and "Tombstone". Sci-Fi / Fantasy: I'm a big sci fi fan so this is a toughie. I'll go with "Planet of the Apes", "The Matrix" & "Serenity". Action Movie: "The Road Warrior" (2nd Max Max movie), "Blade" (1st movie) and my recent favorite "Wanted" Drama: "Goodfellas", "Momento" and "Silence of the Lambs". Horror: "Prince of Darkness" and any of the Hellraiser movies.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-20-09  03:57pm - 5756 days	#33
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by pat362: Yes, I include the new Doctor Who in my calculation. The Tardis is different on the inside, and the effect are much better. At the core it is still the Doctor, a companion and many of his old enemies. I'm a little skeptical on counting the old and new Dr. Who series as one. That opens up a slippery slope of counting relaunches and spin offs in other series -- i.e. Do you count original BSG, Galactica 1980 & the new BSG series as one show? What about future spin offs? The original Dr. Who did run 20-something years though so it deserves props for that!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-18-09  07:31pm - 5758 days	#30
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by pat362: I feel bad about forgetting Doctor Who. I could be wrong but if I'm correct. This is the longest running sci-fi show of all time. The creator was a genius. By giving the main character the ability to regenerate. That is the ability, at a chosen time or when near death, for the Doctor to regenerate into another character. He is still the Doctor but looks different(obviously) and they also explain why he acts differently as well. You have an endless supply of actors to play the role and need never end the series when one actor is tired of the part or they want to change something. My favorite is still Tom Baker. Lost in Space. That was a very good show. Who can forget these immortal words: Danger Will Robinson, Danger Will Robinson. How long did Doctor Who run? Are you counting the new series as a continuation? Stargate SG-1 racked up some years.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

03-17-09  07:17pm - 5759 days	#24
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	I'm an avid sci-fi fan. Choosing a favorite Star Trek series is a tough call. For me, it would be between the original series and TNG. As cheesy as the original series was I did enjoy the space-western feel of it and enjoyed many of the individual episodes. TNG was a longer series and I watched it week to week in the 80's when it was a new series so I become more invested in the story. I think for those reason TNG edges out the original series for me. Pat362, Babylon 5 rules!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

01-11-09  08:34pm - 5824 days	#6
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by rearadmiral: The term "addiction" seems so grossly overused these days. It's like the government can't actually just solve a problem, they have to declare a "war" on it. Using both addiction and war in such a way trivializes the real examples of both. I'm not a physician but to be a true addiction doesn't there have to be some physical changes in reaction to the substance? For coffee drinkers, try going a day without your fix. That headache is a sign of an addiction in the true sense of the word. Someone might have a dependancy on porn, or maybe they just like the fantasy of it. My fear is that labelling it as an addiction will bring out the do-gooders who will try to cure us all. Then all the time we used to spend viewing porn we can do something useful, like sitting in church. I agree, especially where "porn addiction" is concerned. There may be true porn addiction in our society but more than not I think it is used by individuals or organizations as a way to condemn porn use. I've met more than one woman who has accused her boyfriend or husband of being addicted to porn -- they never just use it. My last ex girlfriend saw me with porn once (as in one time) and addiction was brought up in the conversation that followed. I find woman like this usually need to find something wrong with the porn because the women in the porn movies make them feel bad about their bodies. I guess their solution is to displace their insecurities on the guy using it!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-21-08  01:29pm - 5845 days	#42
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by lawless: Hi! My dream site would be a site dedicated to pussies licked by men only. In a such site all clits would be stood out. N.B. : I'm a guy. I enjoy hardcore sex scenes but seeing a guy lick a vagina does nothing for me. I fast forward through it usually. If another girl is licking I'm good with that.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-21-08  01:21pm - 5845 days	#17
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Good question! I rated Sapphic Erotica 98. It was one of my first reviews here on PU so I tend to think I would have ranked it a little lower now -- maybe 92-95. If I use Sapphic Erotica as my starting point here's what they could do to get a 100 from me: - Bump up the movies to true HD quality. (I haven't seen the site since March so maybe they already have.) - Get the video count up over 1000 or add a couple network sites. (w/ at least 20-25% being HD) - Have at least a third of the video content be b/g hardcore. (They might need to rename the site!) - The b/g would need to be with the same quality models and the sex scenes just as passionate as the g/g movies. They don't quite make the grade with their hardcore site, Only Cuties. - Keep the price at $19.99 - Optional: Maybe add some variety and creativity in the movie making.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-21-08  01:00pm - 5845 days	#23
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Back in the 90's and early 00's I was a big fan of Racquel Darrian. More recently I was purging some old video clips and found some hardcore from Sophie Sweet. I deleted some of it because of the low resolution and picture quality. I wish she was still doing hardcore so I could replenish the library.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-17-08  07:47pm - 5879 days	#13
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Porn seems to be one of those niches in popular culture that is always going to get a bad rap. As some of you have mentioned already the reference to porn in the article isn't backed up by any numbers. They probably just needed a short paragraph on it because they wanted to bring in all the possible sexual Boogie men. I agree with Drooler that most porn these days rarely infers infidelity. The storyline in porn has disappeared with the rise of Internet porn so all you're seeing literally is attractive people screwing. You can imagine they are sleeping around on their husband/wife sure, but you can just as easily think of them as single or a committed couple.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-05-08  02:00pm - 5891 days	#46
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	Originally Posted by Jeffrey99: The number one factor on whether I even consider a site is the price. 9 times outta 10 I won't sign up for any site $30+ without some very high ranking reviews and even then it's normally only for a month max. Or if they have a 3 month deal, I'm more willing to spend the extra up front to try it out for a month and then sign up for the 3 month deal. Hey Jeffrey99. I agree with your pricing philosophy. The best sites I've ever joined have been under $20 a month so there has to be something extraordinary for me to shell out more than $30. There are a few sites priced in Euros which typically turn out to be $30+ after the US dollar conversion. It's too bad because I may join some of them if they were cheaper.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

10-18-08  06:48am - 5910 days	#3
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	I'm with you Cybertoad. I've found a few animated video gems but never a full site of it. I've been burned on a couple occasions and gave upon looking.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

10-18-08  06:43am - 5910 days	#3
Goldfish (0) Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA	For the purposes of porn and porn viewing I do not find pregnancy is more sexy.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

151-200 of 265 Posts

< Previous Page

1

2

3

Page 4

5

6

Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.03 seconds.