|
|||||
|
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
Goldfish (0)
|
251-265 of 265 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Page 6 |
05-06-08 07:54pm - 6074 days | #11 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
I started watching porn in the 90's so the hooker look is all I knew for a while. I have seen some 70's porn so I understand where Toadsith is coming from. That said, I'll take a guess. Maybe they borrowed their wardrobe from a sister industry -- stripping. Wherever it came from originally I think the porn market in the 90's into the early 00's did a lot to enforce it. Back then videos and DVD's were the main medium and most of those were provided to the public by a few large porn companies, like Vivid and Wicked, in California. I'm sure when they set a trend many of the smaller companies followed suit. Glam is still with us but there has been a backlash in the market with amateurs, goth chicks/anti-glam and the Euro girls with their more natural and less hookerish look. | |
|
05-06-08 07:22pm - 6074 days | #27 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
I don't know if this counts as a "Next big thing in porn" candidate but I really enjoy seeing a woman get authentic (or seemingly authentic) pleasure from the sex. Recently I've seen a couple amateur porn clips where the woman seemed to be genuinely aroused. I'm so used to the typical, over-the-top moans and grunts of most porn movies that seeing something more real is a nice change of pace. On a slight tangent the worst porn acting has to be when a model picks a particular moan or groan and keeps making the noise repetitively. She may as well be repeating "I'm not into this, I'm not into this, I'm not into this...". What a buzz kill. | |
|
05-04-08 07:52pm - 6076 days | #3 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
The shemale fetish is curious. In reality the best shemales aren't usually attractive as males or females. I guess they are attractive to someone though otherwise there wouldn't be a demand. | |
|
04-28-08 02:41pm - 6082 days | #9 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
I prefer video myself but I download images on occasion for the screen saver. | |
|
04-27-08 07:21pm - 6083 days | #22 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
I strongly agree! The acting is sometimes annoying but in many cases the erotic scenarios a plot can bring is worth the creative risk. When I'd sneak off to the adult video store back in the 90's more often than not I buy DVDs from the "features" section. Usually the bigger porn stars would be in these movies and again, the story lines just made it sexier. The sexy MILF nextdoor, the naughty secretary, the sex starved space alien (who just so happens to look like a human pornstar) -- you can't beat that stuff. | |
|
04-22-08 02:50pm - 6088 days | #26 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
This is a long string already but I have one feature that hasn't been mentioned. If a site has bonus sites or network sites attached to the subscription have an integrated sign-in. One peeve of mine is navigating between sites and hitting that login box over and over again. Especially where I'm provided with the auto-generated user name and password. I also appreciate good site navigation and search. The search and browse features should be sophisticated enough to handle the amount of content on the site. If there's only 20 videos a simple grid with sorting by date, model or category is fine. If there's 2000 videos a search screen should be provided. | |
|
04-22-08 02:34pm - 6088 days | #2 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
I don't see 3-D porn becoming big anytime soon. Now that porn is so accessible in the privacy of your own home I don't see people sneaking out to theaters just to see 3-D porn. A personal holo-deck in your spare bedroom still seems a far off reality. The current fads seems to be amateurs and Euro chicks. Maybe the next big thing will be the return of the American pornstar. | |
|
04-19-08 12:33pm - 6091 days | #12 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
All interesting thoughts. JBDICK had a good idea bringing up the sites he found the best quality video. The one that comes to mind for me is Only Cuties. The video quality is great and they don't overcharge for it. I have noticed regular DVDs (not Blu-ray) on my up-convert player look almost as good if not better than some of the HD programming from my cable company. Has anyone had that experience? | |
|
04-19-08 12:23pm - 6091 days | #4 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
That's a subjective question. We can only guess which models really love it -- some may be good at faking it. I'll just say too tough to call. | |
|
04-19-08 12:19pm - 6091 days | #2 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
I agree with jd1961 that there are probably those that sign up to give one or two reviews and then disappear. I sometimes wonder if a Webmaster has three or four of his buddies come on to give rave reviews -- but that's what the user rankings are for. If you see three excellent reviews and they're all newbies it's pretty easy to figure out. My stance is there shouldn't be any blocking or adjusting of scores. I think PU is sophisticated enough that we can see the one-hit wonders for what they are. | |
|
04-17-08 03:14pm - 6093 days | #14 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
I like perky yet natural looking breasts. I like them on the smaller side of average. I'll probably rethink the list as soon as I submit this reply but here goes. 1) Jackie from Sapphic Erotica and other Euro porn sites: http://www.europornstar.com/Jana-Miartusova/ 2) April Summers 3) Keri Sable I'll give Gloria Gucci an honorable mention. | |
|
04-15-08 07:40pm - 6095 days | Original Post - #1 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
Everyone is excited about watching movies in high definition but when you go to a Web site that has "HD video", how do you know for sure what you're getting? Is it the resolution? dimensions (i.e. widescreen vs. full)? the bit rate? Picture clarity? My personal definition is a resolution of 720 pixels or more. I've heard people argue about the bit rate and other criteria but all I know is it's sold to me as high resolution and looks good or it looks shitty. If it does look bad I don't know if it's due to the bit rate, the type of camera or the video being shot out of focus. (or maybe because they are lying about the high resolution!) Edited on Apr 15, 2008, 07:43pm | |
|
04-14-08 03:26pm - 6096 days | #24 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
I'm with you Colm, more quality sites in this niche would be great. Sapphic Erotica has some good lesbian kissing video. Besides kissing I sometimes enjoy seeing the porn models in leather or latex but I only see it on those dom/sub fetish sites. I'd like to see beautiful women in leather skirts or latex cat suits (sans the latex ski mask) in normal b/g or lesbian sexual scenarios. I can deal with the dom/sub porn on occasion but I'd prefer the wardrobe without the whips and chains. Edited on Apr 14, 2008, 03:38pm | |
|
04-14-08 03:14pm - 6096 days | #17 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
Sasha is definitely in my top ten. I'll go with Keri Sable. | |
|
04-14-08 03:03pm - 6096 days | #9 | |
Goldfish (0)
Active User Posts: 265 Registered: Jan 19, '08 Location: Boston, MA |
If I could only subscribe to one site I'd go with Video Box too. It's cheap, there's a ton of content and it's updated frequently. | |
|
251-265 of 265 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Page 6 |
|