|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
BubbaGump (0)
|
| 1-8 of 8 Posts | Page 1 |
| 01-04-13 06:27pm - 4370 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User  Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
Haven't been around in a while. I have had an ongoing subscription to Bang Bros which I have kept active for a while and download a few videos each month or so. The problem is, I subscribed to a secondary site they have. It is called culineros and is a latin oriented site. It is a good site but I want to cancel it. I already cancelled my bangbros subscription. But this did not cancel, even though it was part of the site as an addon. It is the same password and username etc.. It still comes up in the bangbros area at their site. When I cick the support link to that entry, it comes in spanish. I called the number and they said I have no subscription. Nobody writes me back.I believe perhaps they are playing games and this is their way of prolonging the charges. I believe perhaps they are playing games. At the number to netbilling they say I do not have a subscription. neither bangbros nor these links for support will write me back. But my card keeps getting charged. This is nonsense and it is my opinion they made it like this to be so confusing that you cannot cancel or just give up. This is bad for the industry when they do this kind of crap. I cannot help but believe this is dirty pool. Beware. Anyone who can offer suggestion I would appreciate it. This is BS. Thanks Here is the 'help' from the link:  ...... Si te suscribiste v�NETBILLING En su estado de cuenta aparecera "SUPPORT-HAZE.COM" -o- "HAZESUPPORT" Servicio al cliente, v�telef�a, del departamento de facturaci� Numero libre de cargos: 1-(877)-731-6065 Si llama de fuera del pa� 1-(661)-621-9047 Servicio al cliente, v�correo electr�o, del departamento de facturaci� support@hazecash.com | |
|
||
| 06-11-12 04:13pm - 4577 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
It doesn't take long to discover that there are some less than reputable players in this business who have questionable business practices. In fact, the last two sites I signed up for are intentionally misleading customers and, in essence, ripping them off. They should not be rewarded with scores of 50. This is an insult to the legit players out there who are on the level. There are some shady characters in this business and it is best to not treat them with kid gloves. IMO, there should be freedom to rate a site according to the merits and drawbacks of the site, without having to limit a rating to some arbitraty value. I like to call a spade a spade. It is not my site and I am not trying to overstep my bounds. I just feel that if a site is up to no good or the content quality falls far below a bare minimum of what the average paying customer should expect, they do not deserve a 50. They deserve a lemon badge.  | |
|
||
| 02-16-12 04:28pm - 4693 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
I was reading Denner's post about model names and didn't want to hijack the thread so thought I would discuss the issue here. I was wondering what your vote would be for the most overused or obnoxious stage names chosen by models in the industry? Back in the 80's and 90's there were a lot of Ambers,Bunnies, Porsches, Lynn's, and Stacys. Sometime in the 80's, models stopped using common street names and tried to get real creative. Like today, however, it just got repetitive. I personally dislike the following name choices and cringe at any name that ryhmes( e.g. Alexis Texas) : Alexis, Nikki, Candi, Jasymn, Rio,or Jayden. I also wish models would stop using a lot of X's in the last names like Staxx or what have you. I wish the industry would drop the dippy Tracy Trollop conventions and go back to more common fare when choosing names. IMO, I would find a name like Barbara Smith or Jane Williams to be more interesting and attractive than the overused cliches chosen today. Just my two cents. It would be interesting to hear your opinions. Edited on Feb 16, 2012, 04:39pm | |
|
||
| 02-14-12 06:12pm - 4695 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
I was browsing through Netflix last night and came across a Nighltine episode of 'the great porn debate', taking place at Yale University. I had heard about this traveling debate before but never saw one myself. Ron 'The Hedgehog' Jeremy and a female adult performer were going up against the pastor of the xxx church and one of his members. I thought it was worth some discussion as I enjoy debates in general and this subject would probably make for good conversation on the board. Has anyone seen one of the debates? As an actual debate, I thought it fell well short of containing any substantial or original content. Most of the arguments and rebuttals were classic fare.The purpose of a debate is to convince an audience of the merits of your position and fend off crticisim from the opposition. Unfortunately, I did not think either party was that successful. Jeremy came across more as a pitchman for the industry and his opponents didn't fare any better in this regards. Jeremy was relying on his Charisma and legendary status to appeal to the largely male-dominant college crowd. His celebrity status definitely gave him an advantage here and I think some in the audience were more interested in his presence. The pastor actually never played up the religion card and there were only a few passing references to Christian dogma. I think it has finally sunk in with the opponents that using the 'Jesus' card is not going to win you many converts in such a debate--especially at a place like Yale. The first objection was that young, naive, uneducated, unemployed women looking for easy money is ripe ground for exploitation. Women are being preyed upon and coerced into the business with the promise of easy money. It went back and forth for a bit with no real substance. It wasn't until an audience member posed a question that anyone was given any real food for thought. Most of the criticism and responses were the usual fare. In fact, the only novel or interesting anti-industry criticism or pro-industry rebuttals came from the audience. One in particular stands out --'How is being paid $1,000 for a couple of hours performing on a set any more exploitive than a single mother of three working for $7.20 flipping burgers at McDonalds?'. It was one of the very few ideas presented in the debate that could have led to some interesting and unique dialogue. Unfortunately, the pastor wouldn't touch that one with a ten-foot pole and for some reason, Jeremy never went on the offensive with this. He seemed to be sticking to canned answers. Nothing original of unique from anyone. It was a bit disappointing, albeit entertaining, just due to the presence of the legendary Hedgehog. | |
|
||
| 02-07-12 02:59pm - 4702 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
I never was much into sex toys. I used a fleshglight once but didn't care much for the experience. I do own a high-end silicone real doll I purchased a while ago. I never really use it for sex, though. I think most people think the only reason for buying one is to shag it.  I always was a collector of erotic art and photos and enjoy photgraphy now and then with the doll. It is actually a nice art piece to have around. Kind of ho-hum as a sex toy, however. Cold and clammy.  | |
|
||
| 02-04-12 12:55pm - 4705 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
Had a phone message today from my bank card security asking me to call. Wanted to verify my online transactions. I usually dont have a lot of online transactions but recently signed up for WeArehairy right when my bangrbos auto-renewed. Must have tripped a flag as I usuaully dont buy lots of stuff online. I do appreciate this as it shows my bank takes my security seriously. I just was wondering if anoyne else ever had this happen? With all the fraud out there today, it is something the banks are paranoid about as they eat charges for fraud. I think the operator new it was pretty obvious what the charges were for. It was kind of funny when she read the items for me to verify -- " We have a charge of $24.99 from BangBros help LTD"  | |
|
||
| 01-18-12 04:57pm - 4722 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
This would be an interesting poll, IMO. When viewing porn, do you enjoy seeing models with tattoos and body piercings? Personally, I think a tattoo can be sexy on the right body and in the right place. I get turned off by piercings, however. I cannot stand them when they are in the nipple or vaginal area. It ruins the scenery.  I think tattoos are generally overdone today. When I was young, only bikers, sailors, and the real bad-asses had tattoos. A tattoo meant rebel. It meant something and was unique. Today, tattoos are no longer about individuality and seem to scream conformity to the generational herd. In most cases, the tattoo has become a trendy fashion accessory, not a unique statement or right of passage for the rebels. I have nothing at all against tattoos. However, sometimes I think that If I see yet another arm or thigh filled from top to bottom with with random, apparently nonsensical images, I will go running and screaming into the night. | |
|
||
| 01-08-12 02:13pm - 4732 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
BubbaGump (0)
Active User Posts: 109 Registered: Jan 08, '12 Location: USA |
This is my first post here. I thought I would ask a question. First, just a complaint about porn in general. I don't really get into videos as much as I do still photography. Videos to me are all the same. Everything is the same. There is very little creativity today and everyone is churning them out as fast as they make them and leaving quality behind. Or perhaps maybe its just I have not been looking at the right studios. They take these beautiful women and just run around adhoc with a camera and show closeups of some guys wiener plowing in and out of the models snatch. Or they show the wierd angles or the guy gets in thw way or starts yapping etc. Anyways, end of rant. I view porn maybe once or twice a week, especially when I am on the road on business. My erotic interest include breasts and natural figures on women, etc up to BBW size. My erotic interests are more along the lines of shapely and meaty rears and breasts. I was never into the basketball and baseball shaped implants and prefer the natural look. I guess thats why never really cared for Playboy/Penthouse etc as the models are just too thin. Or maybe its just my perception. As this is a fantasy, I have trouble getting into it as when I look at the models and the thought that these runway models just slipped into my bed, the thought I have is I aint buying it.  Anyways, does anyone have any suggestions or opinions for sites with high-resolution photos of the niche I am speaking of--Breasts, Buns, and Natural women? I am looking for quality photos and such. I was a member of a site a while ago--RealityKings. Some of the models were what I was looking for but the photos are too small and it looks like nobody put a whole lot of thought into it. Thank You. | |
|
||
| 1-8 of 8 Posts | Page 1 |
|
